Transcriptional profiling by RNA-seq of peri-attachment porcine embryos generated by a variety of assisted reproductive technologies

Physiological Genomics

Volumn 45, Issue 14, 2013, Pages 577-589

  Isom, S Clay ^a,b   Stevens, John R ^a   Li, Rongfeng ^b   Spollen, William G ^b   Cox, Lindsay ^a   Spate, Lee D ^b   Murphy, Clifton N ^b   Prather, Randall S ^b  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

ART; Illumina; In vitro embryo production; In vitro fertilization; Parthenogenesis; Somatic cell nuclear transfer

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARY DNA; EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR; RNA; TRANSCRIPTOME; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA; UBIQUITIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; CELL CULTURE; CHROMATIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FERTILIZATION; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE SILENCING; GESTATIONAL AGE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; IN VITRO STUDY; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE MATURATION; PARTHENOGENESIS; PORCINE EMBRYO; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SOMATIC CELL NUCLEAR TRANSFER; STATISTICAL MODEL; SWINE; TROPHOBLAST;

ART; ILLUMINA; IN VITRO EMBRYO PRODUCTION; IN VITRO FERTILIZATION; PARTHENOGENESIS; SOMATIC CELL NUCLEAR TRANSFER;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; SWINE;

EID: 84880294602     PISSN: 10948341     EISSN: 15312267     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00094.2012     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Abeydeera LR, Day BN. In vitro penetration of pig oocytes in a modified Tris-buffered medium: effect of BSA, caffeine and calcium. Theriogenology 48: 537-544, 1997.
2. Alexa A, Rahnenfuhrer J, Lengauer T. Improved scoring of functional groups from gene expression data by decorrelating GO graph structure. Bioinformatics 22: 1600-1607, 2006.
3. Armstrong L, Lako M, Dean W, Stojkovic M. Epigenetic modification is central to genome reprogramming in somatic cell nuclear transfer. Stem Cells 24: 805-814, 2006.
4. Arnold DR, Fortier AL, Lefebvre R, Miglino MA, Pfarrer C, Smith LC. Placental insufficiencies in cloned animals - a workshop report. Placenta 29, Suppl A: S108-S110, 2008.
5. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, Harris MA, Hill DP, Issel-Tarver L, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese JC, Richardson JE, Ringwald M, Rubin GM, Sherlock G. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 25: 25-29, 2000.
6. Auer PL, Doerge RW. Statistical design and analysis of RNA sequencing data. Genetics 185: 405-416, 2010.
7. Balasubramanyam K, Altaf M, Varier RA, Swaminathan V, Ravindran A, Sadhale PP, Kundu TK. Polyisoprenylated benzophenone, garcinol, a natural histone acetyltransferase inhibitor, represses chromatin transcription and alters global gene expression. J Biol Chem 279: 33716-33726, 2004.
8. Bauer BK, Isom SC, Spate LD, Whitworth KM, Spollen WG, Blake SM, Springer GK, Murphy CN, Prather RS. Transcriptional profiling by deep sequencing identifies differences in mRNA transcript abundance in in vivo-derived versus in vitro-cultured porcine blastocyst stage embryos. Biol Reprod 83: 791-798, 2010.
9. Beissbarth T, Speed TP. GOstat: find statistically overrepresented Gene Ontologies within a group of genes. Bioinformatics 20: 1464-1465, 2004.
10. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate - a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc B Met 57: 289-300, 1995.
11. Brevini TA, Pennarossa G, Vanelli A, Maffei S, Gandolfi F. Parthenogenesis in non-rodent species: developmental competence and differentiation plasticity. Theriogenology 77: 766-772, 2012.
12. Calle A, Fernandez-Gonzalez R, Ramos-Ibeas P, Laguna-Barraza R, Perez-Cerezales S, Bermejo-Alvarez P, Ramirez MA, Gutierrez-Adan A. Long-term and transgenerational effects of in vitro culture on mouse embryos. Theriogenology 77: 785-793, 2012.
13. Castro FO, Sharbati S, Rodriguez-Alvarez LL, Cox JF, Hultschig C, Einspanier R. MicroRNA expression profiling of elongated cloned and in vitro-fertilized bovine embryos. Theriogenology 73: 71-85, 2010.
