Investigating movement within irregularly shaped patches: Analysis of mark-release-recapture data using randomization procedures

Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 137-154

  Hovestadt, Thomas ^a   Nowicki, Piotr ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Dispersal kernels; Displacement distance; Habitat patch; Home range; Maculinea teleius; Mark release recapture

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; CORRELATION; DATA PROCESSING; DATA SET; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; HOME RANGE; PATCH USE; RANDOM WALK METHOD; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

MACULINEA; MACULINEA TELEIUS;

EID: 47049128741     PISSN: 15659801     EISSN: 22244662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1560/IJEE.54.1.137     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Armsworth, P.R., Roughgarden, J.E. 2005. The impact of directed versus random movement on population dynamics and biodiversity patterns. American Naturalist 165: 449-465.
2. Auckland, J.N., Debinski, D.M., Clark, W.R. 2004. Survival, movement, and resource use of the butterfly Parnassius clodius. Ecological Entomology 29: 139-149.
3. Baguette, M., Mennechez, G. 2004. Resource and habitat patches, landscape ecology and metapopulation biology: a consensual viewpoint. Oikos 106: 399-403.
4. Baguette, M., Petit, S., Queva, F. 2000. Population spatial structure and migration of three butterfly species within the same habitat network: consequences for conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology 37: 100-108.
5. Bailey, R.-I., Lineham, M.-E., Thomas, C.-D., Butlin R.-K. 2003. Measuring dispersal and detecting departures from a random walk model in a grasshopper hybrid zone. Ecological Entomology 28: 129-138.
6. Barton, B.J., Bach, C.E. 2005. Habitat use by the federally endangered Mitchell's satyr butterfly (Neonympha mitchellii mitchellii) in a Michigan prairie fen. American Midland Naturalist 153: 41-51.
7. Beissinger, S.R., McCullough, D.R., eds. 2002. Population viability analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 576 pp.
8. Bender, D.J., Fahrig, L. 2005. Matrix structure obscures the relationship between interpatch movement and patch size and isolation. Ecology 86: 1023-1033.
9. Blackwell, P.G. 1997. Random diffusion models for animal movement. Ecological Modelling 100: 87-102.
10. Cappuccino, N., Kareiva, P. 1985. Coping with a capricious environment - a population study of a rare Pierid butterfly. Ecology 66: 152-161.
11. Conradt, L., Roper, T.J. 2006. Nonrandom movement behavior at habitat boundaries in two butterfly species: implications for dispersal. Ecology 87: 125-132.
12. Conradt, L., Zollner, P.-A., Roper, T.-J., Frank, K., Thomas, C.-D. 2003. Foray search: an effective systematic dispersal strategy in fragmented landscapes. American Naturalist 161: 905-915.
13. Creel, S. 1998. Social organization and effective population size in carnivores. In: Caro, T., ed. Behavioral ecology and conservation biology. Oxford University Press, NY, pp. 246-265.
14. Dennis, R.L.H. 2004. Butterfly habitats, broad-scale biotope affiliations, and structural exploitation of vegetation at finer scales: the matrix revisited. Ecological Entomology 29: 744-752.
15. Dennis, R.L.H., Sparks, T.H. 2006. When is a habitat not a habitat? Dramatic resource use changes under differing weather conditions for the butterfly Plebejus argus. Biological Conservation 129: 291-301.
16. Dennis, R.-L.-H., Shreeve, T.-G., van-Dyck, H. 2003. Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. Oikos 102: 417-426.
17. Fred, M.S., O'Hara, R.B., Brommer, J.E. 2006. Consequences of the spatial configuration of resources for the distribution and dynamics of the endangered Parnassius apollo butterfly. Biological Conservation 130: 183-192.
18. Gautestad, A.O., Mysterud, I. 1995. The home range ghost. Oikos 74: 195-204.
19. Giuggioli, L., Abramson, G., Kenkre, V.M., Parmenter, R.R., Yates, T.L. 2006. Theory of home range estimation from displacement measurements of animal populations. Journal of Theoretical Biology 240: 126-135.
20. Greene, D.F., Calogeropoulus, C. 2002. Measuring and modelling seed dispersal of terrestrial plants. In: Bullock, J.M., Kenward, R.E., Hails, R.S., eds. Dispersal ecology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp. 3-23.
21. Grosbois, V., Tavecchia, G. 2003. Modeling dispersal with capture-recapture data: disentangling decisions of leaving and settlement. Ecology 84: 1225-1236.
22. Hanski, I., Alho, J., Moilanen, A. 2000. Estimating the parameters of survival and migration of individuals in metapopulations. Ecology 81: 239-251.
23. Hein, S., Gombert, J., Hovestadt, T., Poethke, H.J. 2003. Movement patterns of the bush cricket Platycleis albopunctata in different types of habitat: matrix is not always matrix. Ecological Entomology 28: 432-438.
24. Hilborn, R., Mangel, M. 1997. The ecological detective. Confronting models with data. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 315 pp.
25. Jeanson, R., Blanco, S., Fournier, R., Deneubourg, J.-L., Fourcassié, V., Theraulaz, G. 2003. A model of animal movements in a bounded space. Journal of Theoretical Biology 225: 443-451.
