Individual differences in counterfactual production

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 488-492

  Jasper, John D ^a   Barry, Kyle ^a   Christman, Stephen D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

Author keywords

Counterfactuals; Decision making; Handedness; Hemispheric laterality; Individual differences; Neuropsychology

Indexed keywords

EID: 49349111486     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.026     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Annett M. Handedness and cerebral dominance: The right shift theory. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 10 (1998) 459-469
2. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E., and Quintanar L.R. Individual differences in relative hemispheric alpha abundance and cognitive responses to persuasive communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43 (1982) 623-636
3. Christman S.D. Individual differences in Stroop and local-global processing: A possible role of interhemispheric integration. Brain and Cognition 45 (2001) 97-118
4. Christman S.D., Bentle M., and Niebauer C.L. Handedness differences in body image distortion and eating disorder symptomatology. International Journal of Eating Disorders 40 (2007) 247-256
5. Christman, S. D., Henning, B., Geers, A. L., Propper, R. E., & Niebauer, C. L. (in press). Mixed-handed persons are more easily persuaded and are more gullible: Interhemispheric interaction and belief updating. Laterality.
6. Christman S.D., Jasper J.D., Sontam V., and Cooil B. Individual differences in risk perception versus risk taking: Handedness and interhemispheric interaction. Brain and Cognition 63 (2007) 51-58
7. Christman S.D., Propper R.E., and Brown T.J. Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with earlier offset of childhood amnesia. Neuropsychology 20 (2006) 336-345
8. Christman S.D., Propper R.E., and Dion A. Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with decreased false memories in a verbal converging semantic associates paradigm. Brain and Cognition 56 (2004) 313-319
9. Christman, S. D., & Sontam, V. (2007). Individual differences in ambiguous figure reversals: Degree of handedness and access to the right hemisphere. Presented at the 19th annual meeting of the Association for Psychological Science, Washington, DC.
10. Clarke J.M., and Zaidel E. Anatomical-behavioral relationships: Corpus callosum morphometry and hemispheric specialization. Behavioural Brain Research 64 (1994) 185-202
11. Coltheart M. Conscious experience and delusional belief. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 12 (2005) 153-157
12. Cowell P.E., Kertesz A., and Denenberg V.H. Multiple dimensions of handedness and the human corpus callosum. Neurology 43 (1993) 2353-2357
13. Davidson R.J. Affective style, psychopathology, and resilience: Brain mechanisms and plasticity. American Psychologist 55 (2000) 1193-1214
14. Drake R.A. Processing persuasive arguments; Recall and recognition as a function of agreement and manipulated activation asymmetry. Brain and Cognition 15 (1991) 83-94
15. Drake R.A., and Bingham B.R. Induced lateral orientation and persuasibility. Brain and Cognition 4 (1985) 156-164
16. Fischoff B. The effect of temporal setting on likelihood estimates. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 15 (1976) 180-194
17. Garvey, K., & Niebauer, C. L. (2003). Cerebral laterality and ontological sophistication: Strength of handedness predicts cognitive complexity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, Atlanta.
18. Gilovich T., and Medvec V.H. Some counterfactual determinants of satisfaction and regret. In: Roese N.J., and Olson J.M. (Eds). What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (1995), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 259-282
19. Habib R., Nyberg L., and Tulving E. Hemispheric asymmetries of memory: The HERA model revisited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2003) 241-245
20. Jasper J.D., and Christman S.D. A neuropsychological dimension for anchoring effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 18 5 (2005) 343-369
21. Jasper, J. D., Kunzler, J. S., & Christman, S. D. (submitted for publication). Order effects in belief updating: Different strokes for different (handedness) folks.
22. Kahneman D. Varieties of counterfactual thinking. In: Roese N.J., and Olson J.M. (Eds). What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (1995), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 375-396
23. Kahneman D., and Miller D.T. Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review 93 (1986) 136-153
24. Landman J. Through a glass darkly: Worldviews, counterfactual thought, and emotion. In: Roese N.J., and Olson J.M. (Eds). What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (1995), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 233-258
25. Niebauer C., Aselage J., and Schutte C. Interhemispheric interaction and consciousness: Degree of handedness predicts the intensity of a sensory illusion. Laterality 7 (2002) 85-96
26. Niebauer C.L., and Garvey K. Gödel, Escher, and degree of handedness: Differences in interhemispheric interaction predict differences in understanding self-reference. Laterality 9 (2004) 19-34
27. Oldfield R.L. The assessment of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 (1971) 97-113
28. Propper R.E., and Christman S.D. Mixed- versus strong-handedness is associated with biases toward 'Remember' versus 'Know' judgments in recognition memory: Role of interhemispheric interaction. Memory 12 (2004) 707-714
29. Propper R.E., Christman S.D., and Phaneuf K.A. A mixed-handed advantage in episodic memory: A possible role of interhemispheric interaction. Memory & Cognition 33 (2005) 751-757
30. Ramachandran V.S. Anosognosia in parietal lobe syndrome. Consciousness and Cognition 4 (1995) 22-51
31. Roese N.J. Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin 121 1 (1997) 133-148
32. Roese N.J., and Olson J.M. Counterfactuals, causal attributions, and the hindsight bias: A conceptual integration. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 32 (1996) 197-227
33. Roese N.J., and Olson J.M. Counterfactual thinking: The intersection of affect and function. In: Zanna M.P. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology (1997), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 1-59
34. Schacter S.C. Ambilaterality: Definition from handedness preference questionnaires and potential significance. International Journal of Neuroscience 77 (1994) 47-51
35. Sirois F.M. Procrastination and counterfactual thinking: Avoiding what might have been. British Journal of Social Psychology 43 (2004) 269-286
36. Slovic P., and Fischoff B. On the psychology of experimental surprises. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 3 (1977) 544-551
37. Sontam, V., & Christman, S. D. (2007). Semantic organization: Possible individual differences based on handedness. Presented at the 48th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Long Beach.
38. Sontam, V., Christman, S. D., & Jasper, J. D. (2006). Semantic flexibility. Presented at the 47th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Houston.
39. Sontam, V., Jasper, J. D., & Christman, S. D. (2006). Handedness differences in representation updating. Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
40. Witelson S.F., and Goldsmith C.H. The relationship of hand preference to anatomy of the corpus callosum in men. Brain Research 545 (1991) 175-182