Adaptation to desiccation fails to generate pre- and postmating isolation in replicate Drosophila melanogaster laboratory populations

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 710-723

  Kwan, Lucia ^a   Rundle, Howard D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cuticular hydrocarbons; Ecological speciation; Experimental evolution; Reproductive isolation; Stress resistance

Indexed keywords

HYDROCARBON;

ADAPTATION; ALLOPATRY; CUTICLE; DESICCATION; FLY; HYDROCARBON; LABORATORY METHOD; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); STARVATION;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DEHYDRATION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; INBREEDING; MALE; METABOLISM; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; STARVATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; DEHYDRATION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC SPECIATION; HYDROCARBONS; INBREEDING; MALE; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION, GENETIC; STARVATION; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 77949886421     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00864.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Aitchison J. The statistical analysis of compositional data 1986, Chapman and Hall, London, U.K
2. Bell G A C. Experimental evolution in Chlamydomonas. I. Short-term selection for uniform and diverse environments. Heredity 1997, 78:490-497.
3. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 1995, 57:289-300.
4. Bishop Y M M, Fienberg S E, Holland P W. Discrete multivariate analysis: theory and practice 1975, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
5. Blows M W, Allan R A. Levels of mate recognition within and between two Drosophila species and their hybrids. Am. Nat. 1998, 152:826-837.
6. Chippindale A K, Rice W R. Y chromosome polymorphism is a strong determinant of male fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98:5677-5682.
7. Chippindale A K, Gibbs A G, Sheik M, Yee K J, Djawdan M, Bradley T J, Rose M R. Resource acquisition and the evolution of stress resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 1998, 52:1342-1352.
8. Coyne J A. Genetics of differences in pheromonal hydrocarbons between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetics 1996, 143:353-364.
9. Coyne J A, Orr H A. Speciation 2004, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
10. Coyne J A, Elwyn S, Rolán-Alvarez E. Impact of experimental design on Drosophila sexual isolation studies: direct effects and comparison to field hybridization data. Evolution 2005, 59:2588-2601.
11. Dettman J R, Sirjusingh C, Kohn L M, Anderson J B. Incipient speciation by divergent adaptation and antagonistic epitasis in yeast. Nature 2007, 447:585-588.
12. Dettman J R, Anderson J B, Kohn L M. Divergent adaptation promotes reproductive isolation among experimental populations of the filamentous fungus Neurospora. BMC Evol. Biol. 2008, 8:35.
13. Dobzhansky T. Genetics and the origin of species 1951, 3rd ed, Columbia Univ. Press, New York, NY
14. Dodd D M B. Reproductive isolation as a consequence of adaptive divergence in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 1989, 43:1308-1311.
15. Etges W J, Ahrens M A. Premating isolation is determined by larval-rearing substrates in cactophilic Droosphila mojavensis. V. Deep geographic variation in epicuticular hydrocarbons among isolation populations. Am. Nat. 2001, 158:585-598.
16. Fang S, Takahashi A, Wu C-I. A mutation in the promoter of desaturase 2 is correlated with sexual isolation between Drosophila behavioral races. Genetics 2002, 162:781-784.
17. Ferveur J-F. Cuticular hydrocarbons: their evolution and roles in Drosophila pheromonal communication. Behav. Genet. 2005, 35:279-295.
18. Ferveur J-F, Savarit F, O'Kane C J, Sureau G, Greenspan R J, Jallon J-M. Genetic feminization of pheromones and its behavioral consequences in Drosophila males. Science 1997, 276:1555-1558.
19. Florin A-B, Ödeen A. Laboratory environments are not conducive for allopatric speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 2002, 15:10-19.
20. Foley B, Chenoweth S F, Nuzhdin S V, Blows M W. Natural genetic variation in cuticular hydrocarbon expression in male and female Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2007, 175:1465-1477.
21. Funk D J. Isolating a role for natural selection in speciation: host adaptation and sexual isolation in Neochlamisus bebianea leaf beetles. Evolution 1998, 52:1744-1759.
22. Gibbs A G. Water-proofing properties of cuticular lipids. Am. Zool. 1998, 38:471-482.
23. Gibbs A G, Chippindale A K, Rose M R. Physiological mechanisms of evolved desiccation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Biol. 1997, 200:1821-1832.
24. Grillet M, Dartevelle L, Ferveur J-F. A Drosophila male pheromone affects female sexual receptivity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2006, 273:315-323.
25. Hendry A P. Ecological speciation! Or the lack thereof?. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2009, 66:1383-1398.
26. Hendry A P, Nosil P, Rieseberg L H. The speed of ecological speciation. Funct. Ecol. 2007, 21:455-464.
27. Hoffmann A A, Parsons P A. An integrated approach to environmental stress tolerance and life-history variation: desiccation tolerance in Drosophila. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1989, 37:117-136.
28. Howard R W, Blomquist G J. Ecological, behavioral, and biochemical aspects of insect hydrocarbons. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2005, 50:371-393.
