Evolutionary footprint of coevolving positions in genes

Bioinformatics

Volumn 30, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1241-1249

  Dib, Linda ^a,b   Silvestro, Daniele ^a,b,c   Salamin, Nicolas ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b SWISS INSTITUTE OF BIOINFORMATICS   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RIBULOSEBISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE; RNA 16S;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROBABILITY;

BASE SEQUENCE; BAYES THEOREM; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; PROBABILITY; RIBULOSE-BISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84899522457     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu012     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Altekar, G. et al. (2004) Parallel metropolis coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics, 20, 407-415.
2. Asthana, S. et al. (2007) Analysis of sequence conservation at nucleotide resolution. Plos Comput. Biol., 3, e254.
3. Baussand, J. and Carbone, A. (2009) A combinatorial approach to detect coevolved amino acid networks in protein families of variable divergence. Plos Comput. Biol., 5, e1000488.
4. Bollback, J.P. (2005) Posterior mapping and posterior predictive distributions. In: Nielsen, R. (ed.) Statistical methods in molecular evolution. Springer, New York, pp. 439-462.
5. Boussau, B. et al. (2004) Computational inference of scenarios for alphaproteobacterial genome evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 9722-9727.
6. Cannone, J.J. et al. (2002) The comparative RNA web (CRW) site: an online database of comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron, and other RNAs. BMC Bioinform., 3, 2.
7. Carbone, A. and Dib, L. (2011) Co-evolution and information signals in biological sequences. Theor. Comput. Sci., 412, 2486-2495.
8. Castoe, T.A. et al. (2009) Evidence for an ancient adaptive episode of convergent molecular evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 8986-8991.
9. Chockalingam, K. et al. (2005) Directed evolution of specific receptor-ligand pairs for use in the creation of gene switches. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 5691-5696.
10. Christin, P.A. et al. (2007) C4 Photosynthesis evolved in grasses via parallel adaptive genetic changes. Curr. Biol., 17, 1241-1247.
11. Christin, P.A. et al. (2012) Effect of genetic convergence on phylogenetic inference. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 62, 921-927.
12. Codoner, F.M. and Fares, M.A. (2008) Why should we care about molecular coevolution? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 5691-5696.
13. Cohen, O. et al. (2013) CoPAP: coevolution of presenceabsence patterns. Nucleic Acids Res., 41, W232-W237.
14. Corbi, J. et al. (2012) Accelerated evolution and coevolution drove the evolutionary history of AGPase sub-units during angiosperm radiation. Ann. Bot-London., 109, 693-708.
15. Csuros, M. (2005) Likely scenarios of intron evolution. In: McLysaght, A. and Huson, D. (eds) Comparative Genomics. Spring, Berlin, pp. 47-60.
16. Dib, L. and Carbone, A. (2012) Protein fragments: functional and structural roles of their coevolution networks. Plos One, 7, e48124.
17. Drummond, A.J. and Rambaut, A. (2007) BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol., 7, 214.
18. Dutheil, J.Y. (2012) Detecting coevolving positions in a molecule: why and how to account for phylogeny. Brief. Bioinform., 13, 228-243.
19. Dutheil, J. and Galtier, N. (2007) Detecting groups of coevolving positions in a molecule: a clustering approach. BMC Evol. Biol., 7, 242.
20. Dutheil, J. et al. (2005) A model-based approach for detecting coevolving positions in a molecule. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 22, 1919-1928.
21. Dutheil, J.Y. et al. (2010) Base pairing constraints drive structural epistasis in ribosomal RNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 27, 1868-1876.
22. Fares, M.A. and Travers, S.A. (2006) A novel method to detect intra-molecular coevolution: adding a further dimension to selective constraints analyses. Genetics, 173, 9-23.
23. Felsenstein, J. (1981) Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol., 17, 368-376.
24. FitzJohn, R. (2012) Diversitree: comparative phylogenetic analyses of diversification in R. Meth. Ecol. Evol., 3, 1084-1092.
25. Fitzpatrick, J.L. et al. (2012)Male contest competition and the coevolution of weaponry and testes in pinnipeds. Evolution, 66, 3595-3604.
26. Franceschini, A. et al. (2013) STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D80-D815.
27. Gloor, G.B. et al. (2005) Mutual information in protein multiple sequence alignments reveals two classes of coevolving positions. Biochemistry, 44, 7156-7165.
28. Gobel, U. et al. (2004) Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins, 18, 309-317.
29. GPWG2. (2012) New grass phylogeny resolves deep evolutionary relationships and discovers C4 origins. New Phytol., 193, 304-312.
30. Hao, W. and Golding, G.B. (2006) The fate of laterally transferred genes: life in the fast lane to adaptation or death. Genome Res., 16, 636-643.
31. Huelsenbeck, J.P. et al. (2003) Stochastic mapping of morphological characters. Syst. Biol., 52, 131-158.
32. Jukes, T. and Cantor, C. (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro, H.H. (ed.) Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic Press, New York, pp. 21-132.
33. Lartillot, N. and Philippe, H. (2004) A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol. Biol. Evol., 21, 1095-1109.
34. Lockless, S.W. and Ranganathan, R. (1999) Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. Science, 286, 295-299.
35. Mirkin, B.G. et al. (2003) Algorithms for computing parsimonious evolutionary scenarios for genome evolution, the last universal common ancestor and dominance of horizontal gene transfer in the evolution of prokaryotes. BMC Evol. Biol., 3, 2.
36. Nelder, J. and Mead, R. (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Computer J., 7, 308-313.
37. Pagel, M. (1994) Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. B. Soc. B., 255, 37-45.
38. Pollock, D.D. et al. (1999) Coevolving protein residues: maximum likelihood identification and relationship to structure. J. Mol. Biol., 287, 187-198.
39. Ronquist, F. et al. (2009) A Practical Approach to Phylogenetic Analysis and Hypothesis Testing. In: Lemey, P. and Vandamme, I.A-M. (eds) The Phylogenetic Handbook. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.
40. Tavare, S. (1986) Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. In: Miura, R.M. (ed.) Lectures on Mathematics in the Life Science. American Mathematics Society, Providence, pp. 57-86.
41. Wang, M. et al. (2011) Coevolution of amino acid residues in the key photosynthetic enzyme Rubisco. BMC Evol. Biol., 11, 266.
42. Westhof, E. and Fritsch, V. (2000) RNA folding: beyond Watson-Crick pairs. Structure, 8, R55-R65.
43. Yeang, C.H. et al. (2007) Detecting the coevolution of biosequences-an example of RNA interaction prediction. Mol. Biol. Evol., 24, 2119-2131.
44. Yip, K.Y. et al. (2008) An integrated system for studying residue coevolution in proteins. Bioinformatics, 24, 290-292.