14. Chavatte-Palmer P, Camous S, Jammes H, Le Cleac'h N, Guillomot M, Lee RS. Review: Placental perturbations induce the developmental abnormalities often observed in bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer. Placenta 33, Suppl: S99-S104, 2012.
15. Cui XS, Xu YN, Shen XH, Zhang LQ, Zhang JB, Kim NH. Trichostatin A modulates apoptotic-related gene expression and improves embryo viability in cloned bovine embryos. Cell Reprogram 13: 179-189, 2011.
16. Cui XS, Zhang DX, Ko YG, Kim NH. Aberrant epigenetic reprogramming of imprinted microRNA-127 and Rtl1 in cloned mouse embryos. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 379: 390-394, 2009.
17. Dackor J, Li M, Threadgill DW. Placental overgrowth and fertility defects in mice with a hypermorphic allele of epidermal growth factor receptor. Mamm Genome 20: 339-349, 2009.
18. Dinnyes A, Tian XC, Yang X. Epigenetic regulation of foetal development in nuclear transfer animal models. Reprod Domest Anim 43, Suppl 2: 302-309, 2008.
19. Diskin MG, Morris DG. Embryonic and early foetal losses in cattle and other ruminants. Reprod Domest Anim 43, Suppl 2: 260-267, 2008.
20. Diskin MG, Parr MH, Morris DG. Embryo death in cattle: an update. Reprod Fertil Dev 24: 244-251, 2011.
21. ENCODE Consortium. Standards, Guidelines and Best Practices for RNASeq v1.0. National Human Genome Research Institute. Available at: http://www.encodeproject.org/ENCODE/protocols/dataStandards/ENCODE_RNAseq_Standards_V1.0.pdf.
22. Fahrudin M, Otoi T, Karja NW, Mori M, Murakami M, Suzuki T. Analysis of DNA fragmentation in bovine somatic nuclear transfer embryos using TUNEL. Reproduction 124: 813-819, 2002.
23. Falcon S, Gentleman R. Using GOstats to test gene lists for GO term association. Bioinformatics 23: 257-258, 2007.
24. Fang Z, Cui X. Design and validation issues in RNA-seq experiments. Brief Bioinform 12: 280-287, 2011.
25. Farin PW, Piedrahita JA, Farin CE. Errors in development of fetuses and placentas from in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology 65: 178-191, 2006.
26. Fernandez-Gonzalez R, Ramirez MA, Bilbao A, De Fonseca FR, Gutierrez-Adan A. Suboptimal in vitro culture conditions: an epigenetic origin of long-term health effects. Mol Reprod Dev 74: 1149-1156, 2007.
27. Gartel AL. Transcriptional inhibitors, p53 and apoptosis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1786: 83-86, 2008.
28. Geisert RD, Brookbank JW, Roberts RM, Bazer FW. Establishment of pregnancy in the pig: II. Cellular remodeling of the porcine blastocyst during elongation on day 12 of pregnancy. Biol Reprod 27: 941-955, 1982.
29. Geisert RD, Renegar RH, Thatcher WW, Roberts RM, Bazer FW. Establishment of pregnancy in the pig: I. Interrelationships between preimplantation development of the pig blastocyst and uterine endometrial secretions. Biol Reprod 27: 925-939, 1982.
30. Geisert RD, Schmitt RAM. Early embryonic survival in the pig: can it be improved? J Anim Sci 80: E54-E65, 2002.
31. Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S, Ellis B, Gautier L, Ge Y, Gentry J, Hornik K, Hothorn T, Huber W, Iacus S, Irizarry R, Leisch F, Li C, Maechler M, Rossini AJ, Sawitzki G, Smith C, Smyth G, Tierney L, Yang JY, Zhang J. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 5: R80, 2004.
32. Hao Y, Lai L, Mao J, Im GS, Bonk A, Prather RS. Apoptosis and in vitro development of preimplantation porcine embryos derived in vitro or by nuclear transfer. Biol Reprod 69: 501-507, 2003.
33. Illumina I. The Power of Replicates (Technical Note). 2010.
34. Isom SC, Prather RS, Rucker EB 3rd. Heat stress-induced apoptosis in porcine in vitro fertilized and parthenogenetic preimplantation-stage embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 74: 574-581, 2007.
35. Isom SC, Spollen WG, Blake SM, Bauer BK, Springer GK, Prather RS. Transcriptional profiling of day 12 porcine embryonic disc and trophectoderm samples using ultra-deep sequencing technologies. Mol Reprod Dev 77: 812-819, 2010.
36. Jackson-Grusby L, Beard C, Possemato R, Tudor M, Fambrough D, Csankovszki G, Dausman J, Lee P, Wilson C, Lander E, Jaenisch R. Loss of genomic methylation causes p53-dependent apoptosis and epigenetic deregulation. Nat Genet 27: 31-39, 2001.
37. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucl Acids Res 28: 27-30, 2000.
38. Kishigami S, Mishina Y. BMP signaling and early embryonic patterning. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 16: 265-278, 2005.
39. Kono T, Obata Y, Wu Q, Niwa K, Ono Y, Yamamoto Y, Park ES, Seo JS, Ogawa H. Birth of parthenogenetic mice that can develop to adulthood. Nature 428: 860-864, 2004.
40. Lai L, Prather RS. Production of cloned pigs by using somatic cells as donors. Cloning Stem Cells 5: 233-241, 2003.
41. Lazzari G, Wrenzycki C, Herrmann D, Duchi R, Kruip T, Niemann H, Galli C. Cellular and molecular deviations in bovine in vitro-produced embryos are related to the large offspring syndrome. Biol Reprod 67: 767-775, 2002.
42. Li R, Li Y, Kristiansen K, Wang J. SOAP: short oligonucleotide alignment program. Bioinformatics 24: 713-714, 2008.
43. Liu SZ, Yao LJ, Jiang MX, Lei ZL, Zhang LS, Zhang YL, Sun QY, Zheng YL, Song XF, Chen DY. Apoptosis in rabbit embryos produced by fertilization or nuclear transfer with fibroblasts and cumulus cells. Reproduction 130: 359-366, 2005.
44. Marguerat S, Bahler J. RNA-seq: from technology to biology. Cell Mol Life Sci 67: 569-579, 2010.
45. Marioni JC, Mason CE, Mane SM, Stephens M, Gilad Y. RNA-seq: an assessment of technical reproducibility and comparison with gene expression arrays. Genome Res 18: 1509-1517, 2008.
46. Martin L, Besch-Williford C, Lai L, Cheong HT, Im GS, Park KW, Murphy C, Hao Y, Ellersieck MR, Keisler DH, Schatten H, Green JA, Prather RS. Morphologic and histologic comparisons between in vivo and nuclear transfer derived porcine embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 74: 952-960, 2007.
47. Massuto DA, Kneese EC, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Hooper RN, Ing NH, Jaeger LA. Transforming growth factor beta (TGFB) signaling is activated during porcine implantation: proposed role for latency-associated peptide interactions with integrins at the conceptus-maternal interface. Reproduction 139: 465-478, 2010.
48. Miles JR, Blomberg LA, Krisher RL, Everts RE, Sonstegard TS, Van Tassell CP, Zuelke KA. Comparative transcriptome analysis of in vivoand in vitro-produced porcine blastocysts by small amplified RNA-serial analysis of gene expression (SAR-SAGE). Mol Reprod Dev 75: 976-988, 2008.
49. Morison IM, Ramsay JP, Spencer HG. A census of mammalian imprinting. Trends Genet 21: 457-465, 2005.
50. Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat Meth 5: 621-628, 2008.
51. Niemann H, Tian XC, King WA, Lee RS. Epigenetic reprogramming in embryonic and foetal development upon somatic cell nuclear transfer cloning. Reproduction 135: 151-163, 2008.
52. Oehlert GW. A First Course in Design and Analysis of Experiments. New York: W. H. Freeman, 2000.
53. Oliveira CS, Saraiva NZ, de Souza MM, Tetzner TA, de Lima MR, Garcia JM. Effects of histone hyperacetylation on the preimplantation development of male and female bovine embryos. Reprod Fertil Dev 22: 1041-1048, 2010.
54. Ozsolak F, Milos PM. RNA sequencing: advances, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Genet 12: 87-98, 2011.
55. Paffoni A, Brevini TA, Gandolfi F, Ragni G. Parthenogenetic activation: biology and applications in the ART laboratory. Placenta 29, Suppl B: 121-125, 2008.
56. Palmieri C, Loi P, Ptak G, Della Salda L. Review paper: a review of the pathology of abnormal placentae of somatic cell nuclear transfer clone pregnancies in cattle, sheep, and mice. Vet Pathol 45: 865-880, 2008.
57. Pope WF. Embryonic mortality in swine. In: Embryonic Mortality in Domestic Species, edited by Zavy MT, Geisert RD. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1994, p. 53-77.
58. Radhakrishnan SK, Gartel AL. A novel transcriptional inhibitor induces apoptosis in tumor cells and exhibits antiangiogenic activity. Cancer Res 66: 3264-3270, 2006.
59. Redel BK, Brown AN, Spate LD, Whitworth KM, Green JA, Prather RS. Glycolysis in preimplantation development is partially controlled by the Warburg Effect. Mol Reprod Dev 79: 262-271, 2012.
60. Robinson MD, Oshlack A. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol 11: R25, 2010.
