Efficient fermentation of an improved synthetic grape must by enological and laboratory strains of saccharomyces cerevisiae

AMB Express

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-9

  Viana, Tiago ^a   Loureiro Dias, Maria C ^a   Prista, Catarina ^a  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE AGRONOMIA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

By auxotrophic mutant serie; Natural grape must; Synthetic grape must; Wine fermentation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUXOTROPHIC MUTANT; FERMENTATION MEDIUM; FERMENTATION OPTIMIZATION; GRAPE MUST; KINETICS; NONHUMAN; REPRODUCIBILITY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; VINICULTURE;

EID: 84897123313     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21910855     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13568-014-0016-0     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Albertin W, Marullo P, Aigle M, Dillmann C, de Vienne D, Bely M, Sicard D (2011) Population size drives industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae alcoholic fermentation and is under genetic control. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:2772-2784. doi:10.1128/ AEM.02547-10
2. Baranyi J, Roberts TA (1994) A dynamic approach to predicting bacterial growth in food. Int J Food Microbiol 23:277-294. doi:10.1016/0168-1605(94)90157-0
3. Bauer BE, Rossington D, Mollapour M, Mamnun Y, Kuchler K, Piper PW (2003) Weak organic acid stress inhibits aromatic amino acid uptake by yeast, causing a strong influence of amino acid auxotrophies on the phenotypes of membrane transporter mutants. Eur J Biochem 270:3189-3195. doi:10.1046/ j.1432-1033.2003.03701.x
4. Bely M, Sablayrolles J-M, Barre P (1990) Automatic detection of assimilable nitrogen deficiencies during alcoholic fermentation in oenological conditions. J Ferment Bioeng 70:246-252. doi:10.1016/0922-338X(90)90057-4
5. Borneman AR, Forgan AH, Pretorius IS, Chambers PJ (2008) Comparative genome analysis of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strain. FEMS Yeast Res 8:1185-1195. doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00434.x
6. Borneman AR, Desany BA, Riches D, Affourtit JP, Forgan AH, Pretorius IS, Egholm M, Chambers PJ (2011a) The genome sequence of the wine yeast VIN7 reveals an allotriploid hybrid genome with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii origins. FEMS Yeast Res 12:88-96. doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00773.x
7. Borneman AR, Desany BA, Riches D, Affourtit JP, Forgan AH, Pretorius IS, Egholm M, Chambers PJ (2011b) Whole-genome comparison reveals novel genetic elements that characterize the genome of industrial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 7:e1001287. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001287
8. Brachmann CB, Davies A, Cost GJ, Caputo E, Li J, Hieter P, Boeke JD (1998) Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 14:115-132. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19980130) 14:2<115::AID-YEA204>3.0.CO;2-2
9. Bradbury J, Richards K, Niederer H, Lee S, Rod Dunbar P, Gardner R (2006) A homozygous diploid subset of commercial wine yeast strains. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 89:27-37. doi:10.1007/s10482-005-9006-1
10. Brauer MJ, Huttenhower C, Airoldi EM, Rosenstein R, Matese JC, Gresham D, Boer VM, Troyanskaya OG, Botstein D (2008) Coordination of growth rate, cell cycle, stress response, and metabolic activity in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 19:352-367. doi:10.1091/mbc.E07-08-0779
11. Çakar ZP, Sauer U, Bailey J (1999) Metabolic engineering of yeast: the perils of auxotrophic hosts. Biotechnol Lett 21:611-616. doi:10.1023/A:1005576004215
12. Ciani M, Ferraro L (1996) Enhanced glycerol content in wines made with immobilized Candida stellata cells. Appl Environ Microb 62:128-132
13. Cohen R, Engelberg D (2007) Commonly used Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains (e.g. BY4741, W303) are growth sensitive on synthetic complete medium due to poor leucine uptake. FEMS Microbiol Lett 273:239-243. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00798.x
14. Corbacho I, Teixidó F, Velázquez R, Hernández LM, Olivero I (2011) Standard YPD, even supplemented with extra nutrients, does not always compensate growth defects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae auxotrophic strains. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 99:591-600. doi:10.1007/s10482-010-9530-5
