Migration and survival of Parnassius smintheus: Detecting effects of habitat for individual butterflies

Ecological Applications

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1526-1534

  Matter, Stephen F ^a,b,c,d   Roland, Jens ^a   Moilanen, Atte ^b   Hanski, Ilkka ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c Cincinnati Museum Center   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

Butterflies; Connectivity; Dispersal; Habitat patch; Mark recapture; Metapopulation; Mortality; Parnassius smintheus

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; HABITAT TYPE; HABITAT USE; MARK-RECAPTURE METHOD; METAPOPULATION; MIGRATION; PATCH DYNAMICS; SURVIVAL;

LEPIDOPTERA; PAPILIONIDAE; PAPILIONOIDEA; PARNASSIUS; PARNASSIUS SMINTHEUS;

EID: 6344219989     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/03-5164     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bowne, D. R., J. D. Peles, and G. W. Barrett. 1999. Effects of landscape structure on movement patterns of the hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus). Landscape Ecology 14:53-65.
2. Brommer, J. E., and M. S. Fred. 1999. Movement of the Apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo related to host plant and nectar plant patches. Ecological Entomology 24:125-131.
3. Connor, E. F., and E. D. McCoy. 1979. The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship. American Naturalist 113:791-833.
4. Craig, C. C. 1953. On the utilization of marked specimens in estimating populations of flying insects. Biometrika 40:170-176.
5. Crone, E. E., D. Doak, and J. Pokki. 2001. Ecological influences on the dynamics of a field vole metapopulation. Ecology 82:831-843.
6. Fownes, S. 1999. Habitat of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus. Thesis. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
7. Fownes, S., and J. Roland. 2002. Effects of meadow suitability on female behaviour in the alpine butterfly, Parnassius smintheus Doubleday. Ecological Entomology 27:457-466.
8. Guppy, C. S., and J. H. Shepard. 2001. Butterflies of British Columbia. UBC Press, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
9. Haddad, N. M. 1999. Corridor and distance effects on interpatch movements: a landscape experiment with butterflies. Ecological Applications 9:612-622.
10. Hanski, I. 1994. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology 63:151-162.
11. Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
12. Hanski, I., J. Alho, and A. Moilanen. 2000. Estimating the parameters of survival and migration in metapopulations. Ecology 81:239-251.
13. Heath, J. 1981. Threatened Rhopalocera (butterflies) in Europe. Pages 1-157 in Nature and environment series 23. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France.
14. Joly, P., C. Miaud, A. Lehman, and O. Grolet. 2001. Habitat matrix effect on pond occupancy in newts. Conservation Biology 15:239-248.
15. Jonsen, I., R. Bourchier, and J. Roland. 2001. The influence of non-habitat on Aphthona flea beetle immigration to leafy spurge patches. Oecologia 127:287-294.
16. Keyghobadi, N., J. Roland, and C. Strobeck. 1999. Influence of landscape on the population genetic structure of the alpine butterfly Parnassius smintheus (Papilionidae). Molecular Ecology 8:1481-1495.
17. Kuussaari, M., M. Nieminen, and I. Hanski. 1996. An experimental study of migration in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia. Journal of Animal Ecology 65:791-801.
18. MacArthur, R. H., and E. O. Wilson. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
19. Matter, S. F. 1996. Interpatch movement of the red milkweed beetle, Tetraopes tetraophthalmus: individual responses to patch size and isolation. Oecologia 105:447-453.
20. Matter, S. F. 1997. Population density and area: the role of between- and within-patch processes. Oecologia 110:553-538.
21. Matter, S. F., and J. Roland. 2002. An experimental examination of the effects of habitat quality on the dispersal and local abundance of Parnassius smintheus. Ecological Entomology 27:308-316.
22. Matter, S. F., J. Roland, N. Keyghobadi, and K. Sabourin. 2003. The effects of isolation, habitat area and resources on the abundance, density and movement of the butterfly, Parnassius smintheus. American Midland Naturalist 150:26-36.
23. Moilanen, A. 1995. Parameterization of a metapopulation model: an empirical comparison of several different genetic algorithms, simulated annealing, and TABU search. Pages 551-556 in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, ICEC95. IEEE, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
24. Moilanen, A., and I. Hanski. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology 79:2503-2515.
25. Moilanen, A., and M. Nieminen. 2002. Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Ecology 83:1131-1145.
26. Pither, J., and P. D. Taylor. 1998. An experimental assessment of landscape connectivity. Oikos 83:166-174.
27. Racette, G., G. Chouinard, C. Vincent, and S. B. Hill. 1992. Ecology and management of plum Curculio, Conotrachelus nenuphar (Coleoptera, Curculionidae), in apple orchards. Phytoprotection 73:85-100.
28. Ricketts, T. H. 2001. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. American Naturalist 158:87-99.
29. Roland, J., N. Keyghobadi, and S. Fownes. 2000. Alpine Parnassius butterfly dispersal: effects of landscape and population size. Ecology 81:1642-1653.
30. Simberloff, D., J. A. Farr, J. Cox, and D. W. Mehlman. 1992. Movement corridors-conservation bargains or poor investments? Conservation Biology 6:493-504.
31. Stamps, J., M. Buchner, and V. Krishnen. 1987. The effects of edge permeability and habitat geometry on emigration from habitat patches. American Naturalist 129:533-552.
32. Tischendorf, L., and L. Fahrig. 2000. On the use and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos 90:7-19.
33. Turchin, P. B. 1986. Modelling the effect of host patch size on Mexican bean beetle emigration. Ecology 67:124-132.
34. Turchin, P. 1991. Translating foraging movements in heterogeneous environments into the spatial distribution of foragers. Ecology 72:1253-1266.
35. Wahlberg, N., T. Klemetti, V. Selonen, and I. Hanski. 2002. Metapopulation structure and movements of five species of checkerspot butterflies. Oecologia 130:33-43.
36. Wiens, J. A. 1997. Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology. Pages 43-62 in I. A. Hanski and M. E. Gilpin, editors. Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.