Linkages, contests and overlaps in the global intellectual property rights regime

European Journal of International Relations

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 755-776

  Muzaka, Valbona ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

framing; global governance; intellectual property rights; linkages; regimes

Indexed keywords

EID: 82255182407     PISSN: 13540661     EISSN: 14603713     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1354066110373560     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Abbott F, Cottier T and Gury F (eds) (1999) The International Intellectual Property System: Commentary and Materials, Part I and II. London: Kluwer Law International.
2. Anawalt HC (2003) Intellectual property scope: International intellectual property, progress, and the rule of law. In: Granstrand O (ed.) Economics, Law and Intellectual Property: Seeking Strategies for Research and Teaching in a Developing Field. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 55-76.
3. Blakeney M (2006) A critical analysis of the TRIPs agreement. In Pugatch MP (ed.) The Intellectual Property Debate: Perspectives from Law, Economics and Political Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 17-32.
4. Bøäs M and McNeill D (eds) (2004) Global Institutions and Development: Framing the World. London: Routledge.
5. Boyle J (2003) The second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain. Law and Contemporary Problems 66(33): 33-74.
6. Braithwaite J and Drahos P (2000) Global Business Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Chong D and Druckman JN (2007) Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science 10: 103-126.
8. CHR (Commission on Human Rights) (2003) Resolution 2003/29, E/CN.4/RES/2003/29 (22 April 2003).
9. Drahos P (1996) A Philosophy of Intellectual Property. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
10. Drahos P (2002) Developing countries and international intellectual property standard-setting. Journal of World Intellectual Property 5: 765-789.
11. Drahos P (2003) Expanding intellectual property's empire: The role of FTAs. Working paper. Regulatory Institutions Network, Australian National University.
12. Drahos P and Braithwaite J (2002) Informational Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? London: Earthscan.
13. Druckman JN (2001) On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of Politics 63(4): 1041-1066.
14. ECOSOC (UN Economic and Social Council) (2000) Sub-Committee on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, Resolution 2000/7, UN Doc E/CN.4/Sub.2/RES/2000/9 (17 August 2000).
15. ECOSOC (2001) Sub-Committee on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, Resolution 2001/21, E/CN.4/Sub.2/RES/2001/21 (16 August 2001).
16. Fidler D (2004) SARS, Governance and the Globalization of Disease. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
17. Gale F (1998) Cave 'Cave! Hic dragones': A neo-Gramscian deconstruction and reconstruction of international regime theory. Review of International Political Economy 5(2): 252-283.
18. Gerhing T and Oberthür S (2004) Exploring regime interaction: A framework analysis. In: Underdal A and Young OR (eds) Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 247-269.
19. Haas EB (1980) Why collaborate? Issue-linkage and international regimes. World Politics 32(3): 357-405.
20. Hasenclever A, Mayer P and Rittberger V (1997) Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Helfer LR (2004) Regime shifting: The TRIPs agreement and new dynamics of international intellectual property lawmaking. Yale Journal of International Law 29(Winter): 1-83.
22. Helfer LR (2007) Towards a human rights framework for intellectual property. UC Davis Law Review 40: 971-1020.
23. Hughes J (1997) The philosophy of intellectual property. In: Moore A (ed.) Intellectual Property: Moral, Legal and International Dilemmas. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 107-178.
24. ICTSD (2005) WIPO development agenda status unclear. Bridges 9 (September/October): 22.
25. Kapczynski A (2008) The access to knowledge mobilization and the new politics of intellectual property. Yale Law Journal 117: 804-884.
26. Keeley JF (1990) Toward a Foucauldian analysis of international regimes. International Organization 44(1): 83-105.
27. Keohane RO (1993) The analysis of international regimes: Towards a European-American research program. In: Rittberger V (ed.) Regime Theory and International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 23-45.
28. Kinsella NS (2001) Against intellectual property. Journal of Libertarian Studies 15(2): 1-53.
29. Krasner SD (1982) Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. International Organization 36: 185-205.
30. Kratochwil F and Ruggie J (1986) International organisation: A state of the art on an art of the state. International Organization 40: 753-775.