26. Kindvall, O. 1999. Dispersal in a metapopulation of the bush cricket, Metrioptera bicolor (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 172-185.
27. Lindenmayer, D.B., Possingham, H.P., Lacy, R.C., McCarthy, M.A., Pope, M.L. 2003. How accurate are population models? Lessons from landscape-scale tests in a fragmented system. Ecology Letters 6: 41-47.
28. Mallet, J. 1986a. Dispersal and gene flow in a butterfly with home range behavior (Heliconius erato, Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Oecologia 68: 210-217.
29. Mallet, J. 1986b. Gregarious roosting and home range in Heliconius butterflies. National Geographic Research 2: 198-215.
30. Mennechez, G., Petit, S., Schtickzelle, N., Baguette, M. 2004. Modelling mortality and dispersal: consequences of parameter generalisation on metapopulation dynamics. Oikos 106: 243-252.
31. Moorcroft, P.R., Lewis, M.A. 2006. Mechanistic home range analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 172 pp.
32. Morales, J.M., Haydon, D.T., Frair, J., Holsinger, K.E., Fryxell, J.M. 2004. Extracting more out of relocation data: building movement models as mixtures of random walks. Ecology 85: 2436-2445.
33. Nowicki, P., Witek, M., Skôrka, P., Settele, J., Woyciechowski, M. 2005a. Population ecology of the endangered butterflies Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous and the implications for conservation. Population Ecology 47: 193-202.
34. Nowicki, P., Settele, J., Thomas, J.A., Woyciechowski M. 2005b. A review of population structure of Maculinea butterflies. In: Settele, J., Kühn, E., Thomas, J.A., eds. Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe. 2. Species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia/ Moscow, pp. 144-149.
35. Ovaskainen, O. 2004. Habitat-specific movement parameters estimated using mark-recapture data and a diffusion model. Ecology 85: 242-257.
36. Ovaskainen, O., Cornell, S.J. 2003. Biased movement at a boundary and conditional occupancy times for diffusion processes. Journal of Applied Probability 40: 557-580.
37. Ovaskainen, O., Hanski, I. 2004. From individual behavior to metapopulation dynamics: Unifying the patchy population and classic metapopulation models. American Naturalist 164: 364-377.
38. Pfeifer, M.A., Andrick, U.R., Frey, W., Settele J. 2000. On the ethology and ecology of a small and isolated population of the Dusky Large Blue Butterfly Glaucopsyche (Maculinea) nausithous (Lycaenidae). Nota Lepidopterologica 23: 147-172.
39. R Development Core Team 2007. R: A language and environment for statistical computing Vers. 2.5.0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
40. Ries, L., Debinski, D.M. 2001. Butterfly responses to habitat edges in the highly fragmented prairies of Central Iowa. Journal of Animal Ecology 70: 840-852.
41. Ross, J.A., Matter, S.F., Roland, J. 2005. Edge avoidance and movement of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus in matrix and non-matrix habitat. Landscape Ecology 20: 127-135.
42. Rowley, J.J.L., Alford, R.A. 2007. Movement patterns and habitat use of rainforest stream frogs in northern Queensland, Australia: implications for extinction vulnerability. Wildlife Research 34: 371-378. Schneider, C. 2003. The influence of spatial scale on quantifying insect dispersal: an analysis of butterfly data. Ecological Entomology 28: 252-256.
43. Schneider, C., Dover, J., Fry, G.L.A. 2003. Movement of two grassland butterflies in the same habitat network: the role of adult resources and size of the study area. Ecological Entomology 28: 219-227.
44. Schtickzelle, N., Baguette, M. 2003. Behavioural responses to habitat patch boundaries restrict dispersal and generate emigration-patch area relationships in fragmented landscapes. Journal of Animal Ecology 72: 533-545.
45. Schultz, C.B. 1998. Dispersal behavior and its implication for reserve design in a rare Oregon butterfly. Conservation Biology 12: 284-292.
46. Settele, J., Kühn, E., Thomas, J.A., eds. 2005. Species ecology along a European gradient 2: Maculinea butterflies as a Model. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia/Moscow, 289 pp.
47. Sutherland, I.E., Hodgman, G.W. 1974. Reentrant polygon clipping. Communications of the ACM 17: 32-42.
48. Thomas, J.A. 1995. The ecology and conservation of Maculinea arion and other European species of large blue. In: Pullin, A.S., ed. Ecology and conservation of butterflies. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 180-196.
49. Turchin, P. 1998. Quantitative analysis of movement. Measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
50. Van Dyck, H., Baguette, M. 2005. Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: Routine or special movements? Basic and Applied Ecology 6: 535-545.
51. Wilson, R.J., Thomas, C.D. 2002. Dispersal and the spatial dynamics of butterfly populations. In: Bullock, J.M., Kenward, R.E., Hails R.S., eds. Dispersal ecology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK, pp. 257-278.
52. Wright, S. 1943. Isolation by distance. Genetics 28: 114-138.