Characterization of the altered gene expression profile in early porcine embryos generated from parthenogenesis and somatic cell chromatin transfer

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

  Zhou, Chi ^a   Dobrinsky, John ^b   Tsoi, Stephen ^a   Foxcroft, George R ^a   Dixon, Walter T ^a   Stothard, Paul ^a   Verstegen, John ^b   Dyck, Michael K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b Minitube of America   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIPEPTIDYL PEPTIDASE IV; INITIATION FACTOR 4E; MAMMALIAN TARGET OF RAPAMYCIN; NOTCH RECEPTOR; PROTEIN P53; S6 KINASE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR GATA 2; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG; CHROMATIN; TRANSCRIPTOME;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; DISORDERS OF MITOCHONDRIAL FUNCTIONS; DOWN REGULATION; DPP4 GENE; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EXPANDED BLASTOCYST; GATA2 GENE; GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE TARGETING; IN VIVO STUDY; INFERTILITY THERAPY; KRT8 GENE; LGMN GENE; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NANOG GENE; NIDATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PARTHENOGENESIS; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PREDICTION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SOMATIC CELL CHROMATIN TRANSFER; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; TROPHOBLAST; UBIQUITINATION; ANIMAL; CELL NUCLEUS TRANSPLANTATION; CHROMATIN; CYTOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; SWINE;

ANIMALS; BLASTOCYST; CHROMATIN; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; NUCLEAR TRANSFER TECHNIQUES; PARTHENOGENESIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SWINE; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84898000330     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091728     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Kikuchi K, Onishi A, Kashiwazaki N, Iwamoto M, Noguchi J, et al. (2002) Successful piglet production after transfer of blastocysts produced by a modified in vitro system. Biol Reprod 66: 1033-1041. (Pubitemid 34263123)
2. Lonergan P (2007) State-of-the-art embryo technologies in cattle. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 64: 315-325.
3. Nánássy L, Lee K, Jávor A, Macháty Z (2008) Effects of activation methods and culture conditions on development of parthenogenetic porcine embryos. Anim Reprod Sci 104: 264-274.
4. Rodriguez-Osorio N, Wang Z, Kasinathan P, Page G, Robl J, et al. (2009) Transcriptional reprogramming of gene expression in bovine somatic cell chromatin transfer embryos. BMC Genomics 10: 190.
5. Vejlsted M, Du Y, Vajta G, Maddox-Hyttel P (2006) Post-hatching development of the porcine and bovine embryo-defining criteria for expected development in vivo and in vitro. Theriogenology 65: 153-165. (Pubitemid 41688339)
6. Wang Y, Su J, Wang L, Xu W, Quan F, et al. (2011) The effects of 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine and trichostatin A on gene expression and DNA methylation status in cloned bovine blastocysts. Cell Reprogram 13: 297-306. 10.1089/cell.2010.0098; 10.1089/cell.2010.0098.
7. Mesquita FS, Machado SA, Drnevich J, Borowicz P, Wang Z, et al. (2013) Influence of cloning by chromatin transfer on placental gene expression at day 45 of pregnancy in cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 136: 231-244. 10.1016/j.anireprosci. 2012.10.030; 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.10.030.
8. Sullivan EJ, Kasinathan S, Kasinathan P, Robl JM, Collas P (2004) Cloned calves from chromatin remodeled in vitro. Biol Reprod 70: 146-153. 10.1095/biolreprod.103.021220. (Pubitemid 38063562)
9. Naturil-Alfonso C, Saenz-de-Juano MD, Peñaranda DS, Vicente JS, Marco-Jiménez F (2012) Transcriptome profiling of rabbit parthenogenetic blastocysts developed under in vivo conditions. PLoS ONE 7: e51271. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0051271.
10. Brevini TA, Gandolfi F (2008) Parthenotes as a source of embryonic stem cells. Cell Prolif 41 Suppl 1: 20-30. 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2008.00485.x; 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2008.00485.x.
11. Hao Y, Lai L, Mao J, Im G, Bonk A, et al. (2004) Apoptosis in parthenogenetic preimplantation porcine embryos. Biology of Reproduction 70: 1644-1649. (Pubitemid 38715619)
12. Yoshioka K, Noguchi M, Suzuki C (2012) Production of piglets from in vitro-produced embryos following non-surgical transfer. Anim Reprod Sci 131: 23-29. 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.01.018.
13. Glujovsky D, Blake D, Farquhar C, Bardach A (2012) Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7: CD002118. 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub4.
