Building transnational civil liberties: Transgovernmental entrepreneurs and the European data privacy directive

International Organization

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 103-130

  Newman, Abraham L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548540134     PISSN: 00208183     EISSN: 15315088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0020818308080041     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Aalberts, Tanja E. 2004. The Future of Sovereignty in Multilevel Governance Europe - A Constructivist Reading. Journal of Common Market Studies 42 (1):23-46.
2. Adler, Emanuel, and Peter M. Haas. 1992. Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program. International Organization 46 (1):367-90.
3. Alter, Karen. 1998. Explaining National Court Acceptance of European Court Jurisprudence: A Critical Evaluation of Theories of Legal Integration. In The European Court and National Courts: Doctrine and Jurisprudence, edited by Anne-Marie Slaughter, Alec Stone Sweet, and Joseph Weiler, 227-52. Oxford, England: Hart.
4. Anderson, Jeffrey J. 1995. The State of the (European) Union: From the Single Market to Maastricht, from Singular Events to General Theories. World Politics 47 (3):441-65.
5. Bach, David, and Abraham Newman. 2007. The European Regulatory State and Global Public Policy: Micro-Institutions and Macro-Influence. Journal of European Public Policy 16 (4):827-46.
6. Bache, Ian, and Matthew V. Flinders, eds. 2004. Multi-Level Governance. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
7. Barnett, Michael N., and Raymond Duvall, eds. 2005. Power in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Barnett, Michael N., and Martha Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
9. Bennett, Colin. 1992. Regulating Privacy: Data Protection and Public Policy in Europe and the United States. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
10. Bermann, George. 1993. Regulatory Cooperation with Counterpart Agencies Abroad: The FAA's Aircraft Certification Experience. Law and Policy of International Business 24:669-781.
11. Bignami, Francesca. 2005. Transgovernmental Networks vs. Democracy: The Case of the European Information Privacy Network. Michigan Journal of International Law 26:806-68.
12. Börzel, Tanja A. 1998. Organizing Babylon: On the Different Conceptions of Policy Networks. Public Administration 76 (2):253-73.
13. Börzel, Tanja A., and Madeleine O. Hosli. 2003. Brussels between Bern and Berlin: Comparative Federalism Meets the European Union. Governance 16 (2):179-202.
14. Burley, Ann-Marie, and Walter Mattli. 1993. Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration. International Organization 47 (1):41-76.
15. Büthe, Tim. 2002. Taking Temporality Seriously: Modeling History and the Use of Narratives as Evidence. American Political Science Review 96 (3):481-93.
16. Carpenter, Daniel P. 2001. Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862-1928. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
17. Crane, Barbara. 1984. Policy Coordination by Major Western Powers in Bargaining with the Third World: Debt Relief and the Common Fund. International Organization 38 (3):399-428.
18. Dehousse, Renaud. 1997. Regulation by Networks in the European Community: The Role of European Agencies. Journal of European Public Policy 4 (2):246-61.
19. DiMaggio, Paul J. 1988. Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory. In Institutional Patterns and Organization: Culture and Environment, edited by Lynne G. Zucker, 3-21. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.
20. Eberlein, Burkard, and Abraham Newman. 2008. Escaping the International Governance Dilemma? Incorporated Transgovernmental Networks in the European Union. Governance 21 (1):25-52.
21. Farrell, Henry. 2003. Constructing the International Foundations of E-Commerce: The EU-U.S. Safe Harbor Arrangement. International Organization 57 (2):277-306.
22. _. 2006. Governing Information Flows: States, Private Actors, and E-Commerce. Annual Review of Political Science 6:353-74.
23. Flaherty, David H. 1989. Protecting Privacy in Surveillance Societies: The Federal Republic of Germany, Sweden, France, Canada, and the United States. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
24. Fligstein, Neil. 2001. Social Skill and the Theory of Fields. Sociological Theory 19 (2):105-25.
25. Fligstein, Neil, and Iona Mara-Drita. 1996. How to Make a Market: Reflections on the Attempt to Create a Single Market in the European Union. American Journal of Sociology 102 (1): 1-33.
