Stimulus modality, perceptual overlap, and the go/no-go N2

Psychophysiology

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 157-160

  Nieuwenhuis, Sander ^a,b   Yeung, Nick ^a   Cohen, Jonathan D ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Inhibition; Monitoring; N2; No go; Response conflict; Stimulus modality

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BEHAVIOR; CONFLICT; DATA ANALYSIS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 1142310990     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8986.2003.00128.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Eimer, M. (1993). Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a Go/Nogo task. Biological Psychology, 35, 123-138.
2. Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., & Hohnsbein, J. (1999). ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychologica, 101, 267-291.
3. Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., & Hohnsbein, J. (2002). Inhibition-related ERP components: Variations with modality, age, and time-on-task. Journal of Psychophysiology, 16, 167-175.
4. Falkenstein, M., Koshlykova, N. A., Kiroj, V. N., Hoormann, J., & Hohnsbein, J. (1995). Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/Nogo tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 96, 36-43.
5. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for offline removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468-484.
6. Jodo, E., & Kayama, Y. (1992). Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a go/no-go task. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 82, 477-482.
7. Jones, A. D., Cho, R., Nystrom, L. E., Cohen, J. D., & Braver, T. S. (2002). A computational model of anterior cingulate function in speeded response tasks: Effects of frequency, sequence, and conflict. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 300-317.
8. Kiefer, M., Marzinzik, F., Weisbrod, M., Scherg, M., & Spitzer, M. (1998). The time course of brain activations during response inhibition: Evidence from event-related potentials in a go/no go task. Neuroreport, 9, 765-770.
9. Kok, A. (1986). Effects of degradation of visual stimulation on components of the event-related potential (ERP) in Go/No-Go reaction tasks. Biological Psychology, 23, 21-38.
10. Kopp, B., Rist, F., & Mattler, U. (1996). N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. Psychophysiology, 33, 282-294.
11. Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., Van den Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a Go/NoGo task: Effects of response conflict and trial-type frequency. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 17-26.
12. Pfefferbaum, A., Ford, J. M., Weller, B. J., & Kopell, B. S. (1985). ERPs to response production and inhibition. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 423-434.
13. van Boxtel, G. J., van der Molen, M. W., Jennings, J. R., & Brunia, C. H. (2001). A psychophysiological analysis of inhibitory motor control in the stop-signal paradigm. Biological Psychology, 58, 229-262.
14. Van Veen, V., & Carter, C. S. (2002), The timing of action monitoring processes in anterior cingulate cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 593-602.
15. Yeung, N., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Manuscript submitted for publication.