On the analysis of evolutionary change along single branches in a phylogeny

American Naturalist

Volumn 172, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 140-147

  Revell, Liam J ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative method; Evolutionary rate; Independent contrasts; Phylogenetics; Quantitative characters

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ESTIMATION METHOD; EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; TIME;

GENETIC SPECIATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 46749098036     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/588078     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Butler, M. A., and A. A. King. 2004. Phylogenetic comparative analysis: a modeling approach for adaptive evolution. American Naturalist 164:683-695.
2. Cheverud, J. M., M. M. Dow, and W. Leutenegger. 1985. The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: sexual dimorphism in body weight among primates. Evolution 39:1335-1351.
3. Crespi, B., and M. Worobey. 1998. Comparative analysis of gall morphology in Australian gall thrips: the evolution of extended phenotypes. Evolution 52:1686-1696.
4. Crespi, B. J., and R. Teo. 2002. Comparative phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of semelparity and life history in salmonid fishes. Evolution 56:1008-1020.
5. Edwards, A. W. F., and L. L. Cavalli-Sforza. 1964. Reconstruction of evolutionary trees. Pages 67-76 in V. H. Heywood and J. McNeill, eds. Phenetic and phylogenetic classification. Systematics Association, London.
6. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 125:1-15.
7. _. 1988. Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19:445-471.
8. _. 2004. Inferring phylogenies. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
9. Garland, T., Jr. 1992. Rate tests for phenotypic evolution using phylogenetically independent contrasts. American Naturalist 140:509-519.
10. Garland, T., Jr., and A. R. Ives. 2000. Using the past to predict the present: confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. American Naturalist 155:346-364.
11. Garland, T., Jr., P. H. Harvey, and A. R. Ives. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Systematic Biology 41:18-32.
12. Garland, T., Jr., A. W. Dickerman, C. M. Janis, and J. A. Jones. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Systematic Biology 42:265-292.
13. Garland, T., Jr., P. E. Midford, and A. R. Ives. 1999. An introduction to phylogenetically based statistical methods, with a new method for confidence intervals on ancestral values. American Zoologist 39:374-388.
14. Grafen, A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 326:119-157.
15. Hansen, T. F. 1997. Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation. Evolution 51:1341-1351.
16. Hansen, T. F., and E. P. Martins. 1996. Translating between microevolutionary process and macroevolutionary patterns: the correlation structure of interspecific data. Evolution 50:1404-1417.
17. Harrison, M. K., and B. J. Crespi. 1999. A phylogenetic test of ecomorphological adaptation in Cancer crabs. Evolution 53:961-965.
18. Harvey, P. H., and M. D. Pagel. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
19. Harvey, P. H., and A. Purvis. 1991. Comparative methods for explaining adaptations. Nature 351:619-624.
20. Hendry, A. P., and M. T. Kinnison. 1999. The pace of modern life: measuring rates of contemporary microevolution. Evolution 53:1637-1653.
21. Klingenberg, C. P., and W. Ekau. 1996. A combined morphometric and phylogenetic analysis of an ecomorphological trend: pelagization of Antarctic fishes (Perciformes: Nototheniidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 59:143-177.
22. Larson, A., and J. B. Losos. 1996. Phylogenetic systematics of adaptation. Pages 187-220 in M. R. Rose and G. V. Lauder, eds. Adaptation. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
23. McPeek, M. A. 1995. Testing hypotheses about evolutionary change on single branches of a phylogeny using evolutionary contrasts. American Naturalist 145:686-703.
24. _. 1999. Biochemical evolution associated with antipredator adaptation in damselflies. Evolution 53:1835-1845.
25. McPeek, M. A., and J. M. Brown. 2000. Building a regional species pool: diversification of the Enallagma damselflies in eastern North America. Ecology 81:904-920.
26. McPeek, M. A., A. K. Schrot, and J. M. Brown. 1996. Adaptation to predators in a new community: swimming performance and predator avoidance in damselflies. Ecology 77:617-629.
27. O'Meara, B. C., C. Ané, M. J. Sanderson, and P. C. Wainwright. 2006. Testing for different rates of continuous trait evolution using likelihood. Evolution 60:922-933.
28. Revell, L. J. 2007. Testing the genetic constraint hypothesis in a phylogenetic context: a simulation study. Evolution 61:2720-2727.
29. Revell, L. J., and L. J. Harmon. 2008. Testing quantitative genetic hypotheses about the evolutionary rate matrix for continuous characters. Evolutionary Ecology Research 10:311-331.
30. Revell, L. J., L. J. Harmon, R. B. Langerhans, and J. J. Kolbe. 2007a. A phylogenetic approach to determining the importance of constraint on phenotypic evolution in the Neotropical lizard Anolis cristatellus. Evolutionary Ecology Research 9:261-282.
31. Revell, L. J., M. A. Johnson, J. A. Schulte, II, J. J. Kolbe, and J. B. Losos. 2007b. A phylogenetic test for adaptive convergence in rock-dwelling lizards. Evolution 61:2898-2912.
32. Ridley, M. 1983. The explanation of organic diversity: the comparative method and adaptations for mating. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
33. Rohlf, F. J. 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55:2143-2160.
34. Schluter, D., T. Price, A. Ø. Mooers, and D. Ludwig. 1997. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51:1699-1711.
35. Stoks, R., and M. A. McPeek. 2006. A tale of two diversifications: reciprocal habitat shifts to fill ecological space along the pond permanence gradient. American Naturalist 168(suppl.):S50-S72.
36. Stoks, R., M. A. McPeek, and J. L. Mitchell. 2003. Evolution of prey behavior in response to changes in predation regime: damselflies in fish and dragonfly lakes. Evolution 57:574-585.
37. Thomas, G. H., R. P. Freckleton, and T. Székely. 2006. Comparative analysis of the influence of developmental mode on phenotypic diversification rates in shorebirds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273:1619-1624.
38. Wiens, J. J., G. Parra-Olea, M. García-París, and D. B. Wake. 2007. Phylogenetic history underlies elevational biodiversity patterns in tropical salamanders. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274:919-928.