Intellectual property, human rights and development: The role of ngos and social movements

Intellectual Property, Human Rights and Development: The Role of ngos and Social Movements

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Matthews, Duncan ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856868315     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (164)

1. 3D: Trade - Human Rights - Equitable Economy (2005), Background Note: Intellectual Property, Human Rights and the Drafting of the General Comment on Article 15(1)(c) ICESCR, Geneva: 3D
2. Abbott, Frederick M. (2005), 'The "Rule of Reason" and the Right to Health: Integrating Human Rights and Competition Principles in the Context of TRIPS', in Thomas Cottier, Joost Pauwelyn and Elisabeth Burgi (eds), Human Rights and International Trade, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 279-300.
3. Abbott, Frederick M. (2008), 'Post- mortem on the Geneva Mini-Ministerial: Where does the TRIPS Agreement go from here?' ICTSD Information Note No. 7, August 2008, Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD).
4. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (2008), Medicamentos genéricos, http://www.anvisa.gov.br/hotsite/genericos/index.htm.
5. AIDS Law Project (2007), 18- Month Review: January 2006 to June 2007, Johannesburg and Cape Town, South Africa: AIDS Law Project, http://www.alp.org.za/pdf/Publications/ALP%20Annual%20Reviews/ ALP_2006- 2007_Review.pdf.
6. Arup, Christopher and Plahe, Jagjit (2010), 'Pharmaceutical Patent Networks: Assessing the Infl uence of India's Paragraph 3(d) Internationally', Intellectual Property Quarterly, 1: 15-43
7. Ashton- Hart, Nick (2006), 'Public Participation Brings a Fresh Approach to WIPO', Bridges, 10(8), December 2006-January 2007, www.ictsd. org.
8. Avafi a, Tenu, Berger, Jonathan and Hartzenberg, Trudy (2006), The Ability of Select Sub- Saharan African Countries to Utilise TRIPS Flexibilities and Competition Law to Ensure a Sustainable Supply of Essential Medicines: A Study of Producing and Importing Countries, TRALAC Working Paper No. 12, Stellenbosch, South Africa: US Printers.
9. Baker, Brook K. (2004), Processes and Issues for Improving Access to Utilise TRIPS Flexibilities in Non- Producing Countries, London: DFID Health Systems Resource Centre.
10. Bala Ravi, S. (2003), 'Who Benefi ts and Loses with India's Accession to UPOV?', in Ujjwal Kumar and Suman Sahai (eds), Status of the Rights of Farmers and Plant Breeders in Asia, New Delhi: Gene Campaign, 70-75.
11. Basheer, Shamnad and Reddy, Prashant (2008), '"Ducking" TRIPS in India: A Saga Involving Novartis and the Legality of Section 3(d)', National Law School of India Review, 20(2): 131-55
12. Basso, Maristela (2006), 'Intervention of Health Authorities in Patent Examination: The Brazilian Practice of Prior Informed Consent', International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 1(1-2): 54-73
13. Basso, Maristela and Rodrigues, Edson (2005), 'Exploring Options and Modalities to Move the IP Development Agenda Forward', UNCTADICTSD Dialogue on IPRs and Sustainable Development: Revising the Agenda in a New Context, 24-28 October, Bellagio, Italy
14. Berger, Jonathan (2006), 'Advancing Public Health by Other Means: Using Competition Policy', in Pedro Roff e, Geoff Tansey and David Vivas- Eugui (eds), Negotiating Health: Intellectual Property and Access to Medicines, London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan
15. Blagescu, Monica and Lloyd, Robert (2006), 2006 Global Accountability Report: Holding power to account, London: One World Trust
16. Bogsch, Arpad (1992), The First Twenty- Five Years of the World Intellectual Property Organisation from 1967 to 1992, WIPO Publication No. 881(E), Geneva, Switzerland: International Bureau of Intellectual Property.
17. Boulle, Jacqui and Avafia, Tenu (2005), Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) Evaluation, http://www.tac.org.za/Documents/FinalTACEvaluation-AfaviaAndBoulle- 20050701.pdf.
18. Braithwaite, John and Drahos, Peter (2000), Global Business Regulation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
19. Brazilian Ministry of Health, Surveillance Secretariat and National Programme on STD and AIDS (2008), Targets and Commitments made by the Member States of the United Nations General Assembly Special Session on HIV/AIDS (UNGASS- HIV/AIDS): Brazilian Response 2005-2007. Country Progress Report, http://data.unaids.org/pub/report/2008/brazil_2008_country_progress_report_en.pdf.
