Good vibrations? Vibrotactile self-stimulation reveals anticipation of body-related action effects in motor control

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 232, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 847-854

  Pfister, Roland ^a   Janczyk, Markus ^a   Gressmann, Marcel ^a   Fournier, Lisa R ^b   Kunde, Wilfried ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Action control; Body related feedback; Effect anticipations; Ideomotor theory

Indexed keywords

ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EXPERIMENT; HUMAN; MOTOR CONTROL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SELF STIMULATION; VIBROTACTILE SELF STIMULATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SELF STIMULATION; TOUCH; TOUCH PERCEPTION; VIBRATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84895432931     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: 14321106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3796-6     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Ansorge U (2002) Spatial intention-response compatibility. Acta Psychol 109:285-299
2. Badets A, Koch I, Toussaint L (2013) Role of an ideomotor mechanism in number processing. Exp Psychol 60:34-43
3. Dutzi IB, Hommel B (2009) The microgenesis of action-effect binding. Psychol Res 73:425-435
4. Elsner B, Hommel B (2001) Effect anticipation and action control. J Exp Psychol Hum 27:229-240 (Pubitemid 33594511)
5. Frings C, Rothermund K, Wentura D (2007) Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets. Q J Exp Psychol 60:1367-1377
6. Frings C, Amendt A, Spence C (2011) When seeing doesn't matter: assessing the after-effects of tactile distractor processing in the blind and the sighted. J Exp Psychol Hum 37:1174-1181
7. Frings C, Larra M, Gräbener A, Moeller B, Schächinger H (2013a) Stress disrupts distractor-based retrieval of SR episodes. Biol Psychol 93:58-64
8. Frings C, Moeller B, Rothermund K (2013b) Retrieval of event files can be conceptually mediated. Atten Percept Psychophys 75:700-709
9. Gaschler R, Nattkemper D (2012) Instructed task demands and utilization of action effect anticipation. Frontiers Psychol 3. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00578
10. Giesen C, Rothermund K (2011) Affective matching moderates S-R binding. Cogn Emot 25:342-350
11. Greenwald AG (1970) A choice reaction time test of ideomotor theory. J Exp Psychol 86:20-25
12. Harleß E (1861) Der Apparat des Willens [The Apparatus of Will]. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 38:50-73
13. Herbart JF (1825) Psychologie als Wissenschaft neu gegründet auf Erfahrung, Metaphysik und Mathematik [Psychology as a science newly founded on experience, metaphysics, and mathematics]. August Wilhelm Unzer, Königsberg
14. Herbort O, Butz MV (2012) Too good to be true? Ideomotor theory from a computational perspective. Frontiers Psychol 3:494. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00494
15. Herwig A, Horstmann G (2011) Action-effect associations revealed by eye movements. Psychon Bull Rev 18:531-537
16. Herwig A, Waszak F (2012) Action-effect bindings and ideomotor learning in intention- and stimulus-based actions. Frontiers Psychol 3:444. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00444
17. Herwig A, Prinz W, Waszak F (2007) Two modes of sensorimotor integration in intention-based and stimulus-based actions. Q J Exp Psychol 60:1540-1554
18. Hoffmann J (1993) Vorhersage und Erkenntnis: Die Funktion von Antizipationen in der menschlichen Verhaltenssteuerung und Wahrnehmung [Prediction and Realisation: The function of anticipations in human behavioural control and perception]. Hogrefe, Göttingen
19. Hoffmann J, Lenhard A, Sebald A, Pfister R (2009) Movements or targets: what makes an action in action effect learning? Q J Exp Psychol 62:2433-2449
20. Hommel B (1993) Inverting the Simon effect by intention. Psychol Res 55:270-279
21. Hommel B (2009) Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychol Res 73:512-526
22. Hommel B, Müsseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001) The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 24:849-937
23. Hubbard J, Gazzaley A, Morsella E (2011) Traditional response interference effects from anticipated action outcomes: a response-effect compatibility paradigm. Acta Psychol 138:106-110
24. James W (1890/1981) The principles of psychology, vol 2. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
25. Janczyk M, Skirde S, Weigelt M, Kunde W (2009) Visual and tactile action effects determine bimanual coordination performance. Hum Mov Sci 28:437-449