15. Engel SR, Cherry JM (2013) The New Modern Era of Yeast Genomics: Community Sequencing and the Resulting Annotation of Multiple Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains at the Saccharomyces Genome Database. Database, Oxford. doi:10.1093/database/bat012
16. Fleet GH (2008) Wine yeasts for the future. FEMS Yeast Res 8:979-995.doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00427.x
17. Fournier E (2001) Colorimetric Quantification of Carbohydrates. In: Wrolstad (ed) Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Alberta, Canada, E1.1.1-E1.1.8. doi: 10.1002/0471142913.fae0101s00
18. Giudici P, Solieri L, Pulvirenti A, Cassanelli S (2005) Strategies and perspectives for genetic improvement of wine yeasts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66:622-628. doi:10.1007/s00253-004-1784-2
19. Gómez-Pastor R, Pérez-Torrado R, Cabiscol E, Ros J, Matallana E (2010) Reduction of oxidative cellular damage by overexpression of the thioredoxin TRX2 gene improves yield and quality of wine yeast dry active biomass. Microb Cell Fact 9:9-23. doi:10.1186/1475-2859-9-9
20. Görgens J, Zyl W, Knoetze J, Hahn-Hägerdal B (2005) Amino acid supplementation improves heterologous protein production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in defined medium. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 67:684-691. doi:10.1007/ s00253-004-1803-3
21. Gutiérrez A, Chiva R, Sancho M, Beltran G, Arroyo-López FN, Guillamón JM (2012) Nitrogen requirements of commercial wine yeast strains during fermentation of a synthetic grape must. Food Microbiol 31:25-32. doi:10.1016/j.fm.2012.02.012
22. Hanscho M, Ruckerbauer DE, Chauhan N, Hofbauer HF, Krahulec S, Nidetzky B, Kohlwein SD, Zanghellini J, Natter K (2012) Nutritional requirements of the BY series of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for optimum growth. FEMS Yeast Res 12:796-808. doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2012.00830.x
23. Harsch MJ, Lee SA, Goddard MR, Gardner RC (2010) Optimized fermentation of grape juice by laboratory strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 10:72-82. doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2009.00580.x
24. Lambrechts MG, Pretorius IS (2000) Yeast and its importance to wine aroma - a review. S Afric J Enol Vitic 21:97-129
25. Larsson C, Nilsson A, Blomberg A, Gustafsson L (1997) Glycolytic flux is conditionally correlated with ATP concentration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a chemostat study under carbon- or nitrogen-limiting conditions. J Bacteriol 179:7243-7250
26. López-Malo M, Chiva R, Rozès N, Guillamón JM (2012) Phenotypic analysis of mutant and overexpressing strains of lipid metabolism genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Implication in growth at low temperatures. Int J Food Microbiol 162:26-36, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.12.020
27. Malherbe S, Bauer FF, Toit MD (2007) Understanding problem fermentations - a review. S Afric J Enol Vitic 28:169-186
28. Marullo P, Bely M, Masneuf-Pomarede I, Aigle M, Dubourdieu D (2004) Inheritable nature of enological quantitative traits is demonstrated by meiotic segregation of industrial wine yeast strains. FEMS Yeast Res 4:711-719. doi:10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.01.006
29. Nardi T, Corich V, Giacomini A, Blondin B (2010) A sulphite-inducible form of the sulphite efflux gene SSU1 in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast. Microbiology 156:1686-1696.doi:10.1099/mic.0.036723-0
30. Nelson N (1944) A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi method for the determination of glucose. J Biol Chem 153:375-379
31. Paciello L, de Alteriis E, Mazzoni C, Palermo V, Zueco J, Parascandola P (2009) Performance of the auxotrophic Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4741 as host for the production of IL-1beta in aerated fed-batch reactor: role of ACA supplementation, strain viability, and maintenance energy. Microb Cell Fact 8:70-83. doi:10.1186/1475-2859-8-70
32. Pampulha ME, Loureiro-Dias MC (2000) Energetics of the effect of acetic acid on growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 184:69-72. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb08992.x
33. Pizarro F, Vargas FA, Agosin E (2007) A systems biology perspective of wine fermentations. Yeast 24:977-991. doi:10.1002/yea.1545
34. Pretorius IS (2000) Tailoring wine yeast for the new millennium: novel approaches to the ancient art of winemaking. Yeast 16:675-729. doi:10.1002/1097-0061(20000615)16:8<675::AID-YEA585>3.0.CO;2-B