61. Rodriguez-Osorio N, Wang Z, Kasinathan P, Page GP, Robl JM, Memili E. Transcriptional reprogramming of gene expression in bovine somatic cell chromatin transfer embryos. BMC Genomics 10: 190, 2009.
62. Rosenkranz R, Borodina T, Lehrach H, Himmelbauer H. Characterizing the mouse ES cell transcriptome with Illumina sequencing. Genomics 92: 187-194, 2008.
63. Saeed AI, Bhagabati NK, Braisted JC, Liang W, Sharov V, Howe EA, Li J, Thiagarajan M, White JA, Quackenbush J. TM4 microarray software suite. Meth Enzymol 411: 134-193, 2006.
64. Saeed AI, Sharov V, White J, Li J, Liang W, Bhagabati N, Braisted J, Klapa M, Currier T, Thiagarajan M, Sturn A, Snuffin M, Rezantsev A, Popov D, Ryltsov A, Kostukovich E, Borisovsky I, Liu Z, Vinsavich A, Trush V, Quackenbush J. TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. Biotechniques 34: 374-378, 2003.
65. Sinclair KD, Young LE, Wilmut I, McEvoy TG. In-utero overgrowth in ruminants following embryo culture: lessons from mice and a warning to men. Hum Reprod 15 Suppl 5: 68-86, 2000.
66. Storey JD, Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 9440-9445, 2003.
67. Su H, Li D, Hou X, Tan B, Hu J, Zhang C, Dai Y, Li N, Li S. Molecular structure of bovine Gtl2 gene and DNA methylation status of Dlk1-Gtl2 imprinted domain in cloned bovines. Anim Reprod Sci 127: 23-30, 2011.
68. Su JM, Yang B, Wang YS, Li YY, Xiong XR, Wang LJ, Guo ZK, Zhang Y. Expression and methylation status of imprinted genes in placentas of deceased and live cloned transgenic calves. Theriogenology 75: 1346-1359, 2011.
69. Suzuki J Jr, Therrien J, Filion F, Lefebvre R, Goff AK, Smith LC. In vitro culture and somatic cell nuclear transfer affect imprinting of SNRPN gene in pre- and post-implantation stages of development in cattle. BMC Dev Biol 9: 9, 2009.
70. Team RDC. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2011.
71. Wagner TU. Bone morphogenetic protein signaling in stem cells-one signal, many consequences. FEBS J 274: 2968-2976, 2007.
72. Wang WH, Niwa K, Okuda K. In-vitro penetration of pig oocytes matured in culture by frozen-thawed ejaculated spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 93: 491-496, 1991.
73. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 10: 57-63, 2009.
74. Wei Y, Zhu J, Huan Y, Liu Z, Yang C, Zhang X, Mu Y, Xia P. Aberrant expression and methylation status of putatively imprinted genes in placenta of cloned piglets. Cell Reprogram 12: 213-222, 2010.
75. Whitworth KM, Agca C, Kim JG, Patel RV, Springer GK, Bivens NJ, Forrester LJ, Mathialagan N, Green JA, Prather RS. Transcriptional profiling of pig embryogenesis by using a 15-K member unigene set specific for pig reproductive tissues and embryos. Biol Reprod 72: 1437-1451, 2005.
76. Whitworth KM, Li R, Spate LD, Wax DM, Rieke A, Whyte JJ, Manandhar G, Sutovsky M, Green JA, Sutovsky P, Prather RS. Method of oocyte activation affects cloning efficiency in pigs. Mol Reprod Dev 76: 490-500, 2009.
77. Whitworth KM, Spate LD, Li R, Rieke A, Sutovsky P, Green JA, Prather RS. Activation method does not alter abnormal placental gene expression and development in cloned pigs. Mol Reprod Dev 77: 1016-1030, 2010.
78. Wilkinson L. Exact and approximate area-proportional circular Venn and Euler diagrams. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 18: 321-331, 2012.
79. Wilmut I, Sales DI, Ashworth CJ. Maternal and embryonic factors associated with prenatal loss in mammals. J Reprod Fertil 76: 851-864, 1986.
80. Wrenzycki C, Herrmann D, Lucas-Hahn A, Lemme E, Korsawe K, Niemann H. Gene expression patterns in in vitro-produced and somatic nuclear transfer-derived preimplantation bovine embryos: relationship to the large offspring syndrome? Anim Reprod Sci 82-83: 593-603, 2004.
81. Wu MY, Hill CS. Tgf-beta superfamily signaling in embryonic development and homeostasis. Dev Cell 16: 329-343, 2009.
82. Yoshioka K, Suzuki C, Tanaka A, Anas IM, Iwamura S. Birth of piglets derived from porcine zygotes cultured in a chemically defined medium. Biol Reprod 66: 112-119, 2002.
83. Young LE, Sinclair KD, Wilmut I. Large offspring syndrome in cattle and sheep. Rev Reprod 3: 155-163, 1998.
84. Zhao J, Whyte J, Prather RS. Effect of epigenetic regulation during swine embryogenesis and on cloning by nuclear transfer. Cell Tiss Res 341: 13-21, 2010.