The locus of tool-transformation costs

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 703-714

  Kunde, Wilfried ^a   Pfister, Roland ^a   Janczyk, Markus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Action control; Action effects; Dual task; Locus; PRP; Psychological Refractory Period; Tool use; Tool transformation costs

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HAND; HUMAN; MEMORY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

HAND; HUMANS; MEMORY; MOTOR SKILLS; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REFRACTORY PERIOD, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 84867357472     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0026315     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Collins, T., Schicke, T., & Röder, B. (2008). Action goal selection and motor planning can be dissociated by tool use. Cognition, 109, 363-371. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.001
2. De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 965-980. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.19.5.965
3. de Moura, A. C., & Lee, P. C. (2004). Capuchin stone tool use in Caatinga dry forest. 10 December 2004, Science, 306, 1909. doi:10.1126/science.1102558
4. Fellers, J. H., & Fellers, G. M. (1976, April 2). Tool use in a social insect and its implications for competitive interactions. Science, 192, 70-72. doi:10.1126/science.192.4234.70
5. Green, C. B., Johnston, J. C., & Ruthruff, E. D. (2007). Recognition of pictures may not require central attentional resources, In D. S. McNamara & J. G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 317-322). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
6. Hegele, M., & Heuer, H. (2010). Adaptation to a direction-dependent visuomotor gain in the young and elderly. Psychological Research, 74, 21-34. doi:10.1007/s00426-008-0221-z
7. Heuer, H. (1993). Structural constraints on bimanual movements. Psychological Research, 55, 83-98. doi:10.1007/BF00419639
8. Heuer, H., & Hegele, M. (2008). Adaptation to direction-dependent visuomotor rotations and its decay in younger and older adults. Acta Psychologica, 127, 369-381. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.07.006
9. Heuer, H., & Hegele, M. (2010). The effects of mechanical transparency on adjustment to a complex visuomotor transformation at early and late working age. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 399- 412. doi:10.1037/a0021704
10. Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research, 55, 270-279. doi:10.1007/BF00419687
11. Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368-1384. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.5.1368
12. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-878. doi:10.1017/S0140525X01000103
13. Horrey, W. J., & Wickens, C. D. (2006). Examining the impact of cell phone conversations on driving using meta-analytic techniques. Human Factors, 48, 196-205. doi:10.1518/001872006776412135
14. Iriki, A. (2006). The neural origins and implications of imitation, mirror neurons and tool use. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16, 660-667. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2006.10.008
15. Iriki, A., Tanaka, M., & Iwamura, Y. (1996). Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport, 7, 2325-2330. doi:10.1097/00001756-199610020-00010
16. Janczyk, M., Franz, V. H., & Kunde, W. (2010). Grasping for parsimony: Do some motor actions escape dorsal processing? Neuropsychologia, 48, 3405-3415. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.034
17. Janczyk, M., & Kunde, W. (2010). Does dorsal processing require central capacity? More evidence from the PRP paradigm. Experimental Brain Research, 203, 89-100. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2211-9
18. Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., & Kunde, W. (in press). On the persistence of tool-based compatibility effects. Journal of Psychology. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000086
19. Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
20. Johnston, J. C., & McCann, R. S. (2005). On the locus of dual-task interference: Is there a bottleneck at the stimulus identification stage? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 694-719.
21. Jolicoeur, P., & Dell'Acqua, R. (1998). The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 26, 138-202. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0684
22. Keller, P. E., Dalla Bella, S., & Koch, I. (2010). Auditory imagery shapes movement timing and kinematics: Evidence from a musical task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 508-513. doi:10.1037/a0017604
23. Keller, P., & Koch, I. (2006). The planning and execution of short auditory sequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 711-716. doi:10.3758/BF03193985
24. Knoblich, G., & Kircher, T. (2004). Deceiving oneself about being in control: Conscious detection of changes in visuo-motor coupling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 657-666. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.657
25. Koch, I. (2008). Mechanismen der Interferenz in Doppelaufgaben [Mechanisms of dual-task interference]. Psychologische Rundschau, 59, 24- 32. doi:10.1026/0033-3042.59.1.24
26. Koch, I., & Rumiati, R. I. (2006). Task-set inertia and memoryconsolidation bottleneck in dual tasks. Psychological Research, 70, 448-458. doi:10.1007/s00426-005-0020-8
27. Krüger, D., Klapötke, S., & Mattler, U. (2011). PRP-paradigm provides evidence for a perceptual origin of the negative compatibility effect. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 866-881. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.014
28. Kunde, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 398-394. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.27.2.387
