Protein contribution to plant salinity response and tolerance acquisition

International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 6757-6789

  Kosová, Klára ^a   Prášil, Ilja T ^a   Vítámvás, Pavel ^a  

^a CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Comparative proteomics; Glycophyte; Halophyte; Proteome; Salinity response

Indexed keywords

PHYTOHORMONE; POTASSIUM ION; SODIUM ION; TRANSCRIPTOME; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ENERGY METABOLISM; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENOMICS; HALOPHYTE; HORMONE METABOLISM; ION TRANSPORT; LIPID METABOLISM; MECHANICAL STRESS; NONHUMAN; OSMOTIC POTENTIAL; OSMOTIC STRESS; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT DEFENSE; PLANT RESPONSE; PLANT STRESS; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN METABOLISM; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; SALT STRESS; SALT TOLERANCE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SUCROSE METABOLISM; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; SALINITY;

PLANT PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; SALINITY; SALT-TOLERANCE; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84875454687     PISSN: 16616596     EISSN: 14220067     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ijms14046757     Document Type: Review

References (113)

1. Munns, R. Genes and salt tolerance: Bringing them together. Tansley. Rev. New Phytol. 2005, 167, 645-663.
2. Munns, R. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25, 239-250.
3. Munns, R.; Tester, M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 651-681.
4. Kosová, K.; Vítámvás, P.; Prášil, I.T.; Renaut, J. Plant proteome changes under abiotic stress-contribution of proteomics studies to understanding plant stress response. J. Proteomics 2011, 74, 1301-1322.
5. Flowers, T.J.; Hajibagheri, M.A.; Clipson, N.J.W. Halophytes. Q. Rev. Biol. 1986, 61, 313-337.
6. Flowers, T.J.; Colmer, T.D. Salinity tolerance in halophytes. Tansley Review. New Phytol. 2008, 179, 945-963.
7. Colmer, T.D.; Flowers, T.J.; Munns, R. Use of wild relatives to improve salt tolerance in wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 1059-1078.
8. Hasegawa, P.M.; Bressan, R.A.; Zhu, J.K.; Bohnert, H.J. Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000, 51, 463-499.
9. Flowers, T.J. Improving crop salt tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55, 307-319.
10. Munns, R.; James, R.A.; Läuchli, A. Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 1025-1043.
11. Zhu, J.K. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant. Biol. 2002, 53, 247-273.
12. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K. Transcriptional regulatory networks in cellular responses and tolerance to dehydration and cold stresses. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 781-803.
13. Sobhanian, H.; Aghaei, K.; Komatsu, S. Changes in the plant proteome resulting from salt stress: Toward the creation of salt-tolerant crops? J. Proteomics 2011, 74, 1323-1337.
14. Zhang, H.; Han, B.; Wang, T.; Chen, S.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; Dai, S. Mechanisms of plant salt response: Insights from proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11, 49-67.
15. Inan, G.; Zhang, Q.; Li, P.; Wang, Z.; Cao, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, C.; Quist, T.M.; Goodwin, M.S.; Zhu, J.; et al. Salt cress. A halophyte and cryophyte Arabidopsis relative model systém and its applicability to molecular genetic analyses of growth and development of extremophiles. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135, 1718-1737.
16. Sengupta, S.; Majumder, A.L. Insight into the salt tolerance factors of a wild halophytic rice, Porteresia. coarctata: A physiological and proteomic approach. Planta 2009, 229, 911-929.
17. Sengupta, S.; Majumder, A.L. Porteresia. coarctata (Roxb.) Tateoka, a wild rice: A potential model for studying salt-stress biology in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 526-542.
18. Dassanayake, M.; Oh, D.H.; Haas, J.S.; Hernandez, A.; Hong, H.; Ali, S.; Yun, D.J.; Bressan, R.A.; Zhu, J.K.; Bohnert, H.J.; et al. The genome of the extremophile crucifer Thellungiella. parvula. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 913-918.
19. Taji, T.; Seki, M.; Satou, M.; Sakurai, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Ishiyama, K.; Narusaka, Y.; Narusaka, M.; Zhu, J.K.; Shinozaki, K. Comparative genomics in salt tolerance between Arabidopsis and Arabidopsis-related halophyte salt cress using Arabidopsis microarray. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135, 1697-1709.