31. Leebron DW (2002) Linkages. American Journal of International Law 96(1): 5-27.
32. Levy DL and Newell PJ (2005) A neo-Gramscian approach to business in international environment politics: An interdisciplinary, multilevel framework. In: Levy DL and Newell PJ (eds) The Business of Global Environment Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 47-69.
33. Levy MA, Young OR and Zürn M (1995) The study of international regimes. European Journal of International Relations 1(3): 267-330.
34. Machlup F (1958) An economic review of the patent system. Subcommittee on Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights, of the Committee on the Judiciary, 85th Congress, 2nd Session.
35. Maskus K and Reichman J (2004) The globalization of private knowledge goods and the privatization of global public goods. Journal of International Economic Law 7(2): 279-320.
36. May C (2000) A Global Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights: The New Enclosures? London and New York: Routledge.
37. May C and Sell SK (2006) Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
38. Meunier S and Alter KJ (2006) Memo to participants. Nested and Overlapping Institutions Conference, Princeton University, 24 February. Available at http://www.princeton.edu/~smeunier/conference_nesting.html.
39. Muzaka V (2009) Developing countries and the struggle on the access to medicines front: Victories won and lost. Third World Quarterly 30(7): 1343-1361.
40. Okediji R (2004) Back to bilateralism? Pendulum swings in international intellectual property protection. University of Ottawa Law and Technology Journal 1: 125-147.
41. Penrose ET (1951) The Economics of the International System. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
42. Porter ME (1986) Competition in global industries: A conceptual framework. In Porter ME (ed.) Competition in global industries. Cambridge MA: Harvard Business School Press, 15-60.
43. Pugatch MP (2004) The International Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
44. Raustiala K (2007) Density and conflict in international intellectual property law. UC Davis Law Review 40: 1021-1038.
45. Raustiala K and Victor DG (2004) The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization 58(2): 277-309.
46. Robinson J (1969) The Accumulation of Capital. London: Macmillan.
47. Ruggie JG (1998) Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. London: Routledge.
48. Ryan MP (1998) The function-specific and linkage-bargain diplomacy of international intellectual property lawmaking. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law Summer (Symposium: Linkage as Phenomenon - An Interdisciplinary Approach).
49. Schultz M and Walker D (2005) How intellectual property became controversial: NGOs and the new international IP agenda. Engage 6(1): 82-98.
50. Sell S (2003) Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Sell S (2006) Books, drugs and seeds: The politics of access. Paper presented at the Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue Conference, The Politics and Ideology of Intellectual Property, 20-21 March, Brussels, Belgium.
52. Sell S and Prakash A (2004) Using ideas strategically: The contest between business and NGO networks in intellectual property rights. International Studies Quarterly 48: 143-175.
53. South Centre and CIEL (Centre for International Environmental Law) (2005) IP Quarterly Update: Third Quarter. Available at http://www.southcentre/org
54. Watal J (2000) TRIPs and the 1999 WTO millennium round. Journal of World Intellectual Property 3(1): 3-29.
55. Watal J (2001) Intellectual Property Rights in the WTO and Developing Countries. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
56. WHA (1999) Resolution WHA 52.19, 24 May.
57. WHA (2001) Resolutions WHA 54.10 and WHA 54.11, 21 May.
58. WHA (2008) Report of the Intergovernmental Working Group on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property, A61/9, 19 May. Available at http://www.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/A61/A61_9-en.pdf
59. WTO (2001) Doha Declaration on TRIPs and Public Health, WT/MTN(01)/DEC/W/2.
60. WTO (2005) Hong Kong Ministerial Declaration, adopted 18 December, Geneva, WT/MIN(05)/W/3/Rev.2.
61. Young O (1991) Political leadership and regime formation: On the development of institutions in international society. International Organization 45(3): 281-308.
62. Young OR (1996) Institutional linkages in international society: Polar perspectives. Global Governance 2(1): 1-24.
63. Young OR (2008) Deriving insights from the case of the WTO and the Cartagena Protocol. In: Young OR, Chambers WB, Kim JA et al. (eds) Institutional Interplay: Biosafety and Trade. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 131-158.
64. Yu P (2004) Currents and crosscurrents in the international intellectual property regime. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 38: 1-72.