DNA damage: RNA-binding proteins protect from near and far

Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 141-149

  Dutertre, Martin ^a,b   Lambert, Sarah ^a,b   Carreira, Aura ^a,b   Amor Guéret, Mounira ^a,b   Vagner, Stéphan ^a,b  

^a INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^b CNRS UMR3348   (France)

Author keywords

DNA damage response; MRNA translation; Post transcriptional control of gene expression; RNA processing

Indexed keywords

LONG UNTRANSLATED RNA; RNA BINDING PROTEIN; UNTRANSLATED RNA;

CELL SURVIVAL; DNA DAMAGE; DNA METABOLISM; DNA REPAIR; DNA STRUCTURE; GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUNCTION; GENETIC REGULATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN RNA BINDING; REVIEW; RNA METABOLISM; UPREGULATION;

DNA DAMAGE RESPONSE; MRNA TRANSLATION; POST-TRANSCRIPTIONAL CONTROL OF GENE EXPRESSION; RNA PROCESSING;

ANIMALS; DNA; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; HUMANS; RNA; RNA-BINDING PROTEINS;

EID: 84896716550     PISSN: 09680004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.01.003     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Aguilera A., Garcia-Muse T. Causes of genome instability. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2013, 47:1-32.
2. Glisovic T., et al. RNA-binding proteins and post-transcriptional gene regulation. FEBS Lett. 2008, 582:1977-1986.
3. Lunde B.M., et al. RNA-binding proteins: modular design for efficient function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8:479-490.
4. Jungmichel S., et al. Proteome-wide identification of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation targets in different genotoxic stress responses. Mol. Cell 2013, 52:272-285.
5. Matsuoka S., et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 2007, 316:1160-1166.
6. Adamson B., et al. A genome-wide homologous recombination screen identifies the RNA-binding protein RBMX as a component of the DNA-damage response. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14:318-328.
7. Paulsen R.D., et al. A genome-wide siRNA screen reveals diverse cellular processes and pathways that mediate genome stability. Mol. Cell 2009, 35:228-239.
8. Kleiman F.E., Manley J.L. The BARD1-CstF-50 interaction links mRNA 3' end formation to DNA damage and tumor suppression. Cell 2001, 104:743-753.
9. Mirkin N., et al. The 3' processing factor CstF functions in the DNA repair response. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36:1792-1804.
10. Nazeer F.I., et al. p53 inhibits mRNA 3' processing through its interaction with the CstF/BARD1 complex. Oncogene 2011, 30:3073-3083.
11. Dutertre M., et al. The emerging role of pre-messenger RNA splicing in stress responses: sending alternative messages and silent messengers. RNA Biol. 2011, 8:740-747.
12. Ip J.Y., et al. Global impact of RNA polymerase II elongation inhibition on alternative splicing regulation. Genome Res. 2011, 21:390-401.
13. Fan J., et al. Global analysis of stress-regulated mRNA turnover by using cDNA arrays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99:10611-10616.
14. Braunstein S., et al. Regulation of protein synthesis by ionizing radiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009, 29:5645-5656.
15. Kruiswijk F., et al. Coupled activation and degradation of eEF2K regulates protein synthesis in response to genotoxic stress. Sci. Signal. 2012, 5:ra40.
16. Lu X., et al. Radiation-induced changes in gene expression involve recruitment of existing messenger RNAs to and away from polysomes. Cancer Res. 2006, 66:1052-1061.
17. Masuda K., et al. Global dissociation of HuR-mRNA complexes promotes cell survival after ionizing radiation. EMBO J. 2011, 30:1040-1053.
18. Zhang X., et al. The ATM kinase induces microRNA biogenesis in the DNA damage response. Mol. Cell 2011, 41:371-383.
19. Badura M., et al. DNA damage and eIF4G1 in breast cancer cells reprogram translation for survival and DNA repair mRNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:18767-18772.
20. Kumaraswamy S., et al. Radiation-induced gene translation profiles reveal tumor type and cancer-specific components. Cancer Res. 2008, 68:3819-3826.
21. Powley I.R., et al. Translational reprogramming following UVB irradiation is mediated by DNA-PKcs and allows selective recruitment to the polysomes of mRNAs encoding DNA repair enzymes. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:1207-1220.
22. Decorsiere A., et al. Essential role for the interaction between hnRNP H/F and a G quadruplex in maintaining p53 pre-mRNA 3'-end processing and function during DNA damage. Genes Dev. 2011, 25:220-225.
23. Candeias M.M., et al. P53 mRNA controls p53 activity by managing Mdm2 functions. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10:1098-1105.
24. Grover R., et al. Polypyrimidine tract binding protein regulates IRES-mediated translation of p53 isoforms. Cell Cycle 2008, 7:2189-2198.
25. Mazan-Mamczarz K., et al. RNA-binding protein HuR enhances p53 translation in response to ultraviolet light irradiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:8354-8359.
26. Takagi M., et al. Regulation of p53 translation and induction after DNA damage by ribosomal protein L26 and nucleolin. Cell 2005, 123:49-63.
