Supra-personal cognitive control and metacognition

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 186-193

  Shea, Nicholas ^a   Boldt, Annika ^b   Bang, Dan ^b,c,d   Yeung, Nick ^b   Heyes, Cecilia ^e   Frith, Chris D ^d,f  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c MAGDALEN COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

^d AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^e ALL SOULS COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

^f WELLCOME TRUST CENTRE FOR NEUROIMAGING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY;

COGNITIVE CONTROL; COGNITIVE PROCESS; HUMAN MIND; METACOGNITION; METACOGNITIVES; SENSORIMOTOR SYSTEMS;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

COGNITION; CONSCIOUSNESS; DECISION MAKING; EMOTIONALITY; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; EXPERIENCE; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE; LEARNING; MENTAL HEALTH; MENTAL LOAD; METACOGNITION; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTION; RECALL; REVIEW; SUPRA PERSONAL COGNITIVE CONTROL; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL MASKING; WORKING MEMORY;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; PERCEPTION; THINKING;

EID: 84897063288     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.006     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Block N. Two neural correlates of consciousness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2005, 9:46-52.
2. Kahneman D. A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am. Psychol. 2003, 58:697-720.
3. Evans J.S.B.T., Stanovich K.E. Dual-process theories of higher cognition advancing the debate. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2013, 8:223-241.
4. Kiani R., Shadlen M.N. Representation of confidence associated with a decision by neurons in the parietal cortex. Science 2009, 324:759-764.
5. Kepecs A., et al. Neural correlates, computation and behavioural impact of decision confidence. Nature 2008, 455:227-231.
6. Komura Y., et al. Responses of pulvinar neurons reflect a subject's confidence in visual categorization. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16:749-755.
7. Terrace H.S., Son L.K. Comparative metacognition. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2009, 19:67-74.
8. Carruthers P. How we know our own minds: the relationship between mindreading and metacognition. Behav. Brain Sci. 2009, 32:121-182.
9. Metcalfe J. Metacognitive judgments and control of study. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2009, 18:159-163.
10. Fernandez-Duque D., et al. Executive attention and metacognitive regulation. Conscious. Cogn. 2000, 9:288-307.
11. Drugowitsch J., Pouget A. Probabilistic vs. non-probabilistic approaches to the neurobiology of perceptual decision-making. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2012, 22:963-969.
12. Ernst M.O., Banks M.S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 2002, 415:429-433.
13. Davelaar E.J. Conflict-monitoring and (meta)cognitive control. Connectionist Models of Behaviour and Cognition II. Proceedings of the 11th Neural Computation and Psychology Worksho 2009, 91-102. WorldScientific. J. Mayor (Ed.).
14. Davis E.L., et al. Metacognitive emotion regulation: children's awareness that changing thoughts and goals can alleviate negative emotions. Emotion 2010, 10:498-510.
15. Shenhav A., et al. The expected value of control: an integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function. Neuron 2013, 79:217-240.
16. Sakai K. Task set and prefrontal cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 31:219-245.
17. Yeung N. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Neuroscience 2013, Vol. 2:275-299. Oxford University Press.
18. Norman D.A., Shallice T. Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behaviour. Consciousness and Self-regulation (Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 4) 1986, 1-18. Plenum. R.J. Davidson (Ed.).
19. Desimone R., Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1995, 18:193-222.
20. Dehaene S., Naccache L. Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition 2001, 79:1-37.
21. Kahneman D. Thinking Fast and Slow 2011, Macmillan.
22. Sumner P., et al. Human medial frontal cortex mediates unconscious inhibition of voluntary action. Neuron 2007, 54:697-711.
23. Custers R., Aarts H. The unconscious will: how the pursuit of goals operates outside of conscious awareness. Science 2010, 329:47-50.
24. Logan G.D., Crump M.J.C. Cognitive illusions of authorship reveal hierarchical error detection in skilled typists. Science 2010, 330:683-686.
25. Naccache L., et al. Effortless control: executive attention and conscious feeling of mental effort are dissociable. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:1318-1328.
26. Bach D.R., Dolan R.J. Knowing how much you don't know: a neural organization of uncertainty estimates. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2012, 13:572-586.
27. Summerfield C., Yeung N. Oh, rats! Post-error behavioral adjustment in creatures great and small. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16:1715-1716.
28. Richardson M.J., et al. Rocking together: dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Hum. Mov. Sci. 2007, 26:867-891.
29. Hasson U., et al. Brain-to-brain coupling: a mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2012, 16:114-121.
30. Byrne R., Whiten A. Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes and Humans 1989, Oxford Science Publications.
31. Herrmann E., et al. Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: the cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science 2007, 317:1360-1366.
32. Bahrami B., et al. Optimally interacting minds. Science 2010, 329:1081-1085.
33. Fusaroli R., et al. Coming to terms quantifying the benefits of linguistic coordination. Psychol. Sci. 2012, 23:931-939.
34. Tenney E.R., et al. Calibration trumps confidence as a basis for witness credibility. Psychol. Sci. 2007, 18:46-50.
35. Poizat G., et al. Analysis of contextual information sharing during table tennis matches: an empirical study of coordination in sports. Int. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2009, 7:465-487.
36. Lausic D., et al. Intrateam communication and performance in doubles tennis. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 2009, 80:281-290.
37. Job V., et al. Ego depletion - Is it all in your head? Implicit theories about willpower affect self-regulation. Psychol. Sci. 2010, 21:1686-1693.