20. Bultrini, Dubravka Bojic (2009), Guide to Legislating for the Right to Food, Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, http://www.fao.org/righttofood/publi09/guide_on_legislating.pdf.
21. Cabrera Medaglia, Jorge (2009), Study on the Relationship between the ABS International Regimen and Other International Instruments which Govern the Use of Genetic Resources: The World Trade Organisation (WTO); the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO); and the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV). Comments of UPOV for the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, http://www.cbd.int/doc/programmes/abs/studies/ study- regime- 04- en.pdf.
22. Cameron, Edwin and Berger, Jonathan (2005), 'Patents and Public Health: Principle, politics and paradox', Proceedings of the British Academy, 331-69
23. Chaudhuri, Sudip (2005), The WTO and India's Pharmaceuticals Industry: Patent Protection, TRIPS and Developing Countries, New Delhi: Oxford University Press
24. Chennells, Roger (2007), 'Ethics and Practice in Ethnobiology: The Experience of the San Peoples of South Africa', in Charles, R. McManis (ed.), Biodiversity and the Law: Intellectual Property, Biotechnology and Traditional Knowledge, London: Earthscan: 413-27.
25. Chon, Margaret (2010), 'A Rough Guide to Global Intellectual Property Pluralism', in Rochelle Dreyfuss, Harry First and Diane Zimmerman (eds), Working within the Boundaries of Intellectual Property, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 445-69
26. CIEL (2007), The Gap between Indigenous People's Demands and WIPO's Framework on Traditional Knowledge, Geneva: The Center for International Environmental Law, http://www.wipo.int/tk/en/igc/ngo/ ciel_gap.pdf.
27. Cohen, Jillian Clare and Lybecker, Kristiana M. (2005), 'AIDS Policy and Pharmaceutical Patents: Brazil's Strategy to Safeguard Public Health', World Economy, 28(2): 211-30.
28. Commission on Intellectual Property Rights (2002), Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy, London: Commission on Intellectual Property Rights
29. Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation and Public Health (2006), Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights, Geneva: World Health Organization, http://www.who.int/ intellectualproperty/report/en/.
30. Correa, Carlos (2000), Inte grating Public Health Concerns into Patent Legislation in Developing Countries, Geneva: South Centre
31. Correa, Carlos (2001), Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Property: Issues and Options Surrounding the Protection of Traditional Knowledge, Quaker United Nations Offi ce, Geneva, Switzerland: Discussion Paper Series
32. Costa Chaves, Gabriela, Fogaça Vieria, Marcela and Reis, Renata (2008), 'Access to Medicines and Intellectual Property in Brazil: Refl ections and Strategies of Civil Society', Sur Journal, 8, http://www.surjournal.org/eng/conteudos/getArtigo8.php?,artigo.chaves.htm.
33. Cullet, Philippe (2003), Food Security and Intellectual Property Rights in Developing Countries, IELRC Working paper 2003- 3, Geneva, Switzerland: International Environmental Law Research Centre, http://www.ielrc.org/content/w0303.pdf.
34. Daz, Keshab (2003), 'The Domestic Politics of TRIPS: Pharmaceutical Interests, Public Health, and NGO Infl uence in India,' Paper prepared for the Research Project on 'Linking the WTO to the Poverty- Reduction Agenda', Part of the DFID- Funded Globalisation and Poverty Research Programme, Gujarat Institute of Development Research, Ahmedabad, India
35. Deere, Carolyn (2008), The Implementation Game: The TRIPS Agreement and the Global Politics of Intellectual Property Reform in Developing Countries, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press
36. Dinwoodie, Graeme B. (2007), 'The International Intellectual Property System: Treaties, Norms, National Courts, and Private Ordering', in Daniel Gervais (ed.), Intellectual Property, Trade and Development. Strategies to Optimize Economic Development in the TRIPS- Plus Era, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 61-114.
37. Drahos, Peter (2007), 'Four Lessons for Developing Countries from the Trade Negotiations over Access to Medicines', Liverpool Law Review, 28: 11-39
38. Drahos, Peter (2008), 'Does Dialogue Make a Diff erence? Structural Change and the Limits of Framing', The Yale Journal Pocket Part, 117: 268-73
39. Drahos, Peter with Braithwaite, John (2002), Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy?, London: Earthscan
40. Drezner, Daniel W. (2005), Gauging the Power of Global Civil Society: Intellectual Property and Public Health, mimeo.
