Simulation analysis of the cellulase Cel7A carbohydrate binding module on the surface of the cellulose Iβ

Cellulose

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 951-971

  Alekozai, Emal M ^a,b   GhattyVenkataKrishna, Pavan K ^b   Uberbacher, Edward C ^b   Crowley, Michael F ^b,c   Smith, Jeremy C ^b   Cheng, Xiaolin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Brownian dynamics; Carbohydrate binding; Cellulase; Cellulose; Molecular dynamics; Surface diffusion

Indexed keywords

BROWNIAN MOVEMENT; CARBOHYDRATES; CELLULOSE; HYDROGEN BONDS; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; SURFACE CHEMISTRY; SURFACE DIFFUSION; VAN DER WAALS FORCES;

BROWNIAN DYNAMICS; CARBOHYDRATE BINDING; CARBOHYDRATE-BINDING MODULES; CELLULASE; CRYSTALLINE SUBSTRATES; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; STRUCTURAL ARRANGEMENT; VAN DER WAALS INTERACTION;

FIBERS;

EID: 84897064632     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-013-0026-0     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Arantes V, Saddler JN (2011) Cellulose accessibility limits the effectiveness of minimum cellulase loading on the efficient hydrolysis of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnol Biofuels 4(1): 1-17.
2. Barr B, Hsieh Y-L, Ganem B, Wilson D (1996) Identification of two functionally different classes of exocellulases. Biochemistry 35: 586-592.
3. Beckham GT, Bomble YJ, Matthews JF, Taylor CB, Resch MG, Yarbrough JM, Decker SR, Bu L, Zhao X, McCabe C, Wohlert O, Bergenstråhle M, Brady JW, Adney WS, Himmel ME, Crowley MF (2010a) The O-glycosylated linker from the Trichoderma reesei Family 7 cellulase is a flexible, disordered protein. Biophys J 99(11): 3773-3781.
4. Beckham GT, Matthews JF, Bomble YJ, Bu L, Adney WS, Himmel ME, Nimlos MR, Crowley MF (2010b) Identification of amino acids responsible for processivity in a family 1 carbohydrate-binding module from a fungal cellulase. J Phys Chem B 114(3): 1447-1453.
5. Beckham GT, Bomble YJ, Bayer EA, Himmel ME, Crowley MF (2011) Applications of computational science for understanding enzymatic deconstruction of cellulose. Curr Opin Biotechnol 22(2): 231-238.
6. Berne BJ, Weeks JD, Zhou R (2009) Dewetting and hydrophobic interaction in physical and biological systems. Phys Chem 60(1): 85.
7. Boraston AB (2005) The interaction of carbohydrate-binding modules with insoluble non-crystalline cellulose is enthalpically driven. Biochem J 385(Pt 2): 479.
8. Boraston AB, Bolam DN, Gilbert HJ, Davies GJ (2004) Carbohydrate-binding modules: fine-tuning polysaccharide recognition. Biochem J 382(Pt 3): 769.
9. Bowman GR, Beauchamp KA, Boxer G, Pande VS (2009) Progress and challenges in the automated construction of Markov state models for full protein systems. J Chem Phys 131: 124101.
10. Bremaud P (1999) Markov chains: Gibbs fields Monte Carlo simulation and queues. Springer, Berlin.
11. Breyer WA, Matthews BW (2001) A structural basis for processivity. Protein Sci 10(9): 1699-1711.
12. Bu L, Beckham GT, Crowley MF, Chang CH, Matthews JF, Bomble YJ, Adney WS, Himmel ME, Nimlos MR (2009) The energy landscape for the interaction of the family 1 carbohydrate-binding module and the cellulose surface is altered by hydrolyzed glycosidic bonds. J Phys Chem B 113(31): 10994-11002.
13. Buch I, Giorgino T, De Fabritiis G (2011) Complete reconstruction of an enzyme-inhibitor binding process by molecular dynamics simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(25): 10184.
14. Carrard G, Koivula A, Söderlund H, Béguin P (2000) Cellulose-binding domains promote hydrolysis of different sites on crystalline cellulose. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(19): 10342-10347.
