Students as teachers: Effectiveness of a peer-led STEM learning programme over 10 years

Educational Research and Evaluation

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 210-230

  Drane, Denise ^a   Micari, Marina ^a   Light, Gregory ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

peer instruction; retention; small group learning; STEM education; underrepresented students

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898012514     PISSN: 13803611     EISSN: 17444187     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13803611.2014.895388     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Bonous-Hammarth, M. (2006). Promoting student participation in science, technology, engineering and mathematics careers. In W. R. Allen, M. Bonus-Hammarth, & R. T. Teranishi (Eds.), Higher education in a global society: Achieving diversity, equity, and excellence (pp. 269-282). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
2. Bonsangue, M., & Drew, D. (1995). Mathematics: Opening the gates - Increasing minority students' success in calculus. In J. Gainen & E. Willemsen (Eds.), Fostering student success in quantitative gateway courses (New directions for teaching and learning, No. 61, pp. 23-33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3. Born, W. K., Revelle, W., & Pinto, L. H. (2002). Improving biology performance with workshop groups. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11, 347-365.
4. Carbone, E. (1999). Students behaving badly in large classes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 77, 35-43.
5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.
6. Downing, K., Ning, F., & Shin, K. (2011). Impact of problem-based learning on student experience and metacognitive development. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 5, 55-69.
7. Drane, D., Smith, H. D., Light, G., Pinto, L., & Swarat, S. (2005). The Gateway Science Workshop Program: Enhancing student performance and retention in the sciences through peer-facilitated discussion. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, 337-352.
8. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
9. Freeman, T. M., Anderman, L. H., & Jensen, J. M. (2007). Sense of belonging in college freshmen at the classroom and campus levels. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75, 203-220.
10. Geske, J. (1992). Overcoming the drawbacks of the large lecture class. College Teaching, 40, 151-154.
11. Gneezy, U., Niederle, M., & Rustichini, A. (2003). Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1049-1074.
12. Gosser, D., Kampmeier, J. A., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2010). Peer-led team learning: 2008 James Flack Norris Award address. Journal of Chemical Education, 87, 374-380.
13. Gosser, D., Roth, V., Gafney, L., Kampmeier, J., Strozac, V., Varma-Nelson, P, Weiner, M. (1996). Workshop chemistry: Overcoming barriers to student success. The Chemical Educator Online, 1, 1-17.
14. Hendry, G. D., Ryan, G., & Harris, J. (2003). Group problems in problem-based learning. Medical Teacher, 25, 609-616.
15. Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141-158.
16. Higher Education Research Institute. (2010, January). Degrees of success: Bachelor's degree completion rates among initial STEM majors (HERI/CIRP Research Brief). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
17. Hockings, S. C., DeAngelis, K. J., & Frey, R. F. (2008). Peer-led team learning in general chemistry: Implementation and evaluation. Journal of Chemical Education, 85, 990-996.
18. Hoffman, M., Richmond, J., Morrow, J., & Salomone, K. (2003). Investigating "sense of belonging" in first-year college students. Journal of College Student Retention, 4, 227-256.
19. Horwitz, S., Rodger, S. H., Biggers, M., Binkley, D., Kolin Frantz, C., Gundermann, D., Sweat, M. (2009). Using peer-led team learning to increase participation and success of under-represented groups in introductory computer science. In Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 163-167). New York, NY: ACM.
20. Iiskala, T., Vauras, V., Lehtinen, E., & Salonen, P. (2011). Socially shared metacognition of dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem-solving processes. Learning and Instruction, 21, 379-393.
21. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom (2nd ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
22. Kaufman, A., Mennin, S., Waterman, R., Duban, S., Hansbarger, C., Silverblatt, H., Samet, J. (1989). The New Mexico experiment: Educational innovation and institutional change. Academic Medicine, 64, 285-294.
23. King, A. (1990). Enhancing peer interaction and learning in the classroom through reciprocal peer questioning. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 664-687.
24. King, A., & Rosenshine, B. (1993). Effects of guided cooperative-questioning on children's knowledge construction. The Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 127-148.
25. Klein, R. B. (2004). Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26. Lewis, A. D., Braganza Menezes, D. A., McDermott, H. E., Hibbert, L. J., Brennan, S.-L., Ross, E. E., & Jones, L. A. (2009). A comparison of course-related stressors in undergraduate versus problem-based learning (PBL) versus non-PBL medical programs. BMC Medical Education, 9, Art. no. 60. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-9-60
27. Lewis, S. E., & Lewis, J. E. (2005). Departing from lectures: An evaluation of a peer-led guided inquiry alternative. Journal of Chemical Education, 82, 135-139.
28. Lichtenstein, M. (2005). The importance of classroom environments in the assessment of learning community outcomes. Journal of College Student Development, 46, 341-356.
