Assessing Substrate Accessibility to Enzymatic Hydrolysis by Cellulases

Characterization of Lignocellulosic Materials

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 60-80

  Chandra, Richard P ^a   Esteghlalian, Ali R ^b   Saddler, John N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b DIVERSA CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessing substrate accessibility to enzymatic hydrolysis by cellulases; Combination measurements interior and exterior surface area; Enzymatic hydrolysis by cellulases; Exterior surface area; Interior surface area and mercury porosimetry; Nitrogen adsorption technique; Simons' stain; Solute exclusion; Swelling and water retention value

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889478395     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781444305425.ch4     Document Type: Chapter

References (91)

1. Mansfield, S.D.; Mooney, C.; Sadder, J.N., Substrate and Enzyme Characteristics that Limit Cellulose Hydrolysis; Biotechnol. 1999, 15, 804-816.
2. Zhang, P.; Lynd, L.R., Toward an Aggregated Understanding of Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cellulose: Noncomplexed Cellulase Systems; Biotech. Bioeng. 2004, 88, 797-824.
3. Jeoh, T.;Wilson, D.B.; Walker, L.P., Cooperative and Competitive Binding in Synergistic Mixtures of Thermobifida fusca Cellulases Cel5A, Cel6B, and Cel9A; Biotechnol. Progr. 2000, 18, 760-769.
4. Jeoh, T.;Wilson, D.B.;Walker, L.P., Effect of CellulaseMole Fraction and Cellulose Recalcitrance on Synergism in Cellulose Hydrolysis and Binding; Biotechnol. Progr. 2006, 22, 270-277.
5. Doi, R.H.; Kosugi, A.; Mursashima, K.; Tamaru, Y.; Han, S.O., Cellulosomes from Mesophilic Bacteria; J. Bacteriol. 2006, 185, 5907-5914.
6. Carrard, G.; Koivula, A.; Soderlund, H.; Beguin, P., Cellulose-binding Domains Promote Hydrolysis of Different Sites in Crystalline Cellulose; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 10, 342-347.
7. Esteghlalian, A.; Mansfield, S.D.; Saddler, J.N., Cellulases: Agents for Fiber Modification or Bioconversion? The Effect of Substrate Accessibility on Cellulose Enzymatic Hydrolyzability. In: Viikari, L. and Lantto, R. (eds); Biotechnology in the Pulp and Paper Industry: Progress in Biotechnology; Elsevier Science, Netherlands; 2002; Vol 21; pp. 21-36.
8. Wilson, D., Studies of Thermobifida fusca Plant CellWall Degrading Enzymes; Chem. Rec. 2004, 4, 72-82.
9. Esteghlalian, A.; Bilodeau, M.;Mansfield, S.D.; Saddler, J.N., Do Enzymatic Hydrolyzability and Simons' Stain Reflect the Changes in the Accessibility of Lignocellulosic Substrates to Cellulase Enzymes?; Biotechnol. Progr. 2001, 1049-1054.
10. Saloheimo, M.; Paloheimo, M.; Hakola, S. et al. Swollenin a Trichoderma reesei Protein with Sequence Similarity to the Plant Expansins, Exhibits Disruption Activity on CellulosicMaterials; Eur. J. Biochem. 2002, 269, 4202-4211.
11. Wong, D.W.S., Feruloyl Esterase: A Key Enzyme in Biomass Degradation; Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2006, 133, 87-112.
12. Raghothama, S.; Simpson, P.J.; Szabo, L.; Nagy, T.; Gilbert, H.; Williamson, M.P., Solution Structure of the CBM10 Cellulose Binding Module from Pseudomonas xylanase A; Biochemistry 2000, 39, 978-984.
13. Boraston, A.B.; Bolam, D.N.; Gilbert, H.J.; Davies, G.J., Carbohydrate Binding Modules: Finetuning Polysaccharide Recognition; Biochem. J. 2004, 382, 769-781.
14. Vaaje-Kolstad, G.; Horn, S.; van Aalten, D.M.F.; Synstad, B.; Eijsink, V.G.H., The Non-catalytic Chitin-binding Protein CBP21 from Serratia marcescens is Essential for Chitin Degradation; J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 28492-28497.
