Activation-induced deaminase-coupled DNA demethylation is not crucial for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells

Stem Cells and Development

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 209-218

  Habib, Omer ^a,b   Habib, Gizem ^a   Do, Jeong Tae ^c   Moon, Sung Hwan ^a   Chung, Hyung Min ^a,b  

^a Konkuk University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b CHA University   (South Korea)

^c Konkuk University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATION INDUCED CYTIDINE DEAMINASE; DNA;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEAMINATION; DEMETHYLATION; EMBRYO; EXCISION REPAIR; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CYTIDINE DEAMINASE; DNA; DNA METHYLATION; DNA REPAIR; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; FIBROBLASTS; GENETIC VECTORS; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; MICE; MICE, KNOCKOUT; MICE, SCID; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR-3; RETROVIRIDAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 84893040919     PISSN: 15473287     EISSN: 15578534     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/scd.2013.0337     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Hanna JH, K. Saha and R Jaenisch. (2010). Pluripotency and cellular reprogramming: Facts, hypotheses, unresolved issues. Cell 143:508-525
2. Takahashi K and S Yamanaka. (2006). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126:663-676
3. Okita K, T. Ichisaka and S Yamanaka. (2007). Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 448:313-317
4. Wernig M, A. Meissner, R. Foreman, T. Brambrink, M. Ku, K. Hochedlinger, BE. Bernstein and R Jaenisch. (2007). In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 448:318-324
5. Maherali N,. et al. (2007). Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell 1:55-70
6. Mikkelsen TS,. et al. (2008). Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis. Nature 454:49-55
7. Gao Y,. et al. (2013). Replacement of Oct4 by Tet1 during iPSC induction reveals an important role of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 12:453-469
8. Hochedlinger K and K Plath. (2009). Epigenetic reprogramming and induced pluripotency. Development 136: 509-523
9. Bhutani N, JJ. Brady, M. Damian, A. Sacco, SY. Corbel and HM Blau. (2010). Reprogramming towards pluripotency requires AID-dependent DNA demethylation. Nature 463:1042-1047
10. Wu SC and Y Zhang. (2010). Active DNA demethylation: Many roads lead to Rome. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:607-620
11. Popp C,WDean, S. Feng, SJ. Cokus, S. Andrews, M. Pellegrini, SE. Jacobsen and W Reik. (2010). Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency. Nature 463:1101-1105
12. Nabel CS, H. Jia, Y. Ye, L. Shen, HL. Goldschmidt, JT. Stivers, Y. Zhang and RM Kohli. (2012). AID/APOBEC deaminases disfavor modified cytosines implicated in DNA demethylation. Nat Chem Biol 8:751-758
13. Fritz EL, BR. Rosenberg, K. Lay, A. Mihailovic, T. Tuschl and FN Papavasiliou. (2013). A comprehensive analysis of the effects of the deaminase AID on the transcriptome and methylome of activated B cells. Nat Immunol 14:749-755
14. Rai K, IJ. Huggins, SR. James, AR. Karpf, DA. Jones and BR Cairns. (2008). DNA demethylation in zebrafish involves the coupling of a deaminase, a. glycosylase, and gadd45. Cell 135:1201-1212
15. Guo JU, Y. Su, C. Zhong, GL. Ming and H Song. (2011). Hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine by TET1 promotes active DNA demethylation in the adult brain. Cell 145:423-434
16. Robbiani DF,. et al. (2008). AID is required for the chromosomal breaks in c-myc that lead to c-myc/IgH translocations. Cell 135:1028-1038
17. Ying QL, J. Wray, J. Nichols, L. Batlle-Morera, B. Doble, J. Woodgett, P. Cohen and A Smith. (2008). The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 453:519-523
