PeptiSite: A structural database of peptide binding sites in 4D

Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

Volumn 445, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 717-723

  Acharya, Chayan ^a   Kufareva, Irina ^a   Ilatovskiy, Andrey V ^a,b,c   Abagyan, Ruben ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^b PETERSBURG NUCLEAR PHYSICS INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

^c PETER THE GREAT ST PETERSBURG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Induced fit; Peptide binding site; PeptiSite; Pocketome; SiteFinder

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; MOLECULAR DOCKING; ONLINE SYSTEM; PEPTIDE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; WEB BROWSER;

INDUCED-FIT; PEPTIDE BINDING SITE; PEPTISITE; POCKETOME; SITEFINDER;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; CATALYTIC DOMAIN; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 84897382576     PISSN: 0006291X     EISSN: 10902104     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.12.132     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. C.W. Murray, and D.C. Rees The rise of fragment-based drug discovery Nat. Chem. 1 3 2009 187 192
2. M.M. Hann, A.R. Leach, and G. Harper Molecular complexity and its impact on the probability of finding leads for drug discovery J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41 3 2001 856 864
3. S.H. Gellman Introduction: molecular recognition Chem. Rev. 97 5 1997 1231 1232
4. K.K. Frederick et al. Conformational entropy in molecular recognition by proteins Nature 448 7151 2007 325 329
5. D.D. Boehr, R. Nussinov, and P.E. Wright The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition Nat. Chem. Biol. 5 11 2009 789 796
6. E. Petsalaki et al. Accurate prediction of peptide binding sites on protein surfaces PLoS Comput. Biol. 5 3 2009 e1000335
7. P. Vanhee et al. PepX: a structural database of non-redundant protein-peptide complexes Nucleic Acids Res. 38 Database issue 2010 D545 D551
8. T.R. Kumar, K. Soppimath, and S.K. Nachaegari Novel delivery technologies for protein and peptide therapeutics Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 7 4 2006 261 276
9. S. Lien, and H.B. Lowman Therapeutic peptides Trends Biotechnol. 21 12 2003 556 562
10. J. An, M. Totrov, and R.A. Abagyan Pocketome via comprehensive identification and classification of ligand binding envelopes Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4 6 2005 752 761
11. G. Schneider, and U. Fechner Computer-based de novo design of drug-like molecules Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 4 8 2005 649 663
12. T. Honma Recent advances in de novo design strategy for practical lead identification Med. Res. Rev. 23 5 2003 606 632
13. J.B. Moon, and W.J. Howe Computer design of bioactive molecules: a method for receptor-based de novo ligand design Proteins 11 4 1991 314 328
14. J. Greer et al. Application of the three-dimensional structures of protein target molecules in structure-based drug design J. Med. Chem. 37 8 1994 1035 1054
15. R.E. Babine, and S.L. Bender Molecular recognition of proteinminus signLigand complexes: applications to drug design Chem. Rev. 97 5 1997 1359 1472
16. I.D. Kuntz Structure-based strategies for drug design and discovery Science 257 5073 1992 1078 1082
17. N.M. Glykos, G. Cesareni, and M. Kokkinidis Protein plasticity to the extreme: changing the topology of a 4-alpha-helical bundle with a single amino acid substitution Structure 7 6 1999 597 603
18. M. Huse, and J. Kuriyan The conformational plasticity of protein kinases Cell 109 3 2002 275 282
19. A. Morton, and B.W. Matthews Specificity of ligand binding in a buried nonpolar cavity of T4 lysozyme: linkage of dynamics and structural plasticity Biochemistry 34 27 1995 8576 8588
20. L. Birch et al. Sensitivity of molecular docking to induced fit effects in influenza virus neuraminidase J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 16 12 2002 855 869