29. Kunde, W. (2003). Temporal response-effect compatibility. Psychological Research, 67, 153-159. doi:10.1007/s00426-002-0114-5
30. Kunde, W., Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2004). Anticipated action effects affect the selection, initiation and execution of actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 87-106.
31. Kunde, W., Landgraf, F., Paelecke, M., & Kiesel, A. (2007). Dorsal and ventral processing under dual-task conditions. Psychological Science, 18, 100-104. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01855.x
32. Kunde, W., Müsseler, J., & Heuer, H. (2007). Spatial compatibility effects with tool use. Human Factors, 49, 661-670. doi:10.1518/001872007X215737
33. Kunde, W., & Weigelt, M. (2005). Goal congruency in bimanual object manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 145-156. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.145
34. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490. doi:10.3758/BF03210951
35. Massen, C., & Prinz, W. (2007). Programming tool-use actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 692-704. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.692
36. Massen, C., & Prinz, W. (2009). Movements, actions and tool-use actions: An ideomotor approach to imitation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 2349-2358. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0059
37. McCann, R. S., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 471-484. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.2.471
38. McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287-330. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.86.4.287
39. McLeod, P. (1977). A dual-task response modality effect. Support for multiprocessor models of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 651-667. doi:10.1080/14640747708400639
40. Miller, J., & Reynolds, A. (2003). The locus of redundant-targets and non-targets effects: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1126-1142. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.6.1126
41. Müsseler, J., Kunde, W., Gausepohl, D., & Heuer, H. (2008). Does a tool eliminate spatial compatibility effects? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 211-231. doi:10.1080/09541440701275815
42. Müsseler, J., & Skottke, E.-M. (2011). Compatibility relationships with simple lever tools. Human Factors, 53, 383-390. doi:10.1177/0018720811408599
43. Müsseler, J., & Sutter, C. (2009). Perceiving one's own movement when using a tool. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 359-365. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.02.004
44. Paelecke, M., & Kunde, W. (2007). Action-effect codes in and before the central bottleneck: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 627-644. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.627
45. Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 358-377. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.10.3.358
46. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220
47. Pashler, H., & Christian, C. L. (1994). Bottlenecks in planning and producing vocal, manual and foot responses (Center for Human Information Processing Technical Report). La Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego, Center for Human Information Processing. Available from http://www.pashler.com/manuscripts.html
48. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 19-45.
49. Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (in press). Harleβ' apparatus of will: 150 years later. Psychological Research. doi:10.1007/s00426-011-0362-3
50. Pfister, R., Kiesel, A., & Melcher, T. (2010). Adaptive control of ideomotor effect anticipations. Acta Psychologica, 135, 316-322. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.08.006
51. Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t test for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225-237. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
52. Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., & Remington, R. W. (2009). How strategic is the central bottleneck: Can it be overcome by trying harder? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1368-1384. doi:10.1037/a0015784
53. Ruthruff, E., Miller, J. O., & Lachmann, T. (1995). Does mental rotation require central mechanisms? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 552-570. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.552
54. Sanders, A. F. (1980). Stage analysis of reaction processes. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 331-354). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North-Holland. doi:10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61955-X
55. Savader, S. J., Lillemoe, K. D., & Prescott, C. A. (1997). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy-related bile duct injuries: A health and financial disaster. Annals of Surgery, 225, 268-273. doi:10.1097/00000658-199703000-00005
56. Smith, E. E. (1968). Choice reaction time: An analysis of the major theoretical positions. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 77-110. doi:10.1037/h0020189
57. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9
58. Sülzenbrück, S., & Heuer, H. (2009). Learning the visuomotor transformation of virtual and real sliding levers: Simple approximations of complex transformations. Experimental Brain Research, 195, 153-165. doi:10.1007/s00221-009-1764-y
59. Tombu, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2002). All-or-none bottleneck versus capacity sharing accounts of the psychological refractory period phenomenon. Psychological Research, 66, 274-286. doi:10.1007/s00426-002-0101-x
60. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
61. Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). Can mental rotation occur before the dual-task bottleneck? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 905-921. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.905