Butterfly dispersal in inhospitable matrix: Rare, risky, but long-distance

Landscape Ecology

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 401-412

  Nowicki, Piotr ^a   Vrabec, Vladimir ^b   Binzenhöfer, Birgit ^c   Feil, Johann ^d   Zakšek, Barbara ^e   Hovestadt, Thomas ^f   Settele, Josef ^g  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^b CZECH UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

^c Landschaftsökologische Gutachten and Kartierungen ^*  (Germany)

^d Bavarian Academy for Nature Conservation and Landscape Management   (Germany)

^e Centre for Cartography of Fauna and Flora   (Slovenia)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^g HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dispersal mortality; Emigration; Maculinea (Phengaris); Mark recapture; Movement distance; Virtual migration model

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; DISPERSAL; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EMIGRATION; GRASSLAND; HABITAT TYPE; MARK-RECAPTURE METHOD; MATRIX; METAPOPULATION; MIGRATION; MORTALITY; MOVEMENT; SELECTION;

MACULINEA; MACULINEA NAUSITHOUS; MACULINEA TELEIUS; PAPILIONOIDEA; PHENGARIS;

EID: 84897594291     PISSN: 09212973     EISSN: 15729761     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-013-9971-0     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Anton C, Musche M, Hula V, Settele J (2008) Myrmica host-ants limit the density of the ant-predatory large blue Maculinea nausithous. J Insect Conserv 12: 511-517.
2. Batáry P, Ko{double acute}rösi A, Örvössy N, Köver S, Peregovits L (2009) Species-specific distribution of two sympatric Maculinea butterflies across different meadow edges. J Insect Conserv 13: 223-230.
3. Bonelli S, Vrabec V, Witek M, Barbero F, Patricelli D, Nowicki P (2013) Selection on dispersal in isolated butterfly metapopulations. Popul Ecol 55: 469-478.
4. Bowler DE, Benton TG (2005) Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biol Rev 80: 205-225.
5. Bowne DR, Bowers MA (2004) Interpatch movements in spatially structured populations: a literature review. Landscape Ecol 19: 1-20.
6. Brown JJ, Chippendale GM (1974) Migration of the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus: energy sources. J Insect Physiol 20: 1117-1130.
7. Casula P, Nichols JD (2003) Temporal variability of local abundance, sex ratio and activity in the Sardinian chalk hill blue butterfly. Oecologia 136: 374-382.
8. Clobert J, Ims RA, Rousset F (2004) Causes, mechanisms and consequences of dispersal. In: Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE (eds) Ecology, genetics and evolution of metapopulation. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, pp 307-335.
9. Dierks A, Fischer K (2009) Habitat requirements and niche selection of Maculinea nausithous and M. teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) within a large sympatric metapopulation. Biodivers Conserv 18: 3663-3676.
10. Dreisig H (1995) Thermoregulation and flight activity in territorial-male graylings, Hipparchia semele (Satyridae), and large skippers, Ochlodes venata (Hesperiidae). Oecologia 101: 169-176.
11. Elmes GW, Thomas JA (1992) The complexity of species conservation: interactions between Maculinea butterflies and their ant hosts. Biodivers Conserv 1: 155-169.
12. Eycott AE, Stewart GB, Buyung-Ali LM, Bowler DE, Watts K, Pullin AS (2012) A meta-analysis on the impact of different matrix structures on species movement rates. Landscape Ecol 27: 1263-1278.
13. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34: 487-515.
14. Fric Z, Hula V, Klimova M, Zimmermann K, Konvicka M (2010) Dispersal of four fritillary butterflies within identical landscape. Ecol Res 25: 543-552.
15. Fronhofer E, Kubisch A, Hovestadt T, Poethke HJ (2011) Assortative mating counteracts the evolution of dispersal polymorphisms. Evolution 65: 2461-2469.
16. Gonzalez A, Lawton JH, Gilbert FS, Blackburn TM, Evans-Freke I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics, abundance, and distribution in a microecosystem. Science 281: 2045-2047.
17. Hanski I (1994) A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J Anim Ecol 63: 151-162.
18. Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
19. Hanski I (2009) Eco-evolutionary spatial dynamics in the Glanville fritillary butterfly. PNAS 108: 14397-14404.
20. Hanski I, Moilanen A, Gyllenberg M (1996) Minimum viable metapopulation size. Am Nat 147: 527-541.
21. Hanski I, Alho J, Moilanen A (2000) Estimating the parameters of survival and migration of individuals in metapopulations. Ecology 81: 239-251.
22. Hovestadt T, Nowicki P (2008) Investigating movement within irregularly shaped patches: analysis of MRR data using randomisation procedures. Isr J Ecol Evol 54: 137-154.
23. Hovestadt T, Binzenhöfer B, Nowicki P, Settele J (2011) Do all inter-patch movements represent dispersal? A mixed kernel study of butterfly mobility in fragmented landscapes. J Anim Ecol 80: 1070-1077.
24. Kammer AE, Heinrich B (1978) Insect flight metabolism. Adv Insect Physiol 13: 133-228.
25. Kindlmann P, Burel F (2008) Connectivity measures: a review. Landscape Ecol 23: 879-890.
26. Kingsolver JG (1985) Thermal ecology of Pieris butterflies (Lepidoptera: Pieridae): a new mechanism of behavioural thermoregulation. Oecologia 66: 540-545.
27. Ko{double acute}rösi A, Örvössy N, Batáry P, Harnos A, Peregovits L (2012) Different habitat selection by two sympatric Maculinea butterflies at small spatial scale. Insect Conserv Divers 5: 118-125.
28. Kuefler D, Hudgens B, Haddad NM, Morris WF, Thurgate N (2010) The conflicting role of matrix habitats as conduits and barriers for dispersal. Ecology 91: 944-950.
29. Lowe WH, Allendorf FW (2010) What can genetics tell us about population connectivity? Mol Ecol 19: 3038-3051.
30. Matter SF, Roland J, Moilanen A, Hanski I (2004) Migration and survival of Parnassius smintheus: detecting effects of habitat for individual butterflies. Ecol Appl 14: 1526-1534.
31. Matter SF, Roslin T, Roland J (2005) Predicting immigration in patchy landscapes: effects of spatial scale, patch size and isolation. Oikos 111: 359-367.
32. Matter SF, Doyle A, Illerbrun K, Wheeler J, Roland J (2011) An assessment of direct and indirect effects of climate change for populations of the Rocky Mountain Apollo butterfly (Parnassius smintheus Doubleday). Insect Sci 18: 385-392.
33. Nowicki P, Vrabec V (2011) Evidence for positive density-dependent emigration in butterfly metapopulations. Oecologia 167: 657-665.
34. Nowicki P, Richter A, Glinka U, Holzschuh A, Toelke U, Henle K, Woyciechowski M, Settele J (2005a) Less input same output: simplified approach for population size assessment in Lepidoptera. Popul Ecol 47: 203-212.
35. Nowicki P, Settele J, Thomas JA, Woyciechowski M (2005b) A review of population structure of Maculinea butterflies. In: Settele J, Kuhn E, Thomas JA (eds) Studies in the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, vol 2. Species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, pp 144-149.
36. Nowicki P, Witek M, Skórka P, Settele J, Woyciechowski M (2005c) Population ecology of the endangered butterflies Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous, and its implications for conservation. Popul Ecol 47: 193-202.
37. Nowicki P, Pepkowska A, Kudlek J, Skórka P, Witek M, Settele J, Woyciechowski M (2007) From metapopulation theory to conservation recommendations: lessons from spatial occurrence and abundance patterns of Maculinea butterflies. Biol Conserv 140: 119-129.
38. Nowicki P, Bonelli S, Barbero F, Balletto E (2009) Relative importance of density-dependent regulation and environmental stochasticity for butterfly population dynamics. Oecologia 161: 227-239.
39. Nowicki P, Halecki W, Kalarus K (2013) All natural habitat edges matter equally for endangered Maculinea butterflies. J Insect Conserv 17: 139-146.
40. O'Grady JJ, Brook BW, Reed DH, Ballou JD, Tonkyn DW, Frankham R (2006) Realistic levels of inbreeding depression strongly affect extinction risk in wild populations. Biol Conserv 133: 42-51.
41. Oksanen L (2004) The devil lies in details: reply to Stuart Hurlbert. Oikos 104: 598-605.
42. Petit S, Moilanen A, Hanski I, Baguette M (2001) Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: movements between habitat patches. Oikos 92: 491-500.