27. Gajjar M., et al. The p53 mRNA-Mdm2 interaction controls Mdm2 nuclear trafficking and is required for p53 activation following DNA damage. Cancer Cell 2012, 21:25-35.
28. Keene J.D. RNA regulons: coordination of post-transcriptional events. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8:533-543.
29. Glorian V., et al. HuR-dependent loading of miRNA RISC to the mRNA encoding the Ras-related small GTPase RhoB controls its translation during UV-induced apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2011, 18:1692-1701.
30. Wang W., et al. HuR regulates p21 mRNA stabilization by UV light. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20:760-769.
31. Dutertre M., et al. Exon-based clustering of murine breast tumor transcriptomes reveals alternative exons whose expression is associated with metastasis. Cancer Res. 2010, 70:896-905.
32. Paronetto M.P., et al. The Ewing sarcoma protein regulates DNA damage-induced alternative splicing. Mol. Cell 2011, 43:353-368.
33. Chen Y., et al. SKIP counteracts p53-mediated apoptosis via selective regulation of p21Cip1 mRNA splicing. Genes Dev. 2011, 25:701-716.
34. Dutertre M., et al. Cotranscriptional exon skipping in the genotoxic stress response. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010, 17:1358-1366.
35. Wang X., et al. Induced ncRNAs allosterically modify RNA-binding proteins in cis to inhibit transcription. Nature 2008, 454:126-130.
36. Huarte M., et al. A large intergenic noncoding RNA induced by p53 mediates global gene repression in the p53 response. Cell 2010, 142:409-419.
37. Moumen A., et al. hnRNP K: an HDM2 target and transcriptional coactivator of p53 in response to DNA damage. Cell 2005, 123:1065-1078.
38. Hung T., et al. Extensive and coordinated transcription of noncoding RNAs within cell-cycle promoters. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:621-629.
39. Aguilera A., Garcia-Muse T. R loops: from transcription byproducts to threats to genome stability. Mol. Cell 2012, 46:115-124.
40. Helmrich A., et al. Transcription-replication encounters, consequences and genomic instability. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20:412-418.
41. Tuduri S., et al. Topoisomerase I suppresses genomic instability by preventing interference between replication and transcription. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:1315-1324.
42. Czubaty A., et al. Proteomic analysis of complexes formed by human topoisomerase I. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2005, 1749:133-141.
43. Chai Q., et al. Interaction and stimulation of human FEN-1 nuclease activities by heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 in alpha-segment processing during Okazaki fragment maturation. Biochemistry 2003, 42:15045-15052.
44. Azzalin C.M. UPF1: a leader at the end of chromosomes. Nucleus 2012, 3:16-21.
45. Ford L.P., et al. A model for heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins in telomere and telomerase regulation. Oncogene 2002, 21:580-583.
46. Han S.P., et al. Functional diversity of the hnRNPs: past, present and perspectives. Biochem. J. 2010, 430:379-392.
47. Anantha R.W., et al. Requirement of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein C for BRCA gene expression and homologous recombination. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e61368.
48. Ha K., et al. Sequences in PSF/SFPQ mediate radioresistance and recruitment of PSF/SFPQ-containing complexes to DNA damage sites in human cells. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2011, 10:252-259.
49. Hong Z., et al. The role of hnRPUL1 involved in DNA damage response is related to PARP1. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e60208.
50. Lossaint G., et al. FANCD2 binds MCM proteins and controls replisome function upon activation of S phase checkpoint signaling. Mol. Cell 2013, 51:678-690.
51. Mastrocola A.S., et al. The RNA-binding protein fused in sarcoma (FUS) functions downstream of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in response to DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288:24731-24741.
52. Polo S.E., et al. Regulation of DNA-end resection by hnRNPU-like proteins promotes DNA double-strand break signaling and repair. Mol. Cell 2012, 45:505-516.
53. Rulten S.L., et al. PARP-1 dependent recruitment of the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-associated protein FUS/TLS to sites of oxidative DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42:307-314.
54. Francia S., et al. Site-specific DICER and DROSHA RNA products control the DNA-damage response. Nature 2012, 488:231-235.
55. Wei W., et al. A role for small RNAs in DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 2012, 149:101-112.
56. Chang Y.W., et al. YB-1 disrupts mismatch repair complex formation, interferes with MutSα recruitment on mismatch and inhibits mismatch repair through interacting with PCNA. Oncogene 2013, 10.1038/onc.2013.450.
57. Gaudreault I., et al. YB-1 promotes strand separation in vitro of duplex DNA containing either mispaired bases or cisplatin modifications, exhibits endonucleolytic activities and binds several DNA repair proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32:316-327.
