The conflicting role of matrix habitats as conduits and barriers for dispersal

Ecology

Volumn 91, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 944-950

  Daniel, Kuefler ^a,b   Brian, Hudgens ^c   Haddad, Nick M ^b   Morris And, William F ^d   Nicole, Thurgate ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE STUDIES   (United States)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal movement behavior; Boundary behavior; Butterflies; Connectivity; Landscape mosaic; Movement ecology; Random walk; Satyrodes appalachia

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; CONNECTIVITY; DISPERSAL; HABITAT MOSAIC; HABITAT TYPE; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; MOVEMENT; RIPARIAN FOREST;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BUTTERFLY; ECOSYSTEM; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; ECOSYSTEM; MOVEMENT; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ANIMALIA; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 77951186526     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/09-0614.1     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arellano, L., J. L. Leon-Cortz, and O. Ovaskainen. 2008. Patterns of abundance and movement in relation to landscape structure: a study of a common scarab (Canthon cyanellus cyanellus) in Southern Mexico. Landscape Ecology 23: 69-78.
2. Conradt, L., E. J. Bodsworth, T. J. Roper, and C. D. Thomas. 2000. Non-random dispersal in the butterfly Maniola jurtina: implications for metapopulation models. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267: 1505-1510.
3. Dickson, B. G., J. S. Jenness, and P. Beier. 2005. Influence of vegetation, topography, and roads on cougar movement in southern California. Journal of Wildlife Management 69: 264-276.
4. Dixon, P. M. 2001. The bootstrap and the jackknife: describing the precision of ecological indices. Pages 267-288 in S. M. Schemer and J. Gurevich, editors. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
5. Haddad, N. M. 1999. Corridor use predicted from behaviors at habitat boundaries. American Naturalist 153: 215-227.
6. Haddad, N. M., and J. J. Tewksbury. 2005. Low quality habitat corridors as movement conduits for two butterfly species. Ecological Applications 15: 250-257.
7. Heinrich, B. 1978. Resource heterogeneity and patterns of movement in foraging bumblebees. Oecologia 40: 235-245.
8. Johnson, A. R., J. A. Weins, B. T. Milne, and T. O. Crist. 1992. Animal movements and population dynamics in heterogeneous landscapes. Landscape Ecology 7: 63-75.
9. Jonsen, I. D., R. S. Bourchier, and J. Roland. 2007. Effect of matrix habitat on the spread of flea beetle introductions for biological control of leafy spurge. Landscape Ecology 22: 883-896.
10. Kareiva, P. M., and N. Shigesada. 1983. Analyzing insect movement as a correlated random walk. Oecologia 56: 234-238.
11. Kuefler, D., and N. M. Haddad. 2006. Local versus landscape determinants of butterfly movement behaviors. Ecography 29: 549-560.
12. Levey, D. J., B. M. Bolker, J. J. Tewksbury, S. Sargent, and N. M. Haddad. 2005. Effects of landscape corridors on seed dispersal by birds. Science 30: 146-148.
13. Lima, S. L., and P. A. Zollner. 1996. Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 131-135.
14. Merckx, T., H. Van Dyck, B. Karlssonand, and O. Leimar. 2003. The evolution of movements and behaviour at boundaries in different landscapes: a common arena experiment with butterflies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270: 1815-1821.
15. Nathan, R., W. M. Getz, E. Revilla, M, Holyoak, R. Kadmon, D. Saltz, and P. Smouse. 2009. A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 10: 19052-19059.
16. Ockinger, E., and H. Smith. 2008. Do corridors promote dispersal in grassland butterflies and other insects? Landscape Ecology 23: 27-40.
17. Ovaskainen, O., M. Luoto, I. Ikonen, H. Rekola, E. Meyke, and M. Kuussaari. 2008. An empirical test of a diffusion model: predicting clouded appollo movements in a novel environment. American Naturalist 171: 610-619.
18. Ries, L., and D. Debinski. 2001. Butterfly responses to habitat edges in the highly fragmented prairies of central Iowa. Journal of Animal Ecology 70: 840-852.
19. Ricketts, T. 2001. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. The American Naturalist 158: 87-99.
20. Rizkalla, C. E., and R. K. Swihart. 2007. Explaining movement decisions of forest rodents in fragmented landscapes. Biological Conservation 140: 339-348.
21. Schtickzelle, N., and M. Baguette. 2003. Behavioral responses to habitat patch boundaries restrict dispersal and generate emigration-patch area relationships in fragmented environments. Journal of Animal Ecology 72: 533-545.
22. Schtickzelle, N., A. Joiris, H. Van Dyck, and M. Baguette. 2007. Quantitative analysis of changes in movement behavior within and outside habitat in a specialist butterfly. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 1471-1487.
23. Schultz, C. B. 1998. Dispersal behavior and its implications for reserve design for a rare Oregon butterfly. Conservation Biology 12: 284-292.
24. Schultz, C. B., and E. E. Crone. 2001. Edge-mediated dispersal behavior in a prairie butterfly. Ecology 82: 1879-1892.
25. Shapiro, A. M., and R. T. Carde. 1970. Habitat selection and competition between sibling species of satyrid butterflies. Evolution 24: 48-54.
26. Stamps, J. A. 2001. Habitat selection by dispersers: integrating proximate and ultimate approaches. Pages 230-242 in J. Clobert, E. Danchin, A. A. Dhondt, and J. D. Michaels, editors. Dispersal. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
27. Walston, L. J., and S. J. Mullin. 2008. Variation in amount of surrounding forest habitat influences the initial orientation of juvenile amphibians emigrating from breeding ponds. Canadian Journal of Zoology 86: 141-146.
28. Zalucki, M. P., D. Abel, and J. Pearson. 1980. A novel device for tracking butterflies in the field. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 73: 262-265.