18. Chen J,. et al. (2010). Towards an optimized culture medium for the generation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. J Biol Chem 285:31066-31072
19. Bhutani N, MN. Decker, JJ. Brady, RT. Bussat, DM. Burns, SY. Corbel and HM Blau. (2013). A critical role for AID in the initiation of reprogramming to induced pluripotent stem cells. FASEB J 27:1107-1113
20. Chen J,. et al. (2013). H3K9 methylation is a barrier during somatic cell reprogramming into iPSCs. Nat Genet 45:34-42
21. Chiou SH,. et al. (2013). Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 regulates nuclear reprogramming and promotes iPSC generation without c-Myc. J Exp Med 210:85-98
22. Hajkova P, SJ. Jeffries, C. Lee, N. Miller, SP. Jackson and MA Surani. (2010). Genome-wide reprogramming in the mouse germ line entails the base excision repair pathway. Science 329:78-82
23. Rouleau M, RA. Aubin and GG Poirier. (2004). Poly(ADPribosyl) ated chromatin domains: Access granted. J Cell Sci 117:815-825
24. Kraus WL. (2008). Transcriptional control by PARP-1: Chromatin modulation, enhancer-binding, coregulation, and insulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 20:294-302
25. Simonsson S and J Gurdon. (2004). DNA demethylation is necessary for the epigenetic reprogramming of somatic cell nuclei. Nat Cell Biol 6:984-990
26. Foshay KM,. et al. (2012). Embryonic stem cells induce pluripotency in somatic cell fusion through biphasic reprogramming. Mol Cell 46:159-170
27. Muramatsu M, K. Kinoshita, S. Fagarasan, S. Yamada, Y. Shinkai and T Honjo. (2000). Class switch recombination and hypermutation require activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a potential RNA editing enzyme. Cell 102:553-563
28. Polo JM,. et al. (2012). A molecular roadmap of reprogramming somatic cells into iPS cells. Cell 151:1617-1632
29. Cantone I and AG Fisher. (2013). Epigenetic programming and reprogramming during development. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:282-289
30. Doege CA,. et al. (2012). Early-stage epigenetic modification during somatic cell reprogramming by Parp1 and Tet2. Nature 488:652-655
31. Cortellino S,. et al. (2011). Thymine DNA glycosylase is essential for active DNA demethylation by linked deamination-base excision repair. Cell 146:67-79
32. He YF,. et al. (2011). Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science 333:1303-1307
33. Deplus R,. et al. (2013). TET2 and TET3 regulate GlcNAcylation and H3K4 methylation through OGT and SET1/ COMPASS. EMBO J 32:645-655
34. Vella P,. et al. (2013). Tet proteins connect the O-linked Nacetylglucosamine transferase Ogt to chromatin in embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell 49:645-656
35. Shen L, H. Wu, D. Diep, S. Yamaguchi, AC D'Alessio, HL. Fung, K. Zhang and Y Zhang. (2013). Genome-wide analysis reveals TET-And TDG-dependent 5-methylcytosine oxidation dynamics. Cell 153:692-706
36. Szulwach KE,. et al. (2011). 5-hmC-mediated epigenetic dynamics during postnatal neurodevelopment and aging. Nat Neurosci 14:1607-1616
37. Williams K, J. Christensen, MT. Pedersen, JV. Johansen, PA. Cloos, J. Rappsilber and K Helin. (2011). TET1 and hydroxymethylcytosine in transcription and DNA methylation fidelity. Nature 473:343-348
38. McBride KM, A. Gazumyan, EM. Woo, TA. Schwickert, BT. Chait and MC Nussenzweig. (2008). Regulation of class switch recombination and somatic mutation by AID phosphorylation. J Exp Med 205:2585-2594
39. Arioka Y, A. Watanabe, K. Saito and Y Yamada. (2012). Activation-induced cytidine deaminase alters the subcellular localization of Tet family proteins. PLoS One 7, e45031
40. Patenaude AM and JM Di Noia. (2010). The mechanisms regulating the subcellular localization of AID. Nucleus 1:325-331
41. Li YQ, PZ. Zhou, XD. Zheng, CP. Walsh and GL Xu. (2007). Association of Dnmt3a and thymine DNA glycosylase links DNA methylation with base-excision repair. Nucleic Acids Res 35:390-400