Understanding the complex nature of salinity and drought-stress response in cereals using proteomics technologies

Proteomics

Volumn 14, Issue 4-5, 2014, Pages 611-621

  Ngara, Rudo ^a   Ndimba, Bongani K ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE FREE STATE   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN CAPE   (South Africa)

^c ARC INFRUITEC NIETVOORBIJ   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Drought stress; Plant proteomics; Salinity stress; Sorghum; Stress responsive proteins

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; PROTEOME;

AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; CEREAL; DROUGHT; FOOD CROP; FOOD INDUSTRY; NONHUMAN; NUTRITIONAL DEFICIENCY; OSMOTIC STRESS; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PLANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; SALINITY; SALT STRESS; SORGHUM; STRESS; CROP PRODUCTION; DROUGHT STRESS; DROUGHT TOLERANCE; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY; PLANT STRESS; SALT TOLERANCE;

DROUGHT STRESS; PLANT PROTEOMICS; SALINITY STRESS; SORGHUM; STRESS RESPONSIVE PROTEINS;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; CEREALS; DROUGHTS; PLANT PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; SALINITY; SALT-TOLERANCE; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84896784338     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201300351     Document Type: Review

References (119)

1. Sachs, M. M., Ho, T.-H. D., Alteration of gene expression during environmental stress in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1986, 37, 363-376.
2. Tester, M., Bacic, A., Abiotic stress tolerance in grasses. From model plants to crop plants. Plant Physiol. 2005, 137, 791-793.
3. Altman, A., Plant genetic engineering is a fact, it is an efficient and necessary breeding technique, and it is both a challenge and a solution that will be accepted by the public. Acta Hortic. 2003, 625, 425-437.
4. Vinocur, B., Altman, A., Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: achievements and limitations. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2005, 16, 123-132.
5. Wang, W., Vinocur, B., Altman, A., Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 2003, 218, 1-14.
6. Flowers, T. J., Improving crop salt tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55, 307-319.
7. Mundree, S. G., Baker, B., Mowla, S., Peters, S. et al., Physiological and molecular insights into drought tolerance. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2002, 1, 28-38.
8. Denby, K., Gehring, C., Engineering drought and salinity tolerance in plants: lessons from genome-wide expression profiling in Arabidopsis. Trends Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 547-552.
9. Seki, M., Kamei, A., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., Shinozaki, K., Molecular responses to drought, salinity and frost: common and different paths for plant protection. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2003, 14, 194-199.
10. Chinnusamy, V., Schumaker, K., Zhu, J. K., Molecular genetic perspectives on cross-talk and specificity in abiotic stress signalling in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55, 225-236.
11. Knight, H., Knight, M. R., Abiotic stress signalling pathways: specificity and cross-talk. Trends Plant Sci. 2001, 6, 262-267.
12. Levitt, J., Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses, Academic Press, London 1980.
13. Ho, T.-H. D., Sachs, M. M., Environmental control of genes expression and stress proteins in plants, in: Jones, H. G., Flowers, T. J., Jones, M. B. (Eds.), Plants Under Stress: Biochemistry, Physiology and Ecology and Their Application to Plant Improvement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1989, pp. 157-180.
14. Kasuga, M., Liu, Q., Miura, S., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., Shinozaki, K., Improving plant drought, salt, and freezing tolerance by gene transfer of a single stress-inducible transcription factor. Nat. Biotechnol. 1999, 17, 287-291.
15. Shinozaki, K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., Seki, M., Regulatory network of gene expression in the drought and cold stress responses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6, 410-417.