29. Jallon J-M. A few chemical words exchanged by Drosophila during courtship and mating. Behav. Genet. 1984, 14:441-478.
30. Kassen R. The experimental evolution of specialists, generalists, and the maintenance of diversity. J. Evol. Biol. 2002, 15:173-190.
31. Kent C, Azanchi R, Smith B, Formosa A, Levine J D. Social context influences chemical communication in D. melanogaster males. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:1384-1389.
32. Kilias G, Alahiotis S N, Pelecanos M. A multifactorial genetic investigation of speciation theory using Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 1980, 34:730-737.
33. Krupp J J, Kent C, Billeter J C, Azanchi R, So A K C, Schonfeld J A, Smith B P, Lucas C, Levine J D. Social experience modifies pheromone expression and mating behavior in male Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:1373-1383.
34. Kwan L, Bedhomme S, Prasad N G, Chippindale A K. Sexual conflict and environmental change: tradeoffs within and between the sexes during the evolution of desiccation resistance. J. Genet. 2008, 87:383-394.
35. Lande R. On comparing coefficients of variation. Syst. Zool. 1977, 26:214-217.
36. Lande R, Arnold S J. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 1983, 37:1210-1226.
37. Markow T A, Toolson E C. Temperature effects on epicuticular hydrocarbons and sexual isolation in Drosophila mojavensis. Ecological and evolutionary genetics of Drosophila 1990, 315-331. Barker J S F, Pp, , ed, Plenum Press, New York, NY
38. Mayr E. Systematics and the origin of species 1942, Columbia Univ. Press, New York, NY
39. McKinnon J S, Mori S, Blackman B K, David L, Kingsley D M, Jamieson L, Chou J, Schluter D. Evidence for ecology's role in speciation. Nature 2004, 429:294-298.
40. Mooers A thomampersan, Rundle H D, Whitlock M C. The effects of selection and bottlenecks on male mating success in peripheral isolates. Am. Nat. 1999, 153:437-444.
41. Morrow E H, Stewart A D, Rice W R. Patterns of sperm precedence are not affected by female mating history in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 2005, 59:2608-2615.
42. Nelson D R. Methyl-branched lipids in insects. Insect lipids: chemistry, biochemistry and biology 1993, 271-315. Stanley-Samuelson D WNelson D R. Pp, , eds, Univ. of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE
43. Newman J A, Bergelson J, Grafen A. Blocking factors and hypothesis tests in ecology: is your statistics text wrong?. Ecology 1997, 78:1312-1320.
44. Nosil P, Crespi B J, Sandoval C P. Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation. Nature 2002, 417:440-443.
45. Nosil P, Harmon L J, Seehausen O. Ecological explanations for (incomplete) speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:145-156.
46. Ödeen A, Florin A-B. Effective population size may limit the power of laboratory experiments to demonstrate sympatric and parapatric speciation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2000, 267:601-606.
47. Parker G. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects 1979, 123-166. Blum M SBlum N A. Pp, , eds, Academic Press, New York, NY
48. Pérez-Figueroa A, Caballero A, Rolán-Alvarez E. Comparing the estimation properties of different statistics for measuring sexual isolation from mating frequencies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2005, 85:307-318.
49. Petfield D, Chenoweth S F, Rundle H D, Blows M W. Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variances in male sexual display traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102:6045-6050.
50. Quinn G P, Keough M J. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists 2002, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, NY
51. Rice W R, Chippindale A K. Intersexual ontogenetic conflict. J. Evol. Biol. 2001, 14:685-696.
52. Rice W R, Hostert E E. Laboratory experiments on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years?. Evolution 1993, 47:1637-1653.
53. Rouault J, Capy P, Jallon J-M. Variations of male cuticular hydrocarbons with geoclimatic variables: an adaptative mechanism in Drosophila melanogaster?. Genetica 2001, 110:117-130.
54. Rundle H D. Divergent environments and population bottlenecks fails to generate premating isolation in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 2003, 57:2557-2565.
55. Rundle H D, Nosil P. Ecological speciation. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:336-352.
56. Rundle H D, Whitlock M C. A genetic interpretation of ecologically dependent isolation. Evolution 2001, 55:198-201.
57. Rundle H D, Mooers A thomampersan, Whitlock M C. Single founder-flush events and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Evolution 1998, 52:1850-1855.
58. Rundle H D, Nagel L, Boughman J W, Schluter D. Natural selection and parallel speciation in sympatric sticklebacks. Science 2000, 287:306-308.
59. Schluter D. The ecology of adaptive radiation 2000, Oxford Univ. Press, New York, NY
60. Schluter D. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16:372-380.
61. Toolson E C, Kuper-Simbron R. Laboratory evolution of epicuticular hydrocarbon composition and cuticular permeability in Drosophila pseudoobscura: effects on sexual dimorphism and thermal-acclimation ability?. Evolution 1989, 43:468-473.
62. Whitlock M C. The red queen beats the jack-of-all trades: the limitations on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity and niche breadth. Am. Nat. 1996, 148:S65-S77.