Two-stage dynamic signal detection: A theory of choice, decision time, and confidence

Psychological Review

Volumn 117, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 864-901

  Pleskac, Timothy J ^a   Busemeyer, Jerome R ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Confidence; Diffusion model; Optimal solution; Subjective probability; Time pressure

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME; TIME;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77955313168     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019737     Document Type: Article

References (164)

1. Aczel J., Pfanzagal J. Remarks on the measurement of subjective probability and information. Metrika 1966, 11:91-105.
2. Adams J.K. A confidence scale defined in terms of expected percentages. The American Journal of Psychology 1957, 70:432-436.
3. Adams J.K., Adams P.A. Realism of confidence judgments. Psychological Review 1961, 68:33-45.
4. Anderson J.R. The adaptive character of thought 1990, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
5. Ariely D., Au W.T., Bender R.H., Budescu D.V., Dietz C.B., Gu H., Zauberman G. The effects of averaging subjective probability estimates between and within judges. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2000, 6:130-147.
6. Arkes H.R. Overconfidence in judgmental forecasting. Principles of forecasting: A handbook for researchers and practitioners 2001, 157-176. Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA. J.S. Armstrong (Ed.).
7. Ascher, D. (1974). A model for confidence judgments in choice tasks. Unpublished manuscript, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
8. Ashby F.G. A stochastic version of general recognition theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2000, 44:310-329.
9. Audley R.J. A stochastic model for individual choice behavior. Psychological Review 1960, 67:1-15.
10. Audley R.J., Pike A.R. Some alternative stochastic models of choice. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology 1965, 18:207-225.
11. Baranski J.V., Petrusic W.M. The calibration and resolution of confidence in perceptual judgments. Perception & Psychophysics 1994, 55:412-428.
12. Baranski J.V., Petrusic W.M. On the calibration of knowledge and perception. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 1995, 49:397-407.
13. Baranski J.V., Petrusic W.M. Probing the locus of confidence judgments: Experiments on the time to determine confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:929-945.
14. Barnard G.A. Sequential tests in industrial statistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Supplement 1946, 8:1-26.
15. Bhat U.N. Elements of applied stochastic processes 1984, Wiley, New York, NY.
16. Björkman M., Juslin P., Winman A. Realism of confidence in sensory discrimination-The underconfidence phenomenon. Perception & Psychophysics 1993, 54:75-81.
17. Bogacz R., Brown E., Moehlis J., Holmes P., Cohen J.D. The physics of optimal decision making: A formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. Psychological Review 2006, 113:700-765.
18. Bogacz R., Wagenmakers E.J., Forstmann B.U., Nieuwenhuis S. The neural basis of the speed-accuracy tradeoff. Trends in Neurosciences 2010, 33:10-16.
19. Brier G.W. Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Review 1950, 78:1-3.
20. Brown S.D., Heathcote A. The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation. Cognitive Psychology 2008, 57:153-178.
21. Budescu D.V., Erev I., Wallsten T.S. On the importance of random error in the study of probability judgment: Part I. New theoretical developments. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1997, 10:157-171.
22. Budescu D.V., Wallsten T.S. Processing linguistic probabilities: General principles and empirical evidence. Decision making from the perspective of cognitive psychology 1995, 275-318. Academic Press, New York, NY. J.R. Busemeyer, R. Hestie, D. Medin (Eds.).
23. Budescu D.V., Wallsten T.S., Au W.T. On the importance of random error in the study of probability judgment: Part II. Applying the stochastic judgment model to detect systematic trends. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1997, 10:173-188.
24. Busemeyer J.R., Diederich A. Cognitive modeling 2010, Sage, New York, NY.
25. Busemeyer J.R., Goldstein D. Linking together different measures of preference: A dynamic model of matching derived from decision field theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1992, 52:370-396.
26. Busemeyer J.R., Jessup R.K., Johnson J.G., Townsend J.T. Building bridges between neural models and complex decision making behaviour. Neural Networks 2006, 19:1047-1058.
27. Busemeyer J.R., Townsend J.T. Fundamental derivations from decision field theory. Mathematical Social Sciences 1992, 23:255-282.
28. Busemeyer J.R., Townsend J.T. Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review 1993, 100:432-459.
29. Busey T.A., Tunnicliff J., Loftus G.R., Loftus E.F. Accounts of the confidence-accuracy relation in recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2000, 7:26-48.
