Rapid evolution of cuticular hydrocarbons in a species radiation of acoustically diverse Hawaiian crickets (Gryllidae: Trigonidiinae: Laupala)

Evolution

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 223-231

  Mullen, Sean P ^a   Mendelson, Tamra C ^b   Schal, Coby ^c   Shaw, Kerry L ^a  

^a University of Maryland   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

^c NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Acoustic communication; Biogeography; Chemical communication; Courtship; Hawaii; Laupala; Premating isolation; Sexual signals; Speciation

Indexed keywords

LIPID;

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; BIOACOUSTICS; CHEMICAL CUE; CONSPECIFIC; CRICKET; CUTICLE; DIVERGENCE; GENE FLOW; HYDROCARBON; ISLAND BIOGEOGRAPHY; LIPID; MATE CHOICE; MATE RECOGNITION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SIGNALING; SONG;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; GRYLLIDAE; MALE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; UNITED STATES;

ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ANIMALS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, GAS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; GENETIC SPECIATION; GEOGRAPHY; GRYLLIDAE; HAWAII; LIPIDS; MALE; PHYLOGENY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REPRODUCTION; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

HAWAII [UNITED STATES]; HAWAIIAN ISLANDS; MAUI; NORTH AMERICA; PACIFIC ISLANDS; PACIFIC OCEAN; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA; GRYLLIDAE; LAUPALA; TRIGONIDIINAE;

