Cultural targeting and tailoring of shared decision making technology: A theoretical framework for improving the effectiveness of patient decision aids in culturally diverse groups

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 105, Issue , 2014, Pages 1-8

  Alden, Dana L ^a   Friend, John ^b   Schapira, Marilyn ^c   Stiggelbout, Anne ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^c Div of General Internal Medicine   (United States)

^d LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Culture; Health disparities; Patient decision aids; Shared decision making; Tailoring; Targeting

Indexed keywords

CULTURE; DECISION MAKING; MEDICINE; MULTICULTURALISM;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; CULTURAL COMPETENCE; CULTURAL FACTOR; CULTURAL SENSITIVITY; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; HEALTH BELIEF; HEALTH DISPARITY; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL SOCIOLOGY; PATIENT DECISION AID; PROCESS DESIGN; REVIEW; SHARED DECISION MAKING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

CULTURE; HEALTH DISPARITIES; PATIENT DECISION AIDS; SHARED DECISION MAKING; TAILORING; TARGETING;

CULTURAL COMPETENCY; CULTURAL DIVERSITY; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; PATIENTS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

EID: 84896818267     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: 18735347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.002     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Aaker J., Lee A. 'I' seek pleasures and 'we' avoid pains: the role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research 2001, 28(1):33-49.
2. Albrecht K., Simon D., Buchholz A., Reuter K., Frosch D., Seebauer L., et al. How does a German audience appraise an American decision aid on early stage breast cancer. Patient Education and Counseling 2011, 83(1):58-63.
3. Alter A.L., Kwan V.S.Y. Cultural sharing in a global village: evidence for extracultural cognition in European Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 96(4):743-760.
4. Antshel K.M. Integrating culture as a means of improving treatment adherence in the Latino population. Psychology, Health & Medicine 2002, 7(4):435-449.
5. Barclay J.S., Blackhall L.J., Tulsky J.A. Communication strategies and cultural issues in the delivery of bad news. Journal of Palliative Medicine 2007, 10(4):958-977.
6. Barry M.J., Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making-the pinnacle of patient-centered care. New England Journal of Medicine 2012, 366(9):780-781.
7. Bekker H.L., Hewison J., Thornton J.G. Understanding why decision aids work: linking process with outcome. Patient Education and Counseling 2003, 50(3):323-329.
8. Betsch C., Ulshöfer C., Renkewitz F., Betsch T. The influence of narrative v. statistical information on perceiving vaccination risks. Medical Decision Making 2011, 31(5):742-753.
9. Braddock C.H. The emerging importance and relevance of shared decision making to clinical practice. Medical Decision Making 2010, 30(Suppl.5):5S-7S.
10. Branda M.E., LeBlanc A., Shah N.D., Tiedje K., Ruud K., Van Houten H., et al. Shared decision making for patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized trail in primary care. BMC Health Service Research 2013, 13:301.
11. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E. Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: the thought listing technique. Cognitive assessment 1981, 309-342. Guilford, New York. T. Merluzzi, C. Glass, M. Genest (Eds.).
12. Charles C., Gafni A., Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes two to tango). Social Science & Medicine 1997, 44(5):681-692.
13. Charles C., Gafni A., Whelan T., O'Brien M.A. Cultural influences on the physician-patient encounter: the case of shared treatment decision-making. Patient Education and Counseling 2006, 63(3):262-267.
14. Cross S.E., Hardin E.E., Gercek-Swing B. The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2011, 15(2):142-179.
15. Davis R.E., Resnicow K. The cultural variance framework for tailoring health messages. Designing message for health communication campaigns: Theory and practice 2012, 115-135. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA. H. Cho (Ed.).
16. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry 2000, 11(4):227-268.
17. Galanti G.A. The Hispanic family and male-female relationships: an overview. Journal of Transcultural Nursing 2003, 14(3):180-185.
18. Garcia-Retamero R., Galesic M. Who profits from visual aids: overcoming challenges in people's understanding of risks. Social Science & Medicine 2010, 70(7):1019-1025.
19. Halvorsen P.A. What information do patients need to make a medical decision?. Medical Decision Making 2010, 30(Suppl.5):11S-13S.
20. Higgins E.T. Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological Review 2006, 113(3):439-460.
21. Hoffman-Goetz L., Friedman D.B. Asystematic review of culturally sensitive cancer prevention resources for ethnic minorities. Ethnicity & Disease 2006, 16(4):971-977.
22. Hofstede G. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations 2001, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.
23. Holmes-Rovner M., Stableford S., Fagerlin A., Wei J.T., Dunn R.L., Ohene-Frempong J., et al. Evidence-based patient choice: a prostate cancer decision aid in plain language. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2005, 5:16.
24. Hong J., Lee A.Y. Be fit and be strong: mastering self-regulation through regulatory fit. Journal of Consumer Research 2008, 34(5):682-695.
25. Jibaja-Weiss M.L., Volk R.L., Granchi T.S., Neff N.E., Robinson E.K., Spann S.J., et al. Entertainment education for breast cancer surgery decisions: a randomized trial among patients with low health literacy. Patient Education and Counseling 2011, 84(1):41-48.
26. Kitayama S., Park H., Sevincer A.T., Karasawa M., Uskul A.K. Acultural task analysis of implicit independence: comparing North America, Western Europe, and East Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 97(2):236-255.
27. Kreps G.L. The impact of communication on cancer risk, incidence, morbidity, mortality, and quality of life. Health Communication 2003, 15(2):163-169.