20. Gong, Q.; Li, P.; Ma, S.; Rupassara, S.I.; Bohnert, H.J. Salinity stress adaptation competence in the extremophile Thellungiella halophila in comparison with its relative Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant. J. 2005, 44, 826-839.
21. + uptake in T. halophila. Plant. Cell Environ. 2006, 29, 1220-1234.
22. Pang, Q.; Chen, S.; Dai, S.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yan, X. Comparative proteomics of salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and Thellungiella halophila. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 2584-2599.
23. Wang, M.C.; Peng, Z.Y.; Li, C.L.; Li, F.; Liu, C.; Xia, G.M. Proteomic analysis on a high salt tolerance introgression strain of Triticum aestivum/Thinopyrum ponticum. Proteomics 2008, 8, 1470-1489.
24. Wakeel, A.; Asif, A.R.; Pitann, B.; Schubert, S. Proteome analysis of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) elucidates constitutive adaptation during the first phase of salt stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168, 519-526.
25. Jellouli, N.; Ben Jouira, H.; Skouri, H.; Ghorbel, A.; Gourgouri, A.; Mliki, A. Proteomic analysis of Tunisian grapevine cultivar Razegui under salt stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 165, 471-481.
26. Askari, H.; Edqvist, J.; Hajheidari, M.; Kafi, M.; Salekdeh, G.H. Effects of salinity levels on proteome of Suaeda aegyptiaca leaves. Proteomics 2006, 6, 2542-2554.
27. Wang, X.; Fan, P.; Song, H.; Chen, X.; Li, X.; Li, Y. Comparative proteomic analysis of differentially expressed proteins in shoots of Salicornia europaea under different salinity. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 3331-3345.
28. Yu, J.; Chen, S.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, T.; Yang, C.; Diaz, C.; Sun, G.; Dai, S. Physiological and proteomic analysis of salinity tolerance in Puccinellia tenuiflora. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 3852-3870.
29. 4 plant. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 2882-2897.
30. Caruso, G.; Cavaliere, C.; Guarino, C.; Gubbiotti, R.; Foglia, P.; Lagana, A. Identification of changes in Triticum. durum L. leaf proteome in response to salt stress by two-dimensional electrophoresis and MALDI-TOF mass spektrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008, 391, 381-390.
31. Liska, A.J.; Shevchenko, A.; Pick, U.; Katz, A. Enhanced photosynthesis and redox energy production contribute to salinity tolerance in Dunaliella as revealed by homology-based proteomics. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136, 2806-2817.
32. Katz, A.; Waride, P.; Shevchenko, A.; Pick, U. Salt-induced changes in the plasma membrane proteome of the halotolerant alga Dunaliella. salina as revealed by blue native gel electrophoresis and nano-LC-MS/MS analysis. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2007, 6, 1459-1472.
33. Mehta, P.A.; Rebala, K.C.; Venkataraman, G.; Parida, A. A diurnally regulated dehydrin from Avicennia marina that shows nucleo-cytoplasmic localization and is phosphorylated by Casein kinase II in vitro. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2009, 47, 701-709.
34. Manaa, A.; Ahmed, H.B.; Valot, B.; Bouchet, J.P.; Aschi-Smiti, S.; Causse, M.; Faurobet, M. Salt and genotype impact on plant physiology and root proteome variations in tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 2797-2813.
35. Tada, Y.; Kashimura, T. Proteomic analysis of salt-responsive proteins in the mangrove plant, Bruguiera gymnorhiza. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50, 439-446.
36. Levitt, J. Responses of Plants to Environmental Stress. In Chilling, Freezing and High Temperature Stress, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1980.
37. Larcher, W. Physiological Plant. Ecology, 4th ed.; Springer Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003.
38. Urao, T.; Yakubov, B.; Satoh, R.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Seki, M.; Hirayama, T.; Shinozaki, K. A transmembrane hybrid-type histidine kinase in Arabidopsis functions as an osmosensor. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 1743-1754.
39. Finkelstein, R. Abscisic acid: A seed maturation and antistress signal. In Plant Physiology, 4th ed.; Taiz, L., Zeigler, E., Eds.; Sinauer Associates, Inc.: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2006; pp. 593-616.
