Identifying hidden rate changes in the evolution of a binary morphological character: The evolution of plant habit in campanulid angiosperms

Systematic Biology

Volumn 62, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 725-737

  Beaulieu, Jeremy M ^a   O'Meara, Brian C ^b   Donoghue, Michael J ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882742839     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syt034     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abramowitz M., Stegun I.A. 1972. Handbook of mathematical functions, with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. Washington (DC): National Bureau of Standards.
2. AkaikeH. 1974. A newlook at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19:716-723.
3. Alvarez I., Wendel J.F. 2003. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 29:417-434.
4. The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 161:105-121.
5. Beaulieu J.M., Jhwueng D.-C., Boettiger C., O'Meara, B.C. 2012a. Modeling stabilizing selection: expanding the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model of adaptive evolution. Evolution 66:2369-2383.
6. Beaulieu J.M. Ree R.H., Cavender-Bares J., Weiblen G.D., Donoghue M.J. 2012b. Synthesizing phylogenetic knowledge for ecological research. Ecology 93:S4-S13.
7. Beaulieu J.M., Tank D.C., Donoghue M.J. 2013.ASouthern Hemisphere origin for campanulid angiosperms and traces of the break-up of Gondwana. BMC Evolutionary Biology 13:80.
8. Bremer K., Friis E.M., Bremer B. 2004. Molecular phylogenetic dating of asterid flowering plants shows Early Cretaceous diversification. Systematic Biology 53:496-505.
9. Bremer K., Gustafsson M.H.G. 1997. East Gondwana ancestry of the sunflower alliance of families. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94: 9188-9190.
10. Britton T., Anderson C.J., Jacquet D., Lundqvist S., Bremer K. 2007. Estimating divergence times in large phylogenetic trees. Syst. Biol. 56:741-752.
11. Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer.
12. Butler M.A., King A.A. 2004. Phylogenetic comparative analysis: a modeling approach for adaptive evolution. Am. Nat. 164: 683-695.
13. Carlquist, S. 1974. Island biology. New York and London: Columbia University Press.
14. Colless D.H. 1982. Review of phylogenetics: the theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. Syst. Zool. 31:100-104.
15. CronquistA. 1968. The evolution and classification of flowering plants. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
16. Donoghue M.J. 2008. A phylogenetic perspective on the distribution of plant species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105:11549-11555.
17. Edgar R.C. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuray and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792-1797.
18. Felsenstein J. 1981. A likelihood approach to character weighting and what it tells us about parsimony and compatibility. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 16:183-196.
19. Felsenstein J. 2005. Using the quantitative genetic threshold model for inferences between and within species. Philos. T R Soc B 360: 1427-1434.
20. Felsenstein J. 2012. A comparative method for both discrete and continuous characters using the threshold method. Am. Nat. 179:145-156.
21. Felsenstein J., Churchill G.A. 1996. A hidden Markov model approach to variation among sites in rate of evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 93-104.
22. Formann A.K. 1985. Constrained latent class models: theory and applications. Brit. J. Math. Stat. Psy. 38:87-111.
23. FitchW.M., Markowitz E. 1970. An improved method for determining codon variability and its application to the rate of fixation of mutations in evolution. Biochem. Genet. 4:579-593.
24. FitzJohn R.G., Maddison W.P., Otto S.P. 2009. Estimating traitdependent speciation and extinction rates from incompletely resolved phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 58:595-611.
25. Funk V.A., Bayer R.J., Keeley S., Chan R.,Watson L., Gemeinholzer B., Schilling E., Panero J.L., Baldwin B.G., Garcia-Jacas N., Susanna A., Jansen R.K. 2005. Everywhere but Antarctica: using a supertree to understand the diversity and distribution of the Compositae. Biol. Skr. Dan. Vid. Sel. 55:343-374.
