Resisting intellectual property

Resisting Intellectual Property

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-237

  Halbert, Debora J ^a  

^a OTTERBEIN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909195212     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203799512     Document Type: Book

References (268)

1. A Decade Later: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act, Hearing before the S. Comm. on the Judiciary, 104th Cong. 124-125 (1996).
2. Adams, G. et al., "Consensus Statement on Antiretroviral Treatment for AIDS in Poor Countries by Individual Members of the Faculty of Harvard University," 19 November 2001. Available online at: http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/bioethics/pdf/consensus_aids_therapy.pdf [accessed 5 July 2004].
3. Africa Policy Information Center. ACT UP Media Advisory. Available online at: http://www.africaaction.org/docs00/drug0010.htm [accessed 5 July 2004].
4. Alexander, B.C., "Lack of Access to HIV/AIDS Drugs in Developing Countries: Is There a Violation of the International Human Right to Health?" Human Rights Brief 8, spring 2001: 12-14.
5. American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, How the Public Gets Its New Music: A Statement of Some of the Reasons for the Copyright Law, Its Operation and How it Benefits the Public, New York: American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, 1933.
6. Anderson, B., Imagined Communities, New York: Verso, 1991.
7. Aoki, K., "Neocolonialism, Anticommons Property, and Biopiracy in the (Not-So-Brave) New World Order of International Intellectual Property Protection," Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 6: 11-58, 1998.
8. Aoki, K.,"Space Invaders: Critical Geography, the 'Third World' in International Law and Critical Race Theory," Villanova Law Review 45: 913-57, 2000.
9. Aronowitz, S., "Is a Democracy Possible? The Decline of the Public in the American Debate," in B. Robbins (ed.), The Phantom Public Sphere, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.
10. Arvelo-Jiménex, N., "Kuyujani Originario: The Yekuana Road to the Overall Protection of Their Rights as a People," in M. Finger and P. Schuler (eds.) Poor People's Knowledge: Promoting Intellectual Property in Developing Countries, Washington, DC: Co-published by Oxford University Press and the World Bank, 2004.
11. Awang, S. S., "Indigenous Nations and the Human Genome Diversity Project," in G.J. Sefa Dei, B.L. Hall, and D.G. Rosenberg (eds), Indigenous Knowledge in Global Contexts: Multiple Readings of Our World, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000.
12. Bailey, T.C., "Note, Innovation and Access: The Role of Compulsory Licensing in the Development and Distribution of HIV/AIDS Drugs," University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology and Policy, spring 2001: 193-218.
13. Baker, D., Dying for Patents, Center for Economic Policy and Research, 29 October 2001. Available online at: http://www.commondreams.org/views01/1030-09.htm [accessed 5 July 2004].
14. Balaban, D., "Music in the Digital Millennium: The Effects of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998," UCLA Entertainment Law Review 7, spring 2000: pp. 311-23.
15. Band, J., "Closing the Interoperability Gap: NCCUSL's Adoption of a Reverse Engineering Exception to UCITA," The Computer and Internet Lawyer 19: 1, 2002.
16. Barlow, J.P., "The Next Economy of Ideas: Will Copyright Survive the Napster Bomb? Nope, but Creativity Will," Wired, October 2000: pp. 240-252
17. Baron, R.A., "Making the Public Domain Public," 28 April 2000. Available online at: http://www.studiolo.org/IP/VRA-TM-SF-PublicDomain.htm [accessed 14 July 2004].
18. Barsh, R.L., "Grounded Visions: Native American Conceptions of Landscapes and Ceremony," St Thomas Law Review 13, fall 2000: 127-54.
19. Battiste, M. and Henderson, J. (Sa'ke'j). Y., Protecting Indigenous Knowledge and Heritage, Saskatoon: Purich Publishing Ltd, 2000.
20. Benjamin, C., "Biopiracy and Native Knowledge: Indigenous Rights on the Last Frontier," Native Americas 14, 30 June 1997.
21. Benkler, Y., "Constitutional Bounds of Database Protection: The Role of Judicial Review in the Creation and Definition of Private Rights in Information," Berkeley Technology Law Journal 15: 535-603, 2000.
22. Bernstein, K. J., "The No Electronic Theft Act: The Music Industry's New Instrument In The Fight Against Internet Piracy," UCLA Entertainment Law Review, 7, spring 2000: 325-41.
23. Bettig, R.W., Copyrighting Culture: The Political Economy of Intellectual Property, Boulder: Westview Press, 1996.
24. Binder, J.P., "Current Developments of Public Performance Rights for Sound Recordings Transmitted Online: You Push Play, but Who Gets Paid?" Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review 22: 1-36, 2002.
25. Blakeney, M., "Global Intellectual Property Rights: Boundaries of Access and Enforcement: Panel II: The Law and Policy of Protecting Folklore, Traditional Knowledge, and Genetic Resources," Fordham Intellectual Property Media and Entertainment Law Journal 12, spring 2002: 753-803.
26. Blanke, J. M., "Vincent Van Gogh, 'Sweat of the Brow' and Database Protection," American Business Law Journal 39: 645-82, 2002.
27. Bollier, D., Silent Theft: The Private Plunder of Our Common Wealth, New York: Routledge, 2002.
28. Booker, S. and Minter, W., "AIDS in Africa: Is the World Concerned Enough?" Great Decisions 71-80: 72, 2002. Available online at: http://www.africaaction.org/action/aids2002.pdf [accessed 5 July 2004].
29. Bott, C.M., "Protection of Information Products: Balancing Commercial Reality and the Public Domain," University of Cincinnati Law Review 67: 237-64, 1998.