16. Flowers, T. J., Yeo, A. R., Ion relations of plants under drought and salinity. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1986, 13, 75-91.
17. Hale, M. G., Orcutt, D. M., The Physiology of Plants Under Stress, John Wiley and Sons, New York 1987.
18. Munns, R., Tester, M., Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 651-681.
19. Zhu, J. K., Plant salt tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2001, 6, 66-71.
20. Wyn Jones, R. G., Salt tolerance, in: Johnson, C. B. (Ed.), Physiological Processes Limiting Plant Productivity, Butterworths, London 1981, pp. 271-292.
21. Hurkman, W. J., in: Katterman, F. (Ed.), Environmental Injury to Plants, Academic Press, London 1990, pp. 205-229.
22. Munns, R., Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25, 239-250.
23. Sairam, R. K., Tyagi, A., Physiology and molecular biology of salinity stress tolerance in plants. Curr. Sci. 2004, 86, 407-421.
24. Shao, H. B., Jiang, S. Y., Li, F. M., Chu, L. Y. et al., Some advances in plant stress physiology and their implications in the systems biology era. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2007, 54, 33-36.
25. Xiong, L., Zhu, J. K., Molecular and genetic aspects of plant responses to osmotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25, 131-139.
26. Niu, X., Bressan, R. A., Hasegawa, P. M., Pardo, J. M., Ion homeostasis in NaCl stress environments. Plant Physiol. 1995, 109, 735-742.
27. Hasegawa, P. M., Bressan, R. A., Zhu, J. K., Bohnert, H. J., Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000, 51, 463-499.
28. McNeil, S. D., Nuccio, M. L., Hanson, A. D., Betaines and related osmoprotectants. Targets for metabolic engineering of stress resistance. Plant Physiol. 1999, 120, 945-950.
29. Chen, T. H., Murata, N., Enhancement of tolerance of abiotic stress by metabolic engineering of betaines and other compatible solutes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2002, 5, 250-257.
30. Yeo, A., Molecular biology of salt tolerance in the context of whole-plant physiology. J. Exp. Bot. 1998, 49, 915-929.
31. Bohnert, H. J., Jensen, R. G., Strategies for engineering water-stress tolerance in plants. Trends Biotechnol. 1996, 14, 89-97.
32. Munns, R., Termaat, A., Whole-plant responses to salinity. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1986, 13, 143-160.
33. + transport in higher plants. Ann. Bot. 2003, 91, 503-527.
34. Cushman, J. C., DeRocher, E. J., Bohnert, H. J., Gene expression during adaptation to salt stress, in: Katterman, F. (Ed.), Environmental Injury to Plants, Academic Press, London 1990, pp. 173-203.
35. Zhu, J. K., Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6, 441-445.
36. Smirnoff, N., The role of active oxygen in the response of plants to water deficit and desiccation. New Physiol. 1993, 125, 27-58.
37. Mittler, R., Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 405-410.
38. Kotchoni, S. O., Bartels, D., Water stress induces the up-regulation of a specific set of genes in plants: aldehyde dehydrogenase as an example. Bulg. J. Plant Physiol. 2003, 37-51.
39. Bray, E. A., Plant responses to water deficit. Trends Plant Sci. 1997, 2, 48-54.
40. Clarke, J. M., Durley, R. C., in: Simpsons, C. M. (Ed.), Water Stress on Plants, Praeger Publishers, New York 1981, pp. 89-139.
41. Turner, N. C., in: Mussell, H., Staples, R. C. (Eds.), Stress Physiology in Crop Plants, John Wiley and Sons, New York 1979, pp. 343-372.
42. 4 Plant Biology, Academic Press, London 1999, pp. 3-16.
43. Doggett, H., Sorghum, Longman Scientific & Technical, New York 1988.
44. Buchanan, C. D., Lim, S., Salzman, R. A., Kagiampakis, I. et al., Sorghum bicolor's transcriptome response to dehydration, high salinity and ABA. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 58, 699-720.
45. Sasaki, T., Antonio, B. A., Plant genomics: sorghum in sequence. Nature 2009, 457, 547-548.
46. Ingram, J., Bartels, D., The molecular basis of dehydration tolerance in plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1996, 47, 377-403.
