What do values and norms have to do with scientific literacy?

Exploring the Landscape of Scientific Literacy

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 160-175

  Östman, Leif ^a   Almqvist, Jonas ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898682933     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203843284     Document Type: Chapter

References (59)

1. Aikenhead, G. (1998). Border crossing: Culture, school science, and assimilation of students. In D. A. Roberts, & L. Östman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum(pp. 86-100). New York: Teachers College Press.
2. Almqvist, J. (2005). Learning and artefacts. On the use of information technology in educational settings. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
3. Almqvist, J., & Östman, L. (2006). Privileging and artefacts: On the use of information technology in science education. Interchange, 37, 225-250.
4. Brickhouse, N. W. (2001). Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18(3), 282-295.
5. Brousseau, G., & Warfield, V. M. (1999). The case of Gaël. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 18(1), 7-52.
6. Bruun Jensen, B. B., & Schnack, K. (1997). The action competence approach in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 3, 163-178.
7. Dewey, J. (1922/1988). Human nature and conduct. In J. A. Boydstone (Ed.), The middle works, 1899-1924, Vol 14: 1922. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
8. Dewey, J. (1938/1963). Experience and education. New York: Collier.
9. Englund, T., Öhman, J., & Östman, L. (2008). Deliberative communication for sustainability? A Habermas-inspired pluralistic approach. In S. Gough, & A. Stables (Eds.), Sustainability and security within liberal societies: Learning to live with the future. London: Routledge.
10. Fensham, P. J. (1985). Science for all: A reflective essay. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17, 415-435.
11. Fensham, P. J. (1988). Familiar but different: Some dilemmas and new directions in science education. In P. J. Fensham (Ed.), Development and dilemmas in science education. London: Falmer Press.
12. Hildebrand, D., Bilica, K., & Capps, J. (2008). Addressing controversies in science education: A pragmatic approach to evolution education. Science & Education, 17, 1032-1052.
13. Hurd, P. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82, 404-416.
14. Hutcheon, L. (1992). The complex function of irony. Revista Canadiense de Estudios Hispanicos, 16, 221-234.
15. James, W. (1905/1985). The varieties of religious experience. In F. Burkhardt (Ed.), The works of William James. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Jenkins, E. (2002). Linking school science education with action. In W.-M. Roth, & J. Désautels (Eds.), Science education as/for sociopolitical action(pp. 17-34). Oxford: Peter Lang.
17. Jickling B. (2003). Environmental education and environmental advocacy: Revisited. Journal of Environmental Education, 34, 20-27.
18. Kilbourn, B. (1998). Root metaphors and education. In D. Roberts, & L. Östman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum(pp. 25-38). New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Knain, E. (2001). Ideologies in school science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 319-329.
20. Kolstoe, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85, 291-310.
21. Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71-94.
22. Layton, D., Jenkins, E., Macgill, S., & Davey, A. (1993). Inarticulate science? Perspectives on the public understanding of science and some implications for science education. Driffield, UK: Studies in Education.
23. Lidar, M., Lundqvist, E., & Östman, L. (2006). Teaching and learning in the science classroom. Science Education, 90, 148-163.
24. Lundqvist, E., Almqvist, J., & Östman, L. (2009). Epistemological norms and companion meanings in science classroom communication. Science Education, 93, 859-874.
25. Norris, P. S., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224-240.
26. Öhman, J. (2006). Pluralism and criticism in environmental education and education for sustainable development: A practical understanding. Environmental Education Research, 12, 149-163.
27. Öhman, J., & Östman, L. (2007). Continuity and change in moral meaning-making: A transactional approach. Journal of Moral Education, 36, 151-168.
28. Öhman, J., & Östman, L. (2008). Clarifying the ethical tendency in education for sustainable development practice: A Wittgenstein-inspired approach. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 13, 57-72.
29. Östman, L. (1994). Rethinking science teaching as a moral act. Journal of Nordic Educational Research, 14, 141-150.
30. Östman, L. (1996). Discourses, discursive meanings and socialization in chemical education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 37-55.