15. Chandra RP, Esteghlalian AR, Saddler JN (2009) Assessing substrate accessibility to enzymatic hydrolysis by cellulases. Characterization of Lignocellulosic Materials: 60-80.
16. Coutinho J, Gilkes N, Kilburn D, Warren R, Miller R Jr (1993) The nature of the cellulose-binding domain effects the activities of a bacterial endoglucanase on different forms of cellulose. FEMS Microbiol Lett 113(2): 211-217.
17. Creagh AL, Ong E, Jervis E, Kilburn DG, Haynes CA (1996) Binding of the cellulose-binding domain of exoglucanase Cex from Cellulomonas fimi to insoluble microcrystalline cellulose is entropically driven. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93(22): 12229-12234.
18. Dagel DJ, Liu YS, Zhong L, Luo Y, Himmel ME, Xu Q, Zeng Y, Ding SY, Smith S (2010) In situ imaging of single carbohydrate-binding modules on cellulose microfibrils. J Phys Chem B 115: 635-641.
19. Daidone I, Ulmschneider MB, Di Nola A, Amadei A, Smith JC (2007) Dehydration-driven solvent exposure of hydrophobic surfaces as a driving force in peptide folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(39): 15230.
20. Dill KA, Truskett TM, Vlachy V, Hribar-Lee B (2005) Modeling water, the hydrophobic effect, and ion solvation. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 34: 173-199.
21. Eisenhaber F, Lijnzaad P, Argos P, Sander C, Scharf M (1995) The double cubic lattice method: efficient approaches to numerical integration of surface area and volume and to dot surface contouring of molecular assemblies. J Comput Chem 16(3): 273-284.
22. Elcock AH (2004) Molecular simulations of diffusion and association in multimacromolecular systems. Methods Enzymol 383: 166-198.
23. Elmer SP, Park S, Pande VS (2005) Foldamer dynamics expressed via Markov state models. I. Explicit solvent molecular-dynamics simulations in acetonitrile, chloroform, methanol, and water. J Chem Phys 123: 114902.
24. Ermak DL, McCammon J (1978) Brownian dynamics with hydrodynamic interactions. J Chem Phys 69: 1352.
25. Falkowski P, Scholes RJ, Boyle E, Canadell J, Canfield D, Elser J, Gruber N, Hibbard K, Högberg P, Linder S, Mackenzie FT, Moore B, Pedersen T, Rosenthal Y, Seitzinger S, Smetacek V, Steffen W (2000) The global carbon cycle: a test of our knowledge of earth as a system. Science 290(5490): 291-296.
26. Feller SE, Zhang Y, Pastor RW, Brooks BR (1995) Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: the Langevin piston method. J Chem Phys 103: 4613.
27. Fu C, Mielenz JR, Xiao X, Ge Y, Hamilton CY, Rodriguez M, Chen F, Foston M, Ragauskas A, Bouton J, Dixon RA, Wang Z-Y (2011) Genetic manipulation of lignin reduces recalcitrance and improves ethanol production from switchgrass. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(9): 3803-3808.
28. Gabdoulline R, Wade R (1996) Effective charges for macromolecules in solvent. J Phys Chem 100(9): 3868-3878.
29. Gabdoulline R, Wade RC (1998) Brownian dynamics simulation of protein-protein diffusional encounter. Methods 14(3): 329-341.
30. Gilkes N, Henrissat B, Kilburn D, Miller R Jr, Warren R (1991) Domains in microbial beta-1, 4-glycanases: sequence conservation, function, and enzyme families. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 55(2): 303.
31. Guillén D, Sánchez S, Rodríguez-Sanoja R (2010) Carbohydrate-binding domains: multiplicity of biological roles. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85(5): 1241-1249.
32. Guvench O, Greene SN, Kamath G, Brady JW, Venable RM, Pastor RW, Mackerell AD (2008) Additive empirical force field for hexopyranose monosaccharides. J Comput Chem 29(15): 2543-2564.
33. Guvench O, Hatcher ER, Venable RM, Pastor RW, Mackerell AD (2009) CHARMM additive all-atom force field for glycosidic linkages between hexopyranoses. J Chem Theory Comput 5(9): 2353-2370.
