Accelerated evolution and coevolution drove the evolutionary history of AGPase sub-units during angiosperm radiation

Annals of Botany

Volumn 109, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 693-708

  Corbi, Jonathan ^a   Dutheil, Julien Y ^b   Damerval, Catherine ^a   Tenaillon, Maud I ^a   Manicacci, Domenica ^c  

^a INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

AGPase; Angiosperms; coevolution; dicotyledons; molecular evolution; monocotyledons; neofunctionalization; paralogue genes; starch synthesis; subfunctionalization

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE 1 PHOSPHATE ADENYLYLTRANSFERASE; STARCH;

AMINO ACID; ANGIOSPERM; COEVOLUTION; COMPENSATION; DIVERGENCE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GLUCOSE; GRASS; MUTATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PHYLOGENY; PRECIPITATION (CHEMISTRY); RADIATION BALANCE; STARCH;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; BIOSYNTHESIS; ENZYMOLOGY; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PLANT GENE; RADIATION EXPOSURE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANGIOSPERMS; BASE SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENES, PLANT; GENETIC VARIATION; GLUCOSE-1-PHOSPHATE ADENYLYLTRANSFERASE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; SELECTION, GENETIC; STARCH;

DICOTYLEDONEAE; GYMNOSPERMAE; LILIOPSIDA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; VIRIDIPLANTAE;