31. Östman, L. (1998). How companion meanings are expressed by science education discourse. In D. A. Roberts, & L. Östman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum(pp. 54-70). New York: Teachers College Press.
32. Östman, L. (2007). Content analysis, curriculum theory and didactics: Science education as a political and environmental-ethical problem. In E. Forsberg (Ed.), Curriculum theory revisited(pp. 113-123). Uppsala: Department of Education, Uppsala University.
33. Östman, L. (2010). Education for sustainable development and normativity: A transactional analysis of moral meaning-making and companion meanings in classroom communication. Environmental Education Research, 16(1), 75-93.
34. Östman, L., & Wickman, P.-O. (2001). Practical epistemology, learning and socialization. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 2001, Seattle.
35. Pepper, S. C. (1942). Basis of criticism in the arts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
36. Pepper, S. C. (1945). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
37. Putnam, H. (2002). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
38. Reiss, M. (2007). What should be the aim(s) of school science education? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education(pp. 13-27). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
39. Rhees, R. (1970/1996). Discussions of Wittgenstein. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
40. Roberts, D. A. (2007a). Linné scientific literacy symposium: Opening remarks. In C. Linder, L. Östman, & P.-O. Wickman (Eds.), Promoting scientific literacy: Science education research in transaction. Proceedings from the Linnaeus Tercentenary Symposium(pp. 9-17). Uppsala: Uppsala University.
41. Roberts, D. A. (2007b). Scientific literacy/Science literacy. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education(pp. 729-780). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Roberts, D., & Östman, L. (Eds.). (1998). Problems of meaning in science curriculum. London: Teachers College Press.
43. Rosenthal, D. B., & Bybee, R. W. (1987). Emergence of the biology curriculum: A science of life or a science of living? In T. S. Popkewitz (Ed.), The formation of the school subjects: The struggle for creating an American institution(pp. 123-144). New York: Falmer Press.
44. Roth, W.-M. (2003). Scientific literacy as an emergent feature of collective human praxis. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35, 9-23.
45. Roth, W.-M., & Désautels J. (Eds.). (2002). Science education as/for sociopolitical action. Oxford: Peter Lang.
46. Stables, A., & Scott, W. (2002). The quest for holism in education for sustainable development, Environmental Education Research, 8, 53-60.
47. Von Wright, G. H. (1991). Vetenskapen och förnuftet (Science and reason). Stockholm: Månpocket.
48. Waring, M. (1979). Social pressures and curriculum innovation. A study of the Nuffield Foundation science teaching project. London: Methuen.
49. Webster, S. (2008). How a Deweyan science education further enables ethics in education. Science & Education, 17, 903-919.
50. Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
51. Wickman, P.-O. (2006). Aesthetic experience in science education: Learning and meaning-making as situated talk and action. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52. Wickman, P.-O., & Östman, L. (2001a). University students during practical work: Can we make the learning process intelligible? In H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Gräber, M. Komorek, A. Kross, & P. Reiska (Eds.), Research in science education: Past, present, and future (pp. 319-324). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
53. Wickman, P.-O., & Östman, L. (2001b). Students’ practical epistemologies during laboratory work. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle.
54. Wickman, P.-O., & Östman, L. (2002a). Induction as an empirical problem: How students generalize during practical work. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 465-486.
55. Wickman, P.-O., & Östman, L. (2002b). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86, 601-623.
56. Willinsky, J. (1998). The obscured and present meaning of race in science education. In D. Roberts, & L. Östman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum (pp. 73-86). New York: Teachers College Press.
57. Wittgenstein, L. (1993). A lecture on ethics. In J. C. Klagge, & A. Nordmann (Eds.), Philosophical occasions 1912-1951 (pp. 37-44). Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett.
58. Worster, D. (1985). Nature’s economy. A history of ecological ideas. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59. Zeidler, D. (Ed.). (2003). The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.