Construction of a public CHO cell line transcript database using versatile bioinformatics analysis pipelines

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Rupp, Oliver ^a,d   Becker, Jennifer ^a   Brinkrolf, Karina ^a   Timmermann, Christina ^a   Borth, Nicole ^b,c   Pühler, Alfred ^a   Noll, Thomas ^a   Goesmann, Alexander ^a,d  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

^c AUSTRIAN CENTRE OF INDUSTRIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^d JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARY DNA;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CHO CELL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTIG MAPPING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA LIBRARY; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; FACTUAL DATABASE; FEMALE; GENE CLUSTER; GENE LOCUS; GENOME ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTOMICS;

ANIMALS; CHO CELLS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CRICETULUS; DATABASES, NUCLEIC ACID; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC; TRANSCRIPTOME; WEB BROWSER;

EID: 84896455875     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085568     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Jayapal KP, Wlaschin KF, Hu W-S, Yap M (2007) Recombinant Protein Therapeutics from CHO Cells -20 Years and Counting. Chem Eng Prog 103: 40-47.
2. Puck TT, Cieciura SJ, Robinson A (1958) Genetics of somatic mammalian cells. III. Long-term cultivation of euploid cells from human and animal subjects. J Exp Med 108: 945-956.
3. Jenkins N, Parekh RB, James DC (1996) Getting the glycosylation right: Implications for the biotechnology industry. Nat Biotech 14: 975-981. doi:10.1038/nbt0896-975. (Pubitemid 26286569)
4. IMARC (n.d.). Available: http://www.imarcgroup.com/. Accessed 25 June 2013.
5. Ernst W, Trummer E, Mead J, Bessant C, Strelec H, et al. (2006) Evaluation of a genomics platform for cross-species transcriptome analysis of recombinant CHO cells. Biotechnol J 1: 639-650. doi:10.1002/biot.200600010.
6. De Leon Gatti M, Wlaschin KF, Nissom PM, Yap M, Hu W-S (2007) Comparative transcriptional analysis of mouse hybridoma and recombinant Chinese hamster ovary cells undergoing butyrate treatment. J Biosci Bioeng 103: 82-91. doi:10.1263/jbb.103.82. (Pubitemid 46216907)
7. Yee JC, Wlaschin KF, Chuah SH, Nissom PM, Hu W-S (2008) Quality assessment of cross-species hybridization of CHO transcriptome on a mouse DNA oligo microarray. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 101: 1359-1365. doi:10.1002/bit.21984.
8. Kumar S, Blaxter ML (2010) Comparing de novo assemblers for 454 transcriptome data. BMC Genomics 11: 571. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-571.
9. Kantardjieff A, Nissom PM, Chuah SH, Yusufi F, Jacob NM, et al. (2009) Developing genomic platforms for Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biotechnol Adv 27: 1028-1035. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.05.023.
10. Jacob NM, Kantardjieff A, Yusufi FNK, Retzel EF, Mulukutla BC, et al. (2010) Reaching the depth of the Chinese hamster ovary cell transcriptome. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 105: 1002-1009. doi:10.1002/bit.22588.
11. Birzele F, Schaub J, Rust W, Clemens C, Baum P, et al. (2010) Into the unknown: expression profiling without genome sequence information in CHO by next generation sequencing. Nucl Acids Res 38: 3999-4010. doi:10.1093/nar/gkq116.
12. Hammond S, Swanberg JC, Kaplarevic M, Lee KH (2011) Genomic sequencing and analysis of a Chinese hamster ovary cell line using Illumina sequencing technology. BMC Genomics 12: 67. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-12-67.
13. Xu X, Nagarajan H, Lewis NE, Pan S, Cai Z, et al. (2011) The genomic sequence of the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cell line. Nat Biotechnol 29: 735-741. doi:10.1038/nbt.1932.
14. Becker J, Hackl M, Rupp O, Jakobi T, Schneider J, et al. (2011) Unraveling the Chinese hamster ovary cell line transcriptome by next-generation sequencing. J Biotechnol 156: 227-235. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.09.014.
15. Lewis NE, Liu X, Li Y, Nagarajan H, Yerganian G, et al. (2013) Genomic landscapes of Chinese hamster ovary cell lines as revealed by the Cricetulus griseus draft genome. Nat Biotech advance online publication. Available: http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nbt.2624.html. Accessed 27 July 2013.
16. Brinkrolf K, Rupp O, Laux H, Kollin F, Ernst W, et al. (2013) Chinese hamster genome sequenced from sorted chromosomes. Nat Biotech 31: 694-695. doi:10.1038/nbt.2645.
17. DiGuistini S, Liao NY, Platt D, Robertson G, Seidel M, et al. (2009) De novo genome sequence assembly of a filamentous fungus using Sanger, 454 and Illumina sequence data. Genome Biology 10: R94. doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-9-r94.
18. Surget-Groba Y, Montoya-Burgos JI (2010) Optimization of de novo transcriptome assembly from next-generation sequencing data. Genome Res 20: 1432-1440. doi:10.1101/gr.103846.109.
19. Hassan MA, Melo MB, Haas B, Jensen KDC, Saeij JPJ (2012) De novo reconstruction of the Toxoplasma gondii transcriptome improves on the current genome annotation and reveals alternatively spliced transcripts and putative long non-coding RNAs. BMC Genomics 13: 696. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-13-696.
20. Lu B, Zeng Z, Shi T (2013) Comparative study of de novo assembly and genome-guided assembly strategies for transcriptome reconstruction based on RNA-Seq. Sci China Life Sci 56: 143-155. doi:10.1007/s11427-013-4442-z.