21. S.B. Nabuurs, M. Wagener, and J. de Vlieg A flexible approach to induced fit docking J. Med. Chem. 50 26 2007 6507 6518
22. W. Sherman et al. Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects J. Med. Chem. 49 2 2006 534 553
23. B. Sandak, H.J. Wolfson, and R. Nussinov Flexible docking allowing induced fit in proteins: insights from an open to closed conformational isomers Proteins 32 2 1998 159 174
24. R. Najmanovich et al. Side-chain flexibility in proteins upon ligand binding Proteins 39 3 2000 261 268
25. S.J. Teague Implications of protein flexibility for drug discovery Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2 7 2003 527 541
26. M.E. Fraser et al. Crystallographic analysis of transition-state mimics bound to penicillopepsin: phosphorus-containing peptide analogues Biochemistry 31 22 1992 5201 5214
27. H.J. Hecht et al. Three-dimensional structure of a recombinant variant of human pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor (Kazal type) J. Mol. Biol. 225 4 1992 1095 1103
28. A.M. Lesk, and C. Chothia Elbow motion in the immunoglobulins involves a molecular ball-and-socket joint Nature 335 6186 1988 188 190
29. I. Kufareva, and R. Abagyan Type-II kinase inhibitor docking, screening, and profiling using modified structures of active kinase states J. Med. Chem. 51 24 2008 7921 7932
30. R. Abagyan, and I. Kufareva The flexible pocketome engine for structural chemogenomics Methods Mol. Biol. 575 2009 249 279
31. C. de Graaf, and D. Rognan Selective structure-based virtual screening for full and partial agonists of the beta2 adrenergic receptor J. Med. Chem. 51 16 2008 4978 4985
32. C. de Graaf, and D. Rognan Customizing G protein-coupled receptor models for structure-based virtual screening Curr. Pharm. Des. 15 35 2009 4026 4048
33. J.J. Irwin et al. Automated docking screens: a feasibility study J. Med. Chem. 52 18 2009 5712 5720
34. V. Katritch et al. Analysis of full and partial agonists binding to beta2-adrenergic receptor suggests a role of transmembrane helix V in agonist-specific conformational changes J. Mol. Recognit. 22 4 2009 307 318
35. R.L. Dunbrack Jr., and M. Karplus Conformational analysis of the backbone-dependent rotamer preferences of protein sidechains Nat. Struct. Biol. 1 5 1994 334 340
36. P. Kallblad, and P.M. Dean Efficient conformational sampling of local side-chain flexibility J. Mol. Biol. 326 5 2003 1651 1665
37. R.M. Knegtel, I.D. Kuntz, and C.M. Oshiro Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures J. Mol. Biol. 266 2 1997 424 440
38. D.S. Goodsell, G.M. Morris, and A.J. Olson Automated docking of flexible ligands: applications of AutoDock J. Mol. Recognit. 9 1 1996 1 5
39. M.J. Betts, and M.J. Sternberg An analysis of conformational changes on protein-protein association: implications for predictive docking Protein Eng. 12 4 1999 271 283
40. J.W. Nissink et al. A new test set for validating predictions of protein-ligand interaction Proteins 49 4 2002 457 471
41. H. Claussen et al. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations J. Mol. Biol. 308 2 2001 377 395
42. G. Jones et al. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking J. Mol. Biol. 267 3 1997 727 748
43. I.D. Kuntz et al. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions J. Mol. Biol. 161 2 1982 269 288
44. M. Totrov, and R. Abagyan Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18 2 2008 178 184
45. J.A. Erickson et al. Lessons in molecular recognition: the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy J. Med. Chem. 47 1 2004 45 55
46. H.A. Carlson Protein flexibility and drug design: how to hit a moving target Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 6 4 2002 447 452
47. H.A. Carlson Protein flexibility is an important component of structure-based drug discovery Curr. Pharm. Des. 8 17 2002 1571 1578