41. Dunoff, Jeffrey L. (1998), 'The Misguided Debate Over NGO Participation at the WTO', Journal of International Economic Law, 1, 3: 433-56.
42. Dutfi eld, Graham (2003a), Intellectual Property Rights and the Life Science Industries: A Twentieth Century History, Aldershot: Ashgate
43. Dutfi eld, Graham (2003b), Protecting Traditional Knowledge and Folklore: A Review of Progress in Diplomacy and Policy Formulation, Geneva, Switzerland: ICTSD/UNCTAD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development Issue Paper No. 1.
44. Earth Negotiations Bulletin (2006), First Session of the Governing Body of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture: 12-16 June 2006, 9(364): 12 June 2006, http://www.iisd.ca/ vol09/enb09364e.html.
45. Essential Action (2007), Pharmaceutical Links of NGOs: Contributing to the World Health Organization's Second Public Hearing on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property, Washington, DC: Essential Action, 7 November 2007, mimeo
46. Fourie, Pieter (2006), The Political Management of HIV and AIDS in South Africa: One Burden Too Many?, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan
47. Friedman, Steven and Mottair, Shauna (2004), A Rewarding Engagement? The Treatment Action Campaign and the Politics of HIV/AIDS, Working Paper, Durban, South Africa: Centre for Civil Society and School of Development Studies, University of KwaZulu- Natal
48. Galvao, Jane (2005), 'Brazil and Access to HIV/AIDS Drugs: A Question of Human Rights and Public Health', American Journal of Public Health, 95(7): 1110-16
49. Garde, T.V. (2008), 'Circumventing the Debate over State Policy and Property Rights: Section 3(d) of the Indian Patents Act Law', in Wolrad Prinz zu Waldeck und Pyrmont, Martin J. Adelman, Robert Brauneis, and Josef Drexl (eds), Patents and Technological Progress in a Globalised World: Liber Amicorum Joseph Straus, Berlin, Germany: MPI Studies on Intellectual Property, Competition and Tax Law, Springer.
50. Gervais, Daniel (2007), 'TRIPS and Development', in Daniel Gervais (ed.), Intellectual Property, Trade and Development. Strategies to Optimize Economic Development in the TRIPS- Plus Era, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51. Giovanetti, Tom and Matthews, Merrill (2005), Intellectual Property Rights and Human Rights, Lewisville, Texas: Institute for Policy Innovation
52. GRAIN (2001), 'TRIPS- plus' Through the Back Door: How Bilateral Treaties Impose Much Stronger Rules for IPRs on Life than the WTO, GRAIN Briefi ng, http://www.grain.org/briefings/?id=6.
53. GRAIN (2005), Seedling, July 2005 issue, http://www.grain.org/seedling/?id=344.
54. Grover, Anand (2005), 'Meeting the Unmet Legal Needs of Positive People: The Lawyers Collective HIV/AIDS Unit', in Radhika Ramasubban and Bhanwar Rishyasringa (eds), AIDS and Civil Society: India's Learning Curve, Jaipur: Rawat Publications, 197-224
55. Halbert, Debora J. (2005), Resisting Intellectual Property, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
56. Halbert, Debora J. (2006), 'The World Intellectual Property Organization: Changing Narratives on Intellectual Property', paper presented at Frontiers of Regulation: Scholarly Debates and Policy Challenges, an international conference organized by the European Consortium for Political Research, Standing Group on Regulatory Governance and the Centre for the Study of Regulated Industries, School of Management, University of Bath, 8 September.
57. Haugen, Hans Morten (2005), 'Traditional Knowledge and Human Rights', Journal of World Intellectual Property, 8(5): 663-77
58. Heywood, Mark (2004), How South Africa's HIV/AIDS National Treatment Plan was Won: Sustaining a Civil Society Campaign for Socio-Economic Rights, South Africa: Treatment Action Campaign, http://www.tac.org.za/Documents/PriceofDenial.doc.
59. Hilary, John (2004), Divide and Rule: The EU and US Response to Developing Country Alliances at the WTO, South Africa: Action Aid International
60. Hoen, Ellen 't (2002), 'TRIPS, Pharmaceutical Patents, and Access to Essential Medicines', Chicago Journal of International Law, 3: 34
61. Jawara, Fatoumata and Kwa, Aileen (2003), Behind the Scenes at the WTO: The Real World of International Trade Negotiations, London and New York: Zed Books
62. Kapczynski, Amy (2008), 'The Access to Knowledge Mobilization and the New Politics of Intellectual Property', The Yale Law Journal, 117: 804-85
63. Keayla, B.K. (2005), 'Amended Patents Act: A Critique', Combat Law, 4(2), http://www.indiatogether.org/cgi- bin/tools/pfriend.cgi.
