Inaction inertia, the sunk cost effect, and handedness: Avoiding the losses of past decisions

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 192-200

  Westfall, Jonathan E ^a   Jasper, John D ^b   Christman, Stephen ^b  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

Author keywords

Belief updating; Decision making; Handedness; Inaction inertia; Individual differences; Sunk cost

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CONTROL; BRAIN ASYMMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HANDEDNESS; HUMAN; INACTION INERTIA; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; SUNK COST EFFECT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84864919639     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Arkes H.R., Blumer C. The psychology of sunk costs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1985, 35:124-140.
2. Arkes H.R., Kung Y.H., Hutzel L. Regret, valuation, and inaction inertia. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2002, 87:371-385.
3. Badzakova-Trajkov G., Häberling I.S., Corballis M.C. Magical ideation, creativity, handedness, and cerebral asymmetries: A combined behavioural and fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:2896-2903.
4. Bestelmeyer P.E.G., Carey D.P. Processing biases towards the preferred hand: valid and invalid cueing of left- versus right-hand movements. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:1162-1167.
5. Brockner J. The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Toward theoretical progress. Academy of Management Review 1992, 17(1):39-61.
6. Christman S.D., Bentle M., Niebauer C.L. Handedness differences in body image distortion and eating disorder symptomatology. International Journal of Eating Disorders 2007, 40:247-256.
7. Christman S.D., Henning B., Geers A.L., Propper R.E., Niebauer C.L. Mixed-handed persons are more easily persuaded and are more gullible: Interhemispheric interaction and belief updating. Laterality 2008, 13:403-426.
8. Christman S.D., Jasper J.D., Sontam V., Cooil B. Individual differences in risk perception versus risk taking: Handedness and interhemispheric interaction. Brain and Cognition 2007, 63:51-58.
9. Christman S. Independence versus integration of right and left hemisphere processing: Effects of handedness. Hemispheric communication: Mechanisms and models 1995, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J. F. Kitterle (Ed.).
10. Christman S.D., Propper R.E., Brown T.J. Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with earlier offset of childhood amnesia. Neuropsychology 2006, 20(3):336-345.
11. Christman S.D., Propper R.E., Dion A. Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with decreased false memories in a verbal converging semantic associates paradigm. Brain and Cognition 2004, 56:313-319.
12. Clarke J.M., Zaidel E. Anatomical-behavioral relationships: Corpus callosum morphometry and hemispheric specialization. Behavioural Brain Research 1994, 64:185-202.
13. Coltheart M. Delusional belief. Australian Journal of Psychology 2005, 57:72-76.
14. Cowell P.E., Kertesz A., Deneberg V.H. Multiple dimensions of handedness and the human corpus callosum. Brain Research 1993, 548:126-132.
15. Davidson R.J. Affective style, psychopathology, and resilience. Brain mechanisms and plasticity. American Psychologist 2000, 55:1193-1214.
16. Garland H. Throwing good money after bad: The effect of sunk costs on the decision to escalate commitment to an ongoing project. Journal of Applied Psychology 1990, 75:728-731.
17. Garland H., Newport S. Effects of absolute and relative sunk costs on the decision to persist with a course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991, 48:55-69.
18. Gazzaniga M.S. The split brain revisited. Scientific American 1998, 279:35-39.
19. Habib R., Nyberg L., Tulving E. Hemispheric asymmetries of memory: The HERA model revisited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:241-245.
20. Harvey N., Sevdalis N., Yip M. Regret triggers inaction inertia - But which regret and how?. British Journal of Social Psychology 2006, 45:839-853.
21. Jang D., Mattila A.S., Bai B. Restaurant membership fee and customer choice. The effects of sunk cost and feelings of regret. International Journal of Hospitality Management 2007, 26:687-697.
22. Jasper, J. D., & Christman, S. D. (2009). Handedness and risky choice. "All-or-none" versus "most-or-some" Asian Disease scenarios. Paper presented at the 21st Annual Meeting of the Association for Psychological Science, San Franscisco.
23. Jasper J.D., Barry K., Christman S.D. Individual differences in counterfactual production. Personality and Individual Differences 2008, 45:488-492.