EID: 84857719341     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcr303     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Aguileta G, Bielawski JP, Yang Z. 2006. Evolutionary rate variation among vertebrate beta globin genes: Implications for dating gene family duplication events. Gene 380: 21-29. (Pubitemid 44293156)
2. Altschuh D, Lesk AM, Bloomer AC, Klug A. 1987. Correlation of co-ordinated amino acid substitutions with function in viruses related to tobacco mosaic virus. Journal of Molecular Biology 193: 693-707.
3. Atchley WR, Wollenberg KR, Fitch WM, Terhalle W, Dress AW. 2000. Correlations among amino acid sites in bHLH protein domains: An information theoretic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17: 164-178. (Pubitemid 30057002)
4. Ballicora MA, Laughlin MJ, Fu Y, Okita TW, Barry GF, Preiss J. 1995. Adenosine 5'-diphosphate-glucose pyrophosphorylase from potato tuber. Significance of the N terminus of the small subunit for catalytic properties and heat stability. Plant Physiology 109: 245-251.
5. Ballicora MA, Fu YB, Nesbitt NM, Preiss J. 1998. ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase from potato tubers. Site-directed mutagenesis studies of the regulatory sites. Plant Physiology 118: 265-274. (Pubitemid 128652989)
6. Ballicora MA, Iglesias AA, Preiss J. 2003. ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase, a regulatory enzyme for bacterial glycogen synthesis. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 67: 213-225. (Pubitemid 36693472)
7. Ballicora MA, Iglesias AA, Preiss J. 2004. ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase: A regulatory enzyme for plant starch synthesis. Photosynthesis Research 79: 1-24. (Pubitemid 38184772)
8. Baris I, Tuncel A, Ozber N, Keskin O, Kavakli IH. 2009. Investigation of the interaction between the large and small subunits of potato ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. PLoS Computational Biology 5: Pe1000546. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000546.
9. Beckles DM, Smith AM, and Rees T. 2001. A cytosolic ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase is a feature of graminaceous endosperms, but not of other starch-storing organs. Plant Physiology 125: 818-827. (Pubitemid 32169889)
10. Beisswanger S, Stephan W. 2008. Evidence that strong positive selection drives neofunctionalization in the tandemly duplicated polyhomeotic genes in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 5447-5452. (Pubitemid 351753883)
11. Benderoth M, Textor S, Windsor AJ, Mitchell-Olds T, Gershenzon J, Kroymann J. 2006. Positive selection driving diversification in plant secondary metabolism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103: 9118-9123. (Pubitemid 43902543)
12. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 57: 289-300.
13. Chao JA, Patskovsky Y, Almo SC, Singer RH. 2008. Structural basis for the coevolution of a viral RNA-protein complex. Nature Structural and Molecular Biology 15: 103-105.
14. Clarke ND. 1995. Covariation of residues in the homeodomain sequence family. Protein Science 4: 2269-2278.
15. Comparot-Moss S, Denyer K. 2009. The evolution of the starch biosynthetic pathway in cereals and other grasses. Journal of Experimental Botany 60: 2481-2492.
16. Conant GC, Wolfe KH. 2008. Turning a hobby into a job: How duplicated genes find new functions. Nature Reviews Genetics 9: 938-950. (Pubitemid 352719432)
17. Cross JM, Clancy M, Shaw JR, et al. A polymorphic motif in the small subunit of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase modulates interactions between the small and large subunits. The Plant Journal 41: 501-511.
18. Cross JM, Clancy M, Shaw JR, et al. 2004. Both subunits of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase are regulatory. Plant Physiology 135: 137-144. (Pubitemid 38653661)
19. Denyer K, Dunlap F, Thorbjornsen T, Keeling P, Smith AM. 1996. The major form of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase in maize endosperm is extra-plastidial. Plant Physiology 112: 779-785.
20. Des Marais DL, Rausher MD. 2008. Escape from adaptive conflict after duplication in an anthocyanin pathway gene. Nature 454: 762-765.
21. Deschamps P, Colleoni C, Nakamura Y, et al. 2008. Metabolic symbiosis and the birth of the plant kingdom. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 536-548. (Pubitemid 351301909)
22. Duarte JM, Cui L, Wall PK, et al. 2006. Expression pattern shifts following duplication indicative of subfunctionalization and neofunctionalization in regulatory genes of Arabidopsis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 469-478. (Pubitemid 43100059)
23. Dutheil J, Galtier N. 2007. Detecting groups of coevolving positions in a molecule: A clustering approach. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-242.
24. Fares MA, McNally D. 2006. CAPS: Coevolution analysis using protein sequences. Bioinformatics 22: 2821-2822. (Pubitemid 44742405)
25. Felsenstein J. 1995. PHYLIP: Phylogeny inference package. Version 3.57c. University of Washington, Seattle.
26. Flagel L, Wendel J. 2009. Gene duplication and evolutionary novelty in plants. New Phytologist 183: 557-564.
27. Force A, Lynch M, Pickett FB, Amores A, Yan YL, Postlethwait J. 1999. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151: 1531-1545. (Pubitemid 29177561)
28. Frueauf JB, Ballicora MA, Preiss J. 2003. ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase from potato tuber: Site-directed mutagenesis of homologous aspartic acid residues in the small and large subunits. The Plant Journal 33: 503-511. (Pubitemid 36251191)
