Biases in news media as reflected by personal pronouns in evaluative contexts

Social Psychology

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 103-111

  Sendén, Marie Gustafsson ^a   Lindholm, Torun ^b   Sikström, Sverker ^c  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Implicit attitudes; Intergroup bias; Language bias; Latent semantic analysis; Pronouns in social categorization; Self serving bias

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899050781     PISSN: 18649335     EISSN: 21512590     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000165     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2013). The Big Two in social judgment and behavior. Social Psychology, 44, 61-62. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000137
2. Allport, G. W. (1954/1979). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Aronsson, K., & Sätterlund-Larsson, U. (1987). Politeness strategies and doctor-patient communication: On the social choreography of collaborative thinking. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 6, 1-27.
4. Arvidsson, D., Sikstrçm, S., & Werbart, A. (2011). Changes in self and object representations following psychotherapy measured by a theory-free, computational, semantic space method. Psychotherapy Research, 21, 430-446. doi:10.1080/10503307.2011.577824
5. Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290. doi:10.1037/H0055756
6. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. The William James lectures delivered at Harward University in 1955. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
7. Baumeister, R. F., & Ilko, S. A. (1995). Shallow gratitude-Public and private acknowledgment of external help in accounts of success. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 191-209.
8. Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Stimuli, instruction manual and affective ratings. Gainesville, FL: The NIMH center for the study of emotion and attention, University of Florida.
9. Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation - Cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307
10. Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429-444. doi:10.1111/0022-4537. 00126
11. Brewer, M. B. (2007). The importance of being we: Human nature and intergroup relations. American Psychologist, 62, 726-738. doi:10.1037/0003-066X. 62.8.728
12. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some univer-sals in language usage. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13. Campbell, R. S., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2003). The secret life of pronouns: Flexibility in writing style and physical health. Psychological Science, 14, 60-65. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01419 (Pubitemid 37283117)
14. Carnaghi, A., Maass, A., Gresta, S., Bianchi, M., Cadinu, M., & Arcuri, L. (2008). Nomina sunt omina: On the inductive potential of nouns and adjectives in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 839-859. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.839
15. Chung, C. K., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2007). The psychological functions of function words. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social Communication (pp. 343-359). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
16. Cortes, B. P., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez, R. T., and Rodriguez., A. P., & Leyens, J. P. (2005). Infrahumanization or familiarity? Attribution of uniquely human emotions to the self, the ingroup, and the outgroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 243-253. (Pubitemid 40176564)
17. Critcher, C. R., Helzer, E. G, & Dunning, D. (2011). Self-enhancement via redefinition: Defining social concepts to ensure positive views of the self. In M. D. Alicke & C. Sedikides (Eds.), Handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection (pp. 69-91). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
18. Dixon, T. L., & Linz, D. (2000). Overrepresentation and underrepresentation of African Americans and Latinos as lawbreakers on television news. Journal of Communication, 50, 131-154.
19. Dovidio, J. F., Glick, P., & Rudman, L. A. (2005). On the nature of prejudice. Fifty years after Allport. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
20. Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993). Co-evolution of neo-cortex, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 681-735. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00032325
21. Dunbar, R. I. M. (1997). Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. New York, NY: Faber & Faber.
22. Evans, M. G. (1985). A Monte-Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple-regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 305-323. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(85) 90002-0
23. Fiske, S. T. (2012). Warmth and competence: Stereotype content issues for clinicians and researchers. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 53, 14-20. doi:10.1037/A0026054
24. Fiske, S. T., Lin, K., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 231-254). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25. Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 285-307.
26. Gaertner, L., & Schopler, J. (1998). Perceived ingroup entitativity and intergroup bias: An interconnection of self and others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 963-980.
27. Gaertner, L., Sedikides, C, Luke, M., O'Mara, E. M., Iuzzini, J., Jackson, L. E., ... Wu, Q. (2012). A motivational hierarchy within: Primacy of the individual self, relational self, or collective self? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 997-1013.
28. Gaertner, L., Sedikides, C, and Vevea., J. L., & Iuzzini, J. (2002). The 'I' the "we", and the "when,": A meta-analysis of motivational primacy in self-definition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 574-591. doi:10.1037/ 0022-3514.83.3.574
29. Garcia, D., & Sikstrçm, S. (2013). A collective theory of happiness: Words related to the word "Happiness," in Swedish online newspapers. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 27, 1-4.
30. Geschke, D., Sassenberg, K., Ruhrmann, G., & Sommer, D. (2010). Effects of linguistic abstractness in the mass media: How newspaper articles shape readers' attitudes toward migrants. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 22, 99-104. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/ a000014
31. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
32. Graf, S., Bilewicz, M., Finell, E., & Geschke, D. (2012). Nouns cut slices: Effects of linguistic forms on intergroup bias. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32, 62-83. doi:10.1177/0261927x12463209
33. Gustafsson Senden, M., Lindholm, T., & Sikstrom, S. (in press). Selection bias as reflected by choice of words: The evaluations of "I" and "We" differ between communication contexts but "They," are always worse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology.
34. Koivula, N. (1999). Gender stereotyping in televised media sport coverage. Sex Roles, 41, 589-604. doi: 10.1023/ a:1018899522353
