Ancestral character estimation under the threshold model from quantitative genetics

Evolution

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 743-759

  Revell, Liam J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian; Centrarchidae; Comparative method; Deviance information criterion; Interspecific data; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Phylogenetic tree

Indexed keywords

ANCESTRY; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; LIFE HISTORY; MARKOV CHAIN; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; PERCIFORM; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; RECONSTRUCTION;

CENTRARCHIDAE; PISCES;

BAYESIAN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CENTRARCHIDAE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE METHOD; DEVIANCE INFORMATION CRITERION; GENETICS; INTERSPECIFIC DATA; MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PERCIFORMES; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PHYLOGENY;

BAYESIAN; CENTRARCHIDAE; COMPARATIVE METHOD; DEVIANCE INFORMATION CRITERION; INTERSPECIFIC DATA; MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO; PHYLOGENETIC TREE;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MODELS, GENETIC; PERCIFORMES; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 84896734858     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12300     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Akaike, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19:716-723.
2. Beaulieu, J. M., B. C. O'Meara, and M. J. Donoghue. 2013. Identifying hidden rate changes in the evolution of a binary morphological character: the evolution of plant habit in the campanulid angiosperms. Syst. Biol. 62:725-737.
3. Bokma, F. 2008. Detection of "punctuated equilibrium" by Bayesian estimation of speciation and extinction rates, ancestral character states, and rates of anagenetic and cladogenetic evolution on a molecular phylogeny. Evolution 62:2718-2726.
4. Brooks, D. R., and D. A. McLennan. 1991. Phylogeny, ecology, and behavior: a research program in comparative biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
5. Bürger, R., G. P. Wagner, and F. Stettinger. 1989. How much heritable variation can be maintained in finite populations by mutation-selection balance? Evolution 43:1748-1766.
6. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. 2nd ed. Springer, New York, NY.
7. Butler, M. A., and A. A. King. 2004. Phylogenetic comparative analysis: a modeling approach for adaptive evolution. Am. Nat. 164:683-695.
8. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and A. W. F. Edwards. 1967. Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 19:233-257.
9. Collar, D. C., B. C. O'Meara, P. C. Wainwright, and T. J. Near. 2009. Piscivory limits diversification of feeding morphology in centrarchid fishes. Evolution 63:1557-1573.
10. Cunningham, C. W., K. E. Omland, and T. H. Oakley. 1998. Reconstructing ancestral character states: a critical reappraisal. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:361-366.
11. Eastman, J. M., M. E. Alfaro, P. Joyce, A. L. Hipp, and L. J. Harmon. 2011. A novel comparative method for identifying shifts in the rate of character evolution on trees. Evolution 65:3578-3589.
12. Ekman, S., H. L. Andersen, and M. Wedin. 2008. The limitations of ancestral state reconstruction and the evolution of the ascus in the Lecanorales (lichenized Ascomycota). Syst. Biol. 57:141-156.
13. Felsenstein, J. 1973. Maximum likelihood estimation of evolutionary trees from continuous characters. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 25:471-492.
14. Felsenstein, J. 1973. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
15. Felsenstein, J. 1973. 1988. Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19:445-471.
16. Felsenstein, J. 2004. Inferring phylogenies. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
17. Felsenstein, J. 2005. Using the quantitative genetic threshold model for inferences between and within species. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 360:1427-1434.
18. Felsenstein, J. 2012. A comparative method for both discrete and continuous characters using the threshold model. Am. Nat. 179:145-156.
19. Fitzjohn, R. G. 2010. Quantitative traits and diversification. Syst. Biol. 59:619-633.
20. Geweke, J. 1992. Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments. In J. M. Bernado, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid, and A. F. M. Smith, eds. Bayesian Statistics 4. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
21. Goldberg, E. E., and B. Igić. 2008. On phylogenetic tests of irreversible evolution. Evolution 62:2727-2741.
22. Hansen, T. F. 1997. Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation. Evolution 51:1341-1351.
23. Harvey, P. H., and M. D. Pagel. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK.
24. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and J. P. Bollback. 2001. Empirical and hierarchical Bayesian estimation of ancestral states. Syst. Biol. 50:351-366.