47. Wood, A. J., Saneoka, H., Rhodes, D., Joly, R. J., Goldsbrough, P. B., Betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase in sorghum. Plant Physiol. 1996, 110, 1301-1308.
48. Newton, R. J., Bhaskaran, S., Puryear, J. D., Smith, R. H., Physiological changes in cultured sorghum cells in response to induced water stress: II. Soluble carbohydrates and organic acids. Plant Physiol. 1986, 81, 626-629.
49. Hong-Bo, S., Zong-Suo, L., Ming-An, S., LEA proteins in higher plants: structure, function, gene expression and regulation. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2005, 45, 131-135.
50. Battaglia, M., Olvera-Carrillo, Y., Garciarrubio, A., Campos, F., Covarrubias, A. A., The enigmatic LEA proteins and other hydrophilins. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148, 6-24.
51. Anderson, L., Seilhamer, J., A comparison of selected mRNA and protein abundances in human liver. Electrophoresis 1997, 18, 533-537.
52. Lockhart, D. J., Winzeler, E. A., Genomics, gene expression and DNA arrays. Nature 2000, 405, 827-836.
53. Zivy, M., de Vienne, D., Proteomics: a link between genomics, genetics and physiology. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000, 44, 575-580.
54. Abbott, A., A post-genomic challenge: learning to read patterns of protein synthesis. Nature 1999, 402, 715-720.
55. Dubey, H., Grover, A., Current initiatives in proteomics research: the plant perspective. Curr. Sci. 2001, 80, 262-269.
56. Gygi, S. P., Rochon, Y., Franza, B. R., Aebersold, R., Correlation between protein and mRNA abundance in yeast. Mol. Cell Biol. 1999, 19, 1720-1730.
57. Carpentier, S. C., Coemans, B., Podevin, N., Laukens, K. et al., Functional genomics in a non-model crop: transcriptomics or proteomics? Physiol. Plant. 2008, 133, 117-130.
58. Salekdeh, G. H., Siopongco, J., Wade, L. J., Ghareyazie, B., Bennett, J., Proteomic analysis of rice leaves during drought stress and recovery. Proteomics 2002, 2, 1131-1145.
59. van Wijk, K. J., Challenges and prospects of plant proteomics. Plant Physiol. 2001, 126, 501-508.
60. Kersten, B., Agrawal, G. K., Durek, P., Neigenfind, J. et al., Plant phosphoproteomics: an update. Proteomics 2009, 9, 964-988.
61. Thiellement, H., Bahrman, N., Damerval, C., Plomion, C. et al., Proteomics for genetic and physiological studies in plants. Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 2013-2026.
62. Dunn, M. J., Gorg, A., Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for proteome analysis, in: Pennington, S. R., Dunn, M. J. (Eds.), Proteomics from Protein Sequence to Function, BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford 2001, pp. 43-63.
63. Rabilloud, T., Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in proteomics: old, old fashioned, but it still climbs up the mountains. Proteomics 2002, 2, 3-10.
64. Gorg, A., Obermaier, C., Boguth, G., Harder, A. et al., The current state of two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 2000, 21, 1037-1053.
65. Patton, W. F., A thousand points of light: the application of fluorescence detection technologies to two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and proteomics. Electrophoresis 2000, 21, 1123-1144.
66. Westermeier, R., Electrophoresis in Practice, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 2005.
67. Hurkman, W. J., Tanaka, C. K., High-resolution two-dimensional gel electrophoresis: a cornerstone for plant proteomics, in: Samaj, J., Thelen, J. J. (Eds.), Plant proteomics, Springer, Berlin 2007, pp. 14-28.
68. Patterson, S. D., How much of the proteome do we see with discovery-based proteomics methods and how much do we need to see? Curr. Proteomics 2004, 1, 3-12.
69. Patterson, S. D., Aebersold, R. H., Proteomics: the first decade and beyond. Nat. Genet. 2003, 33(Suppl), 311-323.
70. Patterson, S. D., Mass spectrometry and proteomics. Physiol. Genomics 2000, 2, 59-65.
71. Aebersold, R., Goodlett, D. R., Mass spectrometry in proteomics. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 269-295.
72. Salekdeh, G. H., Komatsu, S., Crop proteomics: aim at sustainable agriculture of tomorrow. Proteomics 2007, 7, 2976-2996.
73. Jorrin, J. V., Maldonado, A. M., Castillejo, M. A., Plant proteome analysis: a 2006 update. Proteomics 2007, 7, 2947-2962.