EID: 33947283720     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00019.x     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Aitchinson, J. 1986. The statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman and Hall, New York.
2. Alonzo, S. H., and B. Sinervo. 2001. Mate choice games, context-dependent good genes, and genetic cycles in the side-blotched lizard, Uta stansburiana. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49:176-186.
3. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton
4. Balakrishnan, R., and G. S. Pollack. 1997. The role of sensory cues in female responses to courting males in the cricket Teleogryllus oceanus. J. Exp. Biol. 200:511-522.
5. Bateson, M., and S. D. Healy. 2005. Comparative evaluation and its implications for mate choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20:659-664.
6. Boake, C. R. B. 2005. Sexual selection and speciation in Hawaiian Drosophila. Behav. Genet. 35:297-303.
7. Boughman, J.W. 2001. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 411:944-948.
8. Buckley, S. H., T. Tregenza, and R. K. Butlin. 2003. Transitions in cuticular composition across a hybrid zone: historical accident or environmental adaptation? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 78:193-201.
9. Candolin, U. 2003. The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol. Rev. 78:575- 595.
10. Coyne, J. A., A. P. Crittenden, and K. Mah. 1994. Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science 265:1461-1464.
11. deCarvalho, T. N., and K. L. Shaw. 2005. Nuptial feeding of spermless spermatophores in the Hawaiian swordtail cricket, Laupala pacifica (Gryllidae: Triginodiinae). Naturwissenschaften 92:483-487.
12. Endler, J. A. 1992. Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am. Nat. 139:S125-S153.
13. Etges, W. J., and M. A. Ahrens. 2001. Premating isolation is determined by larval-rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. V. Deep geographic variation in epicuticular hydrocarbons among isolated populations. Am. Nat. 158:585-598.
14. Ferveur, J. F. 2005. Cuticular hydrocarbons: their evolution and roles in Drosophila pheromonal communication. Behav. Genet. 35:279-295.
15. Funk, D. J. 1998. Isolating a role for natural selection in speciation: host adaptation and sexual isolation in Neochlamisus bebbianae leaf beetles. Evolution 52:1744-1759.
16. Gleason, J. M., and M. G. Ritchie. 1998. Evolution of courtship song and reproductive isolation in the Drosophila willistoni species complex; do sexual signals diverge the most quickly? Evolution 52:1493-1500.
17. Gleason, J. M., J.-M. Jallon, J-D. Rouault, and M. G. Ritchie. 2005. Quantitative trait loci for cuticular hydrocarbons associated with sexual isolation between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Genetics 171:1789- 1798.
18. Hankison, S. J., and M. R. Morris. 2002. Sexual selection and species recognition in the pygmy swordtail, Xiphophorus pygmaeus: conflicting preferences. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 51:140-145.
19. Hassanali, A., P. G. N. Njagi, and M. Omer Bashir. 2005. Chemical ecology of locusts and related acridids. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 50:223-245.
20. Hebets, E. A., and D. R. Papaj. 2005. Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 57:197- 214.
21. Howard, R. W., and G. J. Blomquist. 2005. Ecological, behavioral, and biochemical aspects of insect hydrocarbons. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 50:371- 393.
22. Jennions, M. D., and M. Petrie. 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. 72:283- 327.
23. Johnstone, R. A. 1996. Multiple displays in animal communication: 'Backup signals' and 'multiple messages.' Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 351:329-338.
24. Kansehiro, K. Y. 1976. Ethological isolation and phylogeny in the planitibia subgroup of Hawaiian Drosophila. Evolution 30:740-745.
25. Kansehiro, K. Y. 1980. Sexual isolation, speciation, and the direction of evolution. Evolution 34:437-444.
26. Kondric-Brown, A., and P. E. Nicoletto. 2001. Female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): the interaction between male color and display. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50:346-351.
27. Kortet, R., and A. Hedrick. 2005. The scent of dominance: female field crickets use odour to predict the outcome of male competition. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 59:77-83.
28. Kwiatkowski, M. A., and B. K. Sullivan. 2002. Geographic variation in sexual selection among poulations of an iguanid lizard, Sauromalus obesus (=ater). Evolution 56:2039-2051.
29. Lande, R. 1982. Rapid origin of sexual isolation and character divergence in a cline. Evolution 36:213-223.
30. Liang, D., and J. Silverman. 2000. "You are what you eat": Diet modifies cuticular hydrocarbons and nestmate recognition in the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile. Naturwissenschaften 87:412-416.
31. Liebig, J., C. Peeters, N. J. Oldham, C. Marksẗader, and B. Ḧolldobler. 2000. Are variations in cuticular hydrocarbons of queens andworkers a reliable signal of fertility in the ant Harpegnathos saltator? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:4124-4131.
32. McLain, D. K. 2005. Female soldier beetles display a flexible preference for selectively favored male phenotypes. Evolution 59:1086-1095.
33. Mendelson, T. C. and K. L. Shaw. 2002. Genetic and behavioral components of the cryptic species boundary between Laupala cerasina and L. kohalensis (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Genetica 116:301-310.
34. Mendelson, T. C., and K. L. Shaw. 2005. Sexual behavior: rapid speciation in an arthropod. Nature 433:375-376.
35. Mendelson, T. C., and K. L. Shaw. 2006. Close-range acoustic signaling and mate choice in Hawaiian crickets (Gryllidae: Laupala). Behav. Ecol. Socio. 59:770-776.
36. Neems, R. M., and R. K. Butlin. 1994. Variation in cuticular hydrocarbons across a hybrid zone in the grassphopper Chorthippus parallelus. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 257:135-149.