14. Duranthon V, Watson AJ, Lonergan P (2008) Preimplantation embryo programming: Transcription, epigenetics, and culture environment. Reproduction 135: 141-150. 10.1530/REP-07-0324. (Pubitemid 351267385)
15. Watson AJ, Barcroft LC (2001) Regulation of blastocyst formation. Front Biosci 6: D708-30.
16. Oestrup O, Hall V, Petkov SG, Wolf XA, Hyldig S, et al. (2009) From zygote to implantation: Morphological and molecular dynamics during embryo development in the pig. Reprod Domest Anim 44 Suppl 3: 39-49.
17. Seshagiri PB, Sen Roy S, Sireesha G, Rao RP (2009) Cellular and molecular regulation of mammalian blastocyst hatching. J Reprod Immunol 83: 79-84. 10.1016/j.jri.2009.06.264.
18. Tsoi S, Zhou C, Grant J, Pasternak A, Dobrinsky J, et al. (2012) Development of a porcine (sus scofa) embryo-specific microarray: Array annotation and validation. BMC Genomics 13: 370. Available: http://www. biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/13/370.
19. Degenstein KL, O'Donoghue R, Patterson JL, Beltranena E, Ambrose DJ, et al. (2008) Synchronization of ovulation in cyclic gilts with porcine luteinizing hormone (pLH) and its effects on reproductive function. Theriogenology 70: 1075-1085.
20. Sullivan EJ, Kasinathan S, Kasinathan P, Robl JM, Collas P (2004) Cloned calves from chromatin remodeled in vitro. Biol Reprod 70: 146-153. 10.1095/biolreprod.103.021220. (Pubitemid 38063562)
21. Collas P, Robl JM, Sullivan E, Kasinathan P (2007) Methods for cloning non-human mammals using reprogrammed donor chromatin or donor cells. US Patent 7253334 10/032,191.
22. Carlson DF, Garbe JR, Tan W, Martin MJ, Dobrinsky JR, et al. (2011) Strategies for selection marker-free swine transgenesis using the sleeping beauty transposon system. Transgenic Res 20: 1125-1137. 10.1007/s11248-010-9481- 7; 10.1007/s11248-010-9481-7.
23. Gilbert I, Scantland S, Sylvestre E, Gravel C, Laflamme I, et al. (2009) The dynamics of gene products fluctuation during bovine pre-hatching development. Mol Reprod Dev 76: 762-772. 10.1002/mrd.21030.
24. Kerr MK, Churchill GA (2001) Experimental design for gene expression microarrays. Biostatistics 2: 183-201. 10.1093/biostatistics/2.2.183.
25. Novoradovskaya N, Whitfield ML, Basehore LS, Novoradovsky A, Pesich R, et al. (2004) Universal reference RNA as a standard for microarray experiments. BMC Genomics 5: 20. 10.1186/1471-2164-5-20.
26. Konig R, Baldessari D, Pollet N, Niehrs C, Eils R (2004) Reliability of gene expression ratios for cDNA microarrays in multiconditional experiments with a reference design. Nucleic Acids Res 32: e29. 10.1093/nar/gnh027.
27. Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, et al. (2004) Bioconductor: Open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 5: R80. 10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80.
28. Smyth GK (2005) Limma: Linear models for microarray data. In: Gentleman R, Carey V, Huber W, Irizarry R, Dudoit S, editors. Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions Using R and Bioconductor. : Springer New York. pp. 397-420. 10.1007/0-387-29362-0-23. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0- 387-29362-0-23.
29. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society.Series B (Methodological) 57: 289-300. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2346101.
30. Robert C, Nieminen J, Dufort I, Gaël D, Grant JR, et al. (2011) Combining resources to obtain a comprehensive survey of the bovine embryo transcriptome through deep sequencing and microarrays. Mol Reprod Dev 78: 651-664.
31. Hellemans J, Mortier G, De Paepe A, Speleman F, Vandesompele J (2007) qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biol 8: R19. 10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r19.
32. Yuan JS, Reed A, Chen F, Stewart CN (2006) Statistical analysis of real-time PCR data. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 85. 10.1186/1471-2105-7-85.
33. Liu N, Enkemann SA, Liang P, Hersmus R, Zanazzi C, et al. (2010) Genome-wide gene expression profiling reveals aberrant MAPK and wnt signaling pathways associated with early parthenogenesis. Journal of Molecular Cell Biology 2: 333-344. 10.1093/jmcb/mjq029.
34. Whitworth KM, Agca C, Kim J, Patel RV, Springer GK, et al. (2005) Transcriptional profiling of pig embryogenesis by using a 15-K member unigene set specific for pig reproductive tissues and embryos. Biology of Reproduction 72: 1437-1451. (Pubitemid 40696087)
35. Isom SC, Stevens JR, Li R, Spollen WG, Cox L, et al. (2013) Transcriptional profiling by RNA-seq of peri-attachment porcine embryos generated using a variety of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Physiol Genomics. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00094.2012.