34. Harrison MJ, Nouwens AS, Jardine DR, Zachara NE, Gooley AA, Nevalainen H, Packer NH (1998) Modified glycosylation of cellobiohydrolase I from a high cellulase-producing mutant strain of Trichoderma reesei. Eur J Biochem 256(1): 119-127.
35. Hashimoto H (2006) Recent structural studies of carbohydrate-binding modules. Cell Mol Life Sci 63(24): 2954-2967.
36. Hefford MA, Laderoute K, Willick GE, Yaguchi M, Seligy VL (1992) Bipartite organization of the Bacillus subtilis endo-beta-1, 4-glucanase revealed by C-terminal mutations. Protein Eng Des Sel 5(5): 433.
37. Hervé C, Rogowski A, Blake AW, Marcus SE, Gilbert HJ, Knox JP (2010) Carbohydrate-binding modules promote the enzymatic deconstruction of intact plant cell walls by targeting and proximity effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(34): 15293-15298.
38. Himmel ME, Ding SY, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Brady JW, Foust TD (2007) Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 315(5813): 804.
39. Hinrichs NS, Pande VS (2007) Calculation of the distribution of eigenvalues and eigenvectors in Markovian state models for molecular dynamics. J Chem Phys 126: 244101.
40. Hoffrén AM, Teeri TT, Teleman O (1995) Molecular dynamics simulation of fungal cellulose-binding domains: differences in molecular rigidity but a preserved cellulose binding surface. Protein Eng 8(5): 443-450.
41. Holtzapple M (1993) Cellulose. In: Macrae R, Robinson RK, Saddler MJ (eds) Encyclopedia of food science food technology and nutrition. Academic Press, London 16: 758-767.
42. Igarashi K, Koivula A, Wada M, Kimura S, Penttilä M, Samejima M (2009) High speed atomic force microscopy visualizes processive movement of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I on crystalline cellulose. J Biol Chem 284(52): 36186.
43. Jarvis M (2003) Cellulose stacks up. Nature 426(6967): 611-612.
44. Jervis EJ, Haynes CA, Kilburn DG (1997) Surface diffusion of cellulases and their isolated binding domains on cellulose. J Biol Chem 272(38): 24016.
45. Johansson G, Ståhlberg J, Lindeberg G, Engström Å, Pettersson G (1989) Isolated fungal cellulose terminal domains and a synthetic minimum analogue bind to cellulose. FEBS Lett 243(2): 389-393.
46. Jorgensen WL (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79 (2).
47. Karplus M, McCammon JA (2002) Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nat Struct Mol Biol 9(9): 646-652.
48. Kataeva I, Guglielmi G, Béguin P (1997) Interaction between Clostridium thermocellum endoglucanase CelD and polypeptides derived from the cellulosome-integrating protein CipA: stoichiometry and cellulolytic activity of the complexes. Biochem J 326(Pt 2): 617-624.
49. Kipper K, Väljamäe P, Johansson G (2005) Processive action of cellobiohydrolase Cel7A from Trichoderma reesei is revealed as 'burst'kinetics on fluorescent polymeric model substrates. Biochem J 385(Pt 2): 527.
50. Kraulis J, Clore GM, Nilges M, Jones TA, Pettersson G, Knowles J, Gronenborn AM (1989) Determination of the three-dimensional solution structure of the C-terminal domain of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. A study using nuclear magnetic resonance and hybrid distance geometry-dynamical simulated annealing. Biochemistry 28(18): 7241-7257.
51. Lehtiö J, Sugiyama J, Gustavsson M, Fransson L, Linder M, Teeri TT (2003) The binding specificity and affinity determinants of family 1 and family 3 cellulose binding modules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(2): 484-489.
52. Liu YS, Baker JO, Zeng Y, Himmel ME, Haas T, Ding SY (2011) Cellobiohydrolase hydrolyzes crystalline cellulose on hydrophobic faces. J Biol Chem 286(13): 11195.
53. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS (2002) Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66(3): 506-577.
54. MacKerell AD, Banavali N, Foloppe N (2000) Development and current status of the CHARMM force field for nucleic acids. Biopolymers 56(4): 257-265.
55. McGuffee SR, Elcock AH (2006) Atomically detailed simulations of concentrated protein solutions: the effects of salt, pH, point mutations, and protein concentration in simulations of 1000-molecule systems. J Am Chem Soc 128(37): 12098-12110.