26. Galtier N. 2001. A maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis under a covarion-like model. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:866-873.
27. Geeta R., Davalos L.M., Levy A., Bohs L., Lavin M., Mummenhoff K., Sinha N., Wojciechowski M.F. 2012. Keeping it simple: flowering plants tend to retain, and revert to, simple leaves. New Phytol. 193:481-493.
28. Groover A.T. 2005. What genes make a tree a tree? Trends Plant Sci. 10:210-214.
29. Johnson S.G. 2012. TheNLopt nonlinear-optimization package.Version 2.3, http://ab-initio.mit.edu/nlopt.
30. Koshi J.M., Goldstein R.A. 1996. Probabilistic reconstruction of ancestral protein sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 42:313-320.
31. Lens F., Smets E., Melzer S. 2012. Stem anatomy supports Arabidopsis thaliana as a model for insular woodiness. New Phytol. 193: 12-17.
32. Maddison W.P. 1993. Missing data versus missing characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:576-581.
33. Maddison W.P. 2006. Confounding asymmetries in evolutionary diversification and character change. Evolution 60:1743-1746.
34. Maddison W.P., Maddison D.R. 2011. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.75, http://mesquiteproject.org.
35. Marazzi B., Ane C., Simon M.F., Delgado-Salinas A., Luckow M., Sanderson M.J. 2012. Locating evolutionary precursors on a phylogenetic tree. Evolution 66:3918-3930.
36. Martinez-Millán M. 2010. Fossil record and age of the Asteridae. Bot. Rev. 76:83-135.
37. O'Meara B.C. 2007. Estimating different rates of gene loss on a tree. Genetics 117:1415-1416.
38. O'Meara B.C., Ane C., Sanderson M.J., Wainwright P.C. 2006. Testing for different rates of continuous trait evolution. Evolution 60: 922-933.
39. PagelM. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 255:37-45.
40. Pagel M., Meade A. 2004. A phylogenetic mixture model for detecting pattern-heterogeneity in gene sequence or character-state data. Syst. Biol. 53:571-581.
41. Pagel M., Meade A. 2006. Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Am. Nat. 167:808-825.
42. Panero J.L., Funk V.A. 2008. The value of sampling anomalous taxa in phylogenetic studies: major clade of the Asteraceae revealed. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 47:757-782.
43. Penny D., McCormish B.J., Charleston M.A., Hendy M.D. 2001. Mathematical elegance with biochemical realism: the covarion model of molecular evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 53:711-723.
44. Sargent R.D. 2004. Floral symmetry affects speciation rates in angiosperms. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 271:603-608.
45. Schliep K.P. 2011. phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27:592-593.
46. Slowinski J.B. 1990. Probabilities of n-trees under two models: a demonstration that asymmetrical interior nodes are not improbable. Syst. Zool. 39:89-94.
47. Smith S.A., Beaulieu J.M., Donoghue M.J. 2009. Mega-phylogeny approach for comparative biology: an alternative to supertree and supermatrix approaches. BMC Evol. Biol. 9:1-12.
48. Smith S.A., Beaulieu J.M., Stamatakis A., Donoghue M.J. 2011. Understanding angiosperm diversification using small and large phylogenetic trees. Am. J. Bot. 98:1-12.
49. StamatakisA. 2006. Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688-2690.
50. Tank D.C., Donoghue M.J. 2010. Phylogeny and phylogenetic nomenclature of the Campanulidae based on an expanded sample of genes and taxa. Syst. Bot. 35:425-441.
51. Thomas G.H., Freckleton R.P., Szekely T. 2006.Comparative analyses of the influence of developmental mode on phenotypic diversification rates in shorebirds. P R Soc.London B 273:1619-1624.
52. Vamosi J.C., Vamosi S.M. 2010. Key innovations within a geographical context in flowering plants: towards resolving Darwin's abominable mystery. Ecol. Lett. 13:1270-1279.
53. Wright S. 1934. An analysis of variability in the number of digits in an inbred strain of guinea pigs. Genetics 19:506-536.
54. Yang Z. 1994.Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation fromDNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39:306-314.
55. Yang Z. 2006. Computational molecular evolution. London: Oxford.
56. Yang Z., Kumar S., Nei M. 1995. A new method of inference of ancestral nucleotide and amino acid sequences. Genetics 141: 1641-1650.