fMRI evidence that the neural basis of response inhibition is task-dependent

Cognitive Brain Research

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 419-430

  Mostofsky, Stewart H ^a,b   Schafer, Joanna G B ^a   Abrams, Michael T ^a,b   Goldberg, Melissa C ^a,b   Flower, Abigail A ^a   Boyce, Avery ^a   Courtney, Susan M ^a,c   Calhoun, Vince D ^b,d,e   Kraut, Michael A ^b   Denckla, Martha B ^a,b   Pekar, James J ^a,b  

^a KENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center   (United States)

^e YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerebellum; Doroslateral prefrontal cortex; fMRI; Go No go; Response inhibition; Supplementary motor area; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CEREBELLUM; COLOR DISCRIMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MENTAL TASK; MOTOR CORTEX; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 0037766727     PISSN: 09266410     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00144-7     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Alexander G.E., DeLong M.R., Strick P.L. Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 9:1986;357-381.
2. Ball T., et al. The role of higher-order motor areas in voluntary movement as revealed by high-resolution EEG and fMRI. Neuroimage. 10:1999;682-694.
3. Barkley R.A. Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psycholog. Bull. 121:(1):1997;65-94.
4. Barkley R.A., Grodzinsky G., DuPaul G.J. Frontal lobe functions in attention deficit disorder with and without hyperactivity: a review and research report. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 20:1992;163-188.
5. Bechara A., et al. Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition. 50:1994;7-15.
6. Bechara A., Tranel D., Damasio H. Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. Brain. 123:2000;2189-2202.
7. Burman D.D., Bruce C.J. Suppression of task-related saccades by electrical stimulation in the primate's frontal eye field. J. Neurophysiol. 77:1997;2252-2267.
8. Calhoun V., et al. A weighted least-squares algorithm for estimation and visualization of relative latencies in event-related functional MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 44:2000;947-954.
9. Casey B.J., et al. Implication of right frontostriatal circuitry in response inhibition and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 36:(3):1997;374-383.
10. Castellanos F.X., et al. Executive function oculomotor tasks in girls with ADHD. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 39:2000;644-650.
11. Connolly J.D., et al. A comparison of frontoparietal fMRI activation during anti-saccades and anti-pointing. J. Neurophysiol. 84:2000;1645-1655.
12. Courtney S.M., et al. Transient and sustained activity in a distributed neural system for human working memory. Nature. 386:1997;608-611.
13. Denckla M.B., Rudel R.G. Anomalies of motor development in hyperactive boys. Ann. Neurol. 3:1978;231-233.
14. Dias R., Robbins T.W., Roberts A.C. Dissociable forms of inhibitory control within prefrontal cortex with an analog of the Wisconsin Card Sort Test: restriction to novel situations and independence from 'on-line' processing. J. Neurosci. 17:1997;9285-9297.
15. Durston S., et al. The effect of preceding context on inhibition: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage. 16:2002;449-453.
16. Evans A., et al. 3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes. Proc. IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Med. Imag. Conf. 1993;1813-1817.
17. Friston K.J., et al. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2:1995;189-210.
18. Friston K.J., et al. Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of inference and power. Neuroimage. 4:(3):1996;223-235.
19. Friston K.J., et al. Stochastic designs in event-related fMRI. Neuroimage. 10:(5):1999;607-619.
20. Fuster J.M. The Prefrontal Cortex. 1997;Raven Press, New York.
21. Garavan H., Ross T.J., Stein E.A. Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:1999;8301-8306.
22. Goldar J.C., Outes D.L. Fisiopatologia de la desinhibicion instintiva. Acta Psiquiatr. Psicol. Latinoam. 18:1972;177-185.
23. Goldman-Rakic P.S. Regional and cellular fractionation of working memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;13473-13480.
24. Gorenstein E.E., Mammato C.A., Sandy J.M. Performance of inattentive-overactive children on selected measures of prefrontal-type function. J. Clin. Psychol. 45:1989;619-632.
25. Grodzinsky G., Diamond R. Frontal lobe functioning in boys with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Dev. Neuropsychol. 8:1992;427-445.
26. Guitton D., Buchtel H.A., Douglas R.M. Frontal lobe lesions in man cause difficulties in suppressing reflexive glances and in generating goal-directed saccades. Exp. Brain Res. 58:1985;455-472.
27. Harris E.L., et al. Executive function in children with Tourette syndrome and/or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 1:1995;511-516.
28. Holmes A.P., Friston K.J. Generalisability, random effects and population inference. Neuroimage. 7:1998;S754.
29. Humberstone M., et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of single motor events reveals human presupplementary motor area. Ann. Neurol. 42:1997;632-637.
30. Ikeda A., et al. Movement-related potentials associated with single and repetitive movements recorded from human supplementary motor area. Electoencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 89:1993;269-277.
31. Iversen S.D., Mishkin M. Perseverative interference in monkeys following selective lesions of the inferior prefrontal convexity. Exp. Brain Res. 11:1970;376-386.
32. Johannes S., et al. Altered inhibition of motor responses in Tourette syndrome and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Acta Neurol. Scand. 104:2001;36-43.
33. Jonides J., et al. Inhibition in verbal working memory revealed by brain activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:1998;8410-8413.
