Lack of agreement between pulmonary arterial thermodilution cardiac output and the pressure recording analytical method in postoperative cardiac surgery patients

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 106, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 475-481

  Paarmann, H ^a   Groesdonk, H V ^a,b   Sedemund Adib, B ^a   Hanke, T ^a   Heinze, H ^a   Heringlake, M ^a   Schon J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

cardiac surgery; haemodynamic monitoring; pressure recorded analytical method; pulmonary arterial thermodilution; pulse contour analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTUBATION; FEMALE; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PATIENT MONITORING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; RELIABILITY; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 79952935360     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeq372     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Heringlake M, Heinze H, Misfeld M, Klaus S, Bechtel M. Goaldirected hemodynamic optimization in high-risk cardiac surgery patients: A tale from the past or a future obligation? Minerva Anestesiol 2008; 74: 251-8 (Pubitemid 352037785)
2. Kastrup M, Markewitz A, Spies C, et al. Current practice of hemodynamic monitoring and vasopressor and inotropic therapy in post-operative cardiac surgery patients in Germany. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 3: 347-58
3. Buhre W, Weyland A, Kazmaier S, et al. Comparison of cardiac output assessed by pulse contour analysis and thermodilution in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1999; 13: 437-40 (Pubitemid 29383901)
4. Button D, Weibel L, Reuthebuch O, Genoni M, Zollinger A, Hofer CK. Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/Vigileo system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 329-36 (Pubitemid 47316385)
5. De Castro V, Goarin JP, Lhotel L, Mabrouk N, Perel A, Coriat P. Comparison of stroke volume (SV) and stroke volume respiratory variation (SVV) measures by the axillary artery pulse-contour method and by aortic Doppler echocardiography in patients undergoing aortic surgery. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97: 605-10 (Pubitemid 44593853)
6. Missant C, Rex S, Wouters PF. Accuracy of cardiac output measurements with pulse contour analysis (PulseCO) and Doppler echocardiography during off-pump coronary bypass grafting. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008; 25: 243-8 (Pubitemid 351170389)
7. Bernstein DP. Pressure pulse contour-derived stroke volume and cardiac output in the morbidly obese patient. Obes Surg 2008; 8: 1015-21
8. Romano SM, Pistolesi M. Assessment of cardiac output from systemic arterial pressure in humans. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 1834-41 (Pubitemid 34879600)
9. Faltoni A, Franchi F, Bigio E, et al. Cardiac output thermodilution and the MostCare system in patients on intra-aortic balloon pump. Crit Care 2009; 13(Suppl. 1): P225
10. Zangrillo A, Maj G, Monaco F, et al. Cardiac index validation using the pressure recording analytical method in unstable patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 24: 265-9
11. Scoletta S, Romano SM, Biagioli B, Capannini G, Giomarelli P. Pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) for measurement of cardiac output during various haemodynamic states. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 159-65 (Pubitemid 41487138)
12. Romagnoli S, Romano SM, Bevilacqua S, et al. Cardiac output by pulse contour: Reliability under hemodynamic derangements. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2009; 8: 642-6
13. Giomarelli P, Biagioli B, Scolletta S. Cardiac output monitoring by pressure recording analytical method in cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 26: 515-20 (Pubitemid 39091989)
14. Baba T, Goto T, Yoshitake A, Shibata Y. Radial artery diameter with increased femoral to radial arterial pressure gradient during cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 252-8 (Pubitemid 27349129)
15. Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Pompei L, Coccia C, Pietropaoli P. Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement: Pulmonary artery catheter versus aortic transpulmonary technique. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 350-6 (Pubitemid 34213579)
16. Roding G, Prasser C, Keyl C, Liebhold A, Hobbhahn J. Continuous cardiac output measurement: Pulse contour analysis vs thermodilution technique in cardiac surgical patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 525-30 (Pubitemid 29151232)
17. Comton FD, Zukunft B, Hoffmann C, Zidek W, Schaefer JH. Performance of a minimally invasive uncalibrated cardiac output monitoring system (Flowtrac/Vigileo) in haemodynamically unstable patients. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100: 451-6 (Pubitemid 351773603)
18. Mayer J, Boldt J, Beschmann R, Stephan A, Suttner S. Uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis for less-invasive cardiac output determination in obese patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103: 185-90
19. Chatti R, de Rudniki S, Marque S, et al. Comparison of two versions of the Vigileo-FloTrackTM system (1.03 and 1.07) for stroke volume estimation: A multicentre, blinded comparison with oesophageal Doppler measurements. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 463-9
20. Elkayam U, Berkley R, Azen S, Weber L, Geva B, Henry WL. Cardiac output by thermodilution technique. Effect of injectate's volume and temperature on accuracy and reproducibility in the critically ill patient. Chest 1983; 84: 418-22 (Pubitemid 14233049)
21. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999; 15: 85-91 (Pubitemid 29278438)
22. Romano SM, Scoletta S, Olivotto I, et al. Systemic arterial waveform analysis and assessment of blood flow during extracorporeal circulation. Perfusion 2006; 21: 109-16
23. Calamandrei M, Mirabile L, Muschetta S, Gensini GF, De Simone L, Romano SM. Assessment of cardiac output in children: A comparison between the pressure recording analytical method and Doppler echocardiography. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2008; 9: 310-2 (Pubitemid 351677677)
24. Bazaral MG, Petre J, Novoa R. Errors in thermodilution cardiac output measurements caused by rapid pulmonary artery temperature decreases after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 31-7
25. Bendjelid K, Schütz N, Stuter PM, Romand JA. Continuous cardiac output monitoring after cardiopulmonary bypass: A comparison with bolus thermodilution measurement. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32: 919-22 (Pubitemid 43781377)
26. Heerdt PM, Pond CG, Blessios GA, Rosenbloom M. Inaccuracy of cardiac output by thermodilution during acute tricuspid regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 53: 706-8
27. Jansen JRC, Versprille A. Improvement of cardiac output estimation by the thermodilution method during mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 1986; 12: 71-9 (Pubitemid 16162642)
28. Mayer J, Boldt J, Schöllhorn T, Röhm KD, Menigstu AM, Suttner S. Semi-invasive monitoring of cardiac output by a new device using arterial pressure waveform analysis: A comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98: 176-82 (Pubitemid 47071996)
29. Myles PS, Cui J. Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 309-11 (Pubitemid 47316383)