Temporal constraints of behavioral inhibition: Relevance of inter-stimulus interval in a go-nogo task

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Zamorano, Francisco ^a,b,c   Billeke, Pablo ^a,b,c   Hurtado, José M ^a,d   López, Vladimir ^a   Carrasco, Ximena ^a,c,e   Ossandón, Tomás ^a,b   Aboitiz, Francisco ^a,b  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DEL DESARROLLO   (Chile)

^d Instituto de Sistemas Complejos de Valparaíso   (Chile)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL INHIBITION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GO NOGO TASK; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERSTIMULUS INTERVAL; MALE; MENTAL STRESS; MENTAL TASK; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NORMAL HUMAN; REACTION TIME; REACTIVE INHIBITION; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84896368763     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087232     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Barkley RA (1997) Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychol Bull 121: 65-94.
2. Oosterlaan J, Logan GD, Sergeant JA (1998) Response inhibition in AD/HD, CD, comorbid AD/HD + CD, anxious, and control children: a meta-analysis of studies with the stop task. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 39: 411-425. (Pubitemid 28112167)
3. Konishi S, Nakajima K, Uchida I, Kikyo H, Kameyama M, et al. (1999) Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI. Brain 122 (Pt 5): 981-991. (Pubitemid 29219269)
4. Verbruggen F, Logan GD (2008) Automatic and controlled response inhibition: associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms. J Exp Psychol Gen 137: 649-672.
5. Henriquez M, Villarroel L, Henriquez H, Zamorano F, Rothhammer F, et al. (2012) Intratask Variability As a Correlate for DRD4 and SLC6A3 Variants: A Pilot Study in ADHD. J Atten Disord.
6. Simmonds DJ, Pekar JJ, Mostofsky SH (2008) Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task-dependent. Neuropsychologia 46: 224-232.
7. Huster RJ, Enriquez-Geppert S, Lavallee CF, Falkenstein M, Herrmann CS (2013) Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: functional networks and cognitive contributions. Int J Psychophysiol 87: 217-233.
8. Kopp B, Mattler U, Goertz R, Rist F (1996) N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 99: 19-27. (Pubitemid 26241834)
9. Bruin KJ, Wijers AA (2002) Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study. Clin Neurophysiol 113: 1172-1182. (Pubitemid 34667157)
10. Smith JL, Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ (2007) Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict. Clin Neurophysiol 118: 343-355. (Pubitemid 46038808)
11. Durston S, Thomas KM, Worden MS, Yang Y, Casey BJ (2002) The effect of preceding context on inhibition: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 16: 449-453. (Pubitemid 34852460)
12. Smith JL, Smith EA, Provost AL, Heathcote A (2010) Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo task. Int J Psychophysiol 75: 217-226.
13. Bruin KJ, Wijers AA, van Staveren AS (2001) Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition? Clin Neurophysiol 112: 1660-1671. (Pubitemid 32763249)
14. Enriquez-Geppert S, Konrad C, Pantev C, Huster RJ (2010) Conflict and inhibition differentially affect the N200/P300 complex in a combined go/nogo and stop-signal task. Neuroimage 51: 877-887.
15. Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, van den Wildenberg W, Ridderinkhof KR (2003) Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 3: 17-26. (Pubitemid 37517032)
16. Schulz KP, Clerkin SM, Halperin JM, Newcorn JH, Tang CY, et al. (2009) Dissociable neural effects of stimulus valence and preceding context during the inhibition of responses to emotional faces. Hum Brain Mapp 30: 2821-2833.
17. Elliott R, Rubinsztein JS, Sahakian BJ, Dolan RJ (2000) Selective attention to emotional stimuli in a verbal go/no-go task: an fMRI study. NeuroReport 11: 1739-1744. (Pubitemid 30350344)
18. Kiefer M, Marzinzik F, Weisbrod M, Scherg M, Spitzer M (1998) The time course of brain activations during response inhibition: evidence from event-related potentials in a go/no go task. NeuroReport 9: 765-770. (Pubitemid 28131300)
19. Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, Cohen JD (2004) Stimulus modality, perceptual overlap, and the go/no-go N2. Psychophysiology 41: 157-160. (Pubitemid 38209039)
20. Smith JL, Douglas KM (2011) On the use of event-related potentials to auditory stimuli in the Go/NoGo task. Psychiatry Res 193: 177-181.