30. Boyle, J., Shamans, Software and Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information Society, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.
31. Boyle, J.,"A Politics of Intellectual Property: Environmentalism for the Net," Duke Law Journal 47: 87-116, 1997.
32. Boyle, J.,"The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain," Law and Contemporary Problems 66, spring/summer 2003: 33-74.
33. Brown, M.F., Who Owns Native Culture? Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003.
34. Brush, S. B., "Protectors, Prospectors, and Pirates of Biological Resources," in L. Maffi (ed.), On Biocultural Diversity: Linking Language, Knowledge, and the Environment, Washington: Smithsonian Institute Press, 2001.
35. Burk, D.L., "Muddy Rules for Cyberspace," Cardozo Law Review 21: 121-79, 1999.
36. Burk, D.L.,"Patenting Speech," Texas Law Review 79: 100-62, 2000.
37. Burrows, B., "Patents, Ethics and Spin," in Brian Tokar (ed.), Redesigning Life: The Worldwide Challenge to Genetic Engineering, New York: Zed Books, 2001.
38. Busch, N.A., "Jack and the Beanstalk: Property Rights in Genetically Modified Plants," Minnesota Intellectual Property Review 3: 1-234, 2002.
39. Butler, K.C., "Keeping the World Safe from Naked-Chicks-in-Art Refrigerator Magnets: The Plot to Control Art Images in the Public Domain through Copyrights in Photographic and Digital Reproductions," Hastings Communication and Entertainment Law Journal 21: 57-8, 1998.
40. Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., Wilson, A.C., Cantor, C.R., Cook-Deegan, R.M., and King, M.C. "Call for a Worldwide Survey of Human Genetic Diversity: A Vanishing Opportunity for the Human Genome Project," Genomics 11: 490, 1991.
41. Churchill, W., From a Native Son: Selected Essays in Indigenism, 1985-1995, Boston: South End Press, 1996.
42. Coombe, R., "Objects of Property and Subjects of Politics: Intellectual Property Laws and Democratic Dialogue," Texas Law Review 69: 1853-80, 1991.
43. Coombe, R.,"Author/Izing the Celebrity: Publicity Rights, Postmodern Politics, and Unauthorized Genders," Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal 10: 365-95, 1992.
44. Coombe, R.,"Contingent Articulations: A Critical Cultural Studies of Law," in A. Sarat and T.R. Kearns (eds), Law in the Domains of Culture, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998.
45. Coombe, R.,The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties, Durham: Duke University Press, 1998.
46. Coombe, R.,"Sixth Annual Tribal Sovereignty Symposium: 'The Recognition of Indigenous Peoples' and Community Traditional Knowledge in International Law," St Thomas Law Review 14, winter 2001: 275-85.
47. Coombe, R.,"Fear, Hope, and Longing for the Future of Authorship and a Revitalized Public Domain in Global Regimes of Intellectual Property," DePaul Law Review 52, summer 2003: 1171-91.
48. Correa, C.M., Intellectual Property Rights, the WTO and Developing Countries: The TRIPS Agreement and Policy Options, Penang: Third World Network, 2000.
49. Cunningham, A.B., "Indigenous Knowledge and Biodiversity: Global Commons or Regional Heritage?" Cultural Survival Quarterly 15, 31 July 1991. Available online at: http://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/csq/index.cfm?id=15.3 [accessed 30 July 2004].
50. Dahlgren, P., Television and the Public Sphere: Citizenship, Democracy and the Media, London: Sage Publications, 1995.
51. Davis, W., "Comment, the Medicine Equity and Drug Safety Act of 2000: Releasing Gray Market Pharmaceuticals," Tulane Journal of International and Comp. Law 9, spring 2001: 483-510.
52. Dawson, R.L., The French Booktrade and the "Permission Simple" of 1777: Copyright and Public Domain, Oxford: The Voltaire Foundation, 1992.
53. Day, W., "Artists Don't Make Money from the Record Deals," 2000. Available online at: http://www.rapstation.com/digital_affairs/wendy_day/ [accessed 16 July 2003].
54. Dean, J., Publicity's Secret: How Technoculture Capitalizes on Democracy, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002.
55. Deyhimy, L., "Why Seeing Is no Longer Believing: Misappropriations of Image and Speech," Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Journal 19: 51-73, 1998.
56. Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 100 S.Ct. 2204, 2206
57. Dixon, R., Open Source Software Law, Boston: Artech House, 2004.
58. Dolmo, B.C., "Note, Examining Global Access to Essential Pharmaceuticals in the Face of Patent Protection Rights: The South African Example," Buffalo Human Rights Law Review 7: 137-163, 2001.
59. Dove, M.R., "Center, Periphery, and Biodiversity: A Paradox of Governance and a Developmental Challenge," in S.B. Brush and D. Stabinsky (eds), Valuing Local Knowledge: Indigenous People and Intellectual Property Rights, Washington, DC: Island Press.
60. Draft United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, U.N. Subcommission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, Res. 1994/5 at 105, U.N. Doc.E/CN.4/Sub.2/1994/56 (1994).
61. Drahos, P., "The Rights to Food, Health and Intellectual Property in the Era of 'Biogopolies,'" in Stephen Bottomley and David Kinley (eds), Commercial Law and Human Rights, Burlington: Ashgate/Dartmouth, 2002, pp. 215-33.
62. Drahos, P and Blakeney, M. (eds), Perspectives on Intellectual Property: IP in Biodiversity and Agriculture, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2001.
63. Drahos, P. and Braithwaite, J., Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? New York: The New Press, 2002.
64. Dreyfus, H., "Heidegger on Gaining a Free Relation to Technology," in D.M. Kaplan (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Technology, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2004.