21. Clarke K, Yang Y, Marsh R, Xie L, Zhang KK (2013) Comparative analysis of de novo transcriptome assembly. Sci China Life Sci 56: 156-162. doi:10.1007/s11427-013-4444-x.
22. Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, et al. (2010) Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotech 28: 511-515. doi:10.1038/nbt.1621.
23. Hazelhurst S, Hide W, Lipták Z, Nogueira R, Starfield R (2008) An overview of the wcd EST clustering tool. Bioinformatics 24: 1542-1546. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn203. (Pubitemid 351911711)
24. Haznedaroglu BZ, Reeves D, Rismani-Yazdi H, Peccia J (2012) Optimization of de novo transcriptome assembly from high-throughput short read sequencing data improves functional annotation for non-model organisms. BMC Bioinformatics 13: 170. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-170.
25. Meyer F, Goesmann A, McHardy AC, Bartels D, Bekel T, et al. (2003) GenDB-an open source genome annotation system for prokaryote genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 2187-2195. (Pubitemid 37442085)
26. GenDBE - CHO Project (n.d.). Available: https://gendbe.cebitec.uni- bielefeld.de/cho.html. Accessed 25 June 2013.
27. SAMS - CHO Project (n.d.). Available: https://sams.cebitec.uni-bielefeld. de/cho.html. Accessed 25 June 2013.
28. Bekel T, Henckel K, Küster H, Meyer F, Mittard Runte V, et al. (2009) The Sequence Analysis and Management System - SAMS-2.0: data management and sequence analysis adapted to changing requirements from traditional sanger sequencing to ultrafast sequencing technologies. J Biotechnol 140: 3-12.
29. Grasso C, Lee C (2004) Combining partial order alignment and progressive multiple sequence alignment increases alignment speed and scalability to very large alignment problems. Bioinformatics 20: 1546-1556. doi:10.1093/ bioinformatics/bth126. (Pubitemid 39023158)
30. Grasso C, Quist M, Ke K, Lee C (2003) POAVIZ: a Partial order multiple sequence alignment visualizer. Bioinformatics 19: 1446-1448. (Pubitemid 36939828)
31. FASTX-Toolkit (n.d.). Available: http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx-toolkit/ . Accessed 25 June 2013.
32. Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg SL (2009) TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 25: 1105-1111. doi:10.1093/ bioinformatics/btp120.
33. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, et al. (2011) Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol 29: 644-652. doi:10.1038/nbt.1883.
34. Schulz MH, Zerbino DR, Vingron M, Birney E (2012) Oases: robust de novo RNA-seq assembly across the dynamic range of expression levels. Bioinformatics 28: 1086-1092. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts094.
35. Wu TD, Watanabe CK (2005) GMAP: a genomic mapping and alignment program for mRNA and EST sequences. Bioinformatics 21: 1859-1875. doi:10.1093/ bioinformatics/bti310. (Pubitemid 40668022)
36. Iseli C, Jongeneel CV, Bucher P (1999) ESTScan: a program for detecting, evaluating, and reconstructing potential coding regions in EST sequences. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol: 138-148.
37. Li W, Godzik A (2006) Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22: 1658-1659. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158. (Pubitemid 43985301)
38. Huang X, Madan A (1999) CAP3: A DNA sequence assembly program. Genome Res 9: 868-877. (Pubitemid 29488446)
39. Kent WJ (2002) BLAT-the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res 12: 656-664. doi:10.1101/gr.229202. Article published online before March 2002.
40. Hide W, Burke J, Davison DB (1994) Biological evaluation of d2, an algorithm for high-performance sequence comparison. J Comput Biol 1: 199-215.
41. Schneider J, Blom J, Jaenicke S, Linke B, Brinkrolf K, et al. (2011) RAPYD-rapid annotation platform for yeast data. J Biotechnol 155: 118-126. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.10.076.
42. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389-3402. (Pubitemid 27359211)
43. Boutet E, Lieberherr D, Tognolli M, Schneider M, Bairoch A (2007) UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot. In: Edwards D, editor. Plant Bioinformatics. Methods in Molecular Biology™. Humana Press. 89-112. Available: http://link.springer. com/protocol/10.1007/978-1-59745-535-0-4. Accessed 15 March 2013.
44. Ogata H, Goto S, Sato K, Fujibuchi W, Bono H, et al. (1999) KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucl Acids Res 27: 29-34. doi:10.1093/nar/27.1.29. (Pubitemid 29209394)
45. Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, et al. (2003) The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics 4: 41. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-4-41.
46. Powell S, Szklarczyk D, Trachana K, Roth A, Kuhn M, et al. (2012) eggNOG v3.0: orthologous groups covering 1133 organisms at 41 different taxonomic ranges. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D284-289. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1060.
47. Finn RD, Mistry J, Tate J, Coggill P, Heger A, et al. (2010) The Pfam protein families database. Nucl Acids Res 38: D211-D222. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp985.
48. Zdobnov EM, Apweiler R (2001) InterProScan - an integration platform for the signature-recognition methods in InterPro. Bioinformatics 17: 847-848. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.9.847. (Pubitemid 32970486)
49. Mi H, Muruganujan A, Thomas PD (2013) PANTHER in 2013: modeling the evolution of gene function, and other gene attributes, in the context of phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res 41: D377-386. doi:10.1093/nar/gks1118.