30. Cox D.R., Miller H.D. The theory of stochastic processes 1965, Chapman and Hall, New York, NY.
31. Dawes R.M. Confidence in intellectual judgments vs. confidence in perceptual judgments. Similarity and choice: Papers in honour of Clyde Coombs 1980, 327-345. Humber, Bern, Switzerland. E.D. Lantermann, H. Feger (Eds.).
32. de Finetti B. Does it make sense to speak of 'good probability appraisers'?. The scientist speculates: An anthology of partly-baked ideas 1962, 357-364. Basic Books, New York, NY. I.J. Good (Ed.).
33. Diederich A. Dynamic stochastic models for decision making under time constraints. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1997, 41:260-274.
34. Diederich A., Busemeyer J.R. Simple matrix methods for analyzing diffusion models of choice probability, choice response time, and simple response time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2003, 47:304-322.
35. Dougherty M.R.P. Integration of the ecological and error models of overconfidence using a multiple-trace memory model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2001, 130:579-599.
36. Edwards W. Optimal strategies for seeking information-Models for statistics, choice reaction-times, and human information-processing. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1965, 2:312-329.
37. Egan J.P. Recognition memory and the operating characteristic (Tech. Rep. No. AFCRC-TN-58-51) 1958, Hearing and Communication Laboratory, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
38. Erev I., Wallsten T.S., Budescu D.V. Simultaneous over- and underconfidence: The role of error in judgment processes. Psychological Review 1994, 101:519-527.
39. Estes W.K., Wessel D.L. Reaction time in relation to display size and correctness of response in forced-choice visual signal detection. Perception & Psychophysics 1966, 1:369-373.
40. Feller W. An introduction to probability theory and its applications 1968, Wiley, New York, NY.
41. Ferrell W.R., McGoey P.J. A model of calibration for subjective probabilities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1980, 26:32-53.
42. Festinger L. Studies in decision: I. Decision-time, relative frequency of judgment, and subjective confidence as related to physical stimulus difference. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1943, 32:291-306.
43. Feynman R.P. Appendix F-Personal observations on the reliability of the shuttle [Appendix to the Rogers Commission Report] 1986, Retrieved from http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/51-l/docs/rogers-commission/Appendix-F.txt.
44. Garrett H.E. A study of the relation of accuracy to speed. Archives of Psychology 1922, 56:1-105.
45. Gigerenzer G., Hoffrage U., Kleinbölting H. Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review 1991, 98:506-528.
46. Gold J.I., Shadlen M.N. Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2001, 5:10-16.
47. Gold J.I., Shadlen M.N. Banburismus and the brain: Decoding the relationship between sensory stimuli, decisions, and reward. Neuron 2002, 36:299-308.
48. Gold J.I., Shadlen M.N. The neural basis of decision making. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2007, 30:535-574.
49. Goldstein D.G., Gigerenzer G. Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review 2002, 109:75-90.
50. Gomez P., Perea M., Ratcliff R. A model of the go/no-go task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2007, 136:389-413.
51. Gonzalez R., Nelson T.O. Measuring ordinal association in situations that contain tied scores. Psychological Bulletin 1996, 119:159-165.
52. Goodman L.A., Kruskal W.H. Measures of association for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1954, 49:732-769.
53. Green D.M., Swets J.A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics 1966, Wiley, Oxford, England.
54. Griffin D., Brenner L. Perspectives on probability judgment calibration. Blackwell handbook of judgment & decision making 2004, 177-199. Blackwell, Oxford, England. D.J. Koehler, N. Harvey (Eds.).
55. Griffin D., Tversky A. The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psychology 1992, 24:411-435.
56. Hanes D.P., Schall J.D. Neural control of voluntary movement initiation. Science 1996, October 18, 274:427-430.
57. Heath R.A. Random-walk and accumulator models of psychophysical discrimination-A critical evaluation. Perception 1984, 13:57-65.
58. Heathcote A., Brown S., Mewhort D.J.K. Quantile maximum likelihood estimation of response time distributions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9:394-401.
59. Henmon V.A.C. The relation of the time of a judgment to its accuracy. Psychological Review 1911, 18:186-201.
60. Irwin F.W., Smith W.A.S., Mayfield J.F. Tests of two theories of decision in an " expanded judgment" situation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1956, 51:261-268.