56. McGuffee SR, Elcock AH (2010) Diffusion, crowding & protein stability in a dynamic molecular model of the bacterial cytoplasm. PLoS Comput Biol 6: e1000694.
57. Meister JJ (2000) Polymer modification: principles, techniques, and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
58. Mereghetti P, Wade RC (2011) Diffusion of hydrophobin proteins in solution and interactions with a graphite surface. BMC Biophys 4: 9.
59. Mereghetti P, Gabdoulline RR, Wade RC (2010) Brownian dynamics simulation of protein solutions: structural and dynamical properties. Biophys J 99(11): 3782-3791.
60. Mulakala C, Reilly PJ (2005) Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei) Cel7A as a molecular machine: a docking study. Proteins 60(4): 598-605.
61. Nagy T, Simpson P, Williamson MP, Hazlewood GP, Gilbert HJ, Orosz L (1998) All three surface tryptophans in Type IIa cellulose binding domains play a pivotal role in binding both soluble and insoluble ligands. FEBS Lett 429(3): 312-316.
62. Neusius T, Daidone I, Sokolov IM, Smith JC (2008) Subdiffusion in peptides originates from the fractal-like structure of configuration space. Phys Rev Lett 100(18): 188103.
63. Neusius T, Sokolov IM, Smith JC (2009) Subdiffusion in time-averaged, confined random walks. Phys Rev E 80(1): 011109.
64. Neusius T, Daidone I, Sokolov IM, Smith JC (2011) Configurational subdiffusion of peptides: a network study. Phys Rev E 83(2): 021902.
65. Nimlos MR, Matthews JF, Crowley MF, Walker RC, Chukkapalli G, Brady JW, Adney WS, Cleary JM, Zhong L, Himmel ME (2007) Molecular modeling suggests induced fit of Family I carbohydrate-binding modules with a broken-chain cellulose surface. Protein Eng Des Sel 20(4): 179.
66. Nimlos MR, Beckham GT, Matthews JF, Bu L, Himmel ME, Crowley MF (2012) Binding preferences, surface attachment, diffusivity, and orientation of a family 1 carbohydrate-binding module on cellulose. J Biol Chem 287(24): 20603-20612.
67. Nishiyama Y, Langan P, Chanzy H (2002) Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose Iβ from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 124(31): 9074-9082.
68. Nutt A, Sild V, Pettersson G, Johansson G (1998) Progress curves. Eur J Biochem 258(1): 200-206.
69. Pettersson GÖR, Linder M, Reinikainen T, Drakenberg T, Mattinen ML, Annila A, Kontteli M, Lindeberg G, Ståhlberg J (1995) Identification of functionally important amino acids in the cellulose-binding domain of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I. Protein Sci 4(6): 1056-1064.
70. Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, Villa E, Chipot C, Skeel RD, Kale L, Schulten K (2005) Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 26(16): 1781.
71. Pratt LR (2002) Molecular theory of hydrophobic effects: "She is too mean to have her name repeated.". Annu Rev Phys Chem 53: 409-436.
72. R Development Core Team (2010) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Austria, Vienna.
73. Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH, Britovsek G, Cairney J, Eckert CA, Frederick WJ, Hallett JP, Leak DJ, Liotta CL, Mielenz JR, Murphy R, Templer R, Tschaplinski T (2006) The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science 311(5760): 484-489.
74. Rasaiah JC, Garde S, Hummer G (2008) Water in nonpolar confinement: from nanotubes to proteins and beyond. Annu Rev Phys Chem 59: 713-740.
75. Reinikainen T, Ruohonen L, Nevanen T, Laaksonen L, Kraulis P, Jones TA, Knowles JK, Teeri TT (1992) Investigation of the function of mutated cellulose-binding domains of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I. Proteins 14(4): 475-482.
76. Reinikainen T, Teleman O, Teeri TT (1995) Effects of pH and high ionic strength on the adsorption and activity of native and mutated cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 22(4): 392-403.