29. Light, G., & Micari, M. (2013). Making scientists: Six principles for effective college teaching. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Lowell, B., Salzman, H., Bernstein, H., & Henderson, E. (2009, November). Steady as she goes? Three generations of students through the science and engineering pipeline. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management Washington, DC.
31. Lyle, K. S., & Robinson, W. R. (2003). A statistical evaluation: Peer-led team learning in an organic chemistry course. Chemical Education Today, 80, 132-134.
32. McLean, M., Van Wyk, J. M., Peters-Futre, E. M., & Higgins-Opitz, S. B. (2006). The small group in problem-based learning: More than a cognitive "learning" experience for first-year medical students in a diverse population. Medical Teacher, 28, e94-e103.
33. Meltzer, D. E., & Manivannan, K. (2002). Transforming the lecture-hall environment: The fully interactive physics lecture. American Journal of Physics, 70, 639-654.
34. Micari, M., & Drane, D. (2011). Intimidation in small learning groups: The roles of social-comparison concern, comfort, and individual characteristics in student academic outcomes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12, 175-187.
35. Micari, M., Pazos, P., Streitwieser, B., & Light, G. (2010). Small-group learning in undergraduate STEM disciplines: Effect of group type on student achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16, 269-286.
36. Munkeby, A., Drane, D., & Light, G. (2005, April). Supporting innovative freshman study: The Engineering Workshop Program at Northwestern University. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering, Portland, OR.
37. Nelson, P. E., & Pearson, J. C. (1999). Large lecture classes. In A. L. Vangelisti, J. A. Daly, & G. W. Friedrich (Eds.), Teaching communication: Theory, research, and methods (pp. 347-357). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 1067-1101.
39. Prince, M., & Felder, R. (2007). The many faces of inductive teaching and learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36, 14-20.
40. Qin, Z., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1995). Cooperative versus competitive efforts and problem solving. Review of Educational Research, 65, 129-143.
41. Quitadamo, I., Brahler, C. J., & Crouch, G. J. (2009). Peer-led team learning: A prospective method for increasing critical thinking in undergraduate science courses. Science Educator, 18, 29-39.
42. Rask, K. (2010). Attrition in STEM fields at a liberal arts college: The importance of grades and pre-collegiate preferences. Economics of Education Review, 29, 892-900.
43. Read, B., Archer, L., & Leathwood, C. (2003). Challenging cultures? Student conceptions of "belonging" and "isolation" at a post-1992 university. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 261-277.
44. Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2 Cognition, perception, and language (5th ed., pp. 679-744). New York, NY: Wiley.
45. Saleh, M., Lazonder, A. W., & De Jong, T. (2007). Structuring collaboration in mixed-ability groups to promote verbal interaction, learning, and motivation of average-ability students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 314-331.
46. Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111-139.
47. Severiens, S. E., & Ten Dam, G. T. M. (1994). Gender differences in learning styles: A narrative review and a quantitative meta-analysis. Higher Education, 27, 487-501.
48. Sperry, R. A., & Tedford, P. (2008). Implementing peer-led team learning in introductory computer science courses. Journal of Computing in Small Colleges, 23, 30-35.
49. Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 21-51.
50. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.
51. Summers, J. J., Gorin, J. S., Beretvas, S. N., & Svinicki, M. D. (2005). Evaluating collaborative learning and community. The Journal of Experimental Education, 73, 165-188.
52. Swarat, S., Drane, D., Smith, H. D., Light, G., & Pinto, L. (2004). Opening the gateway: Increasing student retention in introductory science courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 34, 18-23.
53. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
54. Tien, L. T., Roth, V., & Kampmeier, J. A. (2002). Implementation of a peer-led learning instructional approach in an undergraduate organic chemistry course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 606-632.
55. Treisman, U. (1992). Studying students studying calculus: A look at the lives of minority mathematics students in college. The College Mathematics Journal, 23, 362-372.
56. Van Boxtel, C., Van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10, 311-330.
57. Van Vugt, M., De Cremer, D., & Janssen, D. P. (2007). Gender differences in cooperation and competition. Psychological Science, 18, 19-23.
58. Visschers-Pleijers, A. J. S. F., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2004). Exploration of a method to analyze group interactions in problem-based learning. Medical Teacher, 26, 471-478.
59. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60. Wamser, C. C. (2006). Peer-led team learning in organic chemistry: Effects on student performance, success, and persistence in the course. Journal of Chemical Education, 83, 1562-1566.
61. Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21-39.
62. Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 366-389.
63. Webb, N. M., & Farivar, S. (1994). School mathematics: Promoting helping behavior in cooperative small groups in middle school mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 369-395.
64. Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 17, 89-100.