25. Huelsenbeck, J. P., R. Nielsen, and J. P. Bollback. 2003. Stochastic mapping of morphological characters. Syst. Biol. 52:131-158.
26. Ives, A. R., and T. Garland Jr. 2010. Phylogenetic logistic regression for binary dependent variables. Syst. Biol. 59:9-26.
27. Jukes, T. H., and C. R. Cantor. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. Pp. 21-132 in M. N. Murno, ed. Mammalian protein metabolism. Vol. III. Academic Press, New York, NY.
28. Lewis, P. O. 2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst. Biol. 50:913-925.
29. Losos, J. B. 1999. Uncertainty in the reconstruction of ancestral character states and limitations on the use of phylogenetic comparative methods. Anim. Behav. 58:1319-1324.
30. Losos, J. B. 2009. Lizards in an evolutionary tree: ecology and adaptive radiation of anoles. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
31. Losos, J. B., K. I. Warheit, and T. W. Schoener. 1997. Adaptive differentiation following experimental island colonization in Anolis lizards. Nature 387:70-73.
32. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and the analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
33. Maddison, W. P., P. E. Midford, and S. P. Otto. 2007. Estimating a binary character's effect on speciation and extinction. Syst. Biol. 56:701-710.
34. Metropolis, N., A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, and A. H. Teller. 1953. Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21:1087-1092.
35. Near, T. J., D. I. Bolnick, and P. C. Wainwright. 2005. Fossil calibrations and molecular divergence time estimates in the centrarchid fishes (Teleostei: Centrarchidae). Evolution 59:1768-1782.
36. Nielsen, R. 2002. Mapping mutations on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 51:729-739.
37. Nunn, C. L. 2011. The comparative approach in evolutionary anthropology and biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
38. O'Meara, B. C., C. Ané, M. J. Sanderson, and P. C. Wainwright. 2006. Testing for different rates of continuous trait evolution using likelihood. Evolution 60:922-933.
39. Omland, K. E. 1999. The assumptions and challenges of ancestral state reconstructions. Syst. Biol. 48:604-611.
40. Pagel, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255:37-45.
41. Pagel, M. 1999. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 48:612-622.
42. Pagel, M., A. Meade, and D. Barker. 2004. Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 53:673-684.
43. Paradis, E. 2012. Analysis of phylogenetics and evolution with R. 2nd ed. Springer, New York, NY.
44. Paradis, E., J. Claude, and K. Strimmer. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289-290.
45. Plummer, M., N. Best, K. Cowles, and K. Vines. 2006. CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC. R News 6:7-11.
46. R Core Development Team. 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
47. Rabosky, D. L. 2006. Likelihood methods for detecting temporal shifts in diversification rates. Evolution 60:1152-1164.
48. Revell, L. J. 2008. On the analysis of evolutionary change along single branches in a phylogeny. Am. Nat. 172:140-147.
49. Revell, L. J. 2012. phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3:217-223.
50. Revell, L. J., and D. C. Collar. 2009. Phylogenetic analysis of the evolutionary correlation using likelihood. Evolution 63:1090-1100.
51. Revell, L. J. and L. J. Harmon. 2008. Testing quantitative genetic hypotheses about the evolutionary rate matrix for continuous characters. Evol. Ecol. Res. 10:311-321.
52. Revell, L. J., D. L. Mahler, P. R. Peres-Neto, and B. D. Redelings. 2012. A new method for identifying exceptional phenotypic diversification. Evolution 66:135-146.
53. Rice, W. R., and E. E. Hostert. 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 47:1637-1653.
54. Rohlf, F. J. 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55:2143-2160.
55. Ryan, M. J., and A. S. Rand. 1999. Phylogenetic influence on mating call preference in female túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus. Anim. Behav. 57:945-956.
56. Schluter, D., T. Price, A. Ø. Mooers, and D. Ludwig. 1997. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51:1699-1711.
57. Skinner, A., and M. S. Y. Lee. 2010. Plausibility of inferred ancestral phenotypes and the evaluation of alternative models of limb evolution in scincid lizards. Biol. Lett. 6:354-358.
58. Spiegelhalter, D. J., N. G. Best, B. P. Carlin, and A. van der Linde. 2002. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 64:583-639.
59. Stadler, T. 2011. Mammalian phylogeny reveals recent diversification rate shifts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108:6187-6192.
60. Viosca, P. 1936. A new rock bass from Louisiana and Mississippi. Copeia 1:37-45.
61. Wright, S. 1934. An analysis of variability in the number of digits in an inbred strain of guinea pigs. Genetics 19:506-536.
62. Yang, Z. 2006. Computational molecular evolution. Oxford Univ. Press: Oxford, UK.