The Globalization of American Law

International Organization

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2004, Pages

  Kelemen, R Daniel ^a   Sibbitt, Eric C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b Sullivan and Cromwell   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1642633675     PISSN: 00208183     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0020818304581043     Document Type: Review

References (109)

1. Abel, Richard. 1994. Transnational Law Practice. Case Western Reserve Law Review 44:737-870.
2. Alter, Karen. 1998. Who Are the "Masters of the Treaty"?: European Governments and the European Court of Justice. International Organization 52 (1):121-47.
3. _. 2001. Establishing the Supremacy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. BEUC (The European Consumers' Organisation). 2000. Response to the Commission's Green Paper on Liability for Defective Products. BEUC/016/2000. Available from European Commission Web site at . Accessed 20 August 2003.
5. Black, Donald. 1976. The Behavior of Law, New York: Academic Press.
6. Bullock, Robert. 2000. Market Opening in Japan. In New Perspectives on U.S.-Japan Relations, edited by Gerald Curtis, 39-81. Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange.
7. Cohen, Jason. 1997. The Japanese Product Liability Law. Fordham International Law Journal 21:108-89.
8. Commission of the European Communities (Commission). 1976. Proposal for a Directive on Strict Liability for Defective Products. O.J. (C 241).
9. _. 1999a. Financial Services Action Plan. COM (1999) 232 final, 11 May 1999.
10. _. 1999b. Green Paper on Liability for Defective Products. COM (1999) 396 final, 28 July 1999.
11. _. 2000. Progress on Financial Services: 2nd Report. COM (2000) 336 final. 30 May 2000.
12. _. 2001. Report from the Commission on the Application of Directive 85/374 on Liability for Defective Products. COM (2000) 893, 31 January 2001.
13. _. 2002a. Financial Services Action Plan, Sixth Report. COM (2002) 267, 3 June 2002.
14. _. 2002b. Commission Proposal for a Council Directive to Improve Access to Justice in Cross-Border Disputes. COM (2002) 13. Unpublished.
15. Cooter, Robert, and Tom Ginsburg. 1996. Comparative Judicial Discretion. International Review of Law and Economics 16 (3):295-313.
16. Council of Ministers. 1985. Council Directive 85/374 on the Approximation of the Laws, Regulations and Administrative Provisions of the Member States Concerning Liability for Defective Products. O.J. (L210/29).
17. Curtis, Gerald. 1999. The Logic of Japanese Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
18. Dezalay, Yves. 1996. Between the State, Law and the Market. In International Regulatory Competition and Coordination, edited by William Bratton et al., 59-87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Drezner, Daniel. 2001. Globalization and Policy Convergence. International Studies Review 3 (1): 53-78.
20. Duck, Ken. 1996. Now That the Fog Has Lifted: The Impact of Japan's Administrative Procedures Law. Fordham International Law Journal 19:1686-763.
21. Epp, Charles. 1992. Do Lawyers Impair Economic Growth? Law & Social Inquiry 17 (4):585-623.
22. European Parliament. 2001. Resolution on the Final Report of the Committee of Wise Men on the Regulation of European Securities Markets, RSP/2001/2530, 15 March 2001.
23. Ferejohn, John. 1995. Law, Legislation and Positive Political Theory. In Modern Political Economy, edited by Jeffrey Banks and Eric Hanushek, 191-215. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests and International Society. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
25. Franchino, Fabio. 2001. Delegation and Constraints in the National Execution of EC Policies. West European Politics 24 (4):169-92.
26. Galanter, Marc. 1983. Mega-Law and Mega-Lawyering in the Contemporary United States. In The Sociology of the Professions, edited by Robert Dingwall and Philip Lewis, 152-76. London: Mac-Millan Press.
27. _. 1992. Law Abounding: Legalisation Around the North Atlantic. Modern Law Review 55 (1):1-24.
28. _. 1996. The Assault on Civil Justice. In Legal Culture and the Legal Profession, edited by Lawrence Friedman and Harry Scheiber, 79-116. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
29. Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Global Markets and National Politics: Collision Course or Virtuous Circle? International Organization 52 (4):787-824.
30. Garrett, Geoffrey, R. Daniel Kelemen, and Heiner Schulz. 1998. The European Court of Justice, National Governments and Legal Integration in the European Union. International Organization 52 (1): 149-76.
31. Goebel, Roger. 1989. The Internationalization of Law and Legal Practice. Tulane Law Review 63: 443-523.
32. Goldthorpe, John. 1984. Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Haley, John. 1978. The Myth of the Reluctant Litigant. Journal of Japanese Studies 4 (2):359-89.
34. Hall, Ivan. 1997. Cartels of the Mind. New York: Norton.