77. Schubert C (2006) Can biofuels finally take center stage? Nat Biotechnol 24(7): 777-784.
78. Senn H, Thiel W (2007a) QM/MM methods for biological systems. Top Curr Chem 268: 173-290.
79. Senn HM, Thiel W (2007b) QM/MM studies of enzymes. Curr Opin Chem Biol 11(2): 182-187.
80. Senn HM, Thiel W (2009) QM/MM methods for biomolecular systems. Angew Chem Int Ed 48: 1198-1229.
81. Singhal N, Pande VS (2005) Error analysis and efficient sampling in Markovian state models for molecular dynamics. J Chem Phys 123(20): 204909.
82. Srisodsuk M, Reinikainen T, Penttilä M, Teeri TT (1993) Role of the interdomain linker peptide of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I in its interaction with crystalline cellulose. J Biol Chem 268(28): 20756-20761.
83. Srisodsuk M, Lehtiö J, Linder M, Margolles-Clark E, Reinikainen T, Teeri TT (1997) Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I with an endoglucanase cellulose-binding domain: action on bacterial microcrystalline cellulose. J Biotechnol 57(1-3): 49-57.
84. Ståhlberg J, Johansson G, Pettersson G (1993) Trichoderma reesei has no true exo-cellulase: all intact and truncated cellulases produce new reducing end groups on cellulose. Biochim Biophys Acta 1157(1): 107-113.
85. Sullivan AC (1997) Cellulose: the structure slowly unravels. Cellulose 4: 173-207.
86. Swope WC, Pitera JW, Suits F (2004) Describing protein folding kinetics by molecular dynamics simulations. 1. Theory. J Phys Chem B 108(21): 6571-6581.
87. Teeri TT (1997) Crystalline cellulose degradation: new insight into the function of cellobiohydrolases. Trends Biotechnol 15(5): 160-167.
88. Tomme P, Tilbeurgh H, Pettersson G, Damme J, Vandekerckhove J, Knowles J, Teeri T, Claeyssens M (1988) Studies of the cellulolytic system of Trichoderma reesei QM 9414. Eur J Biochem 170(3): 575-581.
89. Tormo J, Lamed R, Chirino AJ, Morag E, Bayer EA, Shoham Y, Steitz TA (1996) Crystal structure of a bacterial family-III cellulose-binding domain: a general mechanism for attachment to cellulose. EMBO J 15(21): 5739.
90. van Oss C, Absolom D, Neumann A (1980) The hydrophobic effect": essentially a van der Waals interaction. Colloid Polym Sci 258(4): 424-427.
91. van Tilbeurgh H, Tomme P, Claeyssens M, Bhikhabhai R, Pettersson G (1986) Limited proteolysis of the cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei: separation of functional domains. FEBS Lett 204(2): 223-227.
92. Vrsanská M, Biely P (1992) The cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei QM 9414: action on cello-oligosaccharides. Carbohydr Res 227: 19-27.
93. Warshel A, Levitt M (1976) Theoretical studies of enzymic reactions: dielectric, electrostatic and steric stabilization of the carbonium ion in the reaction of lysozyme. J Mol Biol 103(2): 227-249.
94. Wohlert J, Berglund LA (2011) A coarse-grained model for molecular dynamics simulations of native cellulose. J Chem Theory Comput.
95. Yaminsky VV, Vogler EA (2001) Hydrophobic hydration. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 6(4): 342-349.
96. Yui T, Shiiba H, Tsutsumi Y, Hayashi S, Miyata T, Hirata F (2010) Systematic docking study of the carbohydrate binding module protein of Cel7A with the cellulose Iα crystal model. J Phys Chem B 114(1): 49-58.
97. Zhao X, Rignall TR, McCabe C, Adney WS, Himmel ME (2008) Molecular simulation evidence for processive motion of Trichoderma reesei Cel7A during cellulose depolymerization. Chem Phys Lett 460(1-3): 284-288.
98. Zhong L, Matthews JF, Crowley MF, Rignall T, Talón C, Cleary JM, Walker RC, Chukkapalli G, McCabe C, Nimlos MR (2008) Interactions of the complete cellobiohydrolase I from Trichodera reesei with microcrystalline cellulose Iβ. Cellulose 15(2): 261-273.
99. Zhou R, Huang X, Margulis CJ, Berne BJ (2004) Hydrophobic collapse in multidomain protein folding. Science 305(5690): 1605-1609.