29. Fu Y, Ballicora MA, Preiss J. 1998. Mutagenesis of the glucose-1-phosphate-binding site of potato tuber ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. Plant Physiology 117: 989-996. (Pubitemid 128652872)
30. Georgelis N, Braun EL, Shaw JR, Hannah LC. 2007. The two AGPase subunits evolve at different rates in angiosperms, yet they are equally sensitive to activity-altering amino acid changes when expressed in bacteria. The Plant Cell 19: 1458-1472. (Pubitemid 47025370)
31. Georgelis N, Braun EL, Hannah LC. 2008. Duplications and functional divergence of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase genes in plants. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8: 232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-232.
32. Georgelis N, Shaw JR, Hannah LC. 2009. Phylogenetic analysis of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase subunits reveals a role of subunit interfaces in the allosteric properties of the enzyme. Plant Physiology 151: 67-77.
33. Gloor GB, Martin LC, Wahl LM, Dunn SD. 2005. Mutual information in protein multiple sequence alignments reveals two classes of coevolving positions. Biochemistry 44: 7156-7165. (Pubitemid 40656660)
34. Goh CS, Cohen FE. 2002. Co-evolutionary analysis reveals insights into protein-protein interactions. Journal of Molecular Biology 324: 177-192. (Pubitemid 35352188)
35. Goh CS, Bogan AA, Joachimiak M, Walther D, Cohen FE. 2000. Co-evolution of proteins with their interaction partners. Journal of Molecular Biology 299: 283-293.
36. Grantham R. 1974. Amino acid difference formula to help explain protein evolution. Science 185: 862-864.
37. Greene TW, Chantler SE, Kahn ML, Barry GF, Preiss J, Okita TW. 1996. Mutagenesis of the potato ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase and characterization of an allosteric mutant defective in 3-phosphoglycerate activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93: 1509-1513. (Pubitemid 26075154)
38. Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59: 307-321.
39. Hahn MW. 2009. Distinguishing among evolutionary models for the maintenance of gene duplicates. Journal of Heredity 100: 605-617.
40. Halabi N, Rivoire O, Leibler S, Ranganathan R. 2009. Protein sectors: Evolutionary units of three-dimensional structure. Cell 138: 774-786.
41. Hannah LC, Shaw JR, Giroux MJ, et al. 2001. Maize genes encoding the small subunit of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. Plant Physiology 127: 173-183. (Pubitemid 32930677)
42. Hendriks JH, Kolbe A, Gibon Y, Stitt M, Geigenberger P. 2003. ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase is activated by posttranslational redoxmodification in response to light and to sugars in leaves of Arabidopsis and other plant species. Plant Physiology 133: 838-849. (Pubitemid 37325692)
43. Hill MA, Kaufmann K, Otero J, Preiss J. 1991. Biosynthesis of bacterial glycogen. Mutagenesis of a catalytic site residue of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase from Escherichia coli. Journal of Biological Chemistry 266: 12455-12460. (Pubitemid 21907116)
44. Hughes AL. 1994. The evolution of functionally novel proteins after gene duplication. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 256: 119-124. (Pubitemid 24168165)
45. Hwang SK, Salamone PR, Okita TW. 2005. Allosteric regulation of the higher plant ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase is a product of synergy between the two subunits. FEBS Letters 579: 983-990. (Pubitemid 40248657)
46. Hwang SK, Hamada S, Okita TW. 2007. Catalytic implications of the higher plant ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase large subunit. Phytochemistry 68: 464-477. (Pubitemid 46186448)
47. Hylton C, Smith AM. 1992. The rb mutation of peas causes structural and regulatory changes in ADP glucose pyrophosphorylase from developing embryos. Plant Physiology 99: 1626-1634.
48. Jin X, Ballicora MA, Preiss J, Geiger JH. 2005. Crystal structure of potato tuber ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. EMBO Journal 24: 694-704. (Pubitemid 40396100)
49. Kamibayashi C, Estes R, Slaughter C, Mumby MC. 1991. Subunit interactions control protein phosphatase 2A. Effects of limited proteolysis, N-ethylmaleimide, and heparin on the interaction of the B subunit. Journal of Biological Chemistry 266: 13251-13260. (Pubitemid 21907336)
50. Kim D, Hwang SK, Okita TW. 2007. Subunit interactions specify the allosteric regulatory properties of the potato tuber ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 362: 301-306. (Pubitemid 47332405)
51. Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16: 111-120. (Pubitemid 11166431)
52. Kondrashov FA, Rogozin IB, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. 2002. Selection in the evolution of gene duplications. Genome Biology 3: Research0008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2002-3-2-research0008.
53. Lovell SC, Robertson DL. 2010. An integrated view of molecular coevolution in protein-protein interactions. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27: 2567-2575.
54. Lynch M, Force A. 2000. The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. Genetics 154: 459-473. (Pubitemid 30045935)
55. Ma J, Ratan A, Raney BJ, Suh BB, Miller W, Haussler D. 2008. The infinite sites model of genome evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 14254-14261.