48. C.N. Cavasotto, and R.A. Abagyan Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases J. Mol. Biol. 337 1 2004 209 225
49. H. Gohlke, L.A. Kuhn, and D.A. Case Change in protein flexibility upon complex formation: analysis of Ras-Raf using molecular dynamics and a molecular framework approach Proteins 56 2 2004 322 337
50. M.I. Zavodszky, and L.A. Kuhn Side-chain flexibility in protein-ligand binding: the minimal rotation hypothesis Protein Sci. 14 4 2005 1104 1114
51. M.J. Bower, F.E. Cohen, and R.L. Dunbrack Jr. Prediction of protein side-chain rotamers from a backbone-dependent rotamer library: a new homology modeling tool J. Mol. Biol. 267 5 1997 1268 1282
52. A.M. Ferrari et al. Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening J. Med. Chem. 47 21 2004 5076 5084
53. R.L. Dunbrack Jr., and M. Karplus Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins. Application to side-chain prediction J. Mol. Biol. 230 2 1993 543 574
54. O.V. Kalinina et al. Combinations of protein-chemical complex structures reveal new targets for established drugs PLoS Comput. Biol. 7 5 2011 e1002043
55. M.L. Benson et al. Binding MOAD, a high-quality protein-ligand database Nucleic Acids Res. 36 Database issue 2008 D674 D678
56. B.A. Shoemaker et al. Inferred biomolecular interaction server - a web server to analyze and predict protein interacting partners and binding sites Nucleic Acids Res. 38 Database issue 2010 D518 D524
57. J. Gunther et al. Utilising structural knowledge in drug design strategies: applications using Relibase J. Mol. Biol. 326 2 2003 621 636
58. E.I. Juritz, S.F. Alberti, and G.D. Parisi PCDB: a database of protein conformational diversity Nucleic Acids Res. 39 Database issue 2011 D475 D479
59. J. Ponomarenko et al. IEDB-3D: structural data within the immune epitope database Nucleic Acids Res. 39 Database issue 2011 D1164 D1170
60. I. Kufareva, A.V. Ilatovskiy, and R. Abagyan Pocketome: an encyclopedia of small-molecule binding sites in 4D Nucleic Acids Res. 40 Database issue 2012 D535 D540
61. H.M. Berman et al. The protein data bank Nucleic Acids Res. 28 2000 235 242
62. G. Bottegoni et al. Four-dimensional docking: a fast and accurate account of discrete receptor flexibility in ligand docking J. Med. Chem. 52 2 2009 397 406
63. A. Ceol et al. DOMINO: a database of domain-peptide interactions Nucleic Acids Res. 35 Database issue 2007 D557 D560
64. K.R. Govindarajan et al. MPID: MHC-peptide interaction database for sequence-structure-function information on peptides binding to MHC molecules Bioinformatics 19 2 2003 309 310
65. B.A. Shoemaker et al. Inferred biomolecular interaction server: a web server to analyze and predict protein interacting partners and binding sites Nucleic Acids Res. 38 Suppl. 1 2010 D518 D524
66. G. Bottegoni et al. Systematic exploitation of multiple receptor conformations for virtual ligand screening PLoS One 6 5 2011 e18845
67. J. Carlsson et al. Structure-based discovery of A2A adenosine receptor ligands J. Med. Chem. 53 9 2010 3748 3755
68. V. Katritch et al. Structure-based discovery of novel chemotypes for adenosine A2A receptor antagonists J. Med. Chem. 53 4 2010 1799 1809
69. D.S. Wishart et al. DrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets Nucleic Acids Res. 36 Database issue 2008 D901 D906
70. G.P.S. Raghava, BioTherapi: Bioinformatics for Therapeutic Peptides and Proteins. Available from: < http://www.imtech.res.in/raghava/biotherapi/ pdrug.html >.
71. E. Raush et al. A new method for publishing three-dimensional content PLoS One 4 10 2009
72. W.H. Lee et al. Interactive JIMD articles using the iSee concept: turning a new page on structural biology data J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 34 3 2011 565 567
73. R. Abagyan et al. Disseminating structural genomics data to the public: from a data dump to an animated story Trends Biochem. Sci. 31 2 2006 76 78