Likely scenarios of intron evolution

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3678 LNBI, Issue , 2005, Pages 47-60

  Csurös, Miklós ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; PROBABILISTIC LOGICS; PROBABILITY; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

EUKARYOTES; EXON-INTRON ORGANIZATION; INTRON EVOLUTION; PROBABILISTIC MODELS;

GENETIC ENGINEERING;

EID: 33646137380     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11554714_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Crick, W.: Split genes and RNA splicing. Science 204 (1979) 264-271
2. Lynch, M., Richardson, A.O.: The evolution of spliceosomal introns. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 12 (2002) 701-710
3. de Souza, S.J.: The emergence of a synthetic theory of intron evolution. Genetica 118 (2003) 117-121
4. Rogozin, I.B., Wolf, Y.I., Sorokin, A.V., Mirkin, B.G., Koonin, E.V.: Remarkable interkingdom conservation of intron positions and massive, lineage-specific intron loss and gain in eukaryotic evolution. Current Biology 13 (2003) 1512-1517
5. Qiu, W.G., Schisler, N., Stoltzfus, A.: The evolutionary gain of spliceosomal introns: Sequence and phase preferences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21 (2004) 1252-1263
6. Nielsen, C.B., Friendman, B., Birren, B., Burge, C.B., Galagan, J.E.: Patterns of intron gain and loss in fungi. PLoS Biology 2 (2004) e422
7. Coghlan, A., Wolfe, K.H.: Origins of recently gained introns in Caenorhabditis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 101 (2004) 11362-11367
8. Vaňáčová, Š., Yan, W., Carlton, J.M., Johnson, P.J.: Spliceosomal introns in the deep-branching eukaryote Trichomonas vaginalis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 102 (2005) 4430-4435
9. Ross, S.M.: Stochastic Processes. Second edn. Wiley & Sons (1996)
10. Rzhetsky, A., Ayala, F.J., Hsu, L.C., Chang, C., Yoshida, A.: Exon/intron structure of aldehyde dehydrogenase genes supports the "introns-late" theory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 94 (1997) 6820-6825
11. Rogozin, I.B., Lyons-Weiler, J., Koonin, E.W.: Intron sliding in conserved gene families. Trends in Genetics 16 (2000) 430-432
12. Felsenstein, J.: Inferring Pylogenies. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass. (2004)
13. Tuffley, C., Steel, M.: Links between maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony under a simple model of site substitution. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 59 (1997) 581-607
14. Roch, S.: A short proof that phylogenetic reconstruction by maximum likelihood is hard. Technical report (2005) math.PR/0504378 at arXiv.org.
15. Chor, B., Tuller, T.: Maximum likelihood of evolutionary trees is hard. In: Proc. Ninth Annual International Conference on Research in Computational Biology (RECOMB). (2005) In press.
16. Roy, S.W., Gilbert, W.: Complex early genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 102 (2005) 1986-1991
17. Roy, S.W., Gilbert, W.: Rates of intron loss and gain: Implications for early eukaryotic evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 102 (2005) 5773-5778
18. Sverdlov, A.V., Rogozin, I.B., Babenko, V.N., Koonin, E.V.: Conservation versus parallel gains in intron evolution. Nucleic Acids Research 33 (2005) 1741-1748
19. Koshi, J.M., Goldstein, R.A.: Probabilistic reconstruction of ancestral protein sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 42 (1996) 313-320
20. Wolf, Y.I., Rogozin, I.B., Koonin, E.V.: Coelomata and not Ecdysozoa: Evidence from genome-wide phylogenetic analysis. Genome Research 14 (2004) 29-36
21. Roy, S.W., Gilbert, W.: Resolution of a deep animal divergence by the pattern of intron conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 102 (2005) 4403-4408
22. Philippe, H., Lartillot, N., Brinkmann, H.: Multigene analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa, and Protostomia. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22 (2005) 1246-1253
23. Philip, G.K., Creevey, C.J., McInerney, J.O.: The Opisthokonta and the Ecdysozoa may not be clades: Stronger support for the grouping of plant and animal than for animal and fungi and stronger support for the Coelomata than Ecdysozoa. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22 (2005) 1175-1184
24. Le Quesne, W.J.: The uniquely evolved character concept and its cladistic application. Systematic Zoology 23 (1974) 513-517
25. Farris, J.S.: Phylogenetic analysis under Dollo's law. Systematic Zoology 26 (1977) 77-88