40. Ma, Y.; Szostkiewicz, I.; Korte, A.; Moes, D.; Yang, Y.; Christmann, A.; Grill, E. Regulators of PP2C phosphatase activity function as abscisic acid sensors. Science 2009, 324, 1064-1068.
41. Park, S.Y.; Fung, P.; Nishimura, N.; Jensen, D.R.; Fujii, H.; Zhao, Y.; Lumba, S.; Santiago, J.; Rodrigues, A.; Chow, T.F.F.; et al. Abscisic acid inhibits type 2C protein phosphatases via the PYR/PYL family of START proteins. Science 2009, 324, 1068-1071.
42. Klingler, J.P.; Batelli, G.; Zhu, J.K. ABA receptors: The START of a new paradigm in phytohormone signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 3199-3210.
43. Pandey, S.; Nelson, D.C.; Assmann S.A. Two novel GPCR-type G proteins are abscisic acid receptor in Arabidopsis. Cell 2009, 136, 136-148.
44. Kosová, K.; Vítámvás, P.; Prášil, I.T. The role of dehydrins in plant stress response. In Handbook of Plant. and Crop. Stress, 3rd ed.; Pessarakli, M., Ed.; CRC Press, Taylor and Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010; pp. 239-285.
45. Liu, J.; Ishitani, M.; Halfter, U.; Kim, C.S.; Zhu, J.K. The Arabidopsis thaliana SOS2 gene encodes a protein kinase that is required for salt tolerance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 3730-3734.
46. + antiporter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 6896-6901.
47. + transport in plants. Plant. Cell 2002, 14, 465-477.
48. Shi, H.; Zhu, J.K. SOS4, a pyridoxal kinase gene, is required for root hair development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129, 585-593.
49. Mohr, H.; Schopfer, P. Plant Physiology, 4th ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1995.
50. Kumari, S.; Panjabi, V.; Kushwaha, H.R.; Sopory, S.K.; Singla-Pareek, S.L.; Pareek, A. Transcriptome map for seedling stage specific salinity stress response indicates a specific set of genes as candidate for saline tolerance in Oryza sativa L. Funct. Integr. Genomics 2009, 9, 109-123.
51. Jiang, Y.; Yang, B.; Harris, N.S.; Deyholos, M.K. Comparative proteomic analysis of NaCl stress-responsive proteins in Arabidopsis roots. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 3591-3607.
52. Ndimba, B.K.; Chivasa, S.; Simon, W.J.; Slabas, A.R. Identification of Arabidopsis salt and osmotic stress responsive proteins using two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Proteomics 2005, 5, 4185-4196.
53. Dani, V.; Simon, W.J.; Duranti, M.; Croy, R.R.D. Changes in the tobacco leaf apoplast proteome in response to salt stress. Proteomics 2005, 5, 737-745.
54. Razavizadeh, R.; Ehsanpour, A.A.; Ahsan, N.; Komatsu, S. Proteome analysis of tobacco leaves under salt stress. Peptides 2009, 30, 1651-1659.
55. Chen, F.; Zhang, S.; Jiang, H.; Ma, W.; Korpelainen, H.; Li, C. Comparative proteomics analysis of salt response reveals sex-related photosynthetic inhibition by salinity in Populus cathayana cuttings. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 3944-3958.
56. Chattopadhyay, A.; Subba, P.; Pandey, A.; Bhushan, D.; Kumar, R.; Datta, A.; Chakraborty, S.; Chakraborty, N. Analysis of the grasspea proteome and identification of stress-responsive proteins upon exposure to high salinity, low temperature, and abscisic acid treatment. Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 1293-1307.
57. Xu, C.; Sibicky, T.; Huang, B. Protein profile analysis of salt-responsive proteins in leaves and roots in two cultivars of creeping bentgrass differing in salinity tolerance. Plant Cell Rep. 2010, 29, 595-615.
58. Abbasi, F.M.; Komatsu, S. A proteomic approach to analyze salt-responsive proteins in rice leaf sheath. Proteomics 2004, 4, 2072-2081.
59. Chitteti, B.; Peng, Z. Proteome and phosphoproteome differential expression under salinity stress in rice (Oryza sativa) roots. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 1718-1727.
60. Dooki, A.D.; Mayer-Posner, F.J.; Askari, H.; Zaiee, A.A.; Salekdeh, G.H. Proteomic responses of rice young panicles to salinity. Proteomics 2006, 6, 6498-6507.