36. Whitworth KM, Zhao J, Spate LD, Li R, Prather RS (2011) Scriptaid corrects gene expression of a few aberrantly reprogrammed transcripts in nuclear transfer pig blastocyst stage embryos. Cell Reprogram 13: 191-204. 10.1089/cell.2010.0087; 10.1089/cell.2010.0087.
37. Schmitt E, Naveau M, Mechulam Y (2010) Eukaryotic and archaeal translation initiation factor 2: A heterotrimeric tRNA carrier. FEBS Lett 584: 405-412. 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.11.002; 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.11.002.
38. Shrestha N, Bahnan W, Wiley DJ, Barber G, Fields KA, et al. (2012) Eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2) signaling regulates proinflammatory cytokine expression and bacterial invasion. J Biol Chem 287: 28738-28744. 10.1074/jbc.M112.375915; 10.1074/jbc.M112.375915.
39. Laplante M, Sabatini DM (2009) mTOR signaling at a glance. J Cell Sci 122: 3589-3594. 10.1242/jcs.051011; 10.1242/jcs.051011.
40. Dowling RJO, Topisirovic I, Fonseca BD, Sonenberg N (2010) Dissecting the role of mTOR: Lessons from mTOR inhibitors. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics 1804: 433-439. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2009.12.001.
41. Ruvinsky I, Meyuhas O (2006) Ribosomal protein S6 phosphorylation: From protein synthesis to cell size. Trends Biochem Sci 31: 342-348. 10.1016/j.tibs.2006.04.003. (Pubitemid 43903237)
42. Gingras AC, Raught B, Sonenberg N (1999) eIF4 initiation factors: Effectors of mRNA recruitment to ribosomes and regulators of translation. Annu Rev Biochem 68: 913-963. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.913. (Pubitemid 29449212)
43. Mitchell M, Schulz SL, Armstrong DT, Lane M (2009) Metabolic and mitochondrial dysfunction in early mouse embryos following maternal dietary protein intervention. Biol Reprod 80: 622-630. 10.1095/biolreprod.108.072595; 10.1095/biolreprod.108.072595.
44. Thouas GA, Trounson AO, Wolvetang EJ, Jones GM (2004) Mitochondrial dysfunction in mouse oocytes results in preimplantation embryo arrest in vitro. Biol Reprod 71: 1936-1942. 10.1095/biolreprod.104.033589. (Pubitemid 39586939)
45. Hochstrasser M (1996) Ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation. Annu Rev Genet 30: 405-439. 10.1146/annurev.genet.30.1.405.
46. Dudek EJ, Lampi KJ, Lampi JA, Shang F, King J, et al. (2010) Ubiquitin proteasome pathway-mediated degradation of proteins: Effects due to site-specific substrate deamidation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51: 4164-4173. 10.1167/iovs.09-4087; 10.1167/iovs.09-4087.
47. DeRenzo C, Seydoux G (2004) A clean start: Degradation of maternal proteins at the oocyte-to-embryo transition. Trends Cell Biol 14: 420-426. 10.1016/j.tcb.2004.07.005. (Pubitemid 39092699)
48. Molchadsky A, Rivlin N, Brosh R, Rotter V, Sarig R (2010) P53 is balancing development, differentiation and de-differentiation to assure cancer prevention. Carcinogenesis 31: 1501-1508. 10.1093/carcin/bgq101; 10.1093/carcin/bgq101.
49. Hata H, Tatemichi M, Nakadate T (2012) Involvement of annexin A8 in the properties of pancreatic cancer. Mol Carcinog. 10.1002/mc.21961; 10.1002/mc.21961.
50. Hammond EM, Mandell DJ, Salim A, Krieg AJ, Johnson TM, et al. (2006) Genome-wide analysis of p53 under hypoxic conditions. Mol Cell Biol 26: 3492-3504. 10.1128/MCB.26.9.3492-3504.2006.
51. Shepherd AK, Singh R, Wesley CS (2009) Notch mRNA expression in drosophila embryos is negatively regulated at the level of mRNA 3′ processing. PLoS One 4: e8063. 10.1371/journal.pone.0008063; 10.1371/journal.pone.0008063.
52. Bolos V, Grego-Bessa J, de la Pompa JL (2007) Notch signaling in development and cancer. Endocr Rev 28: 339-363. 10.1210/er.2006-0046. (Pubitemid 46984831)
53. Donoviel DB, Hadjantonakis AK, Ikeda M, Zheng H, Hyslop PS, et al. (1999) Mice lacking both presenilin genes exhibit early embryonic patterning defects. Genes Dev 13: 2801-2810.