24. Jasper J.D., Christman S.D. A neuropsychological dimension for anchoring effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2005, 18(5):343-369.
25. Jasper, J. D., Woolf, J., Fournier, C., & Christman, S. D. (submitted for publication). Responding to persuasive health messages: Different strokes for different (handedness) folks.
26. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47:263-291.
27. Lyle K.B., McCabe D.P., Roediger H.L. Handedness is related to memory via interhemispheric interaction: Evidence from paired associate recall and source memory tasks. Neuropsychology 2008, 22:523-530.
28. Niebauer C.L., Aselage J., Schutte C. Interhemispheric interaction and consciousness: Degree of handedness predicts the intensity of a sensory illusion. Laterality 2002, 7:85-96.
29. Niebauer C.L., Christman S.D., Reid S.A., Garvey K. Interhemispheric interaction and beliefs on our origin: Degree of handedness predicts beliefs in creationism versus evolution. Laterality 2004, 9:433-447.
30. Oldfield C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
31. Parker A., Dagnall N. Effects of handedness and saccadic bilateral eye movements on components of autobiographical recollection. Brain and Cognition 2010, 73:93-101.
32. Propper R.E., Christman S.D. Mixed- versus strong-handedness is associated with biases toward 'Remember' versus 'Know' judgments in recognition memory: Role of interhemispheric interaction. Memory 2004, 12:707-714.
33. Propper R.E., Christman S.D., Phaneuf K.A. A mixed-handed advantage in episodic memory: A possible role of interhemispheric interaction. Memory and Cognition 2005, 33:751-757.
34. Ramachandran V.S. Anosognosia in parietal lobe syndrome. Consciousness and Cognition 1995, 4:22-51.
35. Samuelson W., Zeckhauser R. Status-quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1988, 1:7-59.
36. Schacter D.L. Priming and multiple memory systems: Perceptual mechanisms of implicit memory. Memory systems 1994 1994, 233-268. MIT Press, Cambridge. D.L. Schacter, E. Tulving (Eds.).
37. Schaubroeck J., Davis E. Prospect theory predictions when escalation is not the only chance to recover sunk costs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1994, 57:59-82.
38. Shobe E.R., Ross N.M., Fleck J.I. Influence of handedness and bilateral eye movements on creativity. Brain and Cognition 2009, 71(3):204-214.
39. Staw B.M. Dressing up like an organization: When psychological theories can explain organizational action. Journal of Management 1991, 17:805-819.
40. Tan H., Yates J.F. Sunk cost effects: The influences of instruction and future return estimates. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1995, 63:311-319.
41. Thaler R.H. Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1999, 12:183.
42. Tykocinski O.E., Pittman T.S. The consequences of doing nothing: Inaction inertia as avoidance of anticipated counterfactual regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 75:607-616.
43. Tykocinski O.E., Pittman S. The consequences of doing nothing: Inaction inertia as avoidance of anticipated counterfactual regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1995, 75:607-616.
44. Tykocinski O.E., Pittman S. Product aversion following a missed opportunity: Price contrast or avoidance of anticipated regret?. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2001, 23:149-156.
45. Tykocinski O.E., Pittman T.S., Tuttle E.E. Inaction inertia: Foregoing future benefits as a result of an initial failure to act. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1995, 68:793-803.
46. Van Dijk E., Van Putten M., Zeelenberg M. Decoupling the past from the present attenuates inaction inertia. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2007, 20:65-79.
47. Van Dijk E., Zeelenberg M. The discounting of ambiguous information in economic decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2003, 16:341-352.
48. Van Putten M., Zeelenberg M. The dark side of discounts: An inaction inertia perspective on the post-promotion dip. Psychology and Marketing 2005, 22:611-622.
49. Welcome S.E., Chiarello C., Towler S., Halderman L.K., Ottoc R., Leonard C.M. Behavioral correlates of corpus callosum size: Anatomical/behavioral relationships vary across sex/handedness groups. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:2427-2435.
50. Whyte G. Escalating commitment to a course of action: A reinterpretation. Academy of Management Review 1986, 11:311-321.
51. Witelson S.F., Goldsmith C.H. The relationship of hand preference to anatomy of the corpus callosum in men. Brain Research 1991, 545:175-182.
52. Zeelenberg M., Nijstad B.A., Van Putten M., Van Dijk E. Inaction inertia, regret, and valuation: A closer look. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2006, 101:89-104.