Shared decision making for patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized trial in primary care

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Branda, Megan E ^a   Leblanc, Annie ^a   Shah, Nilay D ^a   Tiedje, Kristina ^a,b   Ruud, Kari ^a   Van Houten, Holly ^a   Pencille, Laurie ^a   Kurland, Marge ^c   Yawn, Barbara ^c,d   Montori, Victor M ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LUMIÈRE LYON 2   (France)

^c OLMSTED MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision aid; Diabetes; Randomized trial; Shared decision making

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINNESOTA; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84881175476     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-301     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. A shared treatment decision-making approach between patients with chronic conditions and their clinicians: the case of diabetes. Montori VM, Gafni A, Charles C, Health Expectations 2006 9 1 25 36 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00359.x 16436159
2. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NJ, Eden KB, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011 10 CD001431
3. The design of a decision aid about diabetes medications for use during the consultation with patients with type 2 diabetes. Breslin M, Mullan RJ, Montori VM, Patient Educ Couns 2008 73 3 465 472 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.024 18771876
4. Creating a conversation: insights from the development of a decision aid. Montori VM, Breslin M, Maleska M, Weymiller AJ, PLoS Med 2007 4 8 233 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040233 17683195
5. Helping patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus make treatment decisions: statin choice randomized trial. Weymiller AJ, Montori VM, Jones LA, Gafni A, Guyatt GH, et al. Arch Intern Med 2007 167 1076 1082 10.1001/archinte.167.10. 1076 17533211
6. The diabetes mellitus medication choice decision aid: a randomized trial. Mullan RJ, Montori VM, Shah ND, Christianson TJ, Bryant SC, et al. Arch Intern Med 2009 169 17 1560 1568 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.293 19786674
7. The statin choice decision aid in primary care: a randomized trial. Mann D, Ponieman D, Montori VM, Arciniega J, McGinn T, Patient Educ Couns 2010 80 1 138 140 10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.008 19959322
8. State of Minnesota, House of Representatives. 87th session. H.F. 2230 Section 6.7 2012 http://wdoc.house.leg.state.mn.us/leg/LS87/HF2230.0.pdf
9. The patient-centered outcomes research institute (pcori) national priorities for research and initial research agenda. Selby JV, Beal AC, Frank L, JAMA 2012 307 15 1584 10.1001/jama.2012.500
10. Multiple Chronic Conditions Measurement Framework. National Quality Forum 2012 http://www.qualityforum.org/Publications/2012/05/MCC-Measurement- Framework-Final-Report.aspx
11. NQF, National Priorities Partnership, Washington, DC: NQF; 2011 2011 Available at National Priorities Partnership
12. Protocol for the osteoporosis choice trial. A pilot randomized trial of a decision aid in primary care practice. Pencille LJ, Campbell ME, Van Houten HK, Trials 2009 10 113 10.1186/1745-6215-10-113 20003299
13. The impact of decision aids to enhance shared decision making for diabetes (the DAD Study): Protocol of a cluster randomized trial. LeBlanc A, Ruud KL, Branda ME, Tiedje K, Boehmer KR, BMC Health Services Res 2012 130 10.1186/1472-6963-12-130
14. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. O'Connor AM, Med Decis Making 1995 15 1 25 30 10.1177/0272989X9501500105 7898294
15. Helping patients follow prescribed treatment: clinical applications. Haynes RB, McDonald HP, Garg AX, JAMA 2002 288 22 2880 3 10.1001/jama.288.22. 2880 12472330
16. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Lin LI-K, Biometrics 1989 45 255 268 10.2307/2532051 2720055
17. The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Elwyn G, Hutchings H, Edwards A, Rapport F, Wensing M, et al. Health Expect 2005 8 1 34 42 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00311.x 15713169
18. Intra-cluster correlation coefficients in adults with diabetes in primary care practices: the Vermont Diabetes Information System Field Survey. Littenberg B, MacLean CD, BMC Med Res Methodol 2006 6 20 10.1186/1471-2288-6-20 16672056
19. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, J Biomed Inform 2009 42 2 377 81 10.1016/j.jbl2008.08.010 18929686
20. Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. Fergusson D, Aaron SD, Guyatt G, Hebert P, BMJ 2002 325 7365 652 654 10.1136/bmj.325.7365.652 12242181
21. 'They leave at least believing they had a part in the discussion': Understanding Decision Aid Use and Patient-Clinician Decision-Making through Qualitative Research. Tiedje K, Shippee ND, Johnson JM, Patient Educ Couns 2013 10.1016/j.pec.2013.03.013
22. Authoritarian physicians and patients' fear of being labeled 'difficult' among key obstacles to shared decision making. Frosch DL, May SG, Rendle KAS, Health Aff 2012 31 5 1030 1038 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0576
23. Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ, NEJM 2013 368 6 8 10.1056/NEJMp1209500 23281971