26. Gerring, John. 2004. What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for? American Political Science Review 98 (2):341-54.
27. Gesellschaft für Datenschutz und Datensicherung. 1992. Erhebung über die möglichen Auswirkungen der geplanten EG-Datenschutzrichtlinie auf die Wirtschaft. Paper presented at DAFTA, November, Königswinter, Germany.
28. Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2005. The Institutional Foundations of Regulatory Capitalism: The Diffusion of Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598 (1):84-101.
29. Gruber, Lloyd. 2000. Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
30. Hall, Peter A. 2003. Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research. In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by James Mahoney and Dietrich Reuschemeyer, 372-404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Haufler, Virginia. 2001. A Public Role for the Private Sector: Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
32. Heisenberg, Dorothee. 2005. Negotiating Privacy: The European Union, the United States, and Personal Data Protection. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.
33. Héritier, Adrienne. 2001. Overt and Covert Institutionalization in Europe. In The Institutionalization of Europe, edited by Alec Stone Sweet, Wayne Sandholtz, and Neil Fligstein, 56-70. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
34. _. 2002. Public-Interest Services Revisited. Journal of European Public Policy 9 (6):995-1019.
35. Hondius, Frederik Willem. 1975. Emerging Data Protection in Europe. New York: American Elsevier.
36. Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2000. Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, Md.: Rowan & Littlefield.
37. _. 2003. Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance. American Political Science Review 97 (2):233-43.
38. Hopkins, Raymond F. 1976. The International Role of 'Domestic' Bureaucracy. International Organization 30 (3):405-32.
39. Jabko, Nicolas. 2003. The Political Foundations of the European Regulatory State. In The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance, edited by Jacint Jordana and David Levi-Faur, 200-17. Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar.
40. _. 2006. Playing the Market: A Political Strategy for Uniting Europe, 1985-2005. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
41. Jeffery, Charlie. 2000. Sub-National Mobilization and European Integration: Does It Make Any Difference? Journal of Common Market Studies 38 (1):1-23.
42. Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
43. _, and Joseph S. Nye. 1974. Transgovernmental Relations and International Organizations. World Politics 27 (1):39-62.
44. Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Harper-Collins.
45. Kohler-Koch, Beate, and Berthold Rittberger. 2006. Review Article: The "Governance Turn" in EU Studies. Journal of Common Market Studies 44 (Suppl.):27-49.
46. Kretschmer, Friedrich. 1989. Europäische Datenschutznormen aus sieht der Deutschen Industrie. Paper presented at DAFTA, November, Königswinter, Germany.
47. Lavenex, Sandra. 2006. Shifting Up and Out: The Foreign Policy of European Immigration Control. West European Politics 29 (2):329-50.
48. Long, William J., and Marc Pang Quek. 2002. Personal Data Privacy Protection in an Age of Globalization: The US-EU Safe Harbor Compromise. Journal of European Public Policy 9 (3):325-44.
49. Mahoney, James. 2003. Strategies of Causal Assessment in Comparative Historical Analysis. In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, 337-72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Majone, Giandomenico. 1996. Regulating Europe. London: Routledge.
51. Mattli, Walter, and Tim Büthe. 2003. Setting International Standards: Technological Rationality or Primacy of Power? World Politics 56 (1):1-42.
52. McNamara, Kathleen R. 1999. Consensus and Constraint: Ideas and Capital Mobility in European Monetary Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies 37 (3):455-76.
53. Mogg, John. 1991. Initiatives taken by the European Communities in the field of data protection: New Developments. Remarks presented at the 13th Conference of the Data Protection Commissioners, October, Strasbourg, France.
54. _. 1994. Privacy Protection in the Information Society. Transnational Data and Communications Report, November/December, 29-32.