58. Kim E.R., et al. The proteolytic YB-1 fragment interacts with DNA repair machinery and enhances survival during DNA-damaging stress. Cell Cycle 2013, 12:3791-3803.
59. Kuhnert A., et al. Proteomic identification of PSF and p54(nrb) as TopBP1-interacting proteins. J. Cell. Biochem. 2012, 113:1744-1753.
60. Rajesh C., et al. The splicing-factor related protein SFPQ/PSF interacts with RAD51D and is necessary for homology-directed repair and sister chromatid cohesion. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:132-145.
61. Krietsch J., et al. PARP activation regulates the RNA-binding protein NONO in the DNA damage response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:10287-10301.
62. Li S., et al. Involvement of p54(nrb), a PSF partner protein, in DNA double-strand break repair and radioresistance. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:6746-6753.
63. Shin K.H., et al. p53 promotes the fidelity of DNA end-joining activity by, in part, enhancing the expression of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein G. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2007, 6:830-840.
64. Beli P., et al. Proteomic investigations reveal a role for RNA processing factor THRAP3 in the DNA damage response. Mol. Cell 2012, 46:212-225.
65. Bennetzen M.V., et al. Site-specific phosphorylation dynamics of the nuclear proteome during the DNA damage response. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9:1314-1323.
66. Bensimon A., et al. ATM-dependent and -independent dynamics of the nuclear phosphoproteome after DNA damage. Sci. Signal. 2010, 3:rs3.
67. Blasius M., et al. A phospho-proteomic screen identifies substrates of the checkpoint kinase Chk1. Genome Biol. 2011, 12:R78.
68. Edmond V., et al. Acetylation and phosphorylation of SRSF2 control cell fate decision in response to cisplatin. EMBO J. 2011, 30:510-523.
69. Vivarelli S., et al. Paraquat modulates alternative pre-mRNA splicing by modifying the intracellular distribution of SRPK2. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e61980.
70. Reinhardt H.C., et al. DNA damage activates a spatially distinct late cytoplasmic cell-cycle checkpoint network controlled by MK2-mediated RNA stabilization. Mol. Cell 2010, 40:34-49.
71. Mazan-Mamczarz K., et al. ATM regulates a DNA damage response posttranscriptional RNA operon in lymphocytes. Blood 2011, 117:2441-2450.
72. Malanga M., Althaus F.R. Poly(ADP-ribose) reactivates stalled DNA topoisomerase I and induces DNA strand break resealing. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:5244-5248.
73. Kim H.H., et al. Regulation of HuR by DNA damage response kinases. J. Nucleic Acids 2010, 2010:981487.
74. Sakashita E., Endo H. SR and SR-related proteins redistribute to segregated fibrillar components of nucleoli in a response to DNA damage. Nucleus 2010, 1:367-380.
75. Daniely Y., et al. Stress-dependent nucleolin mobilization mediated by p53-nucleolin complex formation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002, 22:6014-6022.
76. Busa R., et al. Genotoxic stress causes the accumulation of the splicing regulator Sam68 in nuclear foci of transcriptionally active chromatin. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:3005-3018.
77. Cammas A., et al. Post-transcriptional control of gene expression through subcellular relocalization of mRNA binding proteins. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2008, 76:1395-1403.
78. Cammas A., et al. Cytoplasmic relocalization of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 controls translation initiation of specific mRNAs. Mol. Biol. Cell 2007, 18:5048-5059.
79. Scoumanne A., et al. The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 is regulated by RNA-binding protein PCBP4 via mRNA stability. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:213-224.
80. Zhang J., et al. Translational repression of p53 by RNPC1, a p53 target overexpressed in lymphomas. Genes Dev. 2011, 25:1528-1543.
81. Cohen A.A., et al. Dynamic proteomics of individual cancer cells in response to a drug. Science 2008, 322:1511-1516.
82. Kohno K., et al. The pleiotropic functions of the Y-box-binding protein, YB-1. Bioessays 2003, 25:691-698.
83. Graber J.H., et al. DNA damage induces targeted, genome-wide variation of poly(A) sites in budding yeast. Genome Res. 2013, 23:1690-1703.
84. Wan G., et al. DNA-damage-induced nuclear export of precursor microRNAs is regulated by the ATM-AKT pathway. Cell Rep. 2013, 3:2100-2112.
85. Baltz A.G., et al. The mRNA-bound proteome and its global occupancy profile on protein-coding transcripts. Mol. Cell 2012, 46:674-690.
86. Castello A., et al. Insights into RNA biology from an atlas of mammalian mRNA-binding proteins. Cell 2012, 149:1393-1406.
87. Castello A., et al. RNA-binding proteins in Mendelian disease. Trends Genet. 2013, 29:318-327.
88. Pryde F., et al. 53BP1 exchanges slowly at the sites of DNA damage and appears to require RNA for its association with chromatin. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118:2043-2055.
89. Hafner M., et al. Transcriptome-wide identification of RNA-binding protein and microRNA target sites by PAR-CLIP. Cell 2010, 141:129-141.
90. Ule J. High-throughput sequencing methods to study neuronal RNA-protein interactions. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2009, 37:1278-1280.