65. Dugger, C.W., "A Catch-22 on Drugs for the World's Poor," New York Times, 16 November 2001: W1.
66. Dutfield, G., "The Public and Private Domains: Intellectual Property Rights in Traditional Knowledge," Science Communication 21: 274-95, 2000.
67. Dutfield, G.,"Indigenous Peoples' Declarations and Statements and Equitable Research Relationships," in Sarah A. Laird (ed.), Biodiversity and Traditional Knowledge: Equitable Partnerships in Practice, Sterling: Earthscan Publications, Ltd, 2002.
68. Eldredv. Ashcroft, 537 U.S. 186 (2003).
69. Elliott, P., "Intellectuals, the 'Information Society' and the Disappearance of the Public Sphere," in C. Newbold and O. Boyd-Barrett (eds), Approaches to Media: A Reader, New York: St Martin's Press, 1995.
70. Fecteau, L.M., "The Ayahuasca Patent Revocation: Raising Questions About Current U.S. Patent Policy," Boston College Third World Law Journal 21, winter 2001: 69-104.
71. Feenberg, A., Questioning Technology, New York: Routledge, 1999.
72. Feist Publications, Inc. V. Rural Telephone Service, Inc. 111 S. Ct. (1991).
73. Ferguson, K. and Turnbull, P., Oh Say Can You See: The Semiotics of the Military in Hawai'i, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.
74. Finger, M. and Schuler, P. (eds), Poor People's Knowledge: Promoting Intellectual Property in Developing Countries, Washington, DC: Co-published by Oxford University Press and the World Bank, 2004.
75. Fisher, W.F. and Ponniah, T. (eds), Another World is Possible: Popular Alternatives to Globalization at the World Social Forum, New York: Zed Books, 2003.
76. Fishman, S., The Public Domain: How to Find Copyright-Free Writings, Music, Art and More, Berkeley: Nolo, 2000.
77. Fixico, D.L., The American Indian Mind in a Linear World, New York: Routledge, 2003.
78. Ford, S.M., "Comment, Compulsory Licensing Provisions under the TRIPS Agreement: Balancing Pills and Patents," American University International Law Review 15: 941-74, 2000.
79. Foster, E., "UCITA, the Undead," Infoworld 24, 6 May 2002: 72.
80. Fraser, N., "Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy," in B. Robbins (ed.), The Phantom Public Sphere, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.
81. Frow, J., "Information as Gift and Commodity," The New Left Review 219: 89-108, 1996.
82. Frow, J.,"Public Domain and the New World Order in Knowledge," Social Semiotics 10: 173-85, 2000.
83. Gaines, J.M., Contested Culture: The Image, the Voice, and the Law, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991.
84. Galtung, J., "After Camelot," in I. Horowitz, The Rise and Fall of Project Camelot, 1967, quoted in L.A. Whitt, "Indigenous Peoples, Intellectual Property and the New Imperial Science," Oklahoma City University Law Review 23, spring/summer 1998: 211-59.
85. Garfield, A., "The First Amendment as a Check on Copyright Rights," Hastings Communication and Entertainment Law Journal 23, spring 2001: 587-605.
86. Garnham, N., Capitalism and Communication: Global Culture and the Economics of Information, London: SAGE Publications, 1990.
87. Garnham, N.,"Concepts of Culture - Public Policy and the Cultural Industries," in A. Gray and J. McGuigan (eds), Studying Culture: An Introductory Reader, New York: Arnold, 1997.
88. Gasaway, L., "Importance of the Public Domain," Information Outlook, July 2001: 32-3.
89. Geffen, N., Treatment Action Center (TAC), Pharmaceutical Patents, Human Rights, and the HIV/AIDS Epidemic, May 2001, p. 4. Available online at: http://www.tac.org.za/. Gene Patents and Other Genomic Inventions, Hearing before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, 13 July 2000.
90. Gernstein, L., "The Wireless, Non-Free, Paperless Future," USC Annenberg Online Journalism Review, 2002.
91. Gibbons, R.G. and Pennisi, C.S., "The 'One-by-One' Approach toward Eliminating the Epidemic of On-Line Music Copyright Infringement," Intellectual Property Today, December 2003: 35.
92. Githaiga, J.W., "Intellectual Property Law and the Protection of Indigenous Folklore and Knowledge," E-Law - Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law 5, June 1998. Available online at: http://www.murdoch.edu.au/elaw/indices/issue/v5n2.html [accessed 7 July 2004].
93. Godwin, M., Cyber Rights: Defending Free Speech in the Digital Age, 2nd edn, Cambridge: MIT Press, 2003. "Gone with the Wind Done Gone: 'Re-Writing' and Fair Use," Harvard Law Review 115: 1193, 2002.
94. Gonzalez, I.G., "Recording Industry Association of America, Inc. v. Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc.," Berkeley Technology Law Journal 15: 67-83, 2000.
95. Greaves, T., "Tribal Rights," in S.B. Brush and D. Stabinsky (eds), Valuing Local Knowledge: Indigenous People and Intellectual Property Rights, Washington, DC: Island Press.
96. Greely, H.T., "Informed Consent, Stored Tissue Samples, and the Human Genome Diversity Project: Protecting the Rights of Research Participants," in R.F. Weir (ed.), Stored Tissue Samples: Ethical, Legal, and Public Policy Implications, Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 1998.
97. Greene, S., "Intellectual Property, Resources, or Territory?" in M. Philip Bradley and P. Petro (eds), Truth Claims: Representation and Human Rights, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2002.
