Peculiar H+ homeostasis of saccharomyces cerevisiae during the late stages of wine fermentation

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 78, Issue 17, 2012, Pages 6302-6308

  Viana, Tiago ^a   Loureiro Dias, Maria C ^a   Loureiro, Virgílio ^a   Prista, Catarina ^a  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE AGRONOMIA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL PERFORMANCE; ETHANOL CONCENTRATIONS; EXPONENTIAL PHASE; FERMENTATION PROCESS; GLUCOSE FERMENTATION; HIGH QUALITY; INTRACELLULAR PH; LATE STAGE; LIVING SYSTEMS; PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; POTENTIAL MECHANISM; STATIONARY PHASE; STATIONARY PHASIS; WINE FERMENTATION; WINE STRAINS;

CELLS; CYTOLOGY; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; PHYSIOLOGY; STRAIN; WINE;

YEAST;

GLUCOSE; HYDROGEN; PROTON PUMP;

BREWING INDUSTRY; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); FERMENTATION; HOMEOSTASIS; MEMBRANE; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; PH; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; YEAST;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CYTOPLASM; FERMENTATION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HOMEOSTASIS; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TEMPERATURE; WINE;

CYTOPLASM; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; HOMEOSTASIS; HYDROGEN; PROTON PUMPS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TEMPERATURE; WINE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84866164995     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01355-12     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. +-ATPase activity and the lipid composition of the plasma membrane in different wine yeast strains. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 110:34-42.
2. D'Amore T, Panchal CJ, Russell I, Stewart GG. 1990. A study of ethanol tolerance in yeast. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 9:287-304.
3. Dickey AN, Yim W-S, Yim W-S, Faller R. 2009. Using ergosterol to mitigate the deleterious effects of ethanol on bilayer structure. J. Phys. Chem. B 113:2388-2397.
4. Ding J, et al. 2009. Tolerance and stress response to ethanol in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 85:253-263.
5. Fujita K, Matsuyama A, Kobayashi Y, Iwahashi H. 2006. The genomewide screening of yeast deletion mutants to identify the genes required for tolerance to ethanol and other alcohols. FEMS Yeast Res. 6:744-750.
6. Guldfeldt LU, Arneborg N. 1998. Measurement of the effects of acetic acid and extracellular pH on intracellular pH of nonfermenting, individual Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells by fluorescence microscopy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:530-534.
7. Gurtovenko AA, Anwar J. 2009. Interaction of ethanol with biological membranes: the formation of non-bilayer structures within the membrane interior and their significance. J. Phys. Chem. B 113:1983-1992.
8. Hayashi M, Maeda T. 2006. Activation of the HOG pathway upon cold stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biochem. 139:797-803.
9. Herman PK. 2002. Stationary phase in yeast. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 5:602-607.
10. Huffer S, Clark ME, Ning JC, Blanch HW, Clark DS. 2011. The role of alcohols in growth, lipid composition, and membrane fluidity of yeast, bacteria, and archaea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:6400-6408.
11. Jimenez J, van Uden N. 1985. Use of extracellular acidification for the rapid testing of ethanol tolerance in yeasts. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 27:1596-1598.
12. Kitagaki H, Araki Y, Funato K, Shimoi H. 2007. Ethanol-induced death in yeast exhibits features of apoptosis mediated by mitochondrial fission pathway. FEBS Lett. 581:2935-2942.
13. Leão C, van Uden N. 1984. Effects of ethanol and other alkanols on passive proton influx in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 774:43-48.
14. Leão C, van Uden N. 1982. Effects of ethanol and other alkanols on the glucose transport system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 24:2601-2604.
15. Lei J, Zhao X, Ge X, Bai F. 2007. Ethanol tolerance and the variation of plasma membrane composition of yeast floc populations with different size distribution. J. Biotechnol. 131:270-275.
16. Liu S, Qureshi N. 2009. How microbes tolerate ethanol and butanol. N. Biotechnol. 26:117-121.
17. Loureiro V, van Uden N. 1986. Roles of the specific growth rate and the ethanol concentration in the adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to ethanol. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 28:1443-1445.
18. 13C nuclear magnetic resonance. Arch. Microbiol. 153:384-391.
19. Ma M, Liu LZ. 2010. Quantitative transcription dynamic analysis reveals candidate genes and key regulators for ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Microbiol. 10:169. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-10-169.
20. Madeira A, et al. 2010. Effect of ethanol on fluxes of water and protons across the plasma membrane of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 10:252-258.
21. Martini S, et al. 2004. In vivo 13C-NMR and modelling study of metabolic yield response to ethanol stress in a wild-type strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 564:63-68.
22. Mortensen HD, Jacobsen T, Koch AG, Arneborg N. 2008. Intracellular pH homeostasis plays a role in the tolerance of Debaryomyces hansenii and Candida zeylanoides to acidified nitrite. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 4835-4840.
23. Opekarova M, Sigler K. 1982. Acidification power: indicator of metabolic activity and autolytic changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Folia Microbiol. 27:395-403.
24. Orij R, Brul S, Smits GJ. 2011. Intracellular pH is a tightly controlled signal in yeast. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 10:933-944.
25. Pampulha ME, Loureiro-Dias MC. 1989. Combined effect of acetic acid, pH and ethanol on intracellular pH of fermenting yeast. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 31:547-550.
26. Pampulha ME, Loureiro-Dias MC. 1990. Activity of glycolytic enzymes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the presence of acetic acid. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 34:375-380.
27. Piper PW. 1995. The heat shock and ethanol stress responses of yeast exhibit extensive similarity and functional overlap. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 134:121-127.
28. Pizarro F, Vargas FA, Agosin E. 2007. A systems biology perspective of wine fermentations. Yeast 24:977-991.
29. Querol A, Fernández-Espinar MT, del Olmo M, Barrio E. 2003. Adaptive evolution of wine yeast. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 86:3-10.
30. Quintas C, Lima-Costa E, Loureiro-Dias MC. 2000. The effect of ethanol on the plasma membrane permeability of spoilage yeasts. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 38:47-51.
31. Rossignol T, Dulau L, Julien A, Blondin B. 2003. Genome-wide monitoring of wine yeast gene expression during alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 20:1369-1385.
32. Rottenberg H. 1979. The measurement of membrane potential and ΔpH in cells, organelles, and vesicles. Methods Enzymol. 55:547-569.
33. Salgueiro SP, Sá-Correia I, Novais JM. 1988. Ethanol-induced leakage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: kinetics and relationship to yeast ethanol tolerance and alcohol fermentation productivity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54:903-909.
34. Teixeira MC, Raposo LR, Mira NP, Lourenço AB, Sá-Correia I. 2009. Genome-wide identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes required for maximal tolerance to ethanol. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:5761-5772.
35. van Uden N. 1985. Ethanol toxicity and ethanol tolerance in yeasts. Annu. Rep. Ferment. Proc. 8:11-58.
36. Viegas CA, Sá-Correia I. 1995. Toxicity of octanoic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae at temperatures between 8.5 and 30°C. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 17:826-831.
37. Yoshikawa K, et al. 2009. Comprehensive phenotypic analysis for identification of genes affecting growth under ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 9:32-44.