Comparison between an uncalibrated pulse contour method and thermodilution technique for cardiac output estimation in septic patients

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 107, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 202-208

  Franchi, F ^a   Silvestri, R ^a   Cubattoli, L ^a   Taccone, F S ^b   Donadello, K ^b   Romano, S M ^c   Giomarelli, P ^a   McBride, W T ^d   Scolletta, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^b ERASME HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^d ROYAL VICTORIA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cardiac output; pulse contour methods; sepsis; thermodilution technique

Indexed keywords

NORADRENALIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY HEMODYNAMICS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; GOLD STANDARD; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; SEPSIS; THERMODILUTION; UNCALIBRATED PULSE CONTOUR METHOD;

EID: 79960547791     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer123     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1368-77
2. Pinsky MR. Hemodynamic evaluation and monitoring in the ICU. Chest 2007; 132: 2020-9
3. Dhingra VK, Fenwick JC, Walley KR, Chittock DR, Ronco JJ. Lack of agreement between thermodilution and Fick cardiac output in critically ill patients. Chest 2002; 122: 990-7
4. Harvey S, Harrison DA, Singer M, et al. Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC-Man): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 472-7 (Pubitemid 41111695)
5. Vincent JL, Pinsky MR, Sprung CL, et al. The pulmonary artery catheter: in medio virtus. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 3093-6
6. Mayer J, Suttner S. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009; 22: 804-8
7. Rödig G, Prasser C, Keyl C, Liebold A, Hobbhahn J. Continuous cardiac output measurement: pulse contour analysis vs thermo-dilution technique in cardiac surgical patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 525-30 (Pubitemid 29151232)
8. Romagnoli S, Romano SM. Estimation of hemodynamic par-ameters by arterial waveform: available technologies. Anesth Analg 2010; 110: 257-8
9. MonnetX, Anguel N, Naudin B, JabotJ, Richard C,TeboulJL. Arter-ial pressure-based cardiac output in septic patients: different accuracy of pulse contour and uncalibrated pressure waveform devices. Crit Care 2010; 14: R109
10. Hamzaoui O, Monnet X, Richard C, Osman D, Chemla D, Teboul JL Effects of changes in vascular tone on the agreement between pulse contour and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements within an up to 6-hour calibration-free period. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 434-40 (Pubitemid 351158616)
11. Romano SM, Pistolesi M. Assessment of cardiac output from sys-temic arterial pressure in humans. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 1834-41 (Pubitemid 34879600)
12. Giomarelli P, Biagioli B, Scolletta S. Cardiac output monitoring by pressure recording analytical method in cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 26: 515-20 (Pubitemid 39091989)
13. Scolletta S, Romano SM, Biagioli B, Capannini G, Giomarelli P. Pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) for measurement of cardiac output during various haemodynamic states. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 159-65 (Pubitemid 41487138)
14. Calamandrei M, Mirabile L, Muschetta S, Gensini GF, De Simone L, Romano SM. Assessment of cardiac output in children: a comparison between the pressure recording analytical method and Doppler echocardiography. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2008; 9: 310-2 (Pubitemid 351677677)
15. Kleinman B, Powell S, Kumar P, Gardner RM. The fast flush test measures the dynamic response of the entire blood pressure monitoring system. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 1215-20 (Pubitemid 23001134)
16. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2010, ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available from http:// www.R-project.org
17. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agree-ment between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-10 (Pubitemid 16134762)
18. Critchley LAH, Critchley JAJH. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measure-ment techniques. J Clin Monitor 1999; 15: 85-91 (Pubitemid 29278438)
19. Myles PS, Cui J. Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 309-11 (Pubitemid 47316383)
20. Carstensen B, Simpson J, Gurrin L. Statistical models for assessing agreement in method comparison studies with replicate measurements. Available from http://staff.pubhealth.ku.dk/~bxc/ MethComp/lam-bsa.pdf (accessed on June 2008)
21. Carstensen B, Gurrin L. MethComp: functions for analysis of method comparison studies. R package version 1.2-1. Available from http://www. pubhealth.ku.dk/~bxc/MethComp/introMeth Comp.pdf (January 2010)
22. Biancofiore G, Critchley LAH, Lee A, et al. Evaluation of an uncali-brated arterial pulse contour cardiac output monitor system in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver surgery. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 47-54
23. Jansen JR, Schreuder JJ, Mulier JP, Smith NT, Settels JJ, Wesseling KH. A comparison of cardiac output derived from the arterial pressure wave against thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 212-22 (Pubitemid 32750529)
24. Perrino AC, Harris SN, Luther MA. Intraoperative determination of cardiac output using multiplane transesophageal echocardiogra-phy: a comparison to thermodilution. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 350-7 (Pubitemid 28373423)
25. Sakka SG, Kozieras J, Thuemer O, Van Hout N. Measurement of cardiac output: a comparison between transpulmonary thermo-dilution and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 337-42 (Pubitemid 47316386)
26. Manecke GR Jr, Auger WR. Cardiac output determination from the arterial pressure wave: clinical testing of a novel algorithm that does not require calibration. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007; 21: 3-7 (Pubitemid 46199245)
27. Langewouters GJ, Wesseling KH, Goedhard WJ. The pressure-dependent dynamic elasticity of 35 thoracic and 16 abdominal human aortas in vitro described by a five-component model. J Biomech 1985; 18: 613-20 (Pubitemid 15023815)
28. Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, et al. Cardiac output measurement in patients undergoing liver transplantation: pul-monary artery catheter versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 1480-6
29. Gardner RM. Direct blood pressure measurement: dynamic response requirements. Anesthesiology 1981; 54: 227-36 (Pubitemid 11154044)
30. Gibbs N, Gardner RM. Dynamics of invasive pressure monitoring systems: clinical and laboratory evaluation. Heart Lung 1988; 17:43-51 (Pubitemid 18061110)
31. O'Rourke MF, Gallagher DE. Pulse wave analysis. J Hypertens 1996; 14: S147-57 (Pubitemid 27051090)
32. Scolletta S, Ranaldi G, Carlucci F, Franchi F, Romano SM, Biagioli B. Relationship between N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (Nt-proBNP) and cardiac cycle efficiency in cardiac surgery. Biomed Pharmacother 2010; 64: 511-5