98. Grierson, K.W., "Enforceability of 'Clickwrap' or 'Shrinkwrap' Agreements Common in Computer Software, Hardware, and Internet Transactions," ALD, 5th, 106: 309, 2003.
99. Gwyn, R., "Big Drug Companies, Shameful Profits," Toronto Star, 7 March 2001. Available online at: http://www.commondreams.org/views01/0307-03.htm [accessed 5 July 2004].
100. Habermas, J., "The Public Sphere," in S. Seidman (ed.), Jurgen Habermas on Society and Politics: A Reader, Boston: Beacon Press, 1989.
101. Habermas, J.,The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into the Category of Bourgeois Society, trans T. Burger, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1989.
102. Haemmerli, A., "Whose Who? The Case for a Kantian Right of Publicity," Duke Law Journal 49, November 1999: 383-492.
103. Halbert, D., "Discourses of Danger and the Computer Hacker," The Information Society 13: 361-74, 1997.
104. Halbert, D.,Intellectual Property in the Information Age: The Politics of Expanding Property Rights, New York: Quorum Press, 1999.
105. Halbert, D.,"Who Owns Your Personality: Reality Television and Publicity Rights," in M.J. Smith and A. Wood (eds), Survivor Lessons: Essays on Communication and Reality Television, Jefferson: McFarland & Company, 2003.
106. Halewood, M., "Indigenous and Local Knowledge in International Law: A Preface to Sui Generis Intellectual Property Protection," McGill Law Journal 44, December 1999: 953-96.
107. Hansen, H., "Global Intellectual Property Rights: Boundaries of Access and Enforcement: Panel II: The Law and Policy of Protecting Folklore, Traditional Knowledge, and Genetic Resources," Fordham Intellectual Property Media and Entertainment Law Journal 12, spring 2002: 753-803.
108. Haraway, D.J., "Universal Donors in a Vampire Culture: It's All in the Family: Biological Kinship Categories in the Twentieth-Century United States," in W. Cronon, (ed.), Uncommon Ground: Toward Reinventing Nature, New York: W.W. Norton, 1995.
109. Hardin, G., "Tragedy of the Commons," in D. Schlosberg and J.S. Dryzek (eds), Debating the Earth: The Environmental Politics Reader, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
110. Harrelson, J.A., "Note: Trips, Pharmaceutical Patents, and the HIV/AIDS Crisis: Finding the Proper Balance between Intellectual Property Rights and Compassion," Widener Law Symposium 7, spring 2001: 175-201.
111. Harvey, D., The Condition of Postmodernity, Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, Inc., 1989.
112. Heald, P.J., "Reviving the Rhetoric of the Public Interest: Choir Directors, Copy Machines, and New Arrangements of Public Domain Music," Duke Law Journal 46: 241-76, 1996.
113. Heidegger, M., "Overcoming Metaphysics," in The End of Philosophy, New York: Harper & Row, 1973.
114. Heidegger, M.,The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, trans. William Lovitt, New York: Harper & Row, 1977.
115. Helfer, L.R., "World Music on a U.S. Stage: A Berne/TRIPS and Economic Analysis of the Fairness in Music Licensing Act," Boston University Law Review 80, February 2000: 93-204.
116. Heller, C., "McDonald's, MTV and Monsanto: Resisting Biotechnology in the Age of Informational Capital," in B. Tokar (ed.), Redesigning Life: The Worldwide Challenge to Genetic Engineering, New York: Zed Books, 2001.
117. Heller, M.A., "The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets," Harvard Law Review 111: 621-88, 1998.
118. Henry, D. and Lexchin, J., "The Pharmaceutical Industry as a Medicines Provider," Lancet 360: 1590-5, 2002.
119. Hereniko, V., "Indigenous Knowledge and Academic Imperialism," in R. Borofsky (ed.), Remembrance of Pacific Pasts: An Invitation to Remake History, Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 2000.
120. Hesse, C., The Other Enlightenment: How French Women Became Modern, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.
121. Hill, R.T., The Public Domain and Democracy: A Study of Social, Economic and Political Problems in the United States in Relation to Western Development, New York: Longmans, Green & Co., Agents, 1910.
122. Himanen, P., The Hacker Ethic: And the Spirit of the Information Age, New York: Random House, 2001.
123. Hochschild, A., King Leopold's Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror and Heroism in Colonial Africa, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1998.
124. Human Genome Diversity Project, Testimony before the Committee on Governmental Affairs, 26 April 1993.
125. Hyde, A., Bodies of Law, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997. "In Congress: Internet Music Sharing; Senate Music Sharing Hearings Portray Napster as Both Thief and Innovator," Leader Publications, Inc. 5, July 2000.
126. Jackson, M., "The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998: A Proposed Amendment to Accommodate Free Speech," Communication Law and Policy 5, winter 2000: 61-92.
127. Jazsi, P., Growth Rate of the Public Domain. Available online at: http://eon.law.harvard.edu/openlaw/eldredvashcroft/pubdomain.html [accessed 14 July 2004].
128. John Moore v. The Regents of the University of California. 51 Cal. 3d 120 at 127 (1990).
129. Joint UN Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) and WHO, "Guidance Modules on Antiretroviral Treatments, Module 1: Introduction to Antiretroviral Treatments," U.N. Doc. UNAIDS/98.7, 1998. Available online at: http://www.paho.org/english/hcp/hca/mod1.doc [accessed 5 July 2004].
130. Joint UNICEF, UNAIDS Secretariat, WHO/HTP, MSF Project, "Sources and Prices of Selected Drugs and Diagnostics for People Living with HIV/AIDS," 1 May 2001, p. 5. Available online at: http://www.accessmed-msf.org/upload/ReportsandPublications/3920012333116/Sources%20and%20prices.pdf [accessed 5 July 2004].
