Paradigm shift in the global IP regime: The agency of academics

Review of International Political Economy

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 275-309

  Morin, Jean Frédéric ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

copyright; epistemic community; Intellectual property; lawyers; paradigm shift; patent; professions; survey; transnational network; World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897621843     PISSN: 09692290     EISSN: 14664526     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2013.819812     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Abbott, A. (1988) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2. Abbott, A. (2005) 'Linked Ecologies: States and Universities as Environments for Professions', Sociological Theory, 21(2): 245-74.
3. AIPPI (2013) 'The International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property: Aims and Purpose',.
4. Antoniades, A. (2003) 'Epistemic Communities, Epistemes and the Construction of (World) Politics', Global Society, 17(1): 21-38.
5. Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B. (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6. Bessen, J. and Meurer, M.J. (2008) Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. Boyle, J. (2008) The Public Domain, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8. Braithwaite, J. and Drahos, P. (2000) Global Business Regulation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Burley, A.M. and Mattli, W. (1993) 'Europe before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration', International Organization, 47(1): 41-76.
10. Cheek, M. (2001) 'The Limits of Informal Regulatory Cooperation in International Affairs: A Review of the Global Intellectual Property Regime', George Washington International Law Review, 33: 277-323.
11. Chwieroth, J.M. (2007) 'Testing and Measuring the Role of Ideas: The Case of Neoliberalism in the International Monetary Fund', International Studies Quarterly, 51(): 5-30.
12. Chwieroth, J.M. (2008) 'Normative Change from Within: The International Monetary Fund's Approach to Capital Account Liberalization', International Studies Quarterly, 52(): 129-58.
13. Coleman, G. (2009) 'Code is Speech: Legal Tinkering, Expertise, and Protest among Free and Open Source Software Developers', Cultural Anthropology, 24(3): 420-54.
14. Conway, E.M. (2010) Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming, London: Bloomsbury Press.
15. Correa, C.M. (2000) Intellectual Property Rights, the WTO and Developing Countries: The TRIPS Agreement and Policy Options, London: Zed Books.
16. Cross, M.K.D. (2013) 'Rethinking epistemic communities twenty years later', Review of International Studies, 39(1): 137-160.
17. De Beer, J. (ed.) (2009) Implementing WIPO's Development Agenda, Ottawa: Wilfred Laurier University Press.
18. Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B.G. (2002) The internationalization of palace wars: lawyers, economists, and the contest to transform Latin American states. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Dobusch, L. and Quack, S. (2013) 'Framing Standards, Mobilizing Users: Copyright Versus Fair Use in Transnational Regulation', Review of International Political Economy, 20(1): 52-88.
20. Drahos, P. (2010) The Global Governance of Knowledge: Patent Offices and Their Clients, New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Drake, W. and Nicolaïdis, K. (1992) 'Ideas, Interests, and Institutionalization: Trade in Services and the Uruguay Round', International Organization, 46(1): 37-100.
22. Dreyfuss, R.C. (2009) 'Designing Intellectual Property Institutions for the Twenty-first Century', Journal of World Intellectual Property Law, 12(5): 341-47.
23. Dutfield, G.M. (2009) Intellectual Property Rights and the Life Science Industries: Past, Present and Future, London: World Scientific.
24. Easterly, W. (2001) 'The Elusive Quest for Economic Growth: Economists' Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics', Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Flynn, S. (2011) 'The Washington Declaration on Intellectual Property and the Public Interest', American University International Law Review, 28(1): 1-17.
26. Fourcade, M. (2006) 'The Construction of a Global Profession: The Transnationalization of Economics', American Journal of Sociology, 112(1): 145-94.
27. Fourcade, M. (2009) Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain and France, 1890 to 1990, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28. Gardner, J. (1980) Legal Imperialism: American Lawyers and Foreign Aid in Latin America, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
29. Goldstein, J. and Keohane, R.O. (1993) Ideas and foreign policy. London: Cornell University Press.
30. Gough, C. and Shackley, S. (2001) 'The respectable politics of climate change: the epistemic communities and NGOs', International Affairs, 77(): 329-346.
31. Haas, E. (1980) 'Why Collaborate Issue-Linkage and International Regimes', World Politics, 32(3): 357-405.
32. Haas, P.M. (1992) 'Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination', International Organization, 46(1): 1-35.
33. Halbert, D.J. (2005) Resisting Intellectual Property, London: Routledge.
34. Helfer, L. (2004) 'Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking', Yale Journal of International Law, 29(1): 1-83.
35. Idris, Kamil (2003) Intellectual Property: A Power Tool for Economic Growth, Geneva: WIPO.
36. Ikenberry, J.G. (1992) 'A World Economy Restored: Expert Consensus and the Anglo-American Postwar Settlement', International Organization, 46(1): 289-321.