35. Harlow, Carol. 1999. Citizen Access to Political Power in the European Union. EUI Working Paper RSC No. 99/2. Florence, Italy: European University Institute.
36. Hayward, Jack. 1982. Mobilising Private Interests in the Service of Public Ambitions. In Policy Styles in Western Europe, edited by Jeremy Richardson, 111-40. London: George Allen & Unwin.
37. Henderson, Dan. 1996. Role of Lawyers in Japan. In Japan, Economic Success and Legal System, edited by Harald Baum, 27-67. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
38. Hodges, Christopher. 2000. Product Liability in Europe. Business Law International 3:171-91.
39. Horn, Murray. 1995. The Political Economy of Public Administration, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Jackson, Howell, and Eric Pan. 2001. Regulatory Competition in International Securities Markets: Evidence from Europe in 1999-Part I, Business Lawyer 56:653.
41. Kagan, Robert. 1997. Should Europe Worry About Adversarial Legalism? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 17 (2):165-84.
42. _. 2000. Comparing National Styles of Regulation in Japan and the U.S. Law & Policy 22 (3-4):225-44.
43. _. 2001. Adversarial Legalism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
44. Kagan, Robert, and Lee Axelrad. 1997. Adversarial Legalism: An International Perspective. In Comparative Disadvantages? Social Regulations and the Global Economy, edited by Pietro Nivola, 146-80. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
45. Karmel, Roberta. 1999. The Case for a European Securities Commission. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 38:9-43.
46. Kelemen, R. Daniel. 2000. Regulatory Federalism: EU Environmental Policy in Comparative Perspective. Journal of Public Policy 20 (2):133-67.
47. _. 2002. The Politics of Eurocratic Structure: The New European Agencies. West European Politics 25(4):93-118.
48. Kissane, Mary. 1997. Global Gadflies: Applications and Implications of U.S.-Style Corporate Governance Abroad. New York Law Journal of International and Comparative Law 17:621-75.
49. Kitschelt, Herbert, Peter Lange, Gary Marks, and John Stephens, eds. 1999. Change and Continuity in Contemporary Capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50. Lannoo, Karel. 2001. Updating EU Securities Market Regulation. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
51. _. 2002. Supervising the European Financial System. CEPS Policy Brief No. 21. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
52. Laurence, Henry. 1999. Spawning the SEC. Indiana Global Legal Studies Journal 6:647-83.
53. Lehmbruch, Gerhard, and Philippe C. Schmitter. 1982. Patterns of Corporatist Policy Making. London: Sage Publications.
54. Loss, Louis and Joel Seligman. 1998. Securities Regulation. 3rd ed. New York: Aspen Publishers.
55. Majone, Giandomenico. 1996. Regulating Europe. New York: Routledge.
56. Marcuse, Andrew. 1996. Why Japan's New Products Liability Law Isn't. Pacific Rim Law and Policy 5:365-98.
57. Martin, Lisa. 1992. Interests, Power and Multilateralism. International Organization 46 (4):765-92.
58. McCubbins, Matthew, Roger Noll, and Barry Weingast. 1987. Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control. Journal of Law Economics and Organization 3(2):243-77.
59. _. 1989. Structure and Process, Policy and Politics: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies. Virginia Law Review 75:431-82.
60. Meyer, John W., John Boli, George Thomas, and Francisco Ramirez. 1997. World Society and the Nation-State. American Journal of Sociology 103 (1):144-81.
61. Milhaupt, Curtis. 1994. Managing the Market: The Ministry of Finance and Securities Regulation in Japan. Stanford Journal of International Law 30:423-82.
62. Miyazawa, Setsuo. 2001. The Politics of Judicial Reform in Japan. Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal 2 (2):89-121.
63. Moe, Terry. 1990. The Politics of Structural Choice. In Organization Theory from Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond, edited by Oliver Williamson, 116-53. New York: Oxford University Press.
64. Mommsen, Wolfgang, and Jaap De Moor, eds. 1992. European Expansion and Law. New York: Berg Publishers.
65. Nottage, Luke. 2000. The Present and Future of Product Liability Dispute Resolution in Japan. William Mitchell Law Review 27:215-35.
66. Okamura, Kazumi, and Chieko Takeshita. 1989. Laws and Regulations Relating to Insider Trading in Japan. Tokyo: Commercial Law Center.
67. Okimoto, Daniel. 1989. Between MITI and the Market. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
68. Pekkanen, Robert. 2000. Japan's New Politics: The Case of the NPO Law. Journal of Japanese Studies 26 (1):111-43.
69. Pollack, Mark. 1997. Delegation, Agency and Agenda Setting in the European Community. International Organization 51 (1):99-134.
70. Prechai, Sacha. 1995. Directives in European Community Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71. Ramseyer, J. Mark. 1994. The Puzzling (In)Dependence of Courts. The Journal of Legal Studies 23:721-47.
72. Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Frances Rosenbluth. 1993. Japan's Political Marketplace. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
73. Repeta, Lawrence, and Jody Chafee. 1998. Japanese Government Information: New Rules for Access. Available from Japan Information Access Project Web site . Accessed 30 September, 2003.
74. Richardson, Jeremy, ed. 1982. Policy Styles in Western Europe. London: George Allen & Unwin.
75. Rosenbluth, Frances, and Michael Thies. 2001. The Electoral Foundations of Japan's Financial Politics. Policy Studies Journal 29 (1):23-37.
76. Rothenberg, Phil. 2000. Japan's New Products Liability Law. Law and Policy in International Business 31 (2):453-516.
77. Sakamoto, Takayuki. 1999. Building Policy Legitimacy in Japan. New York: MacMillan Press.
78. Sarumida, Hiroshi. 1996. Comparative Institutional Analysis of Product Safety Systems in the U.S. and Japan. Cornell International Law Journal 29:79-145.
79. Schwarze, Jürgen, ed. 1996. Administrative Law under European Influence. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
80. Shapiro, Martin. 1992. The Giving Reasons Requirement. University of Chicago Legal Forum 179-220.
81. _. 1993. The Globalization of Law. Indiana Journal of Global Studies 1 (1):37-64.
82. _. 1996. The Globalization of Judicial Review. In Legal Culture and the Legal Profession, edited by Lawrence Friedman and Harry Scheiber, 119-35. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press
83. _. 1998. Globalization and Freedom of Contract. In The State and Freedom of Contract, edited by Harry Scheiber, 269-98. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
84. Shapiro, Martin, and Alec Stone. 1994. The New Constitutional Politics of Europe. Comparative Political Studies 26 (4):397-420.
85. Simmons, Beth. 2001. The International Politics of Harmonization. International Organization 55 (3):589-620.
86. Simmons, Beth, and Zachary Elkins. Forthcoming. Globalization and Policy Diffusion: Explaining Three Decades of Liberalization. In Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition, edited by Miles Kahler and David Lake. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
87. Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2000. Judicial Globalization. Virginia Journal of International Law 40:1103-24.
88. Sobel, Andrew. 1994. Domestic Choices, International Markets. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
89. Spacone, Andrew. 2000. Strict Liability in the European Union. Roger Williams University Law Review 5:341-84.
90. Spar, Debora. 1997. Lawyers Abroad. California Management Review 39 (3):8-28.
91. Stapleton, Jane. 2002. Bugs in Anglo-American Products Liability. South Carolina Law Review 53:1225-61.
92. Stone Sweet, Alec. 2000. Governing with Judges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
93. Streeck, Wolfgang, and Philippe Schmitter. 1991. From National Corporatism to Transnational Pluralism: Organized Interests in the Single European Market. Politics and Society 19 (2):133-65.
94. Swire, Peter. 1996. The Race to Laxity and the Race to Undesirability. Yale Journal on Regulation 14:67-110.
95. Tate, C. Neal, and Torbjörn Vallinder, eds. 1995. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York University Press.
96. Trubek, David, Yves Dezalay, Ruth Buchanan, and John Davis. 1994. Global Restructuring and the Law. Case Western Law Review 44:407-98.
97. Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
98. Upham, Frank. 1987. Law and Social Change in Postwar Japan. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
99. _. 1996. Privatized Regulation: Japanese Regulatory Style in Comparative and International Perspective. Fordham International Law Journal 20:396-511.
100. van Waarden, Frans. 1995. Persistence of National Policy Styles. In Convergence or Diversity?, edited by Brigitte Unger and Frans van Waarden, 333-72. Aldershot, England: Avebury.
101. Vogel, David. 1986. National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the U.S. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
102. _. 1995. Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
103. Vogel, Steven. 1996. Freer Markets, More Rules. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
104. Warren, Manning. 1994. The European Union's Investment Services Directive. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Business Law 15:181-220.
105. Weaver, R. Kent, and Bert Rockman, eds. 1993. Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
106. West, Marc. 1994, The Pricing of Shareholder Derivative Actions in Japan and the U.S. Northwestern University Law Review 88:1436.
107. _. 2001. Why Shareholders Sue: The Evidence from Japan. Journal of Legal Studies 30:351-82.
108. Wiegand, Wolfgang. 1991. The Reception of American Law in Europe. American Journal of Comparative Law 39 (2):229-49.
109. _. 1996. Americanization of Law: Reception or Convergence? In Legal Culture and the Legal Profession, edited by Lawrence Friedman and Harry Scheiber, 137-52. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.