Responding to framed health messages: Different strokes for different (handedness) folks

Psychology and Health

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 671-686

  Jasper, John D ^a   Woolf, Jonathan ^a   Christman, Stephen D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

Author keywords

decision making; framing effects; handedness; health behaviour; individual differences; neuroscience; persuasive communication

Indexed keywords

SUNSCREEN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; METHODOLOGY; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PUBLICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HEALTH COMMUNICATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; PAMPHLETS; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SUNSCREENING AGENTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84896487974     PISSN: 08870446     EISSN: 14768321     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2014.881999     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bartzokis, G., Sultzer, D., Lu, P. H., Nuechterlein, K. H., Mintz, J., & Cummings, J. L. (2004). Heterogeneous age-related breakdown of white matter structural integrity: Implications for cortical 'disconnection' in aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiology of Aging, 25, 843-851.
2. Cameron, L. D., & Chan, C. K. Y. (2008). Designing health communications: Harnessing the power of affect, imagery, and self-regulation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 262-282.
3. Cesario, J., Corker, K. S., & Jelinek, S. (2013). A self-regulatory framework for message framing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 238-249.
4. Cho, H., & Boster, F. J. (2008). Effects of gain versus loss frame antidrug ads on adolescents. Journal of Communication, 58, 428-446.
5. Christman, S. D. (1993). Handedness in musicians: Bimanual constraints on performance. Brain and Cognition, 22, 266-272.
6. Christman, S. D. (2001). Individual differences in stroop and local-global processing: A possible role of interhemispheric interaction. Brain and Cognition, 45, 97-118.
7. Christman, S. D., Bentle, M., & Niebauer, C. L. (2007). Handedness differences in body image distortion and eating disorder symptomatology. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, 247-256.
8. Christman, S. D., Garvey, K. J., Propper, R. E., & Phaneuf, K. A. (2003). Bilateral eye movements enhance the retrieval of episodic memories. Neuropsychology, 17, 221-229.
9. Christman, S. D., Henning, B., Geers, A. L., Propper, R. E., & Niebauer, C. L. (2008). Mixed-handed persons are more easily persuaded and are more gullible: Interhemispheric interaction and belief updating. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 13, 403-426.
10. Christman, S. D., & Jasper, J. D. (2013). "All-or-none" versus "most-or-some" Asian disease scenarios: Effects of meta-frame and handedness. Under review.
11. Christman, S. D., Jasper, J. D., Sontam, V., & Cooil, B. (2007). Individual differences in risk perception versus risk taking: Handedness and interhemispheric interaction. Brain & Cognition, 63, 51-58.
12. Christman, S. D., Propper, R. E., & Brown, T. J. (2006). Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with earlier offset of childhood amnesia. Neuropsychology, 20, 336-345.
13. Christman, S. D., Propper, R. E., & Dion, A. (2004). Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with decreased false memories in a verbal converging semantic associates paradigm. Brain and Cognition, 56, 313-319.
14. Christman, S. D., Sontam, V., & Jasper, J. D. (2009). Individual differences in ambiguous figure perception: Degree of handedness and interhemispheric interaction. Perception, 38, 1183-1198.
15. Coltheart, M. (2007). The 33rd Sir Frederick Bartlett lecture: Cognitive neuropsychiatry and delusional belief. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1041-1062.
16. Davidson, R. J. (2000). Affective style, psychopathology, and resilience: Brain mechanisms and plasticity. American Psychologist, 55, 1193-1214.
17. Detweiler, J. B., Bedell, B. T., Salovey, P., Pronin, E., & Rothman, A. J. (1999). Message framing and sunscreen use: Gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. Health Psychology, 18, 189-196.
18. Giedd, J. N., Rumsey, J. M., Castellanos, F. X., Rajapakse, J. C., Kaysen, D., Vaituzis, C. A.,.Rapoport, J. L. (1996). A quantitative MRI study of the corpus callosum in children and adolescents. Developmental Brain Research, 91, 274-280.
19. Jasper, J. D., Barry, K., & Christman, S. D. (2008). Individual differences in counterfactual production. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 488-492.
20. Jasper, J. D., & Christman, S. D. (2005). A neuropsychological dimension for anchoring effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 343-369.
21. Jasper, J. D., Fournier, C., & Christman, S. D. (2014). Handedness differences in information framing. Brain and Cognition, 84, 85-89.