61. Johnson D.M. Confidence and speed in the two-category judgment. Archives of Psychology 1939, 34:1-53.
62. Johnson J.G., Busemeyer J.R. A dynamic, stochastic, computational model of preference reversal phenomena. Psychological Review 2005, 112:841-861.
63. Juslin P. The overconfidence phenomenon as a consequence of informal experimenter-guided selection of almanac items. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1994, 57:226-246.
64. Juslin P., Olsson H. Thurstonian and Brunswikian origins of uncertainty in judgment: A sampling model of confidence in sensory discrimination. Psychological Review 1997, 104:344-366.
65. Juslin P., Winman A., Olsson H. Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: A critical examination of the hard-easy effect. Psychological Review 2000, 107:384-396.
66. Juslin P., Winman A., Persson T. Can overconfidence be used as an indicator of reconstructive rather than retrieval processes?. Cognition 1995, 54:99-130.
67. Keren G. On the ability of monitoring non-veridical perceptions and uncertain knowledge-Some calibration studies. Acta Psychologica 1988, 67:95-119.
68. Kiani R., Shadlen M.N. Representation of confidence associated with a decision by neurons in the parietal cortex. Science 2009, May 8, 324:759-764.
69. Kim J.N., Shadlen M.N. Neural correlates of a decision in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the macaque. Nature Neuroscience 1999, 2:176-185.
70. Koehler D.J., Brenner L., Griffin D. The calibration of expert judgment: Heuristics and biases beyond the laboratory. Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment 2002, 686-715. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. T.G. Gilovich, D. Griffin (Eds.).
71. Koriat A. Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1997, 126:349-370.
72. Koriat A., Lichtenstein S., Fischhoff B. Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1980, 6:107-118.
73. Laming D.R.J. Information theory of choice-reaction times 1968, Academic Press, New York, NY.
74. Lee M.D., Cummins T.D.R. Evidence accumulation in decision making: Unifying the " take the best" and the " rational" models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11:343-352.
75. Lichtenstein S., Fischhoff B., Phillips L.D. Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases 1982, 306-334. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, A. Tversky (Eds.).
76. Link S.W. The wave theory of difference and similarity 1992, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
77. Link S.W. Confidence and random walk theory. Proceeding of the nineteenth annual meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics 2003, International Society for Psychophysics, Stockholm, Sweden. B.B.E. Borg (Ed.).
78. Link S.W., Heath R.A. Sequential theory of psychological discrimination. Psychometrika 1975, 40:77-105.
79. Luce R.D. Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization 1986, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
80. Macmillan N.A., Creelman C.D. Detection theory: A user's guide 2005, Erlbaum, New York, NY.
81. McClelland A.G.R., Bolger F. The calibration of subjective probabilities: Theories and models 1980-94. Subjective probability 1994, 453-482. Wiley, Chichester, England. G. Wright, P. Ayton (Eds.).
82. Merkle E.C., Van Zandt T. An application of the Poisson race model to confidence calibration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006, 135:391-408.
83. Moreno-Bote, R. (in press). Decision confidence and uncertainty in diffusion models with partially correlated neural integrators. Neural Computation.
84. Murphy A.H. A new vector partition of the probability score. Journal of Applied Meteorology 1973, 12:595-600.
85. Murphy A.H., Winkler R.L. Reliability of subjective probability forecasts of precipitation and temperature. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1977, 26:41-47.
86. Nelder J.A., Mead R. A simplex-method for function minimization. Computer Journal 1965, 7:308-313.
87. Nelson T.O. A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin 1984, 95:109-133.
88. Nelson T.O. The Goodman-Kruskal gamma coefficient as an alternative to signal-detection theory's measures of absolute-judgment accuracy. Progress in mathematical psychology 1987, 299-306. Elsevier Science, New York, NY. E. Roskam, R. Suck (Eds.).
89. Nelson T.O. Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist 1996, 51:102-116.
90. Nelson T.O. The meta-level versus object-level distinction (and other issues) in formulations of metacognition. American Psychologist 1997, 52:179-180.
91. Nelson T.O., Narens L. Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 1990, 26:125-141.
92. Nosofsky R.M., Palmeri T.J. An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review 1997, 104:266-300.
93. Pachella R.G. The interpretation of reaction time in information-processing research. Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition 1974, 41-82. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. B.H. Kantowitz (Ed.).