55. Moravcsik, Andrew. 1993. Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies 31 (4):473-524.
56. _. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
57. _. 1999. A New Statecraft? Supranational Entrepreneurs and International Cooperation. International Organization 53 (2):267-306.
58. Newman, Abraham, and John Zysman. 2006. Transforming Politics in the Digital Era. In How Revolutionary Was the Digital Revolution?: National Responses, Market Transitions, and Global Technology, edited by John Zysman and Abraham Newman, 391-411. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
59. Padgett, John, and Chris Ansell. 1993. Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-1434. American Journal of Sociology 98 (6):1259-319.
60. Papapavlou, George. 1992. Latest Developments Concerning the EC Draft Data Protection Directives. In Recent Developments in Data Privacy Law, edited by Jan Dumortier, 29-57. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.
61. Pearce, Graham, and Nicholas Platten. 1998. Achieving Personal Data Protection in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 36 (4):529-547.
62. Perkmann, Markus. 2007. Policy Entrepreneurship and Multi-Level Governance: A Comparative Study of European Cross-Border Regions. Environment and Planning C 25 (6):861-879.
63. Peterson, John. 1995. Policy Networks and European Union Policy-Making: A Reply to Kassim. West European Politics 18 (2):389-407.
64. Platten, Nick. 1996. Background to and History of the Directive. In EC Data Protection Directive, edited by David Bainbridge, 13-32. London: Butterworths.
65. Pollack, Mark A. 2003. The Engines of Integration? Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Union. New York: Oxford University Press.
66. Posner, Elliot. 2005. Sources of Institutional Change: The Supranational Origins of Europe's New Stock Markets. World Politics 58 (1): 1-40.
67. Putnam, Robert D. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42 (3):427-60.
68. Raustiala, Kal. 2002. The Architecture of International Cooperation: Transgovernmental Networks and the Future of International Law. Virginia Journal of International Law 43 (1):1-92.
69. Richards, John E. 1999. Toward a Positive Theory of International Institutions: Regulating International Aviation Markets. International Organization 53 (1):1-37.
70. Risse-Kappen, Thomas, ed. 1995. Bringing Transnational. Actors Back. In Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71. Sandholtz, Wayne, and John Zysman. 1989. 1992: Recasting the European Bargain. World Politics 42 (1):95-128.
72. Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2001. The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization 55 (1):47-80.
73. Scott, W. Richard. 1998. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
74. Simitis, Spiros. 1995. From the Market to the Polis: The EU Directive on the Protection of Personal Data. Iowa Law Review 80 (3):445-69.
75. _. 1997. Data Protection in the European Union-The Quest for Common Rules. Courses of the Academy of European Law 8 (1):95-141.
76. Slaughter, Ann-Marie. 2000. Governing the Global Economy through Government Networks. In The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International Relations and International Law, edited by Michael Byers, 177-205. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
77. _. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
78. Smith, Michael E. 2004. Europe's Foreign and Security Policy: The Institutionalization of Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
79. Stone Sweet, Alec, Wayne Sandholtz, and Neil Fligstein, eds. 2001. The Institutionalization of Europe. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
80. Thompson, James. 1967. Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
81. Verdun, Amy. 1999. The Role of the Delores Committee in the Creation of EMU: An Epistemic Community? Journal of European Public Policy 6 (2):308-28.
82. Vogel, David. 1995. Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
83. Vogel, Steven Kent. 1996. Freer Markets More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
84. Wuermeling, Ulrich U. 1996. Harmonisation of European Union Privacy Law. John Marshall Journal of Computer and Information Law 14 (3):411-60.
85. Ziegler, Nicholas J. 1995. Institutions, Elites, and Technological Change in France and Germany. World Politics 47 (3):341-72.
86. Zito, Anthony R. 2001. Epistemic Communities, Collective Entrepreneurship and European Integration. Journal of European Public Policy 8 (4):585-603.