64. Krishna Iyer, V.R., Chinnappa Reddy, O., Desai, D.A. and Sachar, Rajinder (1996), People's Commission on the Constitutional Implications of the Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, New Delhi, India: Centre for Study of Global Trade System and Development.
65. Kumar, Ujjwal and Sahai, Suman (eds) (2003), Status of the Rights of Farmers and Plant Breeders in Asia, New Delhi: Gene Campaign
66. Lang, Andrew (2007), 'The Role of the Human Rights Movement in Trade Policy- Making: Human Rights as a Trigger for Social Learning', New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law, 5: 147-72
67. Law and Treatment Access Unit of the AIDS Law Project and the Treatment Action Campaign (2003), The Price of Life: Hazel Tau and Others vs GlaxoSmithKline and Boehringer Ingelheim: A Report on the Excessive Pricing Complaint to South Africa's Competition Commission. Joint publication of the Law and Treatment Access Unit of the AIDS Law Project and the Treatment Action Campaign, http://alp.org.za/ modules.php?op=modload&name=News&fi le=article&sid=222.
68. Lewis, Jane (2001), TRIPS on Trial: The Impact of WTO's Patent Regime on the World's Farmers, the Poor and Developing Countries, Action Aid, Berne Declaration, IATP, Misereor
69. Love, James P. (2006), 'TRIPS, TRIPS+, and new paradigms: The role of NGOs in shaping the debate', paper prepared for the Chicago-Kent College of Law conference on Intellectual Property, Trade and Development: Accommodating and Reconciling Diff erent National Levels of Protection, Chicago, Illinois, 12-13 October.
70. Love, James P. (2007), 'Nongovernmental Generation of International Treaties - An Interview with Gaëlle Krikorian', Nongovernmental Politics, New York: Zone Books, 359-67.
71. Macdonald- Brown, Charters and Ferera, Leon (1998), 'First WTO Decision on TRIPS: India- Patent Protection for Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Chemical Products', European Intellectual Property Review, 20(2): 69-73
72. Mathiharan, K. (2003), 'The Fundamental Right to Health Care', Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, October-December, 11(4).
73. Matthews, Duncan (2002), Globalising Intellectual Property Rights: The TRIPS Agreement, London and New York: Routledge
74. Matthews, Duncan (2004), 'The WTO Decision on Implementation of Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health: A Solution to the Access to Essential Medicines Problem?', Journal of International Economic Law, 7(1): 73-107
75. Matthews, Duncan (2005), 'TRIPS Flexibilities and Access to Medicines in Developing Countries: The Problem with Technical Assistance and Free Trade Agreements', European Intellectual Property Review, 28(11): 420-27
76. Matthews, Duncan (2006), 'From the August 30, 2003 WTO Decision to the December 6, 2005 Agreement on an Amendment to TRIPS: Improving Access to Medicines in Developing Countries?', Intellectual Property Quarterly, 2: 91-130
77. Matthews, Duncan (2007), 'The Role of International NGOs in the Intellectual Property Policy- Making and Norm- Setting Activities of Multilateral Institutions', Chicago- Kent Law Review, 82(3): 1369-87
78. Matthews, Duncan (2008), 'The Fight Against Counterfeiting and Piracy in the Bilateral Trade Agreements of the EU', Briefi ng Paper prepared for the European Parliament Committee on International Trade, Directorate- General for External Policies of the Union, Brussels: European Parliament
79. Matthews, Duncan (2010), 'Intellectual Property Rights, Human Rights and the Right to Health', in F.W. Grosheide (ed.), Intellectual Property and Human Rights: A Paradox, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 118-39.
80. Matthews, Duncan and Munoz- Tellez, Viviana (2006), 'Bilateral Technical Assistance and the TRIPS Agreement: The United States, Japan and the European Communities in Comparative Perspective', Journal of World Intellectual Property, 9(6): 629-53
81. Matthews, Duncan and Munoz- Tellez, Viviana (2007) 'Parallel Trade: A User's Guide' in Anatole Krattiger, Richard T. Mahoney, Lita Nelsen, et al. (eds), Intellectual Property Management in Health and Agriculture Innovation: A Handbook of Best Practices, Oxford: MIHR and Davis, USA: PIPRA.