34. Josephs O., Henson R.N. Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging: modeling, inference and optimization. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 354:1999;1215-1228.
35. Kawashima R., et al. Functional anatomy of GO/NO-GO discrimination and response selection - a PET study in man. Brain Res. 22:1996;79-89.
36. Konishi S., et al. Short communication: No-go dominant brain activity in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Eur. J. Neurosci. 10:1998;1209-1213.
37. Konishi S., et al. Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI. Brain. 122:1999;981-991.
38. Krainik A., et al. Role of the supplementary motor area in motor deficit following medial frontal lobe surgery. Neurology. 57:2001;871-878.
39. Lancaster J.L., et al. Automated Talairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping. Hum. Brain Mapp. 10:2000;120-131.
40. Lichter D.G., Cummings J.L. Introduction and overview. Lichter D.G., Cummings J.L. Frontal-Subcortical Circuits in Psychiatric and Neurological Disorders. 2001;1-43 Guilford Press, New York.
41. Liddle P.F., Kiehl K.A., Smith A.M. Event-related fMRI study of response inhibition. Hum. Brain Mapp. 12:2001;100-109.
42. Matsuzaka Y., Aizawa H., Tanji J. A motor area rostral to the supplementary motor area (presupplementary motor area) in the monkey: neuronal activity during a learned motor task. J. Neurophysiol. 68:1992;653-662.
43. Middleton F.A., Strick P.L. Cerebellar output channels. Schmahmann J. The Cerebellum in Cognition. 1997;61-107 Academic Press, San Diego.
44. Middleton F.A., Strick P.L. A revised neuroanatomy of frontal-subcortical circuits. Lichter D.G., Cummings J.L. Frontal-Subcortical Circuits in Psychiatric and Neurological Disorders. 2001;44-58 Guilford Press, New York.
45. Mostofsky S.H., et al. Oculomotor abnormalities in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A preliminary study. Neurology. 57:2001;423-430.
46. Mostofsky S.H., et al. Oculomotor abnormalities in children with Tourette syndrome with and without ADHD. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 40:2001;1464-1472.
47. Mostofsky S.H., Denckla M.B. School difficulties. McMillan D.C.D., Feigin J.A., Warshaw R.D. Oski's Pediatrics: Principles and Practice. 3rd Edition:1999;829-834 Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.
48. Munoz D., et al. Control of purposive saccadic eye movements and visual fixation in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Becker B. Current Oculomotor Research. 1999;Plenum Press, New York.
49. Muri R.M., et al. Functional organization of saccades and antisaccades in the frontal lobe in humans: a study with echo planar functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 65:1998;374-377.
50. O'Driscoll G.A., et al. Functional neuroanatomy of antisaccade eye movements investigated with positron emission tomography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92:1995;925-929.
51. Parent A. Carpenter's Human Neuroanatomy. 9th Edition:1996;Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.
52. Picard N., Strick P.L. Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activation. Cereb. Cortex 6:1996;342-353.
53. Pierrot-Deseilligny C., et al. Cortical control of reflexive visually-guided saccades. Brain. 114:1991;1473-1485.
54. Price C.J., Friston K.J. Cognitive conjunction: A new approach to brain activation experiments. Neuroimage. 5:1997;261-270.
55. Rizzolatti G., Luppino G., Matelli M. The classic supplementary motor area is formed by two independent areas. Luders H. Supplementary Sensorimotor Area. 1996;45-56 Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia.
56. Rolls E.T., et al. Emotion-related learning in patients with social and emotional changes associated with frontal lobe damage. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 57:1994;1518-1524.
57. Rolls E.T. The orbitofrontal cortex and reward. Cereb. Cortex. 10:2000;284-294.
58. Ross R.G., et al. Eye movement task related to frontal lobe functioning in children with attention deficit disorder. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 33:1994;869-874.
59. Ross R.G., et al. Eye movement task measures inhibition and spatial working memory in adults with schizophrenia, ADHD, and a normal comparison group. Psychiatry Res. 35:2000;35-42.
60. Rubia K., et al. Inhibitory dysfunction in hyperactive boys. Behav. Brain Res. 94:1998;25-32.
61. Rubia K., et al. Hypofrontality in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder during higher-order motor control: a study with functional MRI. Am. J. Psychiatry. 156:1999;891-896.
62. Rubia K., et al. Neuropsychological analyses of impulsiveness in childhood hyperactivity. Br. J. Psychiatry. 179:2001;138-143.
63. Rubia K., et al. Mapping motor inhibition: conjunctive brain activations across different versions of go/no-go and stop tasks. Neuroimage. 13:2001;250-261.
64. Schachar R., et al. Confirmation of an inhibitory control deficit in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 28:2000;227-235.
65. Shue K.L., Douglas V.I. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and the frontal lobe syndrome. Brain Cogn. 20:1992;104-124.
66. Starkstein S.E., Boston J.D., Robinson R.G. Mechanisms of mania after brain injury: 12 case reports and review of the literature. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 176:1988;87-100.
67. Taylor S.F., et al. Isolation of specific interference processing in the Stroop task: PET activation studies. Neuroimage. 6:1997;81-92.
68. Vaidya C.J., et al. Selective effects of methylphenidate in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a functional magnetic resonance study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:1998;14494-14499.
69. Worsley K.J., et al. A three-dimensional statistical analysis for CBF activation studies in human brain. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 12:1992;900-918.