35. Landauer, T. K. (1998). Learning and representing verbal meaning: The latent semantic analysis theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 161-164. (Pubitemid 128188367)
36. Landauer, T. K. (1999). Latent semantic analysis: A theory of the psychology of language and mind. Discourse Processes, 27, 303-310.
37. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
38. Landauer, T. K., and Foltz., P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259-284.
39. Landauer, T. K., Laham, D., & Foltz, P. (2003). Automatic essay assessment. Assessment in Education, 10, 295-308.
40. Landauer, T. K., Laham, D., Foltz, P. W., and Shermis., M. D., & Burstein, J. (2003). Automatic essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Landauer, T. K., and McNamara., D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (2007). Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Lee, J. J., & Pinker, S. (2010). Rationales for indirect speech: The theory of the strategic speaker. Psychological Review, 117, 785-807. doi:10.1037/a0019688
43. Lenton, A., Sedikides, C., & Bruder, M. (2009). A latent semantic analysis of gender stereotype-consistency and narrowness in American English. Sex Roles, 60, 269-278. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9534-z
44. Maass, A. (1999). Linguistic intergroup bias: Stereotype perpetuation through language. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 79-121). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
45. Maass, A., Ceccarelli, R., & Rudin, S. (1996). Linguistic intergroup bias: Evidence for in-group-protective motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 512-526. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.512
46. Maass, A., Milesi, A., Zabbini, S., & Stahlberg, D. (1995). Linguistic intergroup bias - Differential expectancies or in-group protection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 116-126.
47. Maass, A., Salvi, D., Arcuri, L., & Semin, G. R. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts - The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 981-993.
48. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self - Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
49. McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376-390.
50. Menegatti, M., & Rubini, M. (2012). From the individual to the group: The enhancement of linguistic bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 36-40. doi: 10.1002/ Ejsp.856
51. Menegatti, M., & Rubini, M. (2013). Convincing similar and dissimilar others: The power of language abstraction in political communication. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 596-607. doi:10.1177/ 0146167213479404
52. Miller, N. (2002). Personalization and the promise of contact theory. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 387-410. (Pubitemid 34825102)
53. Miller, R. S., & Schlenker, B. R. (1985). Egotism in group members - Public and private attributions of responsibility for group-performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 85-89.
54. Moscatelli, S., Albarello, F., & Rubini, M. (2008). Linguistic discrimination in minimal groups - The impact of status differentials. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27, 140-154. doi:10.1177/0261927x07313652
55. Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status - an integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
56. Na, J., & Choi, I. (2009). Culture and first-person pronouns. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1492-1499. doi:10.1177/ 0146167209343810
57. Nettle, D. (1999). Using social impact theory to simulate language change. Lingua, 108, 95-117.
58. Pennebaker, J. W. (2011). The secret life of pronouns: What our words say about us. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
59. Pennebaker, J. W., and Mehl., M. R., & Niederhoffer, K. G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547-577. (Pubitemid 37417505)
60. Perdue, C. W., and Gurtman., M. B., Dovidio, J. F., & Tyler, R. B. (1990). Us and them - Social categorization and the process of intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 475-486. doi:10.1037/0022- 3514.59.3.475
61. Picard, R. R., & Cook, R. D. (1984). Cross-validation of regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 575-583. doi:10.2307/2288403
62. Pitts, M. J., & Nussbaum, J. F. (2006). Integrating the past and paving the future. Examining current trends and extending boundaries of language and social psychology research. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25, 197-202. (Pubitemid 44117857)
63. Reuters. (2008). Handbook of journalism, Retrieved from http:// handbook.reuters.com/index.php?title=Main-Page
64. Rubini, M., Moscatelli, S., & Palmonari, A. (2007). Increasing group entitativity: Linguistic intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 280-296. doi:10.1177/1368430207 075156
65. Sedikides, C., & Gregg, A. P. (2008). Self-enhancement food for thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 102-116. doi:10.1111/j.1745- 6916.2008.00068.x
66. Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons - Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558-568. doi:10.1037/0022- 3514.54.4.558
67. Sexton, J. B., & Helmreich, R. L. (2000). Analyzing cockpit communications: The links between language, performance, error, and workload. Human Performance in Extreme Environments, 5, 63-68.
68. Sherif, M., and Harvey., O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. V. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers cave experiment. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange.
69. Slatcher, R. B., and Chung., C. K., Pennebaker, J. W., & Stone, L. D. (2007). Winning words: Individual differences in linguistic style among US presidential and vice presidential candidates. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 63-75. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.01.006
70. Stone, L. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2002). Trauma in real time: Talking and avoiding online conversations about the death of Princess Diana. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 173-183. (Pubitemid 36593927)
71. Sutton, R. M. (2010). The creative power of language in social cognition and intergroup relations. In H. Giles, S. Reid, & J. Harwood (Eds.), The dynamics of intergroup communication (pp. 105-115). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
72. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
73. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In S. Worchel & L. W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
74. Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24-54.
75. Twenge, J. M., and Campbell., W. K., & Gentile, B. (2012). Male and female pronoun use in US books reflects women's status, 1900-2008. Sex Roles, 67, 488-493. doi:10.1007/ s11199-012-0194-7
76. Wigboldus, D. H. J., & Douglas, K. (2007). Language, stereotypes, and intergroup relations. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 79-106). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
77. Wigboldus, D. H. J., and Semin., G. R., & Spears, R. (2000). How do we communicate stereotypes? Linguistic biases and inferential consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 5-18.