82. May, Christopher (2006), 'The World Intellectual Property Organisation and the Development Agenda', paper presented at Frontiers of Regulation: Scholarly Debates and Policy Challenges, an international conference organized by the European Consortium for Political Research, Standing Group on Regulatory Governance and the Centre for the Study of Regulated Industries, School of Management, University of Bath, 8 September
83. May, Christopher (2007), The World Intellectual Property Organization: Resurgence and the Development Agenda, London and New York: Routledge
84. Mayne, Ruth (2002), 'The Global Campaign on Patents and Access to Medicines: An Oxfam Perspective', in Peter Drahos and Ruth Mayne (eds), Global Intellectual Property Rights: Knowledge, Access and Development, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan
85. Mbali, Mandisa (2005), The Treatment Action Campaign and the History of Rights- Based, Patient- Driven HIV/AIDS Activism in South Africa, Research Report No. 29, University of KwaZulu- Natal Centre for Civil Society, http://www.ukzn.ac.za/ccs/files/RReport_29.pdf.
86. Mello e Souza, André de (2005), The Power of the Weak: Advocacy Networks, Ideational Change and the Global Politics of Pharmaceutical Patent Rights, unpublished doctoral thesis, Stanford University
87. Menescal, Andréa K. (2005), 'Changing WIPO's Ways? The 2004 Development Agenda in Historical Perspective', Journal of World Intellectual Property, 8(6): 761-96.
88. Mercurio, Bryan (2006), 'TRIPS- Plus Provisions in FTAs: Recent Trends', in Lorand Bartels and Federico Ortino (eds), Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 215-37
89. Morin, Jean- Frédéric (2008), 'Multilateralising TRIPS- Plus Agreements: Is the US Strategy a Failure?', Working Paper, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1276464.
90. MSF (2009), HIV/AIDS Treatment in Developing Countries: The battle for long- term survival has just begun, Campaign for Access to Essential Medicines, http://www.msfaccess.org/fileadmin/user_upload/diseases/hiv-aids/07_16%20BattleForLongTermSurvival_LowRes_FINAL%203.pdf.
91. Mueller, Janice M. (2007), 'The Tiger Awakens: The Tumultuous Transformation of India's Patent System and the Rise of Indian Pharmaceutical Innovation', University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 68(3).
92. Murphy, Bryan D. and Rodrigues, Edson B. (2005), Brazil's Prior Consent Law: A Dialogue between Brazil and the United States over where the TRIPS Agreement Currently Sets the Balance Between the Protection of Pharmaceutical Patents and Access to Medicines, Paper 891, Berkeley, CA: The Berkeley Electronic Press, http://law.bepress.com.expresso/ eps/891.
93. Musungu, Sisule F. (2004), 'A Review of the Outcomes of WIPO Discussions on the Development Agenda Proposal', Bridges, 8(9), October, http:// www.iprsonline.org/ictsd/docs/Musungu_Bridges8- 9.pdf.
94. Musungu, Sisule F. (2007a), 'WIPO Development Agenda - as the dust settles, pondering what is the agenda, whether it is a success or hot air', Thoughts in Colours blog, Monday 9 July, http://thoughtsincolours.blogspot.com/2007/07/wipo-development-agenda-as-dust.html.
95. Musungu, Sisule F. (2007b), A Conceptual Framework for Priority Identifi cation and Delivery of IP Technical Assistance for LDCs during the Extended Transition Period under the TRIPS Agreement, Geneva: Quaker United Nations Offi ce, http://www.quno.org/geneva/pdf/economic/Issues/Priority-ID-English.pdf.
96. Musungu, Sisule F. and Dutfield, Graham (2003), Multilateral Agreements and a TRIPS- plus World: The World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), Geneva and Ottawa: Quakers United Nations Offi ce and the Quaker International Aff airs Programme.
97. Musungu, Sisule F., Villanueva, S. and Blasetti, R. (2004), Utilizing TRIPS Flexibilities for Public Health Protection through South-South Regional Frameworks, Geneva: South Centre.
98. Mutter, Karl (2005), 'Traditional Knowledge Related to Genetic Resources and its Intellectual Property Protection in Colombia', European Intellectual Property Review, 27(9): 327-33
99. Nguyen, Eric (2005), 'A "Development Agenda" at WIPO: A Shift in IP policy on the International Stage - An Interview with James Love of The Consumer Project on Technology', U.C. Davis Business Law Journal, 22(5), http://blj.ucdavis.edu/article/561/.