35. Pronk JT (2002) Auxotrophic yeast strains in fundamental and applied research. Appl Environ Microb 68:2095-2100
36. Ribereau-Gayon P, Dubourdieu D, Donèche B, Lonvaud A (2006) The chemistry of wine. In: Ribereau-Gayon P et al. (ed) Handbook of enology, the microbiology of wine and vinifications. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, pp 1-228
37. Riou C, Nicaud J-M, Barre P, Gaillardin C (1997) Stationary-phase gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentation. Yeast 13:903-915. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199708)13:10<903::AID-YEA145>3.0.CO;2-1
38. Rossouw D, Bauer FF (2009) Comparing the transcriptomes of wine yeast strains: toward understanding the interaction between environment and transcriptome during fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84:937-954. doi:10.1007/s00253-009-2204-4
39. Rossouw D, Jolly N, Jacobson D, Bauer FF (2012) The effect of scale on gene expression: commercial versus laboratory wine fermentations. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 93:1207-1219. doi:10.1007/s00253-011-3564-0
40. Salmon J-M, Barre P (1998) Improvement of nitrogen assimilation and fermentation kinetics under enological conditions by derepression of alternative nitrogen-assimilatory pathways in an industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:3831-3837
41. Santos J, Sousa MJ, Cardoso H, Inácio J, Silva S, Spencer-Martins I, Leão C (2008) Ethanol tolerance of sugar transport, and the rectification of stuck wine fermentations. Microbiology 154:422-430. doi:10.1099/mic.0.2007/011445-0
42. Styger G, Prior B, Bauer F (2011) Wine flavor and aroma. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 38:1145-1159. doi:10.1007/s10295-011-1018-4
43. Swiegers JH, Pretorius IS (2005) Yeast modulation of wine flavor. In: Laskin AI, Gadd GM, Bennett JW (ed) Advances in applied microbiology. Academic Press, United States. pp 131-175
44. Swinnen IAM, Bernaerts K, Dens EJJ, Geeraerd AH, Van Impe JF (2004) Predictive modelling of the microbial lag phase: a review. Int J Food Microbiol 94:137-159. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.01.006
45. Teixeira MC, Raposo LR, Mira NP, Lourenco AB, Sa-Correia I (2009) Genome-wide identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes required for maximal tolerance to ethanol. Appl Environ Microb 75:5761-5772. doi:10.1128/AEM.00845-09
46. Tran T, Forgan AH, Bartowsky EJ, Borneman A (2010) Construction of a wine yeast genome deletion library. 12th International Conference on Culture Collections, Santa Catarina, Brazil. http://www.wfcc.info/iccc12/abstract/ab_tina.pdf. Accessed 12 December 2013
47. Verstrepen K, Chambers P, Pretorius I (2006) The development of superior yeast strains for the food and beverage industries: challenges, opportunities and potential benefits. In: Querol A, Fleet G (eds) Yeasts in Food and Beverages. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 399-444
48. + homeostasis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during the late stages of wine fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:6302-6308. doi:10.1128/AEM.01355-12
49. Walker ME, Gardner JM, Vystavelova A, McBryde C, de Barros LM, Jiranek V (2003) Application of the reuseable, KanMX selectable marker to industrial yeast: construction and evaluation of heterothallic wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, possessing minimal foreign DNA sequences. FEMS Yeast Res 4:339-347. doi:10.1016/S1567-1356(03)00161-2
50. Walker M, Vystavelova A, Pedler S, Eglinton J, Jiranek V (2005) PCR-based gene disruption and recombinatory marker excision to produce modified industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae without added sequences. J Microbiol Meth 63:193-204. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2005.03.015
51. Wang XD, Bohlscheid JC, Edwards CG (2003) Fermentative activity and production of volatile compounds by Saccharomyces grown in synthetic grape juice media deficient in assimilable nitrogen and/or pantothenic acid. J Appl Microbiol 94349-94359
52. Winzeler EA, Shoemaker DD, Astromoff A, Liang H, Anderson K, Andre B, Bangham R, Benito R, Boeke JD, Bussey H, Chu AM, Connelly C, Davis K, Dietrich F, Dow SW, El Bakkoury M, Foury F, Friend SH, Gentalen E, Giaever G, Hegemann JH, Jones T, Laub M, Liao H, Liebundguth N, Lockhart DJ, Lucau-Danila A, Lussier M, M'Rabet N, Menard P et al (1999) Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285:901-906