94. Petrusic W.M., Baranski J.V. Judging confidence influences decision processing in comparative judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10:177-183.
95. Pierce C.S. Illustrations of the logic of science: The probability of induction. The Popular Science Monthly 1877, 12:705-718.
96. Pierce C.S., Jastrow J. On small differences of sensation. Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences 1884, 3:73-83.
97. Pierrel R., Murray C.S. Some relationships between comparative judgment, confidence, and decision-time in weight-lifting. American Journal of Psychology 1963, 76:28-38.
98. Pike R. Response latency models for signal detection. Psychological Review 1973, 80:53-68.
99. Pleskac T.J., Dougherty M.R., Rivadeneira A.W., Wallsten T.S. Random error in judgment: The contribution of encoding and retrieval processes. Journal of Memory and Language 2009, 60:165-179.
100. Ratcliff R. Theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review 1978, 85:59-108.
101. Ratcliff R. A diffusion model account of reaction time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9:278-291.
102. Ratcliff R., Gronlund S.D., Sheu C.F. Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review 1992, 99:518-535.
103. Ratcliff R., Rouder J.N. Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science 1998, 9:347-356.
104. Ratcliff R., Rouder J.N. A diffusion model account of masking in two-choice letter identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:127-140.
105. Ratcliff R., Smith P. A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychological Review 2004, 111:333-367.
106. Ratcliff R., Starns J.J. Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory. Psychological Review 2009, 116:59-83.
107. Ratcliff R., Tuerlinckx F. Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9:438-481.
108. Ratcliff R., Van Zandt T., McKoon G. Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychological Review 1999, 106:261-300.
109. Resulaj A., Kiani R., Wolpert D.M., Shadlen M.N. Changes of mind in decision-making. Nature 2009, September 10, 461:263-268.
110. Roe R.M., Busemeyer J.R., Townsend J.T. Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision making. Psychological Review 2001, 108:370-392.
111. Romo R., Hernandez A., Zainos A., Lemus L., Brody C.D. Neuronal correlates of decision-making in secondary somatosensory cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5:1217-1225.
112. Rottenstreich Y., Tversky A. Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: Advances in support theory. Psychological Review 1997, 104:406-415.
113. Sanders M., McCormick E. Human factors in engineering and design 1993, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
114. Savage L.J. The foundations of statistics 1954, Wiley, New York, NY.
115. Schouten J.F., Bekker J.A.M. Reaction time and accuracy. Acta Psychologica 1967, 27:143-153.
116. Shadish W.R., Haddock K.C. Combining estimates of effect size. The handbook of research synthesis 1994, 261-281. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY. H. Cooper, L.V. Hedges (Eds.).
117. Shadlen M.N., Kiani R., Hanks T., Churchland A.K. Neurobiology of decision making: An intentional framework. Better than conscious? Decision making, the human mind, and implications for institutions 2008, 103-122. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. C. Engel, W. Singer (Eds.).
118. Shadlen M.N., Newsome W.T. Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 2001, 86:1916-1936.
119. Sieck W.R., Merkle E.C., Van Zandt T. Option fixation: A cognitive contributor to overconfidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2007, 103:68-83.
120. Smith P.L. A note on the distribution of response times for a random walk with Gaussian increments. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1990, 34:445-459.
121. Smith P.L. Psychophysically principled models of visual simple reaction time. Psychological Review 1995, 102:567-593.
122. Smith P.L. Stochastic dynamic models of response time and accuracy: A foundational primer. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2000, 44:408-463.
123. Speckman P.L., Rouder J.N. A comment on Heathcote, Brown, and Mewhort's QMLE method for response time distributions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11:574-576.
124. Squire L.R., Wixted J.T., Clark R.E. Recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: A new perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2007, 8:872-883.
125. Stäel von Holstein C. Measurement of subjective probability. Acta Psychologica 1970, 34:146-159.
126. Stone M. Models for choice-reaction time. Psychometrika 1960, 25:251-260.
127. Suantak L., Bolger F., Ferrell W.R. The hard-easy effect in subjective probability calibration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1996, 67:201-221.