56. Madaoui H, Guerois R. 2008. Coevolution at protein complex interfaces can be detected by the complementarity trace with important impact for predictive docking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 7708-7713. (Pubitemid 351872703)
57. Maddison WP. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Systematic Biology 46: 523-536.
58. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2003. Mesquite: A modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 2.72. http://mesquiteproject.org/mesquite/ mesquite.html.
59. Mateu MG, Fersht AR. 1999. Mutually compensatory mutations during evolution of the tetramerization domain of tumor suppressor p53 lead to impaired hetero-oligomerization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 96: 3595-3599. (Pubitemid 29168955)
60. Mintseris J,Weng Z. 2005. Structure, function, and evolution of transient and obligate protein-protein interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102: 10930-10935. (Pubitemid 41105970)
61. Nembaware V, Crum K, Kelso J, Seoighe C. 2002. Impact of the presence of paralogs on sequence divergence in a set of mouse-human orthologs. Genome Research 12: 1370-1376.
62. Ohno S. 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Otto SP. 2007. The evolutionary consequences of polyploidy. Cell, 131: 452-462.
63. Pazos F, Helmer-Citterich M, Ausiello G, Valencia A. 1997. Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction. Journal of Molecular Biology 271: 511-523. (Pubitemid 27373087)
64. Plaxton WC, Preiss J. 1987. Purification and properties of nonproteolytic degraded ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase from maize endosperm. Plant Physiology 83: 105-112.
65. Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. MODELTEST: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818. (Pubitemid 28552116)
66. Preiss J, Ball K, Smith-White B, Iglesias A, Kakefuda G, Li L. 1991. Starch biosynthesis and its regulation. Biochemical Society Transactions 19: 539-547.
67. Rodionov A, Bezginov A, Rose J, Tillier ER. 2011. A new, fast algorithm for detecting protein coevolution using maximum compatible cliques. Algorithms in Molecular Biology 6: 17.
68. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574. (Pubitemid 37038874)
69. Sikka VK, Choi SB, Kavakli IH, Sakulsingharoj C, Gupta S, Ito H Okita T. 2001. Subcellular compartimentation and allosteric regulation of the rice endosperm ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase. Plant Science 161: 461-468. (Pubitemid 32750902)
70. Sivak MN, Preiss J. 1998. Starch: Biochemistry and molecular biology. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research 41: 1-199.
71. Swofford DL. 2003. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
72. Tetlow IJ, Davies EJ, Vardy KA, Bowsher CG, Burrell MM, Emes MJ. 2003. Subcellular localization of ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase in developing wheat endosperm and analysis of the properties of a plastidial isoform. Journal of Experimental Botany 54: 715-725. (Pubitemid 36189217)
73. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4673-4680. (Pubitemid 24354800)
74. Travers SA, Fares MA. 2007. Functional coevolutionary networks of the Hsp70-Hop-Hsp90 system revealed through computational analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1032-44. (Pubitemid 46536714)
75. Tuncel A, Kavakli IH, Keskin O. 2008. Insights into subunit interactions in the heterotetrameric structure of potato ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. Biophysical Journal 95: 3628-3639.
76. Ventriglia T, Kuhn ML, Ruiz MT, et al. 2008. Two Arabidopsis ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase large subunits (APL1 and APL2) are catalytic. Plant Physiology 148: 65-76. (Pubitemid 352847576)
77. Walsh JB. 1995. How often do duplicated genes evolve new functions? Genetics 139: 421-428.
78. Weber H, Heim U, Borisjuk L, Wobus U. 1995. Cell-type specific, coordinate expression of two ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase genes in relation to starch biosynthesis during seed development of Vicia faba L. Planta 195: 352-361.
79. Yang Z. 1994. Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution. Journal of Molecular Evolution 39: 105-11. (Pubitemid 24181131)
80. Yang Z. 1998. Likelihood ratio tests for detecting positive selection and application to primate lysozyme evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 568-73. (Pubitemid 28194621)
81. Yang Z. 2007. PAML 4: Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1586-1591. (Pubitemid 47236688)
82. Yang Z, Nielsen R. 1998. Synonymous and nonsynonymous rate variation in nuclear genes of mammals. Journal of Molecular Evolution 46: 409-418. (Pubitemid 28164945)
83. Yang Z, Nielsen R. 2002. Codon-substitution models for detecting molecular adaptation at individual sites along specific lineages. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 908-917. (Pubitemid 34602960)
84. Yang Z, Wong WS, Nielsen R. 2005. Bayes empirical bayes inference of amino acid sites under positive selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 1107-1118. (Pubitemid 40471423)
85. Yeang CH, Haussler D. 2007. Detecting coevolution in and among protein domains. PLoS Computational Biology 3: E211. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pcbi.0030211.
86. Yep A, Ballicora MA, Preiss J. 2006. The ADP-glucose binding site of the Escherichia coli glycogen synthase. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 453: 188-196. (Pubitemid 44344215)
87. Zhang J, Nielsen R, Yang Z. 2005. Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 2472-2479. (Pubitemid 41661383)