26. Janczyk M, Pfister R, Crognale MA, Kunde W (2012a) Effective rotations: action-effects determine the interplay of mental and manual rotations. J Exp Psychol Gen 141:489-501
27. Janczyk M, Pfister R, Kunde W (2012b) On the persistence of tool-based compatibility effects. J Psychol 220:16-22
28. Janczyk M, Heinemann A, Pfister R (2012c) Instant attraction: immediate action-effect bindings occur for both, stimulus- and goal-driven actions. Frontiers Psychol 3:446. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00446
29. Keller PE, Koch I (2006) Exogenous and endogenous response priming with auditory stimuli. Adv Cogn Psychol 2:269-276
30. Koch I, Kunde W (2002) Verbal response-effect compatibility. Mem Cogn 30:1297-1303 (Pubitemid 36313881)
31. Krieghoff V, Brass M, Prinz W, Waszak F (2009) Dissociating what and when of intentional actions. Frontiers Hum Neurosci 3:1-10
32. Kühn S, Elsner B, Prinz W, Brass M (2009) Busy doing nothing: evidence for nonaction-effect binding. Psychon Bull Rev 16:542-549
33. Kunde W (2001) Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. J Exp Psychol Hum 27:387-394
34. Kunde W (2003) Temporal response-effect compatibility. Psychol Res 67:153-159
35. Kunde W, Koch I, Hoffmann J (2004) Anticipated action effects affect the selection, initiation, and execution of actions. Q J Exp Psychol 57:87-106 (Pubitemid 38157021)
36. Kunde W, Lozo L, Neumann R (2011) Effect-based control of facial expressions. Evidence from action-effect compatibility. Psychon Bull Rev 18:820-826
37. Kunde W, Pfister R, Janczyk M (2012) The locus of tool-transformation costs. J Exp Psychol Hum 38:703-714
38. Ladwig S, Sutter C, Müsseler J (2012) Crosstalk between proximal and distal action effects during tool use. J Psychol 220:10-15
39. Lotze HR (1852) Medicinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele [Medical psychology or the physiology of the mind]. Weidmann'sche Buchhandlung, Leipzig
40. Moeller B, Frings C (2011) Remember the touch: tactile distractors retrieve previous responses to targets. Exp Brain Res 72:2176-2183
41. Nattkemper D, Ziessler M, Frensch PA (2010) Binding in voluntary action control. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 34:1092-1101
42. Oriet C, Stevanovski B, Jolicoeur P (2001) Theory of event coding: interesting, but underspecified. Behav Brain Sci 24:897-898 (Pubitemid 34965943)
43. Pfister R, Janczyk M (2012) Harleß' apparatus of will: 150 years later. Psychol Res 76:561-565
44. Pfister R, Janczyk M (2013) Confidence intervals for two sample means: calculation, interpretation, and a few simple rules. Adv Cogn Psychol 9:74-80
45. Pfister R, Kunde W (2013) Dissecting the response in response-effect compatibility. Exp Brain Res 224:647-655
46. Pfister R, Kiesel A, Melcher T (2010) Adaptive control of ideomotor effect anticipations. Acta Psychol 135:316-322
47. Pfister R, Kiesel A, Hoffmann J (2011) Learning at any rate: action-effect learning for stimulus-based actions. Psychol Res 75:61-65
48. Pfister R, Schwarz KA, Janczyk M (2012) Ubi irritatio, ibi affluxus: a 19th century perspective on haemodynamic brain activity. Cortex 48:1061-1063
49. Pfister R, Dignath D, Hommel B, Kunde W (2013) It takes two to imitate: anticipation and imitation in social interaction. Psychol Sci 24(10):2117-2121
50. Prinz W (1990) A common coding approach to perception and action. In: Neumann O, Prinz W (eds) Relationships between perception and action. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 167-201
51. Prinz W (1992) Why don't we perceive our brain states? Eur J Cogn Psychol 4:1-20
52. Prinz W (1997) Perception and action planning. Eur J Cogn Psychol 9:129-154
53. Rieger M (2007) Letters as visual action-effects in skilled typing. Acta Psychol 126:138-153
54. Ruge H, Krebs RM, Wolfensteller U (2012) Early markers of ongoing action-effect learning. Frontiers Psychol 3:522. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00522
55. Sanders AF (2001) How specific and common is common coding? Behav Brain Sci 24:903-905
56. Shin YK, Proctor RW (2012) Testing boundary conditions of the ideomotor hypothesis using a delayed response task. Acta Psychol 141:360-372
57. Shin YK, Proctor RW, Capaldi EJ (2010) A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychol Bull 136:943-974
58. Stock A, Stock C (2004) A short history of ideo-motor action. Psychol Res 68:176-188 (Pubitemid 40549810)
59. Thorndike EL (1913) Ideo-motor action. Psychol Rev 20:91-106
60. Wolfensteller U, Ruge H (2011) On the timescale of stimulus-based action-effect learning. Q J Exp Psychol 64:1273-1289