74. Jorrin-Novo, J. V., Maldonado, A. M., Echevarria-Zomeno, S., Valledor, L. et al., Plant proteomics update (2007-2008): second-generation proteomic techniques, an appropriate experimental design, and data analysis to fulfill MIAPE standards, increase plant proteome coverage and expand biological knowledge. J. Proteomics 2009, 72, 285-314.
75. Aghaei, K., Komatsu, S., Crop and medicinal plants proteomics in response to salt stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 1-9.
76. Vanderschuren, H., Lentz, E., Zainuddin, I., Gruissem, W., Proteomics of model and crop plant species: Status, current limitations and strategic advances for crop improvement. J. Proteomics 2013, 93, 5-19.
77. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2000, 408, 796-815.
78. International Rice Genome Sequencing Project, The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature 2005, 436, 793-800.
79. Schnable, P. S., Ware, D., Fulton, R. S., Stein, J. C. et al., The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 2009, 326, 1112-1115.
80. Paterson, A. H., Bowers, J. E., Bruggmann, R., Dubchak, I. et al., The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 2009, 457, 551-556.
81. Zhang, G., Liu, X., Quan, Z., Cheng, S. et al., Genome sequence of foxtail millet (Setaria italica) provides insights into grass evolution and biofuel potential. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30, 549-554.
82. Komatsu, S., Plant proteomics databases: their status in 2005. Curr. Bioinform. 2006, 1, 33-36.
83. Heazlewood, J. L., Millar, A. H., Integrated plant proteomics-putting the green genomes to work. Funct. Plant Biol. 2003, 30, 471-482.
84. Speicher, D. W., Overview of proteome analysis, in: Speicher, D. W. (Ed.), Proteome Analysis: Interpreting the Genome, Elsevier, New York 2004, pp. 1-18.
85. Thiellement, H., Zivy, M., Plomion, C., Combining proteomic and genetic studies in plants. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2002, 782, 137-149.
86. Salekdeh, G. H., Siopongco, J., Wade, L. J., Ghareyazie, B., Bennett, J., A proteomic approach to analyzing drought- and salt-responsiveness in rice. Field Crops Res. 2002, 76, 199-219.
87. Vincent, D., Zivy, M., Plant proteome response to abiotic stress, in: Samaj, J., Thelen, J. J. (Eds.), Plant Proteomics, Springer, Berlin 2007, pp. 346-364.
88. Chourey, K., Ramani, S., Apte, S. K., Accumulation of LEA proteins in salt (NaCl) stressed young seedlings of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivar Bura Rata and their degradation during recovery from salinity stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2003, 160, 1165-1174.
89. Zang, X., Komatsu, S., A proteomics approach for identifying osmotic-stress-related proteins in rice. Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 426-437.
90. Wang, W. X., Vinocur, B., Shoseyov, O., Altman, A., Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 244-252.
91. Liu, D., Ford, K. L., Roessner, U., Natera, S. et al., Rice suspension cultured cells are evaluated as a model system to study salt responsive networks in plants using a combined proteomic and metabolomic profiling approach. Proteomics 2013, 13, 2046-2062.
92. Hu, Y., Guo, S., Li, X., Ren, X., Comparative analysis of salt-responsive phosphoproteins in maize leaves using Ti(4+)-IMAC enrichment and ESI-Q-TOF MS. Electrophoresis 2013, 34, 485-492.
93. Chitteti, B. R., Peng, Z., Proteome and phosphoproteome differential expression under salinity stress in rice (Oryza sativa) roots. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 1718-1727.
94. Munns, R., Physiological processes limiting plant growth in saline soils: some dogmas and hypothesis. Plant Cell Environ. 1993, 16, 15-24.
95. Saqib, M., Zorb, C., Schubert, S., Salt-resistant and salt-sensitive wheat genotypes show similar biochemical reaction at protein level in the first phase of salt stress. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2006, 169, 542-548.
96. Kumar Swami, A., Alam, S. I., Sengupta, N., Sarin, R., Differential proteomic analysis of salt stress response in Sorghum bicolor leaves. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2011, 71, 321-328.