37. Neems, R. M., and R. K. Butlin. 1995. Divergence in cuticular hydrocarbons between subspecies of the meadow grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 54:139-149.
38. Nojima, S., C. Schal, F. X. Webster, R. G. Santangelo, and W. L. Roelofs. 2005. Identification of the sex pheromone of the German cockroach, Blattella germanica. Science 307:1104-1106.
39. Noorman, N., and C. J. Den Otter. 2002. Effects of relative humidity, temperature, and population density on production of cuticular hydrocarbons in housefly Musca domestica L. J. Chem. Ecol. 28:1819-1829.
40. Nosil, P., B. J. Crespi, and C. P. Sandoval. 2002. Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation. Nature 417:440- 448.
41. Otte, D. 1994. The crickets of Hawaii: origin, systematics, and evolution. Orthoptera Society/Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Philadelphia.
42. Page, M., L. J. Nelson, G. L. Blomquist, and S. J. Seybold. 1997. Cuticular hydrocarbons as chemotaxonomic characters of pine engraver beetles (Ips ssp.) in the grandicollis subgeneric group. J. Chem. Ecol. 23:1053- 1099.
43. Parsons, Y. M. and K. L. Shaw. 2001. Species boundaries and genetic diversity among Hawaiian crickets of the genus Laupala identified using amplified fragment length polymorphism. Mol. Ecol. 10:1765-1772.
44. Patricelli, G. L., J. A. C. Uy, and G. Borgia. 2003. Multiple male traits interact: attractive bower decorations facilitate attractive behavioral displays in satin bowerbirds. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 270:2389-2395.
45. Rantala, M. J., I. Jokinen, R. Kortet, A. Vainikka, and J. Suhonen. 2002. Do pheromones reveal immunocompetence? Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 269:1681-1685.
46. Rantala, M. J., R. Kortet, and A. Vainikka. 2003. The role of juvenile hormone in immune function and pheromone production trade-offs: a test of the immunocompetence handicap principle. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 270:2257-2261.
47. Rantala, M. J., and R. Kortet. 2004. Male dominance and immunocompetence in a field cricket. Behav. Ecol. 15:187-191.
48. Reyment, R. A. 1989. Compositional data analysis. Terra Nova 1:29-34.
49. Rundle, H. D., S. F. Chenoweth, P. Doughty, and M.W. Blows. 2005. Divergent selection and the evolution of signal traits and mating preferences. PLOS Biol. 3:1988-1995.
50. Rundle, H. D., L. Nagel, J.W. Boughman, and D. Schluter. 2000. Natural selection and parallel speciation in sympatric sticklebacks. Science 287:306- 308.
51. Schulter, D., and T. Price. 1993. Honest perception and population divergence in sexual selected traits. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 253:117-122.
52. Shaw, K. L. 1995. Biogeographic patterns of two independent Hawaiian cricket radiations (Laupala and Prognathogryllus). in W. L. Wagner and V. A. Funk, eds. Hawaiian biogeography: evolution on a hot spot. Archipelago. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
53. Shaw, K. L. 1996. Sequential radiations and patterns of speciation in the Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala inferred from DNA sequences. Evolution 56:237-255.
54. -. 1999. A nested analysis of song groups and species boundaries in the Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala. Mol. Phy. Evol. 11:332-341.
55. -. 2000a. Further acoustic diversity in Hawaiian forests: two new species of Hawaiian cricket (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Laupala). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 129:73-91.
56. -. 2000b. Interspecific genetics of mate recognition: inheritance of female acoustic preference in Hawaiian crickets. Evolution 54:1303-1312.
57. -. 2002. Conflict between mitochondrial and nuclear DNA phylogenies of a recent species radiation: what mtDNA reveals and conceals about modes of speciation in Hawaiian crickets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:16122-16127.
58. Shaw, K. L., and P. Danley. 2003. Behavioral genomics and the study of speciation at a porous species boundary. Zoology 106:261-273.
59. Shaw, K. L., and D. Herlihy. 2000. Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 267:577-584.
60. Shaw, K. L., and E. Lugo. 2001. Mating asymmetry and the direction of evolution in the Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala. Mol. Ecol. 10:751- 759.
61. Shaw, K. L., and A. H. Khine. 2004. Courtship behavior in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina: males provide spermless spermatophoes as nuptial gifts. Ethology 110:81-95.
62. Simmons, L. W. 1990. Pheromonal cues for the recognition of kin by female field crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus. Anim. Behav. 40:192-195.
63. Stennett, M. D., and W. J. Etges. 1997. Pre-mating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. III. Epicuticular hydrocarbon variation is determined by use of different host plants in Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonae. J. Chem. Ecol. 23:2803-2824.
64. Takahashi, A., S.-C. Tsaur, J. A. Coyne, and C.-L. Wu. 2001. The nucleotide changes governing cuticular hydrocarbon variation and their evolution in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:3920-3925.
65. Takahashi, A., and C.-T. Ting. 2004. Genetic basis of sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 120:273-284.
66. Tregenza, T., and N. Wedell. 1997. Definitive evidence for cuticular pheromones in a cricket. Anim. Behav. 54:979-984.
67. Tregenza, T., V. L. Pritchard, and R. K. Butlin. 2000. Patterns of trait divergence between populations of the meadow grasshopper, Chorthippus parallelus. Evolution 54:574-585.
68. Van Doorn, G. S., and F. J.Weissing. 2004. The evolution of female preferences for multiple indicators of quality. Am. Nat. 164:173-186.
69. Vander Meer, R. K., M. D. Breed, K. E. Espelie, and M. L. Winston, eds. 1998. Pheromone communication in social insects: ants, wasps, bees and termites. Westview, Boulder, CO.
70. Via, S. 1999. Reproductive isolation between sympatric races of pea aphids. I. Gene flow restriction and habitat choice. Evolution 53:1446-1457.
71. Wong, B. B. M., H. S. Fisher, and G. G. Rosenthal. 2005. Species recognition by male swordtails via chemical cues. Behav. Ecol. 16:818-822.