15. Esteghlalian, A.; Srivastava, V.; Gilkes, N.; Gregg, D.J.; Saddler, J.N., An Overview of Factors Influencing the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Lignocellulosic Feedstocks. In: Himmel, M.; Baker, J.; Saddler, J.N. (eds); Glycosyl Hydrolases for Biomass Conversion American Chemical Society Symposium Series; American Chemical Society; 2000; pp. 100-111.
16. Zhang, S.; Barr, B.K.; Wilson, D.B., Effects of Noncatalytic Residue Mutations on Substrate Specificity and Ligand Binding of Thermobifida fusca Endocellulase Cel6A; Eur. J. Biochem. 2000, 267, 244-252.
17. Puri, V.P., Effect of Crystallinity and Degree of Polymerization of Cellulose on Enzymatic Eaccharification; Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1984, 26, 1219-1222.
18. Ramos, L.P; Breuil, C.; Saddler, J.N., Effect of Enzymatic Hydrolysis on the Morphology and Fine Structure of Pretreated Cellulosic Residues; Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1993, 15, 821-831.
19. Stone, J.E.; Scallan, A.M.; Donefer, E.; Ahlgren, E., Digestibility as a Simple Function of a Molecule of a Similar Size to a Cellulose Enzyme; Adv. Chem. Ser. 1969, 95, 219.
20. Cowling E.B.; Kirk, T.K., Properties of Cellulose and Lignocellulosic Materials as Substrates for Enzymatic Conversion Processes; Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 1976, 6, 95-123.
21. Grethlein, H.E., The Effect of Pore Size on the Rate of Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cellulosic Substrates; Biotechnology 1985, 3, 155-160.
22. Grethlein, H.E.; Allen, D.C.; Converse, A.O., A Comparative Study of the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Acid PretreatedWhite Pine and Mixed Hardwood; Biotech. Bioeng. 1984, 26, 1498-1505.
23. Chang, M.M.; Chou, T.Y.; Tsao, G.T., Structure, Pretreatment and Hydrolysis of Cellulose; Adv. Biochem. Eng. 1981, 20, 15-42.
24. Thomson, D.N.; Chen, H.C., Comparison of Pretreatment Methods on the Basis of Available Surface Area; Bioresour. Technol. 1992, 39, 155-163.
25. Boussaid, A.L.; Esteghlalian, A.R.; Gregg, D.J.; Lee, K.H.; Saddler, J.N., Steam Pretreatment of Douglas-fir Wood Chips: Can Conditions for Optimum Hemicellulose Recovery Still Provide Adequate Access for Efficient Enzymatic Hydrolysis?; Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2000, 84-86, 693-705.
26. Mooney, C.M.; Mansfield, S.D.; Beatson, R.P.; Saddler, J.N, The Effect of Fiber Characteristics on Hydrolysis and Cellulase Accessibility to Softwood Substrates; EnzymeMicrob. Technol. 1999, 25, 644-650.
27. Weimer, P.J.; Weston, W.J., Relationship between Fine Structure ofNativeCellulose and Cellulose Degradability by the Cellulase Complexes of Trichoderma reesei and Clostridium thermocellum; Biotech. Bioeng. 1985, 27, 1540-1547.
28. Tanaka, M.; Ikesaka, M.; Matsuno, R., Effect of Pore Size and Substrate Diffusion of Enzyme on Hydrolysis of Cellulosic Materials with Cellulase; Biotech. Bioeng. 1988, 32, 698-706.
29. Laureano-Perez L.; Farzaneh, T.; Hasan, A.; Dale, B.E., Understanding Factors that Limit Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Biomass: Characterization of Pretreated Corn Stover; Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2005, 121-124, 1081-1099.
30. Ford, C.W., Effect of Particle Size and Delignification on the Rate of Digestion of Hemicellulose and Cellulose by Cellulase inMature Pangola Grass Stems; Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1983, 34, 241-248.
31. Ragnar E.; Alderborn, G.; Nyström, C., Particle Analysis of Microcrystalline Cellulose: Differentiation between Individual Particles and their Agglomerates; Int. J. Pharm. 1994, 111, 43-50.