21. Bokura H, Yamaguchi S, Kobayashi S (2001) Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task. Clin Neurophysiol 112: 2224-2232. (Pubitemid 33153144)
22. Salisbury DF, Griggs CB, Shenton ME, McCarley RW (2004) The NoGo P300 'anteriorization' effect and response inhibition. Clin Neurophysiol 115: 1550-1558. (Pubitemid 38760301)
23. Logan GD, Cowan WB, Davis KA (1984) On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 10: 276-291.
24. Ramautar JR, Slagter HA, Kok A, Ridderinkhof KR (2006) Probability effects in the stop-signal paradigm: the insula and the significance of failed inhibition. Brain Res 1105: 143-154. (Pubitemid 44175966)
25. Detre JA, Wang J (2002) Technical aspects and utility of fMRI using BOLD and ASL. Clin Neurophysiol 113: 621-634. (Pubitemid 34439266)
26. Eimer M (1993) Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a Go/Nogo task. Biol Psychol 35: 123-138.
27. Garavan H, Ross TJ, Stein EA (1999) Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 8301-8306. (Pubitemid 29328449)
28. Menon V, Adleman NE, White CD, Glover GH, Reiss AL (2001) Error-related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task. Hum Brain Mapp 12: 131-143. (Pubitemid 32186917)
29. Ford JM, Gray M, Whitfield SL, Turken AU, Glover G, et al. (2004) Acquiring and inhibiting prepotent responses in schizophrenia: event-related brain potentials and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Gen Psychiatry 61: 119-129. (Pubitemid 38146546)
30. Jervis BW, Ifeachor EC, Allen EM (1988) The removal of ocular artefacts from the electroencephalogram: a review. Med Biol Eng Comput 26: 2-12. (Pubitemid 18033349)
31. Dawson MRW (1988) Fitting the Ex-Gaussian Equation to Reaction-Time Distributions. Behav Res Meth Instrum Comput 20: 54-57.
32. Castellanos FX, Sonuga-Barke EJ, Milham MP, Tannock R (2006) Characterizing cognition in ADHD: beyond executive dysfunction. Trends Cogn Sci 10: 117-123.
33. Billeke P, Zamorano F, Cosmelli D, Aboitiz F (2013) Oscillatory brain activity correlates with risk perception and predicts social decisions. Cereb Cortex 23: 2872-2883.
34. Maris E, Oostenveld R (2007) Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. J Neurosci Methods 164: 177-190. (Pubitemid 46950991)
35. Nigg JT (2000) On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychol Bull 126: 220-246.
36. Mostofsky SH, Schafer JG, Abrams MT, Goldberg MC, Flower AA, et al. (2003) fMRI evidence that the neural basis of response inhibition is task-dependent. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 17: 419-430. (Pubitemid 36860067)
37. Aron AR, Behrens TE, Smith S, Frank MJ, Poldrack RA (2007) Triangulating a cognitive control network using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI. J Neurosci 27: 3743-3752. (Pubitemid 46557676)
38. Jahfari S, Stinear CM, Claffey M, Verbruggen F, Aron AR (2010) Responding with restraint: what are the neurocognitive mechanisms? J Cogn Neurosci 22: 1479-1492.
39. Aron AR (2011) From reactive to proactive and selective control: developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses. Biol Psychiatry 69: e55-68.
40. van der Meere JJ, Shalev RS, Borger N, Wiersema JR (2009) Methylphenidate, interstimulus interval, and reaction time performance of children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a pilot study. Child Neuropsychol 15: 554-566.
41. Sergeant J (2000) The cognitive-energetic model: an empirical approach to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 24: 7-12.
42. Falkenstein M, Koshlykova NA, Kiroj VN, Hoormann J, Hohnsbein J (1995) Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/Nogo tasks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 96: 36-43.
43. Fallgatter AJ, Ehlis AC, Seifert J, Strik WK, Scheuerpflug P, et al. (2004) Altered response control and anterior cingulate function in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder boys. Clin Neurophysiol 115: 973-981. (Pubitemid 38293497)
44. Pliszka SR, Glahn DC, Semrud-Clikeman M, Franklin C, Perez R, 3rd, et al. (2006) Neuroimaging of inhibitory control areas in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder who were treatment naive or in long-term treatment. Am J Psychiatry 163: 1052-1060. (Pubitemid 44464492)
45. Smith JL, Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ (2008) Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: the P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition. Clin Neurophysiol 119: 704-714.