131. Kauffman, L.A., "A Short History of Radical Renewal," in B. Shepard and R. Hayduk (eds), From ACT UP to the WTO: Urban Protest and Community Building in the Era of Globalization, New York: Verso, 2002.
132. Keck, M.E. and Sikkink, K., Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998.
133. Kelly, K., "Where Music Will Be Coming From," New York Times Magazine, 17 March 2002: 29-31.
134. Kennedy, T. G., "GATT - Out of the Public Domain: Constitutional Dimensions of Foreign Copyright Restoration," St John's Journal of Legal Commentary 11, spring 1996: 545-79.
135. Key, S.W. and DeNoon, D.J., "Cuba Upbeat on Vaccine Deal," World Disease Weekly Plus, 20 September 1999: 17.
136. Kheit, J., "Public Performance Copyright: A Guide to Public Place Analysis," Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal 26: 1-63, 1999.
137. Korten, D., When Corporations Rule the World, San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 1995.
138. Kramer, M., "Comment, The Bolar Amendment Abroad: Preserving the Integrity of American Patents Overseas after the South African Medicines Act," Dickenson Journal of International Law 18, spring 2001: 553-73.
139. Krimsky, S., "The Profit of Scientific Discovery and its Normative Implications," Chicago-Kent Law Review 75: 15-39, 1999.
140. Kunstadt, R.M., "Fat Lady Hasn't Sung on MP3," The National Law Journal, 17 July 2000: A19.
141. Laird, S.A. (ed.), Biodiversity and Traditional Knowledge: Equitable Partnerships in Practice, Sterling: Earthscan Publications, Ltd, 2002.
142. Lane, P., "Human Patenting: Blood Money," Guardian, 21 January 1998: 4.
143. Lange, D., "Recognizing the Public Domain," Law and Contemporary Problems 44: 147-78, 1981.
144. Leistner, M., "Existing Legal Provisions Regarding the Protection of Traditional Knowledge," in S. von Lewinski (ed.), Indigenous Heritage and Intellectual Property: Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore, New York: Kluwer Law International, 2004.
145. Lerner, J. and Tirole, J., "The Simple Economics of Open Source," in NBER Working Paper Series, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, March 2000.
146. Lessig, L., The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World, New York: Random House, 2002.
147. Levey, S., Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution, Garden City: Anchor Press, 1984.
148. Lide, C., "UCITA: A Challenge to Traditional Licensing Policy?" Educause Review 35: 60, 2000.
149. Lipton, J., "Balancing Private Rights and Public Policies: Reconceptualizing Property in Databases," Berkeley Technology Law Journal 18, summer 2003: 773-852.
150. Litman, J., "The Public Domain," Emory Law Journal 39: 965-1023, 1990.
151. Litman, J.,Digital Copyright, New York: Prometheus Books, 2001.
152. Lock, M., "Symposium: Genetic Diversity and the Politics of Difference," Chicago-Kent Law Review 75: 83-111, 1999.
153. Locke, J., Second Treatise of Government, ed. C.B. Macpherson, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1980.
154. Love, C., "Courtney Love Does the Math," Salon.com, 14 June 2000. Available online at: http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2000/06/14/love/index.html [accessed 31 July 2003].
155. Love, J., "Appendix B: Time-line of Disputes over Compulsory Licensing and Parallel Importation in South Africa," 5 August 1999. Available online at: http://www.cptech.org/ip/health/sa/sa-timeline.txt [accessed 5 July 2004].
156. Love, J.,"Five Common Mistakes by Reporters Covering US/South Africa Disputes over Compulsory Licensing and Parallel Imports," Consumer Project on Technology, 23 September 1999. Available online at: http://www.cptech.org/ip/health/sa/mistakes.html [accessed 5 July 2004].
157. McCann, A.T., "Beyond the Commons: The Expansion of the Irish Music Rights Organization, the Elimination of Uncertainty, and the Politics of Enclosure," doctoral dissertation, University of Limerick, January 2002.
158. McCay, B.J. and Fortmann, L., "Voices from the Commons: Evolving Relations of Property and Management," Cultural Survival Quarterly 20, 30 April 1996: 24.
159. McClintock, A., Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest, New York: Routledge, 1995.
160. McDonald, B.D., "The Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act," Berkeley Technology Law Journal 16: 461-84, 2001.
161. McGowan, D., "Symposium: Intellectual Property Challenges in the Next Century: Legal Implications of Open-Source Software," University of Illinois Law Review, 2001: 241-303.
162. McLeod, K., Owning Culture: Authorship, Ownership, and Intellectual Property Law, New York: Peter Lang, 2001.
163. Maffi, L., "Language, Knowledge, and Indigenous Heritage Rights," in L. Maffie (ed.), On Biocultural Diversity: Linking Language, Knowledge, and the Environment, Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, 2001.
164. Marden, E., "The Neem Tree Patent: International Conflict over the Commodification of Life," Boston College International & Comparative Law Review 22, spring 1999: 279-95.
165. Marshall, E., "Companies Rush to Patent DNA," Science, 7 February 1998: 780-1.
166. May, C., A Global Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights: The New Enclosures? New York: Routledge, 2000.
167. May, C.,"Justifying Enclosure," in S. Braman (ed.), Biotechnology and Communication: The Meta-Technologies of Information, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004.
168. May, C.,"Concentrated Industry, Fragmented Consumption: The Global Music Industry in the New Millennium," in M.I. Franklin (ed.), Shake, Rattle and Rap: On Music, Culture and Politics, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005 (forthcoming).