32. Allen, T., Particle Size Measurement, 4th Edition; Chapman and Hall; London, 1990.
33. Aharonson, E.P.; Karasikov. N.; Rojtberg, M.; Shamir. J., Galai CIS-1. A Novel Approach to Aerosol Particle Size Analysis; J. Aerosol Sci. 1986, 17, 530-536.
34. Barth, H., Modern Methods of Particle Size Analysis; Wiley; New York, 1984.
35. Sawada, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Kobayashi, F.; Kuwahara, M.; Watanabe, T., Effects of Fungal Pretreatment and Steam Explosion Pretreatment on Enzymatic Saccharification of Plant Biomass; Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1995, 48, 719-724.
36. Sawada, I.; Kuwahara, M.; Nakamura, Y.; Suda, H., Effect of a Process of Explosion for the Effective Utilization of Biomass; Int. Chem. Eng. 1987, 27, 686-693.
37. Tanahashi, M., Characterisation and DegradationMechanisms ofWood Components by Steam Explosion and Utilization of ExplodedWood; Wood Res. 1990, 77, 49-117.
38. Olson, J.A.; Robertson, A.G.; Finnigan, T.D.; Turner, R.R.H., An Analyzer for Fibre Shape and Length; J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 1995, 21, 367-373.
39. OpTest Equipment; HiRes Fiber Quality Analyzer - User Manual; OpTest, 1999.
40. Mooney, C.A.; Mansfield, S.D.; Beatson, R.P.; Saddler, J.N., The Effect of Fibre Characteristics on Accessibility and Hydrolysis of Softwood Substrates; Proc. 7th Intern. Conf. Biotechnol. Pulp Paper Ind. June 16-19, 1998; Vancouver, BC. Book 3: pp. 99-102.
41. Nahzad, M.M.; Ramos, L.P.; Paszner, L.; Saddler, J.N., Structural Constraints Affecting the Initial Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Recycled Paper; Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1995, 17, 68-74.
42. Lindstrom, T., Chemical Factors Affecting the Behaviour of Fibres During Papermaking; Nordic Pulp Pap. Res. J. 1992, 4, 181-191.
43. Bendzalova, M.; Pekarovicova, A.; Kokta, B.V.; Chen, R., Accessibility of Swollen Cellulosic Fibers; Cellul. Chem. Technol. 1996, 30, 19-32.
44. Ogiwara, Y.; Arai, K., Change in Degree of Polymerization of Wood Pulp with Cellulase Hydrolysis; Text. Res. J. 1969, 39, 422-427.
45. Hopner, T.; Jayme, G.; Ulrich, J.C., Determination of the Water Retention (Swelling Value) of Pulps; Das Papier 1955, 9, 476-482.
46. Chemical Pulp -Water Retention Value, Test Method SCAN-C 62:00, Scandinavian Pulp, Paper and Board Testing Comm., Stockholm, Sweden; 2000.
47. Scallan, A.M.; Caries, I.E., TheCorrelation of theWaterRetentionValuewith the Fibre Saturation Point; Svensk Papperstidn. 1972, 75, 699-703.
48. Ogiwara, Y.; Arai, K., Swelling Degree of CelluloseMaterials and Hydrolysis Rate with Cellulase; Text. Res. J. 1968, 38, 885-891.
49. Bonaventura, F.;Marzetti, A.; Sarto, V.; Beltrame, P.L.; Carniti, P., CellulosicMaterials: Structure and Enzymatic Hydrolysis Relationships; J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1996, 30, 19-32.
50. Schimper, C.; Keckeis, R.; Ibanescu, C.; Burtscher, E.; Manian, A.P.; Bechtold, T., Influence of Steam and Dry Heat Pretreament on Fibre Properties and Cellulase Degradation of Cellulosic Fibres; Biocatal. Biotransform. 2004, 22, 383-389.
51. Laivins G.V.; Scallan A.M., The Mechanism of Hornification of Wood Pulps. In: Baker, C.F (ed.); Products of Papermaking. Transactions of the 10th Fundamental Research Symposium; Pira International; Oxford, 1993; pp. 1235-1260.