61. Kim, D.W.; Rakwal, R.; Agrawal, G.K.; Jung, Y.H.; Shibato, J.; Jwa, N.S.; Iwahashi, Y.; Iwahashi, H.; Kim, D.H.; Shim, I.S.; et al. A hydroponic rice seedling culture model system for investigating proteome of salt stress in rice leaf. Electrophoresis 2005, 26, 4521-4539.
62. Yan S.; Tang Z.; Su W.; Sun W. Proteomic analysis of salt stress-responsive proteins in rice root. Proteomics 2005, 5, 235-244.
63. Jacoby, R.P.; Millar, A.H.; Taylor, N.L. Wheat mitochondrial proteomes provide new links between antioxidant defense and plant salinity tolerance. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 6595-6604.
64. Peng, Z.; Wang, M.; Li, F.; Lv, H.; Li, C.; Xia, G. A proteomic study of the response to salinity and drought stress in an introgression strain of bread wheat. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2009, 8, 2676-2686.
65. Fatehi, F.; Hosseinzadeh, A.; Alizadeh, H.; Brimavandi, T.; Struik, P.C. The proteome response of salt-resistant and salt-sensitive barley genotypes to long-term salinity stress. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 6387-6397.
66. Rasoulnia, A.; Bihamta, M.R.; Peyghambari; S.A., Alizadeh; H.; Rahnama, A. Proteomic response of barley leaves to salinity. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2011, 38, 5055-5063.
67. Sugimoto, M.; Takeda, K. Proteomic analysis of specific proteins in the root of salt-tolerant barley. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 2009, 73, 2762-2765.
68. Witzel, K.; Weidner, A.; Surabhi, G.K.; Börner, A.; Mock, H.P. Salt stress-induced alterations in the root proteome of barley genotypes with contrasting response towards salinity. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 3546-3557.
69. Witzel, K.; Weidner, A.; Surabhi, G.K.; Varshney, R.K.; Kunze, G.; Buck-Sorlin, G.H.; Börner, A.; Mock, H.P. Comparative analysis of the grain proteome fraction in barley genotypes with contrasting salinity tolerance during germination. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 211-222.
70. Veeranagamallaiah, G.; Jyothsnakumari, G.; Thippeswamy, M.; Reddy, P.C.O.; Surabhi, G.K.; Sriranganayakulu, G.; Mahesh, Y.; Rajasekhar, B.; Madhurarekha, C.; Sudhakar, C. Proteomic analysis of salt stress responses in foxtail millet (Setaria italica L. cv. Prasad) seedlings. Plant Sci. 2008, 175, 631-641.
71. Bandehagh, A.; Salekdeh, G.H.; Toorchi, M.; Mohammadi, A.; Komatsu, S. Comparative proteomic analysis of canola leaves under salinity stress. Proteomics 2011, 11, 1965-1975.
72. Aghaei, K.; Ehsanpour, A.A.; Shah, A.H.; Komatsu, S. Proteome analysis of soybean hypokotyl and root under salt stress. Amino Acids 2009, 36, 91-98.
73. Sobhanian, H.; Razavizadeh, R.; Nanjo, Y.; Ehsanpour, A.A.; Jazii, F.R.; Motamed, N.; Komatsu, S. Proteome analysis of soybean leaves, hypocotyls and roots under salt stress. Proteome Sci. 2010, 8, 19.
74. Kav, N.N.V.; Srivastava, S.; Goonewardende, L.; Blade, S.F. Proteome-level changes in the roots of Pisum sativum in response to salinity. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2004, 145, 217-230.
75. Jain, S.; Srivastava, S.; Sarin, N.B.; Kav, N.N.V. Proteomics reveals elevated levels of PR10 proteins in saline-tolerant peanut (Arachis hypogaea) calli. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2006, 44, 253-259.
76. Kumar Swami, A.; Alam, S.I.; Sengupta, N.; Sarin, R. Differential proteomic analysis of salt response in Sorghum bicolor leaves. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2011, 71, 321-328.
77. Ngara, R.; Ndimba, R.; Borch-Jensen, J.; Jensen, O.N.; Ndimba, B. Identification and profiling of salinity stress-responsive proteins in Sorghum bicolor seedlings. J. Proteomics 2012, 75, 4139-4150.