54. Ye Y, Lukinova N, Fortini ME (1999) Neurogenic phenotypes and altered notch processing in drosophila presenilin mutants. Nature 398: 525-529. 10.1038/19096.
55. Lindsell CE, Shawber CJ, Boulter J, Weinmaster G (1995) Jagged: A mammalian ligand that activates Notch1. Cell 80: 909-917.
56. Ohtsuka T, Ishibashi M, Gradwohl G, Nakanishi S, Guillemot F, et al. (1999) Hes1 and Hes5 as notch effectors in mammalian neuronal differentiation. EMBO J 18: 2196-2207. 10.1093/emboj/18.8.2196. (Pubitemid 29179176)
57. Ferjentsik Z, Hayashi S, Dale JK, Bessho Y, Herreman A, et al. (2009) Notch is a critical component of the mouse somitogenesis oscillator and is essential for the formation of the somites. PLoS Genet 5: e1000662. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000662; 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000662.
58. Strumpf D, Mao CA, Yamanaka Y, Ralston A, Chawengsaksophak K, et al. (2005) Cdx2 is required for correct cell fate specification and differentiation of trophectoderm in the mouse blastocyst. Development 132: 2093-2102. 10.1242/dev.01801. (Pubitemid 40744469)
59. Ma GT, Roth ME, Groskopf JC, Tsai FY, Orkin SH, et al. (1997) GATA-2 and GATA-3 regulate trophoblast-specific gene expression in vivo. Development 124: 907-914. (Pubitemid 27107438)
60. Assou S, Boumela I, Haouzi D, Monzo C, Dechaud H, et al. (2012) Transcriptome analysis during human trophectoderm specification suggests new roles of metabolic and epigenetic genes. PLoS ONE 7: e39306. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0039306.
61. Alam H, Gangadaran P, Bhate AV, Chaukar DA, Sawant SS, et al. (2011) Loss of keratin 8 phosphorylation leads to increased tumor progression and correlates with clinico-pathological parameters of OSCC patients. PLoS One 6: e27767. 10.1371/journal.pone.0027767.
62. Baribault H, Price J, Miyai K, Oshima RG (1993) Mid-gestational lethality in mice lacking keratin 8. Genes Dev 7: 1191-1202. (Pubitemid 23207410)
63. Hesse M, Franz T, Tamai Y, Taketo MM, Magin TM (2000) Targeted deletion of keratins 18 and 19 leads to trophoblast fragility and early embryonic lethality. EMBO J 19: 5060-5070. 10.1093/emboj/19.19.5060.
64. Viswanathan SR, Mermel CH, Lu J, Lu CW, Golub TR, et al. (2009) microRNA expression during trophectoderm specification. PLoS One 4: e6143. 10.1371/journal.pone.0006143; 10.1371/journal.pone.0006143.
65. Yang Y, Bai W, Zhang L, Yin G, Wang X, et al. (2008) Determination of microRNAs in mouse preimplantation embryos by microarray. Dev Dyn 237: 2315-2327. 10.1002/dvdy.21666; 10.1002/dvdy.21666.
66. Castro FO, Sharbati S, Rodriguez-Alvarez LL, Cox JF, Hultschig C, et al. (2010) MicroRNA expression profiling of elongated cloned and in vitro-fertilized bovine embryos. Theriogenology 73: 71-85. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.08.003; 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.08.003.
67. Foltz M, Boll M, Raschka L, Kottra G, Daniel H (2004) A novel bifunctionality: PAT1 and PAT2 mediate electrogenic proton/amino acid and electroneutral proton/fatty acid symport. FASEB J 18: 1758-1760. 10.1096/fj.03-1387fje. (Pubitemid 39561675)
68. Klein C, Scoggin KE, Ealy AD, Troedsson MH (2010) Transcriptional profiling of equine endometrium during the time of maternal recognition of pregnancy. Biol Reprod 83: 102-113. 10.1095/biolreprod.109.081612; 10.1095/biolreprod.109.081612.
69. Degrelle SA, Blomberg Le A, Garrett WM, Li RW, Talbot NC (2009) Comparative proteomic and regulatory network analyses of the elongating pig conceptus. Proteomics 9: 2678-2694. 10.1002/pmic.200800776; 10.1002/pmic. 200800776
70. Ledgard AM, Lee RS, Peterson AJ (2009) Bovine endometrial legumain and TIMP-2 regulation in response to presence of a conceptus. Mol Reprod Dev 76: 65-74. 10.1002/mrd.20931; 10.1002/mrd.20931.
71. Fujiwara H, Higuchi T, Sato Y, Nishioka Y, Zeng BX, et al. (2005) Regulation of human extravillous trophoblast function by membrane-bound peptidases. Biochim Biophys Acta 1751: 26-32. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2005.04.007. (Pubitemid 41033291)