22. Jasper, J. D., Prothero, M., & Christman, S. D. (2009). I'm not sexist! Cognitive dissonance and the differing cries of mixed- and strong-handers. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 268-272.
23. Latimer, A. E., Williams-Piehota, P., Katulak, N. A., Cox, A., Mowad, L., Higgins, E. T., & Salovey, P. (2008). Promoting fruit and vegetable intake through messages tailored to individual differences in regulatory focus. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35, 363-369.
24. Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 149-188.
25. Luders, E., Cherbuin, N., Thompson, P. M., Gutman, B., Anstey, K. J., Sachdev, P., & Toga, A. W. (2010). When more is less: Associations between corpus callosum size and handedness lateralization. NeuroImage, 52, 43-49.
26. Lyle, K. B., Logan, J., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Eye movements enhance memory for individuals who are strongly right-handed and harm it for individuals who are not. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 515-520.
27. Lyle, K. B., McCabe, D. P., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Handedness is related to memory via interhemispheric interaction: Evidence from paired associate recall and source memory tasks. Neuropsychology, 22, 523-530.
28. McCormick, M., & Seta, J. J. (2012). Lateralized goal framing: How selective presentation impacts message effectiveness. Journal of Health Psychology, 17, 1099-1109.
29. Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 500-510.
30. Murphy, S., & Bennett, P. (2004). Health psychology and public health: Theoretical possibilities. Journal of Health Psychology, 9, 13-27.
31. Niebauer, C. L., Aselage, J., & Schutte, C. (2002). Interhemispheric interaction and consciousness: Degree of handedness predicts the intensity of a sensory illusion. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 7, 85-96.
32. Niebauer, C. L., Christman, S. D., Reid, S. A., & Garvey, K. (2004). Interhemispheric interaction and beliefs on our origin: Degree of handedness predicts beliefs in creationism versus evolution. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 9, 433-447.
33. Noar, S. M. (2006). A 10-year retrospective of research in health mass media campaigns: Where do we go from here? Journal of Health Communication, 11, 21-42.
34. O'Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12, 623-644.
35. Oldfield, R. L. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
36. Orbell, S., & Hagger, M. (2006). Temporal framing and the decision to take part in type 2 diabetes screening: Effects of individual differences in consideration of future consequences on persuasion. Health Psychology, 25, 537-548.
37. Parker, A., & Dagnall, N. (2007). Effects of bilateral eye movements on gist based false recognition in the DRM paradigm. Brain & Cognition, 63, 221-225.
38. Parker, A., Relph, S., & Dagnall, N. (2008). Effects of bilateral eye movements on the retrieval of item, associative, and contextual information. Neuropsychology, 22, 136-145.
39. Prichard, E., Propper, R. E., & Christman, S. D. (2013). Degree of handedness, but not direction, is a systematic predictor of cognitive performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 3-6.
40. Propper, R. E., Christman, S. D., & Phaneuf, K. A. (2005). A mixed-handed advantage in episodic memory: A possible role of interhemispheric interaction. Memory & Cognition, 33, 751-757.
41. Ramachandran, V. S. (1995). Anosognosia in parietal lobe syndrome. Consciousness and Cognition, 4, 22-51.
42. Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 3-19.
43. Salovey, P. (2005). Promoting prevention and detection: Psychologically tailoring and framing messages about health. In R. Bibace, J. D. Laird, K. L. Noller, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Science and medicine in dialogue: Thinking through particulars and universals (pp. 17-42). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
44. Schiffer, F. (1997). Affect changes observed with right versus left lateral visual field stimulation in psychotherapy patients: Possible physiological, psychological, and therapeutic implications. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 38, 289-295.
45. Schiffer, F., Stinchfield, Z., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2002). Prediction of clinical response to transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression by baseline lateral visual-field stimulation. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 15, 18-27.
46. Westfall, J. E., Jasper, J. D., & Christman, S. D. (2012). Inaction inertia, the sunk cost effect, and handedness: Avoiding the losses of past decisions. Brain & Cognition, 80, 192-200.
47. Witelson, S. F., & Goldsmith, C. H. (1991). The relationship of hand preference to anatomy of the corpus callosum in men. Brain Research, 545, 175-182.