46. Kok A (1986) Effects of degradation of visual stimuli on components of the event-related potential (ERP) in go/nogo reaction tasks. Biol Psychol 23: 21-38.
47. van Boxtel GJ, van der Molen MW, Jennings JR, Brunia CH (2001) A psychophysiological analysis of inhibitory motor control in the stop-signal paradigm. Biol Psychol 58: 229-262. (Pubitemid 33033297)
48. Donkers FC, van Boxtel GJ (2004) The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition. Brain Cogn 56: 165-176. (Pubitemid 39423879)
49. Folstein JR, Van Petten C (2008) Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiology 45: 152-170. (Pubitemid 350233271)
50. Botvinick MM, Cohen JD, Carter CS (2004) Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends Cogn Sci 8: 539-546. (Pubitemid 39536251)
51. Jodo E, Kayama Y (1992) Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 82: 477-482.
52. Senkowski D, Herrmann CS (2002) Effects of task difficulty on evoked gamma activity and ERPs in a visual discrimination task. Clin Neurophysiol 113: 1742-1753. (Pubitemid 35335463)
53. Kok A (2001) On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology 38: 557-577.
54. Donchin E, Kubovy M, Kutas M, Johnson R, Tterning RI (1973) Graded changes in evoked response (P300) amplitude as a function of cognitive activity. Percept Psychophys 14: 319-324.
55. Donchin E, Coles MGH (1998) Context updating and the P300. Behav Brain Sci 21: 152-154.
56. Gaspar PA, Ruiz S, Zamorano F, Altayo M, Perez C, et al. (2011) P300 amplitude is insensitive to working memory load in schizophrenia. Bmc Psychiatry 11: 29.
57. Duncan-Johnson CC, Donchin E (1977) On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology 14: 456-467.
58. Hillyard SA, Hink RF, Schwent VL, Picton TW (1973) Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science 182: 177-180.
59. Kok A, Ramautar JR, De Ruiter MB, Band GP, Ridderinkhof KR (2004) ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task. Psychophysiology 41: 9-20. (Pubitemid 38209024)
60. Bekker EM, Kenemans JL, Verbaten MN (2005) Source analysis of the N2 in a cued Go/NoGo task. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 22: 221-231. (Pubitemid 40093914)
61. Dimoska A, Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ (2006) The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection? Brain Cogn 62: 98-112. (Pubitemid 44556960)
62. Smith JL, Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ (2006) Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition. Int J Psychophysiol 61: 121-133. (Pubitemid 43947284)
63. Polich J (2007) Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol 118: 2128-2148.
64. Baars BJ, Ramsoy TZ, Laureys S (2003) Brain, conscious experience and the observing self. Trends Neurosci 26: 671-675. (Pubitemid 37415018)
65. Smallwood J, Brown KS, Baird B, Mrazek MD, Franklin MS, et al. (2012) Insulation for daydreams: a role for tonic norepinephrine in the facilitation of internally guided thought. PLoS ONE 7: e33706.
66. Aston-Jones G, Cohen JD (2005) An integrative theory of locus coeruleusnorepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annu Rev Neurosci 28: 403-450. (Pubitemid 41098911)
67. Sanders AF (1983) Towards a model of stress and human performance. Acta Psychol (Amst) 53: 61-97.
68. Polich J, Criado JR (2006) Neuropsychology and neuropharmacology of P3a and P3b. Int J Psychophysiol 60: 172-185. (Pubitemid 43776735)
69. Shenhav A, Botvinick MM, Cohen JD (2013) The expected value of control: an integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function. Neuron 79: 217-240.
70. Norman DA, Shallice T (1986) Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior. In: Davidson RJ, Schwartz GE, Shapiro D, editors. Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research, Vol IV: Plenum Press.pp. 1-18.
71. Schacht A, Dimigen O, Sommer W (2010) Emotions in cognitive conflicts are not aversive but are task specific. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 10: 349-356.
72. Recio G, Schacht A, Sommer W (2009) Effects of inter-stimulus interval on skin conductance responses and event-related potentials in a Go/NoGo task. Biol Psychol 80: 246-250.
73. Nakata H, Inui K, Wasaka T, Tamura Y, Kida T, et al. (2005) Effects of ISI and stimulus probability on event-related go/nogo potentials after somatosensory stimulation. Exp Brain Res 162: 293-299. (Pubitemid 40576804)