52. Pommier, J.; Fuentes, J.L.; Goma, G., Using Enzymes to Improve the Process and the Product Quality in the Recycled Paper Industry; Tappi J. 1989, 72, 187.
53. Oksanen, T.; Pere, J.; Paavlainen, L.; Buchert, J.; Viikari, L., Treatment of Recycled Kraft Pulps with Trichoderma reesei Hemicellulases and Cellulases; J. Biotechnol. 2000, 78, 39-48.
54. Page, D.H., The Beating of Chemical Pulps - the Action and Effects. In: Baker, C.F. and Punton, V.W. (eds); Fundamentals of Papermaking Volume 1; Mechanical Engineering Publications Ltd; London, 1989; pp. 1-38.
55. Sing, K.S.W.; Everett, D.H.; Haul, R.A.W. et al., Reporting Physisorption Data for Gas/Solid systems with Special Reference to the Determination of Surface Area and Porosity; Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57, 603-619.
56. Simons, F.L., A Stain for Use in the Microscopy of Beaten Fibers; Tappi J. 1950, 33, 312-314.
57. Yu, X.; Minor, J.L.; Atalla, R.H., Mechanism of Action of Simons' Stain; Tappi J. 1995, 78, 175-180.
58. Akhtar, M.; Blanchette, R.A.; Burnes, T.A., Using Simon's Stain to Predict Energy Savings during Biomechanical Pulping; Wood Fiber Sci. 1995, 27, 258-264.
59. Yu, X.; Atalla, R.H., A Staining Technique for Evaluating the Pore Structure Variations of Microcrystalline Cellulose Powders; Powder Technol. 1998, 98, 135-138.
60. Jayme, G.; Harders-Steinhauser, M., Determination of Differences in Density in Cellulose Fibers by Double Color Staining; Papier 1955, 9, 507-510.
61. Joutsimo, O.; Robertsen, L., The Effect ofMechanical Treatment on Softwood Kraft Pulp Fibers; Paperi ja Puu. 2005, 87, 41-45.
62. Beardmore, D.H.; Fan, L.T.; Lee, Y.H., Gamma-ray Irradiation as a Pretreatment for the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cellulose; Biotechnol. Lett. 1980, 2, 435-438.
63. Gharpuray, M.M.; Lee, Y.H.; Fan, L.T., Structural Modification of Lignocellulosics by Pretreatments to Enhance Enzymatic Hydrolysis; Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1983, 25, 157-172.
64. Haselton, W.R., Gas Adsorption byWood, Pulp, and Paper. I. The low-temperature Adsorption of Nitrogen, Butane, and Carbon Dioxide by Sprucewood and its Components; Tappi J. 1954, 37, 404-412.
65. Brunauer, S.; Emmett, P.H.; Teller, E., Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1938, 60, 309-319.
66. Robens, E.; Dabrowski, A.; Kutarov, V.V., Comments on the Surface Structure Analysis byWater and Nitrogen Adsorption; J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2004, 76, 647-657.
67. Thode, E.F.; Swanson, J.W.; Becher, J.J., Nitrogen adsorption on Solvent-ExchangedWood Cellulose Fibers: Indications of "Total" Surface Area and Pore-Size Distribution; J. Phys. Chem. 1958, 62, 1036-1039.
68. Jin, H.; Nishiyama, Y.; Wada, M.; Kuga, S., Nanofibrillar Cellulose Aerogels; Colloids Surf. A 2004, 240, 63-67.
69. Fan, L.T.; Lee, Y.H.; Beardmore, D.H., Mechanism of the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cellulose: Effects of Major Structural Features of Cellulose on Enzymatic Hydrolysis; Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1980, 22, 177-199.
70. Fan, L.T.; Lee, Y.H.; Beardmore, D.H., The Influence of Major Structural Features of Cellulose on Rate of Enzymatic Hydrolysis; Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1981, 23, 419-424.
71. Neuman, R.P.; Walker, L.P., Solute Exlusion from Cellulose in Packed Columns: Experimental Investigation and Pore Volume Measurements; Biotech. Bioeng. 1992, 40, 218-225.