128. Svenson O., Maule A.J. Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making 1993, Plenum Press, New York, NY.
129. Swensson R.G. Elusive tradeoff-Speed vs. accuracy in visual discrimination tasks. Perception & Psychophysics 1972, 12:16-32.
130. Swensson R.G., Edwards W. Response strategies in a two-choice reaction task with a continuous cost for time. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1971, 88:67-81.
131. Thurstone L.L. A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review 1927, 34:273-286.
132. Townsend J.T., Ashby F.G. Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes 1983, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
133. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 1974, September 27, 185:1124-1131.
134. Tversky A., Koehler D.J. Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psychological Review 1994, 101:547-567.
135. Usher M., McClelland J.L. The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review 2001, 108:550-592.
136. Usher M.M., McClelland J.L. Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice. Psychological Review 2004, 111:757-769.
137. Van Zandt T. How to fit a response time distribution. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2000, 7:424-465.
138. Van Zandt T. ROC curves and confidence judgments in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26:582-600.
139. Van Zandt T., Colonius H., Proctor R.W. A comparison of two response time models applied to perceptual matching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2000, 7:208-256.
140. Van Zandt T., Maldonado-Molina M.M. Response reversals in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004, 30:1147-1166.
141. Vickers D. Decision processes in visual perception 1979, Academic Press, New York, NY.
142. Vickers D. Where does the balance of evidence lie with respect to confidence?. Proceedings of the seventeenth annual meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics 2001, 148-153. Pabst, Lengerich, Germany. E. Sommerfeld, R. Kompass, T. Lachmann (Eds.).
143. Vickers D., Burt J., Smith P., Brown M. Experimental paradigms emphasizing state or process limitations: 1. Effects on speed accuracy tradeoffs. Acta Psychologica 1985, 59:129-161.
144. Vickers D., Packer J. Effects of alternating set for speed or accuracy on response-time, accuracy and confidence in a unidimensional discrimination task. Acta Psychologica 1982, 50:179-197.
145. Vickers D., Smith P. Accumulator and random-walk models of psychophysical discrimination: A counter-evaluation. Perception 1985, 14:471-497.
146. Vickers D., Smith P., Burt J., Brown M. Experimental paradigms emphasizing state or process limitations: 2. Effects on confidence. Acta Psychologica 1985, 59:163-193.
147. Volkman J. The relation of the time of judgment to the certainty of judgment. Psychological Bulletin 1934, 31:672-673.
148. von Winterfeldt D., Edwards W. Decision analysis and behavioral research 1986, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
149. Voss A., Voss J. A fast numerical algorithm for the estimation of diffusion model parameters. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2008, 52:1-9.
150. Wagenmakers E.J., van der Maas H.L.J., Grasman R.P.P.P. An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:3-22.
151. Wald A. Sequential analysis 1947, Wiley, New York, NY.
152. Wald A., Wolfowitz J. Optimum character of the sequential probability ratio test. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1948, 19:326-339.
153. Wallsten T.S. An analysis of judgment research analyses. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1996, 65:220-226.
154. Wallsten T.S., Bender R.H., Li Y. Dissociating judgment from response processes in statement verification: The effects of experience on each component. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1999, 25:96-115.
155. Wallsten T.S., Budescu D.V., Erev I., Diederich A. Evaluating and combining subjective probability estimates. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1997, 10:243-268.
156. Wallsten T.S., Budescu D.V., Zwick R. Comparing the calibration and coherence of numerical and verbal probability judgments. Management Science 1993, 39:176-190.
157. Wallsten T.S., González-Vallejo C. Statement verification: A stochastic model of judgment and response. Psychological Review 1994, 101:490-504.
158. Wang X.J. Probabilistic decision making by slow reverberation in cortical circuits. Neuron 2002, 36:955-968.
159. Wickelgren W.A. Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information-processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica 1977, 41:67-85.
160. Winkler R.L., Murphy A.H. " Good" probability assessors. Journal of Applied Meteorology 1968, 7:751-758.
161. Winman A., Juslin P. Calibration of sensory and cognitive judgments-Two different accounts. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 1993, 34:135-148.
162. Yates J.F. Judgment and decision making 1990, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
163. Yates J.F., Curley S.P. Conditional distribution analyses of probabilistic forecasts. Journal of Forecasting 1985, 4:61-73.
164. Yonelinas A.P. Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory-Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:1341-1354.