Shedding light on black boxes in protein identification

Proteomics

Volumn 14, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1001-1005

  Vaudel, Marc ^a,b   Venne, A Saskia ^b   Berven, Frode S ^a,c   Zahedi, René P ^b   Martens, Lennart ^d,e   Barsnes, Harald ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^b LEIBNIZ INSTITUT FÜR ANALYTISCHE WISSENSCHAFTEN ISAS E V   (Germany)

^c HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^d DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^e GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Open Source; Protein Identification; Publication Guidelines; Tutorial

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; GENE ONTOLOGY; HUMAN; PEPTIDE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATA BANK; PROTEOMICS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA BASE; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN DATABASE;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84898619035     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201300488     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Nilsson, T., Mann, M., Aebersold, R., Yates, J. R., 3rd et al., Mass spectrometry in high-throughput proteomics: ready for the big time. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 681-685.
2. Bodzon-Kulakowska, A., Bierczynska-Krzysik, A., Dylag, T., Drabik, A. et al., Methods for samples preparation in proteomic research. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2007, 849, 1-31.
3. Canas, B., Pineiro, C., Calvo, E., Lopez-Ferrer, D., Gallardo, J. M., Trends in sample preparation for classical and second generation proteomics. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1153, 235-258.
4. Granvogl, B., Ploscher, M., Eichacker, L. A., Sample preparation by in-gel digestion for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 389, 991-1002.
5. Burkhart, J. M., Schumbrutzki, C., Wortelkamp, S., Sickmann, A., Zahedi, R. P., Systematic and quantitative comparison of digest efficiency and specificity reveals the impact of trypsin quality on MS-based proteomics. J. Proteomics 2012, 75, 1454-62.
6. Gevaert, K., Van Damme, P., Ghesquiere, B., Impens, F. et al., A la carte proteomics with an emphasis on gel-free techniques. Proteomics 2007, 7, 2698-2718.
7. Fenn, J. B., Mann, M., Meng, C. K., Wong, S. F., Whitehouse, C. M., Electrospray ionization for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. Science 1989, 246, 64-71.
8. Hillenkamp, F., Karas, M., Beavis, R. C., Chait, B. T., Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry of biopolymers. Anal. Chem. 1991, 63, 1193A-1203A.
9. Barsnes, H., Eidhammer, I., Martens, L., A global analysis of peptide fragmentation variability. Proteomics 2011, 11, 1181-1188.
10. Makarov, A., Electrostatic axially harmonic orbital trapping: a high-performance technique of mass analysis. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 1156-1162.
11. Nesvizhskii, A. I., A survey of computational methods and error rate estimation procedures for peptide and protein identification in shotgun proteomics. J. Proteomics 2010, 73, 2092-2123.
12. Barsnes, H., Martens, L., Crowdsourcing in proteomics: public resources lead to better experiments. Amino Acids 2013, 44, 1129-1137.
13. Vaudel, M., Sickmann, A., Martens, L., Current methods for global proteome identification. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2012, 9, 519-532.
14. Martens, L., Hermjakob, H., Proteomics data validation: why all must provide data. Mol. Biosyst. 2007, 3, 518-522.
15. Vaudel, M., Sickmann, A., Martens, L., Introduction to opportunities and pitfalls in functional mass spectrometry based proteomics. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1844, 12-20.
16. Everett, L. J., Bierl, C., Master, S. R., Unbiased statistical analysis for multi-stage proteomic search strategies. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 700-707.
17. Foster, L. J., Interpretation of data underlying the link between colony collapse disorder (CCD) and an invertebrate iridescent virus. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2011, 10, M110.006387.
18. Editors, Matters of significance. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 805.
19. Martin, S. F., Falkenberg, H., Dyrlund, T. F., Khoudoli, G. A. et al., PROTEINCHALLENGE: crowd sourcing in proteomics analysis and software development. J. Proteomics 2013, 88, 41-46.
20. Editors, In need of an upgrade. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 857.
21. Kinsinger, C. R., Apffel, J., Baker, M., Bian, X. et al., Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam Principles). J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11, 1412-1419.
22. Martens, L., Vizcaino, J. A., Banks, R., Quality control in proteomics. Proteomics 2011, 11, 1015-1016.
23. Pichler, P., Mazanek, M., Dusberger, F., Weilnbock, L. et al., SIMPATIQCO: a server-based software suite which facilitates monitoring the time course of LC-MS performance metrics on Orbitrap instruments. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11, 5540-5547.
24. Lange, V., Picotti, P., Domon, B., Aebersold, R., Selected reaction monitoring for quantitative proteomics: a tutorial. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2008, 4, 222.
25. UniProt Consortium, The universal protein resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, D190-D195.
26. Chambers, M. C., Maclean, B., Burke, R., Amodei, D. et al., A cross-platform toolkit for mass spectrometry and proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30, 918-920.
27. Geer, L. Y., Markey, S. P., Kowalak, J. A., Wagner, L. et al., Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J. Proteome Res. 2004, 3, 958-964.
28. Fenyo, D., Beavis, R. C., A method for assessing the statistical significance of mass spectrometry-based protein identifications using general scoring schemes. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 768-774.
29. Vaudel, M., Barsnes, H., Berven, F. S., Sickmann, A., Martens, L., SearchGUI: an open-source graphical user interface for simultaneous OMSSA and X!Tandem searches. Proteomics 2011, 11, 996-999.
30. Elias, J. E., Gygi, S. P., Target-decoy search strategy for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 604, 55-71.
31. Flicek, P., Ahmed, I., Amode, M. R., Barrell, D. et al., Ensembl 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D48-D55.
32. Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D. et al., Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25, 25-29.
33. Villaveces, J. M., Jimenez, R. C., Garcia, L. J., Salazar, G. A. et al., Dasty3, a WEB framework for DAS. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 2616-2617.
34. Franceschini, A., Szklarczyk, D., Frankild, S., Kuhn, M. et al., STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D808-D815.
35. Matthews, L., Gopinath, G., Gillespie, M., Caudy, M. et al., Reactome knowledgebase of human biological pathways and processes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, D619-D622.
36. Berman, H. M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G. et al., The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235-242.
37. Vizcaino, J. A., Mueller, M., Hermjakob, H., Martens, L., Charting online OMICS resources: a navigational chart for clinical researchers. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 2009, 3, 18-29.
38. Martens, L., Hermjakob, H., Jones, P., Adamski, M. et al., PRIDE: the proteomics identifications database. Proteomics 2005, 5, 3537-3545.
39. Wang, R., Fabregat, A., Rios, D., Ovelleiro, D. et al., PRIDE Inspector: a tool to visualize and validate MS proteomics data. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30, 135-137.