72. Westermarck, S.; Juppo, A.M.; Yliruusi, J., Mercury Porosimetry of Mannitol Tablets: Effect of Scanning Speed and Moisture; Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2000, 5, 181-188.
73. Keller, J.U.; Staudt, R., Gas Adsorption Equilibria: Experimental Methods and Adsorption Isotherms; Springer; New York, 2005.
74. Gregg, S.J.; Sing, K.S.W., Adsorption, Surface Area, and Porosity, 2nd Edition; Academic Press; New York, 1985.
75. Bendzalova, M.; Pekarovicova, A.; Kokta, B.V., Surface Characteristics of Fibers in High Yield Pulping with Ethanol; Cellul. Chem. Technol. 1995, 29, 713-724.
76. Van Dyke, B.H.; Wilson, D.B., Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cellulose. A Kinetic Study; PhD. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1972.
77. Eriksson, I.; Haglind, I.; Lidbrandt, O.; Salmen, L., Fiber Swelling Favoured by Lignin Softening; Wood Sci. Technol. 1991, 25, 135-144.
78. Aggenbrandt, L.; Samuellson, O., Penetration of Water Soluble Polymers into Cellulose Fibers; J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1964, 8, 2801-2812.
79. Stone, I.E.; Scallan, A.M., A Structural Model for the Cell Wall of Water Swollen Pulp Fibers Based on their Accessibility to Macromolecules; Cellul. Chem. Technol. 1968, 2, 343-358.
80. Lin, J.K.; Ladisch, M.R.; Patterson, J.A.; Noller, C.H., Determining Pore Size Distribution inWet Cellulose by Measuring Solute Exclusion Using a Differential Refractometer; Biotech. Bioeng. 1987, 29, 976-981.
81. Grethlein, H.E., Effect of Steam Explosion Pretreatment on Pore Size and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Poplar; Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1986, 8, 274-280.
82. Mansfield, S.D.; de Jong, E.; Stephens, R.S.; Saddler, J.N., Physical Characterization of Enzymatically Modified Kraft Pulp Fibers; J. Biotechnol. 1997, 57, 205-216.
83. Converse, A.O., Substrate Factors Limiting EnzymaticHydrolysis. In: Saddler, J.N. (ed.); Bioconversion of Forest and Agricultural Plant Residues; CAB International; Wollingford, UK, 1993; pp. 93-106.
84. Wong, K.Y.; Deverell, K.F.; Mackie, K.L.; Clark, T.A.; Donaldson, L., The Relationship between Fiber Porosity and Cellulose Digestibility in Steam Exploded Pinus Radiata; Biotech. Bioeng. 1988, 31, 447-456.
85. Yang, B.; Wyman, C.E., BSA Treatment to Enhance Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cellulose in Lignin Containing Substrates; Biotech. Bioeng. 2006, 94, 611-617.
86. Eriksson, T.; Börjesson, J.; Tjerneld, F., Mechanism of Surfactant Effect in Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Lignocellulose; Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2002, 31, 353-364.
87. Meunier-Goddik, L.; Bothwell, M.; Sangseethong, K. et al., Physiochemical Properties of Pretreated Poplar Feedstocks during Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation; Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1999, 24, 667-674.
88. Knappert, D.R.; Grethlein, H.E.; Converse, A.O., Partial Acid Hydrolysis of Cellulosic Material as a Pretreatment for Enzymatic Hydrolysis; Biotech. Bioeng. 1980, 22, 1449-1463.
89. Knappert, D.R.; Grethlein, H.E.; Converse, A.O., Partial Acid Hydrolysis of Poplar Wood as a Pretreatement for Enzymatic Hydrolysis; Biotech. Bioeng. Symp. 1981, 11, 66-77.
90. Goel, S.C.; Ramachandran, K.B., Comparison of the Rates of Enzymic Hydrolysis of Pretreated Rice Straw and Bagasse with Cellulases; Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1983, 5, 281-284.
91. Mooney, C.A.; Mansfield, S.D.; Touhy, M.G.; Saddler, J.N., The Effect of Initial Pore Volume and Lignin Content on the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Softwoods; Bioresour. Technol. 1998, 64, 113-119.