28. Kreps G.L. Communication and racial inequalities in health care. American Behavioral Scientist 2006, 49(6):760-774.
29. Kreuter M.W., Lukwago S.N., Brennan L.K., Scharff D.P., Wadud E.S. Effectiveness of tailored and non-tailored educational materials to promote nutrition label reading. Health Education 2002, 102(6):271-279.
30. Kreuter M.W., Lukwago S.N., Bucholtz D.C., Clark E.M., Sanders-Thompson V. Achieving cultural appropriateness in health promotion programs: targeted and tailored approaches. Health Education & Behavior 2003, 30(2):133-146.
31. Kreuter M.W., Skinner C.S. Tailoring: what's in a name?. Health Education Research 2000, 15(1):1-4.
32. Kreuter M.W., Skinner C.S., Steger-May K., Holt C.L., Bucholtz D.C., Clark E.M., et al. Responses to behaviorally vs culturally tailored cancer communication among African American women. American Journal of Health Behavior 2004, 28(3):195-207.
33. Larkey L.K., Lopez A.M., Minnal A., Gonzalez J. Storytelling for promoting colorectal cancer screening among underserved Latina women: a randomized pilot study. Cancer Control 2009, 16(1):79-87.
34. Lee A.Y., Keller P.A., Sternthal B. Value from regulatory construal fit: the persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness. Journal of Consumer Research 2010, 36(5):735-747.
35. Llewellyn-Thomas H.A., Crump R.T. Decision support for patients: values clarification and preference elicitation. Medical Care Research and Review 2013, 70(Suppl.1):50S-79S.
36. Maly R.C., Umezawa Y., Ratliff C.T., Leake B. Racial/ethnic group differences in treatment decision-making and treatment received among older breast carcinoma patients. Cancer 2006, 106(4):957-965.
37. Mischel W. Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Review of Psychology 2004, 55:1-22.
38. Mischel W., Shoda Y. Acognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review 1995, 102(2):246-268.
39. Montori V.M., Shah N., Pencille L.J., Branda M.E., Van Houten H.K., Swiglo B.A., et al. Use of a decision aid to improve treatment decisions in osteoporosis: the osteoporosis choice randomized trial. The American Journal of Medicine 2012, 124(6):549-556.
40. Noar S.M., Benac C.N., Harris M.S. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin 2007, 133(4):673-693.
41. Oyserman D. Culture as situated cognition: cultural mindsets, cultural fluency, and meaning making. European Review of Social Psychology 2011, 22(1):164-214.
42. Oyserman D., Coon H.M., Kemmelmeier M. Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumption and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin 2002, 128(1):3-72.
43. Oyserman D., Sorensen, Reber R., Chen S.X. Connecting and separating mind-sets: culture as situated cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 97(2):217-235.
44. Pieterse A.H., de Vries M., Kunneman M., Stiggelbout A.M., Feldman-Stewart D. Theory-informed design of values clarification methods: a cognitive psychological perspective on patient health-related decision making. Social Science & Medicine 2013, 77:156-163.
45. Reber R., Schwarz N., Winkielman P. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2004, 8(4):364-382.
46. Schwartz S.H. Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in experimental social psychology 1992, Vol. 25:1-65. Academic Press, New York.
47. Schwartz S.H., Bardi A. Value hierarchies across cultures: taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2001, 32(3):268-290.
48. Shaffer V.A., Hulsey L., Zikmund-Fisher B.J. The effects of process-focused versus experience-focused narratives in a breast cancer treatment decision task. Patient Education and Counseling 2013, 93(2):255-264.
49. Sheppard V.B., Williams K.P., Harrison T.M., Jennings Y., Lucas W., Stephen J., et al. Development of decision-support intervention for Black women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology 2010, 19(1):62-70.
50. Stacey D., Bennett C.L., Barry M.J., Col N.F., Eden K.B., Holmes-Rovner M., et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, (10). Art. No.:+CD001431. 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
51. Tanjasiri S.P., Kagawa-Singer M., Foo M.A., Chao M., Linayao-Putnam I., Nguyen J., et al. Designing culturally and linguistically appropriate health interventions: the "life is precious" Hmong breast cancer study. Health Education & Behavior 2007, 34(1):140-153.
52. Taylor V.M., Hislop T.G., Jackson J.C., Tu S.P., Yasui Y., Schwartz S.M., et al. Arandomized controlled trial of interventions to promote cervical cancer screening among Chinese women in North America. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2002, 94(9):670-677.
53. Triandis H.C. Culture and psychology: a history of the study of their relationship. Handbook of cultural psychology 2007, 59-76. Guilford Press, New York. S. Kitayama, D. Cohen (Eds.).
54. Updegraff J.A., Sherman D.K., Luyster F.S., Mann T.L. The effects of message quality and congruency on perceptions of tailored health communications. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2007, 43(2):249-257.
55. Uskul A.K., Keller J., Oyserman D. Regulatory fit and health behavior. Psychology and Health 2008, 23(3):327-346.
56. Uskul A.K., Oyserman D. When message-frame fits salient cultural-frame, messages feel more persuasive. Psychology and Health 2010, 25(3):321-337.
57. Uskul A.K., Sherman D.K., Fitzgibbon J. The cultural congruency effect: culture, regulatory focus and the effectiveness of gain- vs. loss-framed health messages. Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 45(3):535-541.
58. Wang J., Schwartz M., Luta G., Maxwell A., Mandelblatt J. Intervention tailoring for Chinese American women: comparing the effects of two videos on knowledge, attitudes and intentions to obtain a mammogram. Health Education Research 2012, 27(3):523-536.
59. Winterbottom A., Bekker H.L., Conner M., Mooney A. Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systemic review. Social Science & Medicine 2008, 67(12):2079-2088.
60. Zikmund-Fisher B.J., Fagerlin A., Roberts T.R., Derry H.A., Ubel P.A. Alternate methods of framing information about medication side effects: incremental risk versus total risk of occurrence. Journal of Health Communication 2008, 13(2):107-124.