43. Poethke HJ, Hovestadt T, Mitesser O (2003) Local extinction and the evolution of dispersal rates: causes and correlations. Am Nat 161: 631-640.
44. Prevedello JA, Vieira MV (2010) Does the type of matrix matter? A quantitative review of the evidence. Biodivers Conserv 19: 1205-1223.
45. Reed DH (2004) Extinction risk in fragmented habitats. Anim Conserv 7: 181-191.
46. Ricketts TH (2001) The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 158: 87-99.
47. Ries L, Debinski DM (2001) Butterflies responses to habitat edges in the highly fragmented prairies of Central Iowa. J Anim Ecol 70: 840-852.
48. Roff DA (1994) Habitat persistence and the evolution of wing dimorphism in insects. Am Nat 144: 772-798.
49. Roland J, Keyghobadi N, Fownes S (2000) Alpine Parnassius butterfly dispersal: effects of landscape and population size. Ecology 81: 1642-1653.
50. Ross JA, Matter SF, Roland J (2005) Edge avoidance and movement of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus in matrix and non-matrix habitat. Landscape Ecol 20: 127-135.
51. Rueffler C, van Dooren TJM, Leimar O, Abrams PA (2006) Disruptive selection and then what? TREE 21: 238-245.
52. Sacktor B (1975) Biochemistry of insect flight. 1. Utilization of fuels by muscle. In: Candy DJ, Kilby BA (eds) Insect biochemistry and function. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 1-88.
53. Schtickzelle N, Baguette M (2003) Behavioural responses to habitat patch boundaries restrict dispersal and generate emigration-patch area relationships in fragmented landscapes. J Anim Ecol 72: 533-545.
54. Schtickzelle N, Mennechez G, Baguette M (2006) Dispersal depression with habitat fragmentation in the bog fritillary butterfly. Ecology 87: 1057-1065.
55. Schtickzelle N, Joiris A, van Dyke H, Baguette M (2007) Quantitative analysis of changes in movement behaviour within and outside habitat in a specialised butterfly. BMC Evol Biol 7: 4. doi: 10. 1186/1471-2148-7-4.
56. Schultz CB (1998) Dispersal behavior and its implications for reserve design for a rare Oregon butterfly. Conserv Biol 12: 284-292.
57. Schultz CB, Franco AMA, Crone EE (2012) Response of butterflies to structural and resource boundaries. J Anim Ecol 81: 724-734.
58. Sielezniew M, Stankiewicz-Fiedurek AM (2013) Behavioural evidence for a putative oviposition-deterring pheromone in the butterfly, Phengaris (Maculinea) teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Eur J Entomol 110: 71-80.
59. Skórka P, Nowicki P, Lenda M, Witek M, Śliwińska EB, Settele J, Woyciechowski M (2013) Different flight behaviour of the endangered scarce large blue butterfly Phengaris teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) within and outside its habitat patches. Landscape Ecol 28: 533-546.
60. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (2012) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 4th edn. WH Freeman and Co., New York.
61. Stettmer C, Binzenhöfer B, Hartmann P (2001) Habitatmanagement und Schutzmassnahmen für die Ameisenbläulinge Glaucopsyche teleius und Glaucopsyche nausithous. Teil 1: populationsdynamik, Ausbreitungsverhalten und Biotopverbund. Natur und Landschaft 76: 278-287.
62. Sutcliffe OL, Thomas CD (1996) Open corridors appear to facilitate dispersal by the ringlet butterfly (Aphantopus hyperantus) between woodland clearings. Conserv Biol 10: 1359-1365.
63. Thomas JA (1984) The behaviour and habitat requirements of Maculinea nausithous (the Dusky Large Blue) and M. teleius (the Scarce Large Blue) in France. Biol Conserv 28: 325-347.
64. Thomas JA (1995) The ecology and conservation of Maculinea arion and other European species of Large Blue Butterfly. In: Pullin AS (ed) Ecology and conservation of butterflies. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 180-197.
65. With KA, King AW (1999) Dispersal success on fractal landscapes: a consequence of lacunarity thresholds. Landscape Ecol 14: 73-82.
66. Zeller KA, McGarigal K, Whiteley AR (2012) Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review. Landscape Ecol 27: 777-797.
67. Zollner PA, Lima SL (1999) Search strategies for landscape level interpatch movements. Ecology 80: 1019-1030.