100. Odell, John S. and Sell, Susan K. (2006) 'Reframing the Issue: The WTO Coalition on Intellectual Property and Public Health, 2001', in John S. Odell (ed.), Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the WTO and NAFTA, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 85-114.
101. Okediji, Ruth L. (2009), 'History Lessons for the WIPO Development Agenda', in Neil Weinstock Netanel (ed.), The Development Agenda: Global Intellectual Property and Developing Countries, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
102. Orbinski, James (2008), An Imperfect Off ering: Dispatches from the Medical Frontline, London: Rider Books/Ebury Publishing/Random House
103. Oxfam (2001a), Dare to Lead: Public Health and Company Wealth, Oxfam Briefi ng Paper on GlaxoSmithKline, Oxford: Oxfam, http:// www.oxfam.org.uk/resources/policy/health/downloads/daretolead.pdf.
104. Oxfam (2001b), Formula for Fairness: Patient Rights before Patent Rights, Oxfam Briefi ng Paper on Pfi zer, Oxford: Oxfam, http://www.oxfam.org. uk/resources/policy/health/downloads/cb_pfizer.pdf.
105. Paranaguá Moniz, Pedro de (2005), The Development Agenda for WIPO: Another Stillbirth? A Battle Between Access to Knowledge and Enclosure, mimeo
106. Pécoul, Bernard, Chirac, Pierre, Trouiller, Patrice and Pinel, Jacques (1999), 'Access to Essential Drugs in Poor Countries: A Lost Battle?' Journal of the American Medical Association, 281(4): 361-7
107. Pérez- Casas, Carmen (2000), HIV/AIDS Medicines Pricing Report. Setting Objectives: is there a political will? MSF, http://www.msfaccess.org/fileadmin/user_upload/key-publication/Durban%20report%20update%20dec%202000.pdf.
108. Petit, Michael, Collins, Wanda, Fowler, Cary, Correa, Carlos and Thornström, Carl- Gustaf (2000), 'Why Governments Can't Make Policy - The Case of Plant Genetic Resources in the International Arena', Background Paper prepared for the Global Forum on Agricultural Research, 21-23 May, Dresden, document no. GFAR/00/02- 03.
109. Plaisier, Nora and Wijmenga, Paul (2004), Evaluation of Trade- Related Technical Assistance. Three Geneva Based Organisations: ACWL, AITC and QUNO. IOB Working Document, The Netherlands: IOB.
110. Quaker United Nations Offi ce (2001), 'Development Co- operation, TRIPS, Indigenous Knowledge and Genetic Resources', Report based on a seminar held by the Quaker United Nations Offi ce at Jongny- sur-Vevey, Switzerland, 6-7 April 2001
111. Ragavan, S. (2006), 'Of the Inequals of the Uruguay Round', Marquette Intellectual Property Review, 10(2): 273-304.
112. Ramasubban, Radhika and Rishyasringa, Bhanwar (2005), AIDS and Civil Society: India's Learning Curve, Jaipur, India: Rawat Publications
113. Rangnekar, D. (2005), 'No Pills for Poor People? Understanding the Disembowelment of India's Patent Regime', CSGR Working Paper No. 176/05, University of Warwick: Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation.
114. Rodrigues, Edson B. (2006), 'Japan Trade Mark Act, Secs. 3(1)(iii), 4(1) (xvi) - Cupuaçu', International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 37(1), 98-103.
115. Rosina, Monica Steffen Guise, Wang, Daniel and de Campos, Than Christina (2008), 'Access to Medicines: Pharmaceutical Patents and the Right to Health', in Lea Shaver (ed.), Access to Knowledge in Brazil: New Research on Intellectual Property, Innovation and Development, New Haven, CT: Information Society Project, Yale Law School, 166-214.
116. Sahai, Suman (2001), 'India's Plant Variety Protection and Farmers' Rights Act 2001', Bridges, 8(11): http://www.iprsonline.org/ictsd/docs/ SahaiBridgesYear5N8Oct2001.pdf.
117. Sahai, Suman (2002), 'Civil Society Trashes India's Decision to Join UPOV: NGOs Demand Discussion in Parliament', AgBioIndia, New Delhi: India
118. Scherer, Frederick M. and Watal, J. (2001), 'Post- TRIPS Options for Access to Patented Medicines in Developing Countries', CMH Working Paper Series, World Health Organization, Commission on Macroeconomics and Health, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, June.
