Thermodilution vs pressure recording analytical method in hemodynamic stabilized patients

Journal of Critical Care

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 260-264

  Donati, Abele ^a   Carsetti, Andrea ^a   Tondi, Stefania ^a   Scorcella, Claudia ^a   Domizi, Roberta ^a   Damiani, Elisa ^a   Gabbanelli, Vincenzo ^a   Münch, Christopher ^b   Adrario, Erica ^a   Pelaia, Paolo ^a   Cecconi, Maurizio ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITÀ POLITECNICA DELLE MARCHE   (Italy)

^b OSPEDALI RIUNITI   (Italy)

^c ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cardiac output; Hemodynamic monitoring; Pressure recording analytical method; Thermodilution

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; CARDIOVASCULAR MONITORING DEVICE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; HEART OUTPUT; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT ERROR; PRESSURE RECORDING ANALYTICAL METHOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; THERMODILUTION; THERMODILUTION DEVICE; ADULT; AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; CRITICAL ILLNESS; DEVICES; FEMALE; GERMANY; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CATHETERIZATION, SWAN-GANZ; CRITICAL ILLNESS; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 84896722234     PISSN: 08839441     EISSN: 15578615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ganz W., Donoso R., Marcus H.S., et al. A new technique for measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution in man. Am J Cardiol 1971, 27:392-396.
2. Hadian M., Pinsky M.R. Evidence-based review of the use of the pulmonary artery catheter: impact data and complications. Crit Care 2006, 10(Suppl 3):S8.
3. Harvey S., Harrison D.A., Singer M., et al. Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC-Man): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005, 366:472-477.
4. Vincent J.L., Rhodes A., Perel A., et al. Clinical review: update on hemodynamic monitoring-a consensus of 16. Crit Care 2011, 15:229.
5. Goedje O., Hoeke K., Lichtwarck-Aschoff M., et al. Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1999, 27:2407-2412.
6. Romano S.M., Pistolesi M. Assessment of cardiac output from systemic arterial pressure in humans. Crit Care Med 2002, 30:1834-1841.
7. Giomarelli P., Biagioli B., Scolletta S. Cardiac output monitoring by pressure recording analytical method in cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004, 26:515-520.
8. Scolletta S., Romano S.M., Biagioli B., et al. Pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) for measurement of cardiac output during various haemodynamic states. Br J Anaesth 2005, 95:159-165.
9. Romagnoli S., Romano S.M., Bevilacqua S., et al. Cardiac output by arterial pulse contour: reliability under hemodynamic derangements. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2009, 8:642-646.
10. Zangrillo A., Maj G., Monaco F., et al. Cardiac index validation using the pressure recording analytic method in unstable patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010, 24:265-269.
11. Scolletta S., Franchi F., Taccone F.S., et al. An uncalibrated pulse contour method to measure cardiac output during aortic counterpulsation. Anesth Analg 2011, 113:1389-1395.
12. Franchi F., Silvestri R., Cubattoli L., et al. Comparison between an uncalibrated pulse contour method and thermodilution technique for cardiac output estimation in septic patients. Br J Anaesth 2011, 107:202-208.
13. Takala J., Ruokonen E., Tenhunen J.J., et al. Early non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in hemodynamically unstable intensive care patients: a multi-center randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2011, 15:R148.
14. Scolletta S., Taccone F.S., Romagnoli S., et al. Pressure recording analytical method to measure cardiac output after cardiac surgery: some practical considerations. Br J Anaesth 2011, 107:814-815.
15. Romagnoli S., Romano S.M., Bevilacqua S., et al. Dynamic response of liquid-filled catheter systems for measurement of blood pressure: precision of measurements and reliability of the Pressure Recording Analytical Method with different disposable systems. J Crit Care 2011, 26:415-422.
16. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, 1:307-310.
17. Critchley L.A., Critchley J.A. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999, 15:85-91.
18. Cecconi M., Parsons A.K., Rhodes A. What is a fluid challenge?. Curr Opin Crit Care 2011, 17:290-295.
19. Shoemaker W.C., Appel P.L., Kram H.B., et al. Prospective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high-risk surgical patients. Chest 1988, 94:1176-1186.
20. Donati A., Loggi S., Preiser J.C., et al. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy reduces morbidity and length of hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients. Chest 2007, 132:1817-1824.
21. Rhodes A., Cecconi M., Hamilton M., et al. Goal-directed therapy in high-risk surgical patients: a 15-year follow-up study. Intensive Care Med 2010, 36:1327-1332.
22. Vincent J.L., Pinsky M.R., Sprung C.L., et al. The pulmonary artery catheter: in medio virtus. Crit Care Med 2008, 36:3093-3096.
23. Donati A., Nardella R., Gabbanelli V., et al. The ability of PiCCO versus LiDCO variables to detect changes in cardiac index: a prospective clinical study. Minerva Anestesiol 2008, 74:367-374.
24. Franchi F., Falciani E., Donadello K., et al. Echocardiography and pulse contour analysis to assess cardiac output in trauma patients. Minerva Anestesiol 2013, 79:137-146.
25. Calamandrei M., Mirabile L., Muschetta S., et al. Assessment of cardiac output in children: a comparison between the pressure recording analytical method and Doppler echocardiography. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2008, 9:310-312.
26. Paarmann H., Groesdonk H.V., Sedemund-Adib B., et al. Lack of agreement between pulmonary arterial thermodilution cardiac output and the pressure recording analytical method in postoperative cardiac surgery patients. Br J Anaesth 2011, 106:475-481.
27. Biais M., Cottenceau V., Stecken L., et al. Evaluation of stroke volume variations obtained with the pressure recording analytic method. Crit Care Med 2012, 40:1186-1191.
28. Cecconi M., Grounds M., Rhodes A. Methodologies for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement: are we as good as we think we are?. Curr Opin Crit Care 2007, 13:294-296.
29. Cecconi M., Rhodes A., Poloniecki J., et al. Bench-to-bedside review: the importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies-with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care 2009, 13:201.
30. Hadian M., Kim H.K., Severyn D.A., et al. Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters. Crit Care 2010, 14:R212.