78. Zörb, C.; Herbst, R.; Forreite, C.; Schubert, S. Short-term effects of salt exposure on the maize chloroplast protein pattern. Proteomics 2009, 9, 4209-4220.
79. Zörb, C.; Schmitt, S.; Mühling, K.H. Proteomic changes in maize roots after short-term adjustment to saline growth conditions. Proteomics 2010, 10, 4441-4449.
80. Chen, S.; Gollop, N.; Heuer, B. Proteomic analysis of salt-stressed tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) seedlings: effect of genotype and exogenous application of glycinebetaine. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 2005-2019.
81. Aghaei, K.; Ehsanpour, A.A.; Komatsu, S. Proteome analysis of potato under salt stress. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 4858-4868.
82. Du, C.X.; Fan, H.F.; Guo, S.R.; Tezuka, T.; Li, J. Proteomic analysis of cucmber seedling roots subjected to salt stress. Phytochemistry 2010, 71, 1450-1459.
83. Tanou, G.; Job, C.; Rajjou, L.; Arc, E.; Belghazi, M.; Diamantidis, G.; Molassiotis, A.; Job, D. Proteomics reveals the overlapping roles of hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide in the acclimation of citrus plants to salinity. Plant J. 2009, 60, 795-804.
84. Vincent, D.; Ergül, A.; Bohlman, M.C.; Tattersall, E.A.R.; Tillett, R.L.; Wheatley, M.D.; Woolsey, R.; Quilici, D.R.; Joets, J.; Schlauch, K.; et al. Proteomic analysis reveals differences between Vitis. vinifera L. cv. Chardonnay and cv. Cabernet Sauvignon and their responses to water deficit and salinity. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 1873-1892.
85. Salekdeh, G.H.; Komatsu, S. Crop proteomics: Aim at sustainable agriculture of tomorrow. Proteomics 2007, 7, 2976-2996.
86. Li, W.; Zhang, C.; Lu, Q.; Wen, X.; Lu, C. The combined effect of salt stress and heat shock on proteome profiling in Suaeda salsa. J. Plant. Physiol. 2011, 168, 1743-1752.
87. Barkla, B.J.; Vera-Estrella, R.; Hernandez-Coronado, M.; Pantoja, O. Quantitative proteomics of the tonoplast reveals a role for glycolytic enzymes in salt tolerance. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 4044-4058.
88. 2 concentration enhances salinity tolerance in Aster tripolium L. Planta 2010, 231, 583-594.
89. Wang, X.; Yang, P.; Gao, Q.; Liu, X.; Kuang, T.; Shen, S.; He, Y. Proteomic analysis of the response to high-salinity stress in Physcomitrella patens. Planta 2008, 228, 167-177.
90. Huang, F.; Fulda, S.; Hagermann, M.; Norling, B. Proteomic screening of salt-stress-induced changes in plasma membranes of Synechocystis sp. strain PCC6803. Proteomics 2006, 6, 910-920.
91. Cheng, Y.; Qi, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Chen, X.; Wang, N.; Zhao, X.; Chen, H.; Cui, X.; Xu, L.; Zhang, W. New changes in the plasma-membrane-associated proteome of rice roots under salt stress. Proteomics 2009, 9, 3100-3114.
92. Caruso, A.; Morabito, D.; Delmotte, F.; Kahlem, G.; Carpin, S. Dehydrin induction during drought and osmotic stress in Populus. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2002, 40, 1033-1042.
93. Godoy, J.A.; Lunar, S.; Torres-Schumann, J.; Moreono, J.; Rodrigo, R.M.; Pintor-Toro, J.A. Expression, tissue distribution and subcellular localization of dehydrin TAS14 in salt-stressed tomato plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 1994, 26, 1921-1934.
94. Moons, A.; Bauw, G.; Prinsen, E.; van Montagu, M.; van Der Straeten, D. Molecular and physiological responses to abscisic acid and salts in roots of salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant Indica rice varietites. Plant Physiol. 1995, 107, 177-186.
95. Brini, F.; Hanin, M.; Lumbreras, V.; Irar, S.; Pages, M.; Masmoudi, K. Functional characterization of DHN-5, a dehydrin showing a differential phosphorylation pattern in two Tunisian durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) varieties with marked differences in salt and drought tolerance. Plant Sci. 2007, 172, 20-28.