37. Jordana, J. and Levi-Faur, D. (2005) 'The Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism in Latin America: Sectoral and National Channels in the Making of a New Order', Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(): 102-24.
38. Kapczynski, A. (2008) 'The Access to Knowledge Mobilization and the New Politics of Intellectual Property', Yale Law Journal, 117: 804-85.
39. Karaganis, J. (2012) The Bellagio Global Dialogues on Intellectual Property, PIJIP Research Paper no. 2012-12, Washington, DC:.
40. Kelemen, D.R. and Sibbitt, E.C. (2004) 'The Globalization of American Law', International Organization, 58(): 103-36.
41. Kogut, B. and Macpherson, M. (2011) 'The Mobility of Economists and the Diffusion of Policy Ideas: The Influence of Economics on National Policies', Research Policy, 40(10): 1307-20.
42. Kratochwil, F. (1989) Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
43. Litfin, K.T. (1995) 'Framing Science: Precautionary Discourse and the Ozone Treaties', Millennium, 24(2): 251-77.
44. Mattei, U. (2003) 'A Theory of Imperial Law: A Study on U.S. Hegemony and the Latin Resistance', Global Jurist Frontiers, 3(2): 1-61.
45. Matthews, D. (2011) Intellectual Property, Human Rights and Development: The Role of NGOs and Social Movements, London: Edward Elgar.
46. May, C. (2007) The World Intellectual Property Organization, Abingdon: Routledge.
47. May, C. and Sell, S.K. (2006) Intellectual property rights: a critical history, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
48. Menescal, A.K. (2005) 'Changing WIPO's Ways? The 2004 Development Agenda in Historical Perspective', Journal of World Intellectual Property, 8(6): 761-96.
49. Mitchell, N.J., Herron, K.G., Jenkins-Smith, H.C. and Whitten, G.D. (2007) 'Elite Beliefs, Epistemic Communities and the Atlantic Divide: Scientists' Nuclear Policy Preferences in the United States and European Union', British Journal of Political Science, 37(4): 753-64.
50. Mochnacki, A. (2009) 'Copyright: Disruptive Events, Social Skill and the Bulte-Geist Affair', Paper presented at the ECPR Conference, Potsdam,.
51. Morin, J.-F. (2009) 'Multilateralizing TRIPsPlus Agreements: Is the US Strategy a Failure?', The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 12(3): 175-97.
52. Morin, J.-F. (2010) 'The Two-level Game of Transnational Networks: The Case of the Access to Medicines Campaign', International Interactions, 36(4): 309-34.
53. Muzaka, V. (2011) 'Linkages, Contests and Overlaps in the Global Intellectual Property Rights Regime', European Journal of International Relations, 17(4): 755-76.
54. Newman, A.L. (2008) 'Building Transnational Civil Liberties: Transgovernmental Entrepreneurs and the European Data Privacy Directive', International Organization, 62(): 103-30.
55. Peterson, M.J. (1992) 'Whalers, Cetologists, Environmentalists, and the International Management of Whaling', International Organization, 46(1): 148-86.
56. Quack, S. (2007) 'Legal Professionals and Transnational Law-making: A Case of Distributed Agency', Organization, 14(5): 643-66.
57. Reichman, J.H. (2009) 'Intellectual Property in the Twenty-first Century: Will the Developing Countries Lead or Follow?', Houston Law Review/University of Houston, 46(4): 1115-85.
58. Samuelson P. (2006) 'Enriching Discourse on Public Domains', Duke Law Journal, 55: 783-834.
59. Seabrooke, L. (2011) 'Economists and Diplomacy: Professions and the Practice of Economic Policy', International Journal, 66(): 629-42.
60. Seabrooke, L. and Tsingou, E. (2009) '. Revolving Doors and Linked Ecologies in the World Economy: Policy Locations and the Practice of International Financial Reform', Working paper, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, University of Warwick.
61. Sebenius, J. (1992) 'Challenging Convention Explanations of International Cooperation: Negotiation Analysis and the Case of Epistemic Communities', International Organization, 46(1): 323-65.
62. Schneider, I. (2013) 'Merely the Tip of the Iceberg', in D. Beldiman (ed.) Access to Information and Knowledge: 21st Century Challenges in Intellectual Property and Knowledge Governance, Northampton, Edward Elgar.
63. Sell, S. (2003) Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Sell, S. (2013) 'Revenge of the Nerds: Collective Action against Intellectual Property Maximalism in the Global Information Age', International Studies Review, 15(1): 67-85.
65. Sell, S. and Prakash, A. (2004) 'Using Ideas Strategically: The Contest between Business and NGO Networks in Intellectual Property Rights', International Studies Quarterly, 48(): 143-75.
66. Sending, O.J. (2011) Expertise and Field Dynamics in Global Governance,. NUPI working paper, Oslo.
67. Stone D. (2004) 'Transfer Agents and Global Networks in the Transnationalization of Policy', Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3): 545-66.
68. t Hoen, E. (2002) 'Public Health and International Law: TRIPS, Pharmaceutical Patents, and Access to Essential Medicines: A Long Way from Seattle to Doha', Chicago Journal of International Law, 3(): 27-46.
69. Toke, D. (1999) 'Epistemic Communities and Environmental Groups', Politics, 19(2): 97-102.
70. Van Waarden, F. and Drahos, M. (2002) 'Courts and (Epistemic) Communities in the Convergence of Competition Policies', Journal of European Public Policy 9(6): 913-34.
71. Verdun, A. (1999) 'The Role of the Delors Committee in the Creation of EMU: An Epistemic Community?', Journal of European Public Policy, 6(2): 308-28.
72. Youde, J. (2005) 'The Development of a Counter-epistemic Community: AIDS, South Africa, and International Regimes', International Relations, 19(4): 421-39.
73. Zito, A.R. (2001) 'Epistemic communities, collective entrepreneurship and European integration', Journal of European Public Policy, 8(4): 585-603.