119. Schmidlehner, Michael (2003), 'Cupuaçu - a case of Amazonian self- assertion', Seedling, April, GRAIN, http://www.grain.org/ seedling/?id=234.
120. Schultz, Michael F. and Walker, David B. (2006), 'The New International Intellectual Property Agenda', in Are Intellectual Property Rights Human Rights? Washington, DC: The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies.
121. Sell, Susan K. (2002), 'TRIPS and the Access to Medicines Campaign', paper prepared for Access to Medicines for the Developing World: International Facilitation or Hindrance? Conference sponsored by the University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, Wisconsin, 9-10 March.
122. Sell, Susan K. (2003), Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
123. Sell, Susan K. and May, Christopher (2001), 'Moments in Law: Contestation and Settlement in the History of Intellectual Property', Review of International Political Economy, 8(3): 467-500.
124. Sell, Susan K. and Prakash, Aseem (2004), 'Using Ideas Strategically: The Context Between Business and NGO Networks in Intellectual Property Rights', International Studies Quarterly, 48: 143-75.
125. Shadlen, Kenneth (2009), 'The Politics of Patents and Drugs in Brazil and Mexico: The Industrial Bases of Health Policies', Comparative Politics, 42(1): 41- 58
126. Shiva, Vandana (1996), Protecting Our Biological and Intellectual Heritage in the Age of Biopiracy, New Delhi: Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Natural Resource Policy
127. Shiva, Vandana (2001), Protect or Plunder? Protecting Intellectual Property Rights, London and New York: Zed Books
128. Shiva, Vandana and Bhutani, Shalini (2001), An Activist's Handbook on Biodiversity, New Delhi: Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology
129. Shiva, Vandana, Bhutani, Shalini, Prasad, Urvashi, Jafri, Afsar H. (1999), An Activist's Handbook on Biodiversity, New Delhi: Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology.
130. Shiva, Vandana and Jafri, Afsar H. (2001), The Need for a Genuine Sui Generis Law to Defend Farmers' Rights as Traditional Breeders: The Inadequacies of the PVP Act, 2001, RFSTE/Navdanya.
131. SIDA (2001), AIDS: The Challenge of this Century - Prevention, Care and Impact Mitigation, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency Report
132. Siplon, Patricia D. (2002), AIDS and the Policy Struggle in the United States, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
133. Smallman, Shawn (2007), The AIDS Pandemic in Latin America, Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press
134. Smolders, Walter (2005), 'Disclosure of Origin and Access and Benefi t Sharing: The Special Case of Seeds for Food and Agriculture', Quaker United Nations Offi ce, Geneva, Switzerland: QUNO Occasional Paper 17
135. Stannard, Clive, van der Graaff, Niek, Randell, Alan, Lallas, Peter and Kenmore, Peter (2004), 'Agricultural Biological Diversity for Food Security: Shaping International Initiatives to Help Agriculture and the Environment', Howard Law Journal, 48(1): 397-430
136. Sullivan, Sian (2001), 'Diff erence, Identity, and Access to Offi cial Discourses: Hai||om, "Bushmen", and a Recent Namibian Ethnography', Anthropos: International Review of Anthropology and Linguistics, 96: 179-92
137. Sulpino Vieira, F. (2007), 'Right to Health Litigations: A Discussion on the Observance of the Principles of Brazil's Health System', Revista de Saúde Pública, Scientifi c Electronic Library Online, 42(2), http://www.scielo.br/ scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034- 89102008000200025&lng=e& nrm=iso&tlng=en.
138. Sutherland, Peter et al. (2004), The Future of the WTO: Addressing Institutional Challenges in the New Millennium, Geneva: World Trade Organization.
139. Swiderska, Krystyana (2006), Protecting Traditional Knowledge: A Framework Based on Customary Laws and Bio- cultural Heritage, paper for the International Conference on Endogenous Development and Bio-Cultural Diversity, 3-5 October
140. Tansey, Geoff (1999), Trade, Intellectual Property and Biodiversity: Key Issues and Options for the 1999 Review of Article 27.3(b) of the TRIPS Agreement, London: Quaker Peace and Service, and Geneva: Quaker United Nations Offi ce
141. Tansey, Geoff (2002), Food Security, Biotechnology and Intellectual Property: Unpacking Some Issues around TRIPS. A Discussion Paper, Geneva: Quaker United Nations Offi ce.