169. Menn, J., All the Rave: The Rise and Fall of Shawn Fanning's Napster, New York: Crown Business, 2003.
170. Mickunas, A., "The Public Domain," in J.W. Murphy and D.L. Peck (eds), Open Institutions: The Hope for Democracy, Connecticut: Praeger, 1993.
171. Miles, E., "In Re Aimster & MGM, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.: Peer-to-Peer and the Sony Doctrine," Berkeley Technology Law Journal 19(1): 21-58, 2004.
172. Miller, C.J., "Patent Law and Human Genomics," Capital University Law Review 26: 893-922, 1997.
173. Minasi, M., The Software Conspiracy: Why Software Companies Put out Faulty Products, How They Can Hurt You, and What You Can Do about It, New York: McGraw Hill, 2000.
174. Morgan, E.S., Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and America, New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1988.
175. Morris, R., "When Is a CD Factory Not Like a Dance Hall? The Difficulty of Establishing Third-Party Liability for Infringing Digital Music Samples," Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal 18: 257-306, 2000.
176. Nash, R., Wilderness and the American Mind, 3rd edn, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967.
177. Office of the US Trade Representative, 2001 Comprehensive Report of the President of the United States on U.S. Trade and Investment Policy toward Sub-Saharan Africa and Implementation of the African Growth and Opportunity Act 43, May 2001. Available online at: http://www.ustr.gov/regions/africa/repo_2001.pdf [accessed 5 July 2004].
178. Oh, C., "Report on TRIPS Council Special Discussion on Access to Medicines (September 19, 2001) and TRIPS Informal Meeting," Third World Network, 21 September 2001. Available online at: http://www.africapolicy.org
179. Oh, S., "Legal Update: The Digital Performance Rights in Sound Recordings Act of 1995: Exclusive Performance Rights for Digital Transmission of Copyrighted Works," Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law 2: 17, 1996.
180. OTA Report on the Human Genome Project, Hearing before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, 27 April 1988.
181. Park, R.S., "Note, The International Drug Industry: What the Future Holds for South Africa's HIV/AIDS Patients," Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 11, winter 2002: 125-54.
182. Pedraza, L. "MP3: Second Verse," UCLA Entertainment Law Review 7, spring 2000: 343-55.
183. Perens, B. et al., "Free Software Leaders Stand Together," 15 May 2001. Available online at: http://perens.com/Articles/StandTogether.html [accessed 13 July 2004].
184. Perlman, M., Steal This Idea: Intellectual Property Rights and the Corporate Confiscation of Creativity, New York: Palgrave, 2002.
185. Petreley, N., "Napster Doesn't Have to Undermine the Way the Music Industry Makes its Money," Infoworld, 13 March 2000.
186. Pharmaceutical Patent Issues: Interpreting GATT, Hearing before the S. Comm. on the Judiciary, 104th Cong. 227, 1996.
187. Pitcher, E., DeLisi, D.C., Gollin, M., McGoodwin, W., and Wittenberg, L. "Symposium: Probing the Human Genome: Who Owns Genetic Information?" Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law 4: para 2-122, 1997.
188. Pollack, M., "The Right to Know?: Delimiting Database Protection at the Juncture of the Commerce Clause, the Intellectual Property Clause and the First Amendment," Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal 17: 47-145, 1999.
189. Pollack, W.M., "Tuning in: The Future of Copyright Protection for Online Music in the Digital Millennium," Fordham Law Review 68, May 2000: 2445-88.
190. Posey, D., "Effecting International Change," Cultural Survival Quarterly, 15, 31 July 1991.
191. Posey, D.,"Intellectual Property Rights and the Sacred Balance: Some Spiritual Consequences from the Commercialization of Traditional Resources," in J.A. Grim (ed.), Indigenous Traditions and Ecology: The Interbeing of Cosmology and Community, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.
192. Posey, D.A. and Dutfield, G., Beyond Intellectual Property: Towards Traditional Resource Rights for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities, Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 1996.
193. Quinn, M.L., "Sixth Annual Tribal Sovereignty Symposium: 'The Recognition of Indigenous Peoples' and Community Traditional Knowledge in International Law," St Thomas Law Review 14, winter 2001: 287-313.
194. Rattray, G.N., "The Enola Bean Patent Controversy: Biopiracy, Novelty and Fish-and-Chips," Duke Law and Technology Review 8: para. 11, June 2002.
195. Raymond, E. (ed.), The New Hacker's Dictionary, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991.
196. Raymond, E. The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary, Cambridge: O'Reilly, 1999.
197. Reichman, J.H. and Uhlir, P.F., "Database Protection at the Crossroads: Recent Developments and Their Impact on Science and Technology," Berkeley Technology Law Journal 14: 793-838, 1999.
198. Reichman, J.H.and Uhlir, P.F.,"Promoting Public Good Uses of Scientific Data: A Contractually Reconstructed Commons for Science and Innovation," Conference on the Public Domain, Durham: Duke University School of Law, pp. 239-322, 2001.
199. Richardson, B., "From Longitude to Empire: The Articulations of Place in the Voyages of Captain Cook," dissertation, University of Hawai'i (2001). Available online at: http://www2.hawaii.edu/~richards. Forthcoming with University of British Columbia Press.
200. Robbins, B. (ed.), The Phantom Public Sphere, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.
201. Robbins, R.M., Our Landed Heritage: The Public Domain 1776-1970, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1976.
202. Roht-Arriaza, N., "Of Seeds and Shamans: The Appropriation of the Scientific and Technical Knowledge of Indigenous and Local Communities," Michigan Journal of International Law 17, summer 1996: 919-65.
