Mapping mutations on phylogenies

Systematic Biology

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 729-739

  Nielsen, Rasmus ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Data augmentation; DNA sequence evolution; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Phylogenetics

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHROMOSOME MAP; CONFERENCE PAPER; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MUTATION; PHYLOGENY; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MUTATION; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 0036804625     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150290102393     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Bush, R. M., W. M. Fitch, C. A. Bender, and N. J. Cox. 1999. Positive selection on the H3 hemagglutinin gene of human influenza virus A. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1457-1465.
2. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:368-376.
3. Fitch, W. M., R. M. Bush, C. A. Bender, and N. J. Cox. 1997. Long term trends in the evolution of H(3) HA1 human influenza type A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:7712-7718.
4. Hastings, W. K. 1970. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57:97-109.
5. Huelsenbeck, J. P., B. Rannala, and B. Larget. 2000. A Bayesian framework for the analysis of cospeciation. Evolution 54:353-364.
6. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes 2.0. Available from http://brahms.biology.rochester.edu/software.html
7. Jukes, T. H., and C. R. Cantor. 1969. Evolution of Protein Molecules. Pages 21-123 in Mammalian Protein Metabolism (H. N. Munro, ed.). Academic Press, New York.
8. Larget, B., and D. Simon. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:750-759.
9. Meng, X.-L. 1994. Posterior predictive p-values. Ann. Stat. 22:1142-1160.
10. Metropolis, N., A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller. 1953. Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21:1087-1091.
11. Nielsen, R. 2001. Mutations as missing data: Inferences on the ages and distributions of nonsynonymous and synonymous mutations. Genetics (in press).
12. Rubin, D. B. 1984. Bayesianly justifiable and relevant frequency calculations for the applied statisticians. Ann. Stat. 12:1151-1172.
13. Swofford, D. L. 2001. PAUP* 4.0b2. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
14. Tavaré, S. 1986. Some probabilistic and statistical problems on the analysis of DNA sequences. Lect. Math. Life. Sci. 17:57-86.
15. Templeton, A. R. 1996. Contingency tests of neutrality using intra/interspecific gene trees: The rejection of neutrality for the evolution of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II gene in the hominoid primates. Genetics 144:1263-1270.
16. Wyckoff, G. J., W. Wang, and C. I. Wu. 2000. Rapid evolution of male reproductive genes in the descent of man. Nature 403:304-309.
17. Yang, Z., R. Nielsen, N. Goldman, and A.-M. K. Pedersen. 2000. Codon-substitution models for variable selection pressure at amino acid sites. Genetics 155:431-449.
18. Yang, Z., and B. Rannala. 1997. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: A Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:717-724.