96. Agarwal, P.; Reddy, M.K.; Sopory, S.K.; Agarwal, P.K. Plant Rabs: Characterization, functional diversity, and role in stress tolerance. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2009, 27, 417-430.
97. Pandey, A.; Chakraborty, S.; Datta, A.; Chakraborty, N. Proteomics approach to identify dehydration responsive nuclear proteins from chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7, 88-107.
98. Singh, R.; Green, M.R. Sequence-specific binding of transfer RNA by glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Science 1993, 259, 365-368.
99. Ronai, Z.; Robinson, R.; Rutberg, S.; Lazarus, P.; Sardana, M. Aldolase DNA interactions in a SEWA cell system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1992, 1130, 20-28.
100. Lee, H.; Guo, Y.; Ohta, M.; Xiong, L.; Stevenson, B.; Zhu, J.K. LOS2, a genetic locus required for cold-responsive gene transcription encodes a bi-functional enolase. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 2692-2702.
101. Moon, H.; Lee, B.; Choi, G.; Shin, S.; Prasad, D.T.; Lee, O.; Kwak, S.S.; Kim, D.H.; Nam, J.; Bahk, J.; et al. NDP kinase 2 interacts with two oxidative stress-acivated MAPKs to regulate cellular redox state and enhances multiple stress tolerance in transgenic plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 358-363.
102. Hashimoto, M.; Kisseleva, L.; Sawa, S.; Furukawa, T.; Komatsu, S.; Koshiba, T. A novel rice PR10 protein, RSOsPR10, specifically induced in roots by biotic and abiotic stress, possibly via the jasmonic acid signalling pathway. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45, 550-559.
103. Park, C.J.; Kim, K.J.; Shin, R.; Park, J.M.; Shin, Y.C.; Paek, K.H. Pathogenesis-related protein 10 isolated from hot pepper functions as a ribonuclease in an antiviral pathway. Plant J. 2004, 37, 186-198.
104. Mogensen, J.E.; Wimmer, R.; Larsen, J.N.; Spangfort, M.D. The major birch allergen, Bet v 1, shows affinity for a broad spectrum of physiological ligands. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 684-692.
105. Zhang W.; Peumans, W.J.; Barre A.; Astoul, C.H.; Rovira P.; Rougé P.; Proost P.; Truffa-Bachi P.; Jalali, A.A.H.; van Damme, E.J.M. Isolation and characterization of a jacalin-related mannose-binding lectin from salt-stressed rice (Oryza sativa) plants. Planta 2000, 210, 970-978.
106. Carpita, N.; Sabularse, D.; Montezinos, D.; Delmer, D.P. Determination of the pore size of cell walls of living plants. Science 1979, 205, 1144-1147.
107. Battaglia, M.; Olvera-Carillo, Y.; Garciarrubio, A.; Covarrubias, A.A. The enigmatic LEA proteins and other hydrophilins. Plant Physiol. 2008, 48, 6-24.
108. Hundertmark, M.; Hincha, D.K. LEA (late embryogenesis abundant) proteins and their encoding egenes in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Genomics 2008, 9, 118-139.
109. +-ATPase and upregulating its transport activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27, 7781-7790.
110. Garcia-Olmedo, F.; Molina, A.; Segura, A.; Moreno, M. The defensive role of nonspecific lipid-transfer proteins in plants. Trends Microbiol. 1995, 3, 72-74.
111. Bugos, R.C.; Hieber, A.D.; Yamamoto, H.Y. Xanthophyll cycle enzymes are members of the lipocalin family, the first identified from plants. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 15321-15324.
112. Vítámvás, P.; Prášil, I.T.; Kosová, K.; Planchon, S.; Renaut, J. Analysis of proteome and frost tolerance in chromosome 5A and 5B reciprocal substitution lines between two winter wheats during long-term cold acclimation. Proteomics 2012, 12, 68-85.
113. Vítámvás, P.; Kosová, K.; Prášilová, P.; Prášil, I.T. Accumulation of WCS120 protein in wheat cultivars grown at 9 °C or 17 °C in relation to their winter survival. Plant Breeding 2010, 129, 611-616.