203. Rose, C.M., Property and Persuasion: Essays on the History, Theory, and Rhetoric of Ownership, Boulder, San Francisco: Westview Press, 1994.
204. Rose, M., Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.
205. Ross, T., "Copyright and the Invention of Tradition," Eighteenth-Century Studies 26: 1-27, 1992.
206. Rothenberg, S., Copyright and Public Performance of Music, Littleton: Fred B. Rothman & Co., 1987 [originally published The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1954].
207. Said, E., Culture and Imperialism, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1994.
208. Samuelson, P., "Mapping the Digital Public Domain: Threats and Opportunities," Law and Contemporary Problems 66, spring/summer 2003: 148-54.
209. Sarma, L., "Biopiracy: Twentieth Century Imperialism in the Form of International Agreements," Temple International and Comparative Law Journal 13, spring 1999: 107-36.
210. Sawyer, E., "An ACT UP Founder 'acts up' for Africa's Access to AIDS," in B. Shepard and R. Hayduk (eds), From ACT UP to the WTO: Urban Protest and Community Building in the Era of Globalization, New York: Verso, 2002.
211. Scherer, F. M., "The Law and Economics of Intellectual Property Rights: The Pharmaceutical Industry and World Intellectual Property Standards," Vanderbilt Law Review 53, November 2000: 2245-54.
212. Sell, S., Power and Ideas: North-South Politics of Intellectual Property and Antitrust, Albany: University of New York Press, 1998.
213. Sell, S.,Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
214. Sennett, R., The Fall of Public Man, New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1974.
215. Shand, H., "Gene Giants: Understanding the 'Life Industry'," in B. Tokar (ed.), Redesigning Life: The Worldwide Challenge to Genetic Engineering, New York: Zed Books, 2001.
216. Shiva, V., Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge, Boston: South End Press, 1997.
217. Shiva, V., "Biopiracy: The Theft of Knowledge and Resources," in B. Tokar (ed.), Redesigning Life: The Worldwide Challenge to Genetic Engineering, New York: Zed Books, 2001.
218. Shiva, V., "Seed Satyagraha: A Movement for Farmers' Rights and Freedoms in a World of Intellectual Property Rights, Globalized Agriculture and Biotechnology," in B. Tokar (ed.), Redesigning Life: The Worldwide Challenge to Genetic Engineering, New York: Zed Books, 2001.
219. Shulman, S., Owning the Future, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1999.
220. Smith, J., Chatfield, C., and Pagnucco, R., Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity beyond the State, Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1997.
221. Smith, M.H., "The Limits of Copyright: Property, Parody, and the Public Domain," Duke Law Journal 42: 1233-72, 1993.
222. Spectar, J.M., "The Hybrid Horseman of the Apocalypse: The Global AIDS Pandemic & the North-South Fracas," Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 29, winter 2001: 253-99.
223. Sprigman, C., "The Mouse That Ate the Public Domain: Disney, the Copyright Term Extension Act and Eldred v. Ashcroft". Available online at: http://writ.news.findlaw.com/commentary/20020305_sprigman.html [accessed 14 July 2004].
224. Stallman, R., "Confusing Words and Phrases That Are Worth Avoiding." Available online at: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#IntellectualProperty [accessed 14 July 2004].
225. Starr, P., "The Electronic Commons: The Promise of the New Public Domain," The American Prospect 11 (10), 27 March-10 April 2000: 30-4.
226. Story, A.S., "Don't Ignore Copyright, the 'Sleeping Giant' on the TRIPS and International Educational Agenda," in P. Drahos and R. Mayne (eds), Global Intellectual Property Rights: Knowledge, Access and Development, New York: Palgrave, 2002.
227. Study on the Protection of the Cultural and Intellectual Property of Indigenous Peoples, U.N. Subcommission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, 45th Sess., Agenda Item 14, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/13993/28 (1993).
228. Tabor, A.M., "Recent Development: AIDS Crisis," Harvard Journal on Legislation 39, summer 2001: 515-28.
229. Taubes, G., "Scientists Attacked for 'Patenting' Pacific Tribe," Science, 17 November 1995.
230. Tauli-Corpuz, V., "Biotechnology and Indigenous Peoples," in B. Tokar (ed.), Redesigning Life: The Worldwide Challenge to Genetic Engineering, New York: Zed Books, 2001.
231. Theodoulou, S.Z. (ed.), AIDS: The Politics and Policy of Disease, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1996.
232. Therien, J.R., "Exorcising the Specter of a 'Pay-Per-Use' Society: Toward Preserving Fair Use and the Public Domain in the Digital Age," Berkeley Technology Law Journal 16: 979-1043, 2001.
233. Thierer, A. and Crews, W. (eds), Copy Fights: The Future of Intellectual Property in the Information Age, Washington, DC: Cato Institute, 2002.
234. Thilman, J., "Art and Music Sampling: The Death of Creativity," Telecommunications Radio Project, Program #5-93: KPFA Radio, 1 December 1993. Available online at: http://www.eff.org/pub/Intellectual_property/art_and_music_sampling.paper [accessed 31 July 2003].
235. Thompson, E.P., Customs in Common, New York: New York Press, 1991.
236. Thompson, N., "Drug Abuse," The New Republic, 7 October 2002: 18-21.
237. Tokar, B. (ed), Redesigning Life: The Worldwide Challenge to Genetic Engineering, New York: Zed Books, 2001.
238. Torvalds, L. and Diamond, D., Just for Fun: The Story of an Accidental Revolutionary, New York: Harper Publishers, 2001.