38. Hurks P.P.M. Does instruction in semantic clustering and switching enhance verbal fluency in children?. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2012, 26:1019-1037.
39. Koriat A. The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. Psychol. Rev. 2012, 119:80-113.
40. Bahrami B., et al. Together, slowly but surely: the role of social interaction and feedback on the build-up of benefit in collective decision-making. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2012, 38:3-8.
41. Payne B.D., Manning B.H. Basal reader instruction: effects of comprehension monitoring training on reading comprehension, strategy use and attitude. Read. Res. Instr. 1992, 32:29-38.
42. Reed N., et al. Implicit knowledge and motor skill: what people who know how to catch don't know. Conscious. Cogn. 2010, 19:63-76.
43. Meiser T., et al. Metacognitive inferences in source memory judgements: the role of perceived differences in item recognition. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2007, 60:1015-1040.
44. Brewer W.F., Sampaio C. The metamemory approach to confidence: a test using semantic memory. J. Mem. Lang. 2012, 67:59-77.
45. Overgaard M., Sandberg K. Kinds of access: different methods for report reveal different kinds of metacognitive access. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2012, 367:1287-1296.
46. Friston K. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 11:127-138.
47. Shea N. Reward prediction error signals are meta-representational. Nous 2012, 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2012.00863.x.
48. Yue C.L., et al. When disfluency is - and is not - a desirable difficulty: the influence of typeface clarity on metacognitive judgments and memory. Mem. Cogn. 2013, 41:229-241.
49. Chambon V., Haggard P. Sense of control depends on fluency of action selection, not motor performance. Cognition 2012, 125:441-451.
50. Hoffman Y., et al. Explicit memory for unattended words the importance of being in the 'no'. Psychol. Sci. 2011, 22:1490-1493.
51. Nardini M., et al. Fusion of visual cues is not mandatory in children. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:17041-17046.
52. Tomasello M. Why We Cooperate 2009, MIT Press.
53. Sterelny K. The Evolved Apprentice 2012, MIT Press.
54. Matzel L.D., Kolata S. Selective attention, working memory, and animal intelligence. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2010, 34:23-30.
55. Dickinson A. Associative learning and animal cognition. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2012, 367:2733-2742.
56. Mayer A., Träuble B.E. Synchrony in the onset of mental state understanding across cultures? A study among children in Samoa. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 2013, 37:21-28.
57. Rigoni D., et al. Inducing disbelief in free will alters brain correlates of preconscious motor preparation: the brain minds whether we believe in free will or not. Psychol. Sci. 2011, 22:613-618.
58. Pleskac T.J., Busemeyer J.R. Two-stage dynamic signal detection: a theory of choice, decision time, and confidence. Psychol. Rev. 2010, 117:864-901.
59. Yeung N., Summerfield C. Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2012, 367:1310-1321.
60. Pasquali A., et al. Know thyself: metacognitive networks and measures of consciousness. Cognition 2010, 117:182-190.
61. Smith J.D., et al. The highs and lows of theoretical interpretation in animal-metacognition research. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2012, 367:1297-1309.
62. Schwartz B. Sources of information in metamemory: judgments of learning and feelings of knowing. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1994, 1:357-375.
63. Gigerenzer G., et al. Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychol. Rev. 1991, 98:506-528.
64. Higham P.A., et al. Investigating strength and frequency effects in recognition memory using type-2 signal detection theory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2009, 35:57-80.
65. Peirce C.S. Illustrations of the logic of science: the probability of induction. Popular Sci. Monthly 1877, 12:705-718.
66. Charles L., et al. Distinct brain mechanisms for conscious versus subliminal error detection. Neuroimage 2013, 73:80-94.
67. Middlebrooks P.G., Sommer M.A. Neuronal correlates of metacognition in primate frontal cortex. Neuron 2012, 75:517-530.
68. Kepecs A., Mainen Z.F. A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2012, 367:1322-1337.
69. Hanks T.D., et al. Elapsed decision time affects the weighting of prior probability in a perceptual decision task. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:6339-6352.
70. Moreno-Bote R. Decision confidence and uncertainty in diffusion models with partially correlated neuronal integrators. Neural Comput. 2010, 22:1786-1811.
71. Zylberberg A., et al. The construction of confidence in a perceptual decision. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2012, 6:79.
72. Koriat A. How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychol. Rev. 1993, 100:609-639.
73. Castel A.D., et al. Illusions of competence and overestimation of associative memory for identical items: evidence from judgments of learning. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2007, 14:107-111.
74. Hertzog C., et al. Episodic feeling-of-knowing resolution derives from the quality of original encoding. Mem. Cogn. 2010, 38:771-784.
75. Koriat A. Subjective confidence in perceptual judgments: a test of the self-consistency model. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2011, 140:117-139.
76. Call J. Do apes know that they could be wrong?. Anim. Cogn. 2010, 13:689-700.
77. Beran M.J., Smith J.D. Information seeking by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Cognition 2010, 120:90-105.
78. Foote A.L., Crystal J.D. Metacognition in the rat. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:551-555.
79. Adams A., Santi A. Pigeons exhibit higher accuracy for chosen memory tests than for forced memory tests in duration matching-to-sample. Learn. Behav. 2011, 39:1-11.
80. Templer V.L., Hampton R.R. Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) show robust evidence for memory awareness across multiple generalization tests. Anim. Cogn. 2012, 15:409-419.
81. Kornell N., et al. Transfer of metacognitive skills and hint seeking in monkeys. Psychol. Sci. 2007, 18:64-71.
82. Le Pelley M.E. Metacognitive monkeys or associative animals? Simple reinforcement learning explains uncertainty in nonhuman animals. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2012, 38:686.