97. Ngara, R., Ndimba, R., Borch-Jensen, J., Jensen, O. N., Ndimba, B., Identification and profiling of salinity stress-responsive proteins in Sorghum bicolor seedlings. J. Proteomics 2012, 75, 4139-4150.
98. Riccardi, F., Gazeau, P., de Vienne, D., Zivy, M., Protein changes in response to progressive water deficit in maize. Quantitative variation and polypeptide identification. Plant Physiol. 1998, 117, 1253-1263.
99. Aghaei, K., Ehsanpour, A. A., Shah, A. H., Komatsu, S., Proteome analysis of soybean hypocotyl and root under salt stress. Amino Acids 2009, 36, 91-98.
100. Parker, R., Flowers, T. J., Moore, A. L., Harpham, N. V., An accurate and reproducible method for proteome profiling of the effects of salt stress in the rice leaf lamina. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 1109-1118.
101. Veeranagamallaiah, G., Jyothsnakumari, G., Thippeswamy, M., Reddy, P. C. O. et al., Proteomic analysis of salt stress responses in foxtail millet (Setaria italica L. cv. Prasad) seedlings. Plant Sci. 2008, 175, 631-641.
102. Aghaei, K., Ehsanpour, A. A., Komatsu, S., Proteome analysis of potato under salt stress. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 4858-4868.
103. Hajheidari, M., Abdollahian-Noghabi, M., Askari, H., Heidari, M. et al., Proteome analysis of sugar beet leaves under drought stress. Proteomics 2005, 5, 950-960.
104. Costa, R., Bahrman, N., Frigerio, J.-M., Kremer, A., Plomion, C., Water-deficit-response proteins in maritime pines. Plant Mol. Biol. 1998, 38, 587-596.
105. Zhang, H., Han, B., Wang, T., Chen, S. et al., Mechanisms of plant salt response: insights from proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11, 49-67.
106. Kosova, K., Prail, I. T., Vitamvas, P., Protein contribution to plant salinity response and tolerance acquisition. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 6757-6789.
107. Zhao, Q., Zhang, H., Wang, T., Chen, S., Dai, S., Proteomics-based investigation of salt-responsive mechanisms in plant roots. J. Proteomics 2013, 82, 230-253.
108. Perez-Alfocea, F., Ghanem, M. E., Gomez-Cadenas, A., Dodd, I. C., Omics of root-to-shoot signaling under salt stress and water deficit. OMICS 2011, 15, 893-901.
109. Barkla, B. J., Castellanos-Cervantes, T., de Leon, J. L., Matros, A. et al., Elucidation of salt stress defense and tolerance mechanisms of crop plants using proteomics-current achievements and perspectives. Proteomics 2013, 13, 1885-1900.
110. Zhu, J. K., Genetic analysis of plant salt tolerance using Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 941-948.
111. Komatsu, S., Karibe, H., Hamada, T., Rakwal, R., Phosphorylation upon cold stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1999, 98, 1304-1310.
112. Yan, S. P., Zhang, Q. Y., Tang, Z. C., Su, W. A., Sun, W. N., Comparative proteomic analysis provides new insights into chilling stress responses in rice. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2006, 5, 484-496.
113. Ishida, H., Makino, A., Mae, T., Fragmentation of the large subunit of ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase by reactive oxygen species occurs near Gly-329. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 5222-5226.
114. Hashiguchi, A., Ahsan, N., Komatsu, S., Proteomics application of crops in the context of climatic changes. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43, 1803-1813.
115. Roy, A., Rushton, P. J., Rohila, J. S., The potential of proteomics technologies for crop improvement under drought conditions. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2011, 30, 471-490.
116. Agrawal, G. K., Pedreschi, R., Barkla, B. J., Bindschedler, V. et al., Translational plant proteomics: a perspective. J. Proteomics 2012, 75, 4588-4601.
117. Rosenow, D. T., Quisenberry, J. E., Wendt, C. W., Clark, L. E., Drought tolerant sorghum and cotton germplasm. Agric. Water Manage. 1983, 7, 207-222.
118. Krishnamurthy, L., Serraj, R., Hash, C. T., Dakheel, A. J., Reddy, B. V. S., Screening sorghum genotypes for salinity tolerant biomass production. Euphytica 2007, 156, 15-24.
119. Cushman, J. C., Bohnert, H. J., Genomic approaches to plant stress tolerance. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2000, 3, 117-124.