239. "Traditional Knowledge," World Intellectual Property Organization. Available online at: http://www.wipo.int/tk/en/index.html [accessed 7 July 2004].
240. Trask, H.K., From a Native Daughter: Colonialism and Sovereignty in Hawai'i, Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 1999.
241. Trotti, J.L., "Compensation Versus Colonization: A Common Heritage Approach to the Use of Indigenous Medicine in Developing Western Pharmaceuticals," Food and Drug Law Journal 56: 367-83, 2001.
242. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, New Developments in Biotechnology: Ownership of Human Tissues and Cells - A Special Report, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, March 1987, p. 79.
243. US Dept of State, Report, U.S. Government Efforts to Negotiate the Repeal, Termination or Withdrawal of Article 15(C) of the South African Medicines and Related Substances Act of 1965, 5 February 1999. Available online at: http://www.cptech.org/ip/health/sa/stdept-feb51999.html [accessed 5 July 2004].
244. Vaidhyanathan, S., Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity, New York: New York University Press, 2001.
245. Vaidhyanathan, S.,The Anarchist in the Library: How the Clash between Freedom and Control is Hacking the Real World and Crashing the System, New York: Basic Books, 2004.
246. Varese, S., "The New Environmentalist Movement of Latin American Indigenous People," in S.B. Brush and D. Stabinsky (eds), Valuing Local Knowledge: Indigenous People and Intellectual Property Rights, Washington, DC: Island Press, 1996.
247. Van Alstyne, W.W., "The Public Domain: Reconciling What the First Amendment Forbids with What the Copyright Clause Permits: A Summary Explanation and Review," Law and Contemporary Problems 66, winter/spring 2003: 225-38.
248. van Wendel de Joode, R., de Bruijn, J.A. and van Eeten, M.J.G., Protecting the Virtual Commons: Self-Organizing Open Source and Free Software Communities and Innovative Intellectual Property Regimes, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2003.
249. Venturelli, S., "Political Justice and Civil Society in the Information Age," in K.F. Kersten and W.E. Biernatzki (eds), Value and Communication: Critical Humanistic Perspectives, Cresskill: Hampton Press, Inc, 2000.
250. Veravanich, P., "Rio Grande: The MP3 Showdown at High Noon in Cyberspace," Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal 10, winter 2000: 433-80.
251. Vernon, C.M., "Common Cultural Property: The Search for Rights of Protective Intervention," Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 26: 435-79, 1994.
252. Visser, C.J., "Making Intellectual Property Laws Work for Traditional Knowledge," in M. Finger and P. Schuler (eds), Poor People's Knowledge: Promoting Intellectual Property in Developing Countries, Washington, DC: Co-published by Oxford University Press and the World Bank, 2004.
253. Vittone, J., American Bar Association Working Group Report on the Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act (UCITA) ( http://www.aba.org ), 31 January 2002. Available online at: http://www.abanet.org/ucita/report_on_ucita.pdf [accessed 13 July 2004].
254. Wallace, B., "Shareware Goes Formal," in R. DeMaria and G.R. Fontaine (eds), Public Domain Software: Untapped Resources for the Business User, Redwood City: M&T Publishing, 1988.
255. Warner, M., "The Mass Public and the Mass Subject," in B. Robbins (ed.), The Phantom Public Sphere, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.
256. Weber, S., The Success of Open Source, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004.
257. Weissman, R., "A Long, Strange TRIPS: The Pharmaceutical Industry Drive to Harmonize Global Intellectual Property Rules, and the Remaining WTO Legal Alternatives Available to Third World Countries," University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 17, winter 1996: 1069-125.
258. Weissman, R.,"AIDS and Developing Countries: Democratizing Access to Essential Medicines," Foreign Policy in Focus 4(23), August 1999. Available online at: http://www.foreignpolicy-infocus.org/briefs/vol4/v4n23aids.html [accessed 5 July 2004].
259. Wellington, A., "'Rewriting Genesis': Intellectual Property Rights and Global (In)Justice," in Y. Hudson (ed.), Globalism and the Obsolescence of the State, Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press, 1999.
260. Whitt, L.A., Roberts, M., Norman, W., and Grieves, V. "Belonging to the Land: Indigenous Knowledge Systems and the Natural World," Oklahoma City University Law Review 26, summer 2001: 701-43.
261. Williams, P., The Alchemy of Race and Rights: Diary of a Law Professor, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991.
262. Williams, R.A., The American Indian in Western Legal Thought: The Discourses of Conquest, New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
263. Williams, S., Free as in Freedom: Richard Stallman's Crusade for Free Software, Beijing: O'Reilly, 2002.
264. Wirtén, E.H., No Trespassing: Authorship, Intellectual Property Rights, and the Boundaries of Globalization, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004.
265. Woodmansee, M., "The Cultural Work of Copyright: Legislating Authorship in Britain, 1837-1842," in A. Sarat and T.R. Kearns (eds), Law and the Domains of Culture, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998.
266. Young, R. and Rohm, W.G., Under the Radar: How Red Hat Changed the Software Business - and Took Microsoft by Surprise, Scottsdale: The Coriolis Group.
267. Zaveri, N.B., Patents for Medicine: Balanced Patent Law - The Need of the Hour, Issues/Options before the Nation and the Parliament for Patent Law Changes for "TRIPS," Mumbai: Indian Drug Manufacturers' Association, 1998.
268. Ziemann, G., "RIAA's Statistics Don't Add up to Piracy," MacWizards Music, 11 December 2002. Available online at: http://www.azoz.com/music/features/0008.html [accessed 20 July 2003].