142. Távora dos Santos Filho, Ezio (2000), 'Real Challenges for Real Actors: The Role of Advocacy and Activism in the Fight against AIDS in Brazil', Sexual Health Exchange, 4, http://www.kit.nl/ils/exchange_ content/html/ 2000_4_real_challenges_asp?
143. UNAIDS (2008), Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic, Geneva, Switzerland: UNAIDS
144. UNCTAD- ICTSD (2005), UNCTAD- ICTSD Resource Book on TRIPS and Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
145. United Nations (1966), International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, adopted 16 December 1966, 993 U.N.T.S. 3 General Assembly Resolution 2200 (XXI), 21 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 16) at 49, U.N. Doc.A/6316.
146. United Nations (2009), Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health (Anand Grover). United Nations General Assembly, Eleventh Session, 31 March, Agenda Item 3, A/HRC/11/ 12.
147. United Nations Commission on Human Rights (2001), Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: The Impact of the Agreement on Trade- Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights on Human Rights: Report of the High Commissioner, 27 June, E/CN.4/Sub.2/2001/13/
148. United Nations Economic and Social Committee (1999), General Comment No. 12 on the Right to Adequate Food (Article 11 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Twentieth session, Geneva, 26 April-14 May, E/C.12/1999/5.
149. United Nations Economic and Social Committee (2000a), General Comment No. 14 on the Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health (Article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Twenty- second session, Geneva, 25 April-12 May, E/C.12/2000/4.
150. United Nations Economic and Social Committee (2000b), Discussion paper submitted by Dr. Audrey R. Chapman for the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) on Implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, E/C.12/2000/12, Geneva: United Nations.
151. United Nations Economic and Social Committee (2005), General Comment No. 17 on the Right of Everyone to Benefi t from the Protection of the Moral and Material Interests Resulting from any Scientifi c, Literary or Artistic Production of which he is the Author (Article 15(1)(c) of the Covenant), Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Thirty- fi fth session, 7-25 November, E/C.12/2005/GC/17.
152. United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Sub- Commission on Human Rights (2000), Resolution 2000/7: Intellectual Property Rights and Human Rights
153. United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Sub- Commission on Human Rights (2001), Resolution 2001/21: Intellectual Property Rights and Human Rights
154. United States Trade Representative (2009), 2009 National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers, http://ustr.gov/assets/Document_ Library/Reports_Publications/2009/2009_National_Trade_Estimate_ Report_on_Foreign_Trade_Barriers/asset_upload_fi le405_15451.pdf.
155. Waal, Alex de (2006), AIDS and Power: Why There is no Political Crisis - Yet, London and New York: Zed Books
156. Watal, Jayashree (2001), Intellectual Property Rights in the WTO and Developing Countries, The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International
157. WIPO (2001), Intellectual Property Needs Expectations of Traditional Knowledge Holders: Report on Fact- fi nding Missions on Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge (1998-1999), Geneva, Switzerland: WIPO, http://www.wipo.int/tk/en/tk/ff m/report/index.html.
158. WIPO (2003), Intellectual Property - A Power Tool for Economic Growth, Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization, http://www.wipo. int/about- wipo/en/dgo/wipo_pub_888/index_wipo_pub_888.html.
159. World Bank (2008), Global Economic Prospects 2008 - Technology Diff usion in the Developing World, Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, http:// siteresources.worldbank.org/INTGEP2008/Resources/complete- report. pdf.
160. World Health Assembly (2006), Public Health, Innovation, Essential Health Research and Intellectual Property Rights: Towards a Global Strategy and Plan of Action, Fifty- ninth World Health Assembly, WHA59.24, 27 May.
161. World Health Assembly (2008), Global Strategy and Plan of Action on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property, Sixty- fi rst World Health Assembly, WHA61.21, 24 May.
162. Wynberg, Rachel (2004), 'Rhetoric, Realism and Benefi t- Sharing: Use of Traditional Knowledge of Hoodia Species in the Development of an Appetite Suppressant', Journal of World Intellectual Property, 7(6): 851-76
163. Yu, Peter K. (2007), 'Ten Common Questions about Intellectual Property and Human Rights', Legal Studies Research Paper No. 04- 27, Michigan State University College of Law.
164. Yu, Peter K. (2008), 'Building Intellectual Property Coalitions for Development